Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 11:19:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 105 »
541  Economy / Speculation / Re: Calling top at $16500 on: December 16, 2017, 11:28:26 PM
For a bit of fun heres an idea for the top. How does a brief spike to $50k in the very near future sound ?



That would be similar to the first bubble peak of 2013

Then a crash, but first a ginormous spike

I wonder if the reason many fail in TA is that they don't use the log price scale enough.
542  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 14, 2017, 11:35:22 PM
I've been warning people about Kraken on here for months.

Thieves...avoid.

 I was assimilated when they took over CAVirtex.

Been trying to get my coins off but it has been impossible to login today.   Angry Angry Angry Angry

edit:  and Hitbtc is also down for more than 24 hrs..   Shocked Shocked Shocked

 Finally was able to make a Bitcoin withdraw and the tx shows up on the network.  I'm done with Kraken.



I'm done with kraken as soon as i manage to withdraw funds. Haven't prooved ID so can only withdraw tiny bits, after refreshing the withdraw page 20 times, once per day
543  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 14, 2017, 11:31:13 PM
Hey HairyMaclairy (from Donaldson's Dairy) thats interesting about the transaction volumes of the  coins.

I agree with some previous comments about segwit not delivering. Why implement and not use? It makes no sense. Are they really worried segwit isn't secure perhaps?
544  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 12, 2017, 02:43:20 PM
[ edited out]

Maybe it is hope, hope, hope, and maybe you will get lucky?    But I think even the public at large understands that bcash is not going to become the new bitcoin, and that could be part of the reason that some money is flowing into litecoin because no one (except for a few nutjob zealots or some confused folks) wants to put any of their money into sabotage coin, right?

Now you are pumping Litecoin? In a Bitcoin WO thread? Tell me it ain't so!

I am not going to respond to the rest of your nonsense, but I did read what you had to say.    Roll Eyes

Regarding your point about my "pumping litecoin," it is not so.   I have neither increased nor decreased my litecoin holdings during this latest pump, and my holdings of litecoin are relatively small, less than .5% of my total crypto holdings.  I just mentioned litecoin and some seemingly temporary dynamics where the cash seems to be flowing, but maybe my point is not really that relevant as you suggest because just prior to litecoin, we also had Dash puming and then IOTA pumping.  Ultimately, I could give a ratt's ass about litecoin, even though they were and have been a bitcoin imitation coin, and I mentioned litecoin since they seem to be more genuinely attempting to complement bitcoin rather than serving as a sabotage attempt on bitcoin in the same way that bcash served (and is serving) as such a disgruntled sabotage and diversion vehicle.

Dash was puming?

No. I want to alert about the weaknesses of Bitcoin Segwit.

You object to the name BCash, and yet you refer to Bitcoin as "Bitcoin Segwit"
Careful, your double standards and hypocrisy are showing.


The objection to BCash comes from the fact BCash is also another thing (I think) and cos it hurts the bitcoin cash investors feewlings
https://medium.com/@freetrade68/announcing-bcash-8b938329eaeb

Whereas the objection for the term Bitcoin Segwit is only because your poor feewlings got hurt

 Grin



It could be called Bitcoin Buffalo Bollocks for all I care.
Bottom line is it's making me rich.....

Sounds like an idea for a fork. Lets do it.
545  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 12, 2017, 01:18:04 PM
No. I want to alert about the weaknesses of Bitcoin Segwit.

You object to the name BCash, and yet you refer to Bitcoin as "Bitcoin Segwit"
Careful, your double standards and hypocrisy are showing.


The objection to BCash comes from the fact BCash is also another thing (I think) and cos it hurts the bitcoin cash investors feewlings
https://medium.com/@freetrade68/announcing-bcash-8b938329eaeb

Whereas the objection for the term Bitcoin Segwit is only because your poor feewlings got hurt

 Grin

546  Economy / Speculation / Re: Calling top at $16500 on: December 11, 2017, 10:11:53 PM
There are loads of people out there who are losing money in this bullish market. One of the groups is technical analysts.
Don't get me wrong, I love TA, however it seems TA is really just not very effective on crypto.

Seems to work pretty well for me mostly
547  Economy / Speculation / Re: Calling top at $16500 on: December 11, 2017, 10:10:59 PM
Hi sgbett its good to see posting again. I remember your analysis from way back including your postings about the S curve. Always appreciated your ideas.

Like you I assume this particular time will be no different ie there will be a crash and following bear market from this run up. Very hard to predict where it will end though. I'm not convinced the top is in yet though.

I wonder if segwit problems may prick the bubble, perhaps like Hyperme.sh alludes to with miners stealing a booty of coins held on segwit addresses. 

Its funny to see the idea that this run up has already had 'crashes' which just recovered very quick. Ah such innocence

548  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 08, 2017, 12:02:29 AM
What the fuck is wrong with you people that you are still sending money to the exchange that outright stole a third of the funds people had there? You deserve to be poor.

If you must know I had to sell my stash of 7 bitcoins back in 2016 due to financial circumstances. So I am poor now which is why I am using Bitfinex as well as a couple of other exchanges to trade alt-coins in order to get back to my 7 bitcoins with a view of making it to at least 10.

Not everyone who got bitcoins back in 2014 like me was able to hold them all due to money issues.

But I am glad you have enough bitcoins that you dont need to trade, that is also my ultimate goal but in the meantime I find it very difficult trading using my notepad or paper wallets  Grin

Anyway if you feel I deserve to be poor then please ignore

If you want to help then you know what to do  - 1PRjBfDaPiTRdTrbWyxPSrcSCZJ98McxGF

Wink



Good luck on your quest. If more than 21 million people want only 1 bitcoin each then you know what direction the price has to go. I also like to trade and increase my stack.

I think the point was though, why use that particular exchange rather one thats less shady?

Well I have used 4 exchanges so far. Poloniex, Bittrex, Kraken, Bitfinex

I'd say of those four Bitfinex has by far the most superior chart layout/order options/useability. I have only started trading for about 4 months or so.and therefor Im new to this (but not to Bitcoin).
Bittrex is good as there is a wide array of alts but for me not good for day trading.
Poloniex well I think is a poor version of Bitfinex
Kraken is Kraken, I stopped using that after 2 weeks

But if you have any suggestions on other alternatives I am all ears.
So far I have managed to put together about 0.15 BTC worth of BTC and alts but I did start off with almost no capitol and have been out of work and this have also been living off trades too.

Well I haven't used bitfinex I guess in part because of bad rep. I used bitcoinica in the beginning which was hacked and I lost my entire stack at the time, would add a huge chunk to my  fortune if I had it now. Since then I only store small amounts on exchange at any one time as I hope everyone else is doing. Then I used cryptsy (hacked), mintpal (hacked), polo (which I quite liked even despite its Monero fixation but started not to trust), I started using Kraken after it added Dash (but it is unusable because its sever is a ZX81). At the moment my preferred option is Bittrex which I joined primarily because it was the only one listing byteball. The search for a decent exchange continues...

 
549  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 07, 2017, 11:44:54 PM
A bigger problem though is transaction clearing time, I just moved a bit to buy some equipment before end of year (tax deductible and I need this stuff) and it still hasn't confirmed.

If this keeps up I may have to use Litecoin.

Mempool is growing bigtime. Make sure to include a good fee for quick confirmation.

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h

I have 2 fairly large transactions totally stuck - even though I put them through as 'fast' by believing my BTC Core wallet's advice.

Nothing confirmed for hours - what fees actually WORK right now - anyone recommend a site to suggest accurate fee requirements?

Feeling very stupid...
Not the same, but fees, man!
I tried to use embeded shapeshift in coinomi to dump some BCH yesterday. Fees >$150. wtf. Tried the embeded changelly. >$80.  So I still have the BCH... Probably send it to polo eventually.

Just send to an exchange, works fine - I just did it with BTC Gold, simple and not too pricey to do...

I only have poloniex for alts, so limited there.  And now is NOT the time to try to sign up at an exchange.  Let alone try to log on Cheesy  I suppose I should check what Kraken, Bitfinex, Bitstamp trade.  I haven't used any of them in ages.  Almost got a bittrex account a few months ago, but the user agreement scared me away.

Kraken is a bunch of shit right now. 50% of the time pages have to be reloaded and then it sends you back to the beginning! Argh.
550  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 07, 2017, 11:39:25 PM
NASA logo barf bag ready

The reason you might want a barf bag is that In-Q-Tel was the one buying up all the coins when they were $1, so purchasing bitcoin higher is essentially contributing money to the CIA.  If you think I'm kidding, no.  The only question is how many coins they control which were bought at next to nothing.

evidence or fuck off

This is not new information.

IDK about In-Q-Tel buying it all up, but I do know the various three letter agencies were mining BTC (and I would assume the various other CCs as well) in the beginning. To the effect of multiple wallets with thousands of coins each.

For me its good to see Roach posting here. HIs opinion is one of few I enjoy, especially compared to the kind of drivel from the dancing queen.

This is a possibility I don't like and haven't discounted. We all know 'Satoshi' mined a shit load in the beginning. We also don't know who Satoshi is. Things that make you go hmmm.

For Roach I wonder why he doesn't profit from bitcoin anyway despite his insight? Should only the CIA profit? Or the CiA and free thinking liberty minded individuals too?
551  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 07, 2017, 11:34:10 PM
What the fuck is wrong with you people that you are still sending money to the exchange that outright stole a third of the funds people had there? You deserve to be poor.

If you must know I had to sell my stash of 7 bitcoins back in 2016 due to financial circumstances. So I am poor now which is why I am using Bitfinex as well as a couple of other exchanges to trade alt-coins in order to get back to my 7 bitcoins with a view of making it to at least 10.

Not everyone who got bitcoins back in 2014 like me was able to hold them all due to money issues.

But I am glad you have enough bitcoins that you dont need to trade, that is also my ultimate goal but in the meantime I find it very difficult trading using my notepad or paper wallets  Grin

Anyway if you feel I deserve to be poor then please ignore

If you want to help then you know what to do  - 1PRjBfDaPiTRdTrbWyxPSrcSCZJ98McxGF

Wink



Good luck on your quest. If more than 21 million people want only 1 bitcoin each then you know what direction the price has to go. I also like to trade and increase my stack.

I think the point was though, why use that particular exchange rather one thats less shady?
552  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Fork 1:1 of Bitcoin - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees on: November 28, 2017, 11:58:10 AM
Bcash? Is that the best you trolls can come up with? Back to troll school for you guys I'm afraid.
553  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments on: November 28, 2017, 10:53:44 AM
Chief developer Tony Churyumoff is speaking at hub.berlin‘s ‘Transformers Arena’ today on 10:35 UTC (11:35 local time Berlin). Livestream here:
https://www.hub.berlin/en/livestream

Please retweet: https://twitter.com/cryptkeeperbtt/status/935404215031214080
I have just a meeting. Can someone record and deploy the livestream?

Hopefully someone else will have recorded it.I just caught the end in which he was answering questions about the smart contracts
554  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: November 24, 2017, 12:45:05 PM
Is there a light wallet for bitcoin gold? I don't want to use a mobile wallet, I want it on desktop. But not with full blockchain.
555  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: November 23, 2017, 12:14:49 AM
Do they imagine once the rewards run dry these goons will mine txns for free?

There is an interesting idea that whales will become miners and mine their own fees back. In which case whales/miners get free transactions. Unlike those users who aren't miners
556  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency on: November 22, 2017, 11:02:57 PM
I worry about my next tax declaration. They will never believe you!

The worth of a Masternode is more than half a million dollar today and there is no stop.
It was 10k at begin of the year (last tax year) and remember not so long ago (3 years or so) it was just 1000 dollar!


If it makes you feel any better. There are a LOT of people here that will have to fill taxes - me being one.
The closer it gets the more work I see that I'll have to do.
Taxes on crypto are not hard, just complicated - lots of math....

I too have wondered if the good ole' tax-man is gonna believe me - lol
To go from high-poverty/low-middle to high-middle in 2017 - quit my job in July - Cash some crypto out for the 1st time - School loans paid-in-full - Couple trips to Vegas, dropped $1K+ per day, lol - and the list goes on and on.....

I believe that just being honest with everything is best. Even more so since, for some of us, we have more money than we ever thought we would have and there is no reason to put yourself into 'jeopardy' by cutting the tax-man out of the picture..... besides.... as a responsible crypto-user, you're obligated to follow the laws in your area. Each person that skirts the GUV, just gives them more reason if fuck with us all.....


[steps-off-soap-box]
.......................................... anywho  


- ramble'n on

$600 by 00:01 UTC tonight?


On the tax question I am willing to pay up. Although begrudgingly as I do not condone my tax funding military or war efforts, in the middle east or anywhere else. My problem is with the bank. In cashing out some crypto I am encountering 'problems'
557  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency on: November 22, 2017, 10:57:59 PM
The spirits say that bitcoin is the worst and the best coin is ltc, dash and etc, for signs always points to them for me, but my head does not agree and thinks that the best is BTS and the worst is LTC. Life experience has proven that head hear not need, only heart and signs  Smiley

I believe in signs too Smiley

Always listen to the signs
558  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments on: November 22, 2017, 09:24:41 PM

I am a byteball investor and while I think the tech is very interesting I also have a few doubts.

Firstly in the distribution I see a danger that faith in this project could start to evaporate. By tinkering endlessly with the distribution this causes uncertainty for investors. Investors don't like uncertainty. Compared to say bitcoin in which new coins enter circulation at a predetermined rate. Here it just depends on the whim and fancy of the dev when he decides to do an air-drop. No offence Tony. But the initial promise was to distribute every full moon until 98% are in circulation. This has obviously not been kept which makes one wonder what else can be trusted.

To my knowledge no promises were ever made.

I like very much that airdrops are slowing down, the amount of bytes and blackbytes to distribute from the created supply is LIMITED, only 400.000 GB and equivalent GBB to go.

When all is distributed, who will pay the bills?


A coin needs continuous development and marketing.

Paying these things from donations is not a business model.

You need a piece of the created coins to pay for this so that all coinholders pay their part of the bill.


So either you continue to inflate the supply and let a piece of it go to pay for the bills, as Dash does, or you continue to slow down the spending of the limited supply.

The latter is our only realistic option.


This means also that much wiser spending needs to develop over time, as the percentage of coins spend on the project, compared to it's value, goes down, already a big problem.

So they must be spend ever more effectively so that continued growth in users is there.

The airdrop program is bringing in less and less new users for the coins spend, Tony made the right decision to continue to phase it out.



First off thanks for replying to my questions. I hope you don't think I'm having a dig at byteball, there are lots of things I really like about it, which is why I have invested in it. The fact that I have a few doubts that I wish to talk about, shouldn't detract from the numerous good points about byteball.  

Perhaps a monthly airdrop wasn't promised, however I did get that impression from the website. Anyway I think my point still stands, just as the number of bytes is limited, so it is with bitcoin too, limited to 21 million bitcoin. Whereas in bitcoin coins are minted (which you could think of as air-dropped in small quantities to miners over a long timescale), it is predetermined by the software. However in byteball the coins were all pre-mined and you now depend on the whim of Tony how they enter circulation. The original plan has changed and might change again. What is to stop Tony deciding he wants to keep 20% instead of 2%? There might be good reasons for that, to fund development or some other reason. The point is about the uncertainty of it, not what is the right or wrong strategy. I don't think anyone would disagree attracting new users is a good aim.  If slowing down the supply and using the 'treasury' of remaining bytes held by the developer to fund development is the aim, maybe the plan should be laid out and stuck to?

The issue of how development will be funded is a big problem for many projects and byteball too. I am a big fan of Dash and like the approach it has taken of a treasury and proposals with voting to decide how it is spent. With Dash it is clearly and unambiguously handled by the software. But anyway I realise this is a very different project than Dash. Byteball has this uncertainty holding it back though, I think.  



My other reservation is my more serious concern which is in terms of the witnesses. As I understand it witnesses of which there are only 12 in all, are owned by Tony and will collect majority of the fees for the whole network. Obviously Tony will not be trusted to run all the witnesses for ever. How does one become a witness? As a thought experiment imagine if byteball becomes a huge success displacing bitcoin and becoming a real global payments system.  Who will be the witnesses gathering all that phenomenal amount of fees? Will there still be only 12? Will users be happy that all their fees are centralised to so few witnesses?

Perhaps someone can put to rest some of my doubts. Thanks



What people often forget to mention is that POW coins always lead to only a few miners able to collude together to have 51% of the mining power. Simply because processing work is done more effectively on larger scale. In Bitcoin for example I bet 3 people rule over more than 51% of hashing power and could double spend if they collude.

In Byteball over time these witnesses will be 12 different people and so 7 need to collude together to have 51% of confirmation power and double spend, that is double to tripple as much bad actors needed and so double or tripple as decentralised.

Right now if Tony dies the project is over and out, so witnesses can still be centralised in Tony, as the project is still fully dependent on him anyway. Over time though it is indeed important that more people take on leadership roles so that the project can go on without him if necessary, and indeed witnesses become more decentralised as well.

Check out recent interview with CryptKeeper for interesting details on what power of witnesses exactly is:
https://techburst.io/byteball-interview-part-1-crypto-of-the-3rd-generation-witnesses-iota-vs-byteball-900b629bff



I think a large part of my fears on this are due to me not understanding witnesses in enough detail. The problems of POW you mention are real, it is true but I would class as separate to my concerns about witnesses.

I looked at the link you sent and it is very interesting but doesn't mention fees as pertaining to witnesses, only that they serialise the transactions. I still worry that witnesses might potentially one day be rewarded too much. More research needed by me.

But also the number of witnesses, 12, is a very small number. For 7 to collude is not far fetched at all. I take your point about POW centralisation of mining. But that is deflecting attention to the problem in this network by pointing at another network.

Perhaps by some more debate on these points I can understand better. I would like to know more about the witnesses if there is some good info I can digest, I'd appreciate. Thanks again.
559  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments on: November 22, 2017, 10:59:50 AM
I am a byteball investor and while I think the tech is very interesting I also have a few doubts.

Firstly in the distribution I see a danger that faith in this project could start to evaporate. By tinkering endlessly with the distribution this causes uncertainty for investors. Investors don't like uncertainty. Compared to say bitcoin in which new coins enter circulation at a predetermined rate. Here it just depends on the whim and fancy of the dev when he decides to do an air-drop. No offence Tony. But the initial promise was to distribute every full moon until 98% are in circulation. This has obviously not been kept which makes one wonder what else can be trusted.

My other reservation is my more serious concern which is in terms of the witnesses. As I understand it witnesses of which there are only 12 in all, are owned by Tony and will collect majority of the fees for the whole network. Obviously Tony will not be trusted to run all the witnesses for ever. How does one become a witness? As a thought experiment imagine if byteball becomes a huge success displacing bitcoin and becoming a real global payments system.  Who will be the witnesses gathering all that phenomenal amount of fees? Will there still be only 12? Will users be happy that all their fees are centralised to so few witnesses?

Perhaps someone can put to rest some of my doubts. Thanks
560  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [DASH] Dash Price and Trade Discussion Thread [UNMODERATED] on: November 22, 2017, 12:31:29 AM
Since DashHole cultists are deleting posts containing information contrary to their groupthink, here is an unmoderated Dash price thread.

Share & Enjoy!

------------------------------------------------

*snip*


The Dash Scamassu ATM, Proton Mail, Mycelium, and Coinfirm fiascos aren't helping the price keep up with Bitcoin, much less Monero.

At least one Masternode owner (and Foundation Member) will "start offloading this month" if there is no substantial progress reported, because Dash core team proposals "keep asking for money but have zero responsibility and accountability to provide updates."

Is there enough volume and bid depth to absorb several Masternodes being liquidated?

Hahaha Icey has a Dash Price discussion thread.  Icey you are obsessed. I wondered where you got to? Classic

I used to think bigrcanada1 was just teasing you saying he knows you are really a bull. But this is it confirmed.  Wink
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 105 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!