joblo (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
October 17, 2016, 02:04:30 PM |
|
joblo, you're probably already aware of the Tromp's Equihash solvers, which were released under open-source. Are you considering implementing them into your cpuminer-opt, thus adding support for equihash algortihm (for z.cash)? That's a cuda miner, still looking for a CPU miner. |
|
|
|
darun123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2016, 04:51:04 PM |
|
joblo, you're probably already aware of the Tromp's Equihash solvers, which were released under open-source. Are you considering implementing them into your cpuminer-opt, thus adding support for equihash algortihm (for z.cash)? That's a cuda miner, still looking for a CPU miner. Hello guys Anybody has optimized miner XZC order is free |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist
|
|
October 17, 2016, 07:27:26 PM
Last edit: October 17, 2016, 08:58:50 PM by kenshirothefist |
|
joblo, you're probably already aware of the Tromp's Equihash solvers, which were released under open-source. Are you considering implementing them into your cpuminer-opt, thus adding support for equihash algortihm (for z.cash)? That's a cuda miner, still looking for a CPU miner. Not true. It has fastest to-date known public CPU implementation as well as CUDA implementation. |
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
October 17, 2016, 07:34:14 PM |
|
yep, but remains a weird algo  that remember me riecoin stuff |
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
October 17, 2016, 08:54:31 PM
Last edit: October 17, 2016, 09:07:01 PM by felixbrucker |
|
cpuminer 3.4.8 is released. Source code: git: https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opttarball: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZMnVmX0Qwcjg1cmc/view?usp=sharingWindows binaries https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZQkRWSEx1WVNOaWs/view?usp=sharingIt adds support for zcoin lyra2 using either "-a zcoin" or "-a lyra2z". Lyra2RE (lyra2) and lyra2REv2 (lyra2v2) still work as usual. Although I have optimixed it for AVX2 there was no observable change in performance in my testing. I suspect the algo is I/O bound meaning the CPU spends a lot of time waiting on data from memory. LGA2011 systems with 4 channel DDR may do better. Feedback is appreciated. The diff display for cryptonight in the API has been fixed. Changes in diff will now be displayed by default (--show-diff). Use "--hide-diff" to disable. Removed some cpuminer-multi artifacts. I am considering dropping the btver1 build from the Windows binaries package. Before I do so I would like to know if anyone is using it and whether it performs better on an AMD CPU than any of the Intel builds. The btver1 build does not include any optimizartions so is not suitable for recent AMD CPUs. testing, thanks! version reports 4.3.8-dev, is this intended for releases? (also 3 and 4 are swapped it seems) |
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 17, 2016, 09:12:05 PM
Last edit: October 18, 2016, 01:20:09 AM by joblo |
|
cpuminer 3.4.8 is released.
testing, thanks! version reports 3.4.8-dev, is this intended for releases? edit: also version on startup in console reports 4.3.8 That was a pretty stupid mistake, two actually. The tarball and binaries have the right code, but wrong version. Fixed the version in GIT. |
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 17, 2016, 09:13:53 PM |
|
The source tarball and Windows binares will display incorrect version information. The code is fine. The version is now fixed in git. cpuminer 3.4.8 is released. Source code: git: https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opttarball: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZMnVmX0Qwcjg1cmc/view?usp=sharingWindows binaries https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZQkRWSEx1WVNOaWs/view?usp=sharingIt adds support for zcoin lyra2 using either "-a zcoin" or "-a lyra2z". Lyra2RE (lyra2) and lyra2REv2 (lyra2v2) still work as usual. Although I have optimixed it for AVX2 there was no observable change in performance in my testing. I suspect the algo is I/O bound meaning the CPU spends a lot of time waiting on data from memory. LGA2011 systems with 4 channel DDR may do better. Feedback is appreciated. The diff display for cryptonight in the API has been fixed. Changes in diff will now be displayed by default (--show-diff). Use "--hide-diff" to disable. Removed some cpuminer-multi artifacts. I am considering dropping the btver1 build from the Windows binaries package. Before I do so I would like to know if anyone is using it and whether it performs better on an AMD CPU than any of the Intel builds. The btver1 build does not include any optimizartions so is not suitable for recent AMD CPUs. |
|
|
|
darun123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2016, 09:23:12 PM |
|
cpuminer 3.4.8 is released. Source code: git: https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opttarball: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZMnVmX0Qwcjg1cmc/view?usp=sharingWindows binaries https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZQkRWSEx1WVNOaWs/view?usp=sharingIt adds support for zcoin lyra2 using either "-a zcoin" or "-a lyra2z". Lyra2RE (lyra2) and lyra2REv2 (lyra2v2) still work as usual. Although I have optimixed it for AVX2 there was no observable change in performance in my testing. I suspect the algo is I/O bound meaning the CPU spends a lot of time waiting on data from memory. LGA2011 systems with 4 channel DDR may do better. Feedback is appreciated. The diff display for cryptonight in the API has been fixed. Changes in diff will now be displayed by default (--show-diff). Use "--hide-diff" to disable. Removed some cpuminer-multi artifacts. I am considering dropping the btver1 build from the Windows binaries package. Before I do so I would like to know if anyone is using it and whether it performs better on an AMD CPU than any of the Intel builds. The btver1 build does not include any optimizartions so is not suitable for recent AMD CPUs. to me are mostly fx 8350 and a few pieces i5 1156 e now in this the miner shows me the h / s eg Fx 8350 accepted 367H, 6,84H / s if this is normal |
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 17, 2016, 09:41:22 PM |
|
to me are mostly fx 8350 and a few pieces i5 1156 e now in this the miner shows me the h / s eg Fx 8350 accepted 367H, 6,84H / s if this is normal
I can't say what's normal for AMD but your CPU has AES and AVX so you might get better performance using an Intel build (assuming you're using the binaries) with those features, depending on the algo. |
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
October 17, 2016, 10:17:51 PM |
|
to me are mostly fx 8350 and a few pieces i5 1156 e now in this the miner shows me the h / s eg Fx 8350 accepted 367H, 6,84H / s if this is normal
I can't say what's normal for AMD but your CPU has AES and AVX so you might get better performance using an Intel build (assuming you're using the binaries) with those features, depending on the algo. those where the numbers i got, amd is pretty weak in zcoin algo, though they change it to mpt soon, so that might change |
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 18, 2016, 01:21:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
mikhan
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2016, 03:35:16 AM |
|
@joblo,
is it normal to have 11-12 h/s on double e5-2690v3 (2x 12cores x 2threads)? tried different amount of threads, 48,12,24 etc
also cpu usage is only 14-15% in taskmanager
at cryptonight algo it got 750 h/s (48 threads)
|
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 18, 2016, 03:49:48 AM |
|
@joblo,
is it normal to have 11-12 h/s on double e5-2690v3 (2x 12cores x 2threads)? tried different amount of threads, 48,12,24 etc
also cpu usage is only 14-15% in taskmanager
at cryptonight algo it got 750 h/s (48 threads)
Read back a page or 2, another user had issues with dual xeons. |
|
|
|
mikhan
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2016, 04:00:45 AM |
|
tried cpuminer-xzc, it shows weird (?) 220-230 kh/s hashrate but a pool shows about 60-70 h/s, 48 threads
|
|
|
|
|
mikhan
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2016, 04:08:19 AM |
|
@joblo,
is it normal to have 11-12 h/s on double e5-2690v3 (2x 12cores x 2threads)? tried different amount of threads, 48,12,24 etc
also cpu usage is only 14-15% in taskmanager
at cryptonight algo it got 750 h/s (48 threads)
Read back a page or 2, another user had issues with dual xeons. default run (no -t option) shows 48 threads so both cpus are in game |
|
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
October 18, 2016, 09:30:31 AM |
|
tried cpuminer-xzc, it shows weird (?) 220-230 kh/s hashrate but a pool shows about 60-70 h/s, 48 threads
are you referring to ocminers cpuminer-xzc or cpuminer-opt by joblo? please share the parameters used to start the miner for further debug, might just be a wrong algo specified |
|
|
|
|
darun123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2016, 09:35:35 AM |
|
tried cpuminer-xzc, it shows weird (?) 220-230 kh/s hashrate but a pool shows about 60-70 h/s, 48 threads
are you referring to ocminers cpuminer-xzc or cpuminer-opt by joblo? please share the parameters used to start the miner for further debug, might just be a wrong algo specified Me again, something was clearly the older cpu 1156 and 1366 do not provide anything more than hs with older miner such as the fx processors have not improved anything if someone has a solution thank you in advance |
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
October 18, 2016, 12:47:24 PM |
|
tried cpuminer-xzc, it shows weird (?) 220-230 kh/s hashrate but a pool shows about 60-70 h/s, 48 threads
are you referring to ocminers cpuminer-xzc or cpuminer-opt by joblo? please share the parameters used to start the miner for further debug, might just be a wrong algo specified Me again, something was clearly the older cpu 1156 and 1366 do not provide anything more than hs with older miner such as the fx processors have not improved anything if someone has a solution thank you in advance Pleas provide the command line and program output. |
|
|
|
darun123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2016, 01:51:38 PM |
|
tried cpuminer-xzc, it shows weird (?) 220-230 kh/s hashrate but a pool shows about 60-70 h/s, 48 threads
are you referring to ocminers cpuminer-xzc or cpuminer-opt by joblo? please share the parameters used to start the miner for further debug, might just be a wrong algo specified Me again, something was clearly the older cpu 1156 and 1366 do not provide anything more than hs with older miner such as the fx processors have not improved anything if someone has a solution thank you in advance Pleas provide the command line and program output. cpuminer-btver1 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:5595 -u darun.darun -p 1 --hide-diff |
|
|
|
|
|
