[$XVG] VERGE [POW][MultiAlgo][TOR/i2P][no premine/ico!]

[Dogedarkdev]

Now trying to send back to the exchange and it keeps saying "error broadcasting transaction". This is really frustrating

It happened to me before. Try to reach the support and detailed your issue. That's what I did few months back.

i think he got it squared away, but thanks for chiming in =]

[1715657533]

1715657533

[indo1]

My precious coin but was hacked a long time a go , so sad

how?

in C-CEX someone hack my account and sell it , then withdraw the btc , in last year I have 100000xvg but now I only have 2000 and it from buying in bittrex, maybe I will buy more

im sorry to hear that. i never heard of any c-cex hacks. maybe you didnt have 2fa on though?

yes dev I not use it

[polylogic]

faucet still not working,
but at least with error msg now:
TRANSACTION FAILED. ERROR: ECONNREFUSED

[Dogedarkdev]

faucet still not working,
but at least with error msg now:
TRANSACTION FAILED. ERROR: ECONNREFUSED

yeah we know =]

it's disconnected while we add code to make it only pay each person once per day.

[CoinFacker]

Is that Verge QT for osx the electrum version?
Only getting 1 connection, not seeing how many blocks it is downloading?
Keeps out of sync!

[Dogedarkdev]

Is that Verge QT for osx the electrum version?
Only getting 1 connection, not seeing how many blocks it is downloading?
Keeps out of sync!

qt is not electrum. go to vergecurrency.de or cryptochainer.com (there are instructions on vergecurrency.de on how to download it so you dont have to wait and sync)

[Dogedarkdev]

Mining Verge coin using AMD cards?
I can't seem to find any info mining AMD cards for Verge coin. Can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you!

theres a list of them on our website, and our discord has a mining discussion as well.

[CoinFacker]

Is that Verge QT for osx the electrum version?
Only getting 1 connection, not seeing how many blocks it is downloading?
Keeps out of sync!

[kaigeta]

So... RadioCrypto milestone not happening, canceled, or what? I know it's not a huge deal, but i was curious to see what the "include in core wallets" would end up looking like.

Also i noticed in an interview that the merchandise store was supposed to only accept XVG. Did the community vote to have it also accept BTC? I thought accepting only XVG was a great idea.

radiocrypto is up. and it is in the core wallets on the github already, and will be in the next core release.

yes, the merch store is already being built, and will only accept xvg.

Nice. RadioCrypto website looks solid. Glad to hear it'll be XVG only. The Road Map currently says it will accept XVG and BTC, hence my confusion. Thanks for clearing that up.

glad you like it. we're still posting content to the radiocrypto.com site, but tonight's first show will be on at 8pm PST / 11pm EST (CoinMetal with Frank Dashwood)

Just want to say man. Your (+ the community's) commitment, principle, and vision for this coin are the reason I bought it. Been following silently since Doge and i'm incredibly impressed at what has been built here. If absolutely nothing else, this is an awesome experiment to see if the crypto market values a shiny brand over the real thing. It's an experiement i'm happy to be on the losing side of (sorta?), if we're wrong.

Also take fucking http://vergecurrency.com/radio/ down, or redirect, if cryptoradio is the new jazz!

[Dogedarkdev]

So... RadioCrypto milestone not happening, canceled, or what? I know it's not a huge deal, but i was curious to see what the "include in core wallets" would end up looking like.

Also i noticed in an interview that the merchandise store was supposed to only accept XVG. Did the community vote to have it also accept BTC? I thought accepting only XVG was a great idea.

radiocrypto is up. and it is in the core wallets on the github already, and will be in the next core release.

yes, the merch store is already being built, and will only accept xvg.

Nice. RadioCrypto website looks solid. Glad to hear it'll be XVG only. The Road Map currently says it will accept XVG and BTC, hence my confusion. Thanks for clearing that up.

glad you like it. we're still posting content to the radiocrypto.com site, but tonight's first show will be on at 8pm PST / 11pm EST (CoinMetal with Frank Dashwood)

Just want to say man. Your (+ the community's) commitment, principle, and vision for this coin are the reason I bought it. Been following silently since Doge and i'm incredibly impressed at what has been built here. If absolutely nothing else, this is an awesome experiment to see if the crypto market values a shiny brand over the real thing. It's an experiement i'm happy to be on the losing side of (sorta?), if we're wrong.

Also take fucking http://vergecurrency.com/radio/ down, or redirect, if cryptoradio is the new jazz!

lol thanks! it is rather fun, isnt it?

vergecurrency.com/radio will be modified soon to have the radiocrypto.com player and chatbox in it, so basically it will look like the main page of radiocrypto. we're adding more to the show schedule tonight, stay tuned!

[kaigeta]

So... RadioCrypto milestone not happening, canceled, or what? I know it's not a huge deal, but i was curious to see what the "include in core wallets" would end up looking like.

Also i noticed in an interview that the merchandise store was supposed to only accept XVG. Did the community vote to have it also accept BTC? I thought accepting only XVG was a great idea.

radiocrypto is up. and it is in the core wallets on the github already, and will be in the next core release.

yes, the merch store is already being built, and will only accept xvg.

Nice. RadioCrypto website looks solid. Glad to hear it'll be XVG only. The Road Map currently says it will accept XVG and BTC, hence my confusion. Thanks for clearing that up.

glad you like it. we're still posting content to the radiocrypto.com site, but tonight's first show will be on at 8pm PST / 11pm EST (CoinMetal with Frank Dashwood)

Just want to say man. Your (+ the community's) commitment, principle, and vision for this coin are the reason I bought it. Been following silently since Doge and i'm incredibly impressed at what has been built here. If absolutely nothing else, this is an awesome experiment to see if the crypto market values a shiny brand over the real thing. It's an experiement i'm happy to be on the losing side of (sorta?), if we're wrong.

Also take fucking http://vergecurrency.com/radio/ down, or redirect, if cryptoradio is the new jazz!

lol thanks! it is rather fun, isnt it?

vergecurrency.com/radio will be modified soon to have the radiocrypto.com player and chatbox in it, so basically it will look like the main page of radiocrypto. we're adding more to the show schedule tonight, stay tuned!

Seriously man, kudos! I'd say you're wrong, but, well, you're not. I started using the net in the era of newsgroups, bulletins, and then irc. This IS a rather fun coin and community, i've learned a lot. More than i've learned from one group since those days. Maybe XVG has renewed my faith in the net for a time, haha. Anyway.... haha

Chatbox you say!? I'll be there to complain about minor SEO stuff or something (lurk)!

[TheMostGhost]

Well. I can't say enough.

Love the commitment, "the sportsmanship" and i also treasure gains which are the real consequence of hard work put in by the dev.

Great job.

I also support vergecurrency - via twitter account @TheGhosTMost (Cointeller) - feel happy to tweet and retweet with me.

I believe XVG is destined to be a success on and off the pitch 

[Lalaland122]

There are a lot of coins for crypto. I guess there is not a big chance to get it to moon.

[Slemicek]

There are a lot of coins for crypto. I guess there is not a big chance to get it to moon.

Thank you for such relevant post.

[TheMostGhost]

There are a lot of coins for crypto. I guess there is not a big chance to get it to moon.

Thank you for such relevant post.

I believe this post should be highlighted.

[lao]

Hi Dev,

Hope you  will find some time to address this , still curious to see your thoughts.



Hey Sunerok,

would  like to see your view&Verge community on this:

I just realized that loopback - dummy IPs -  on the user side, but public ledger  can be integrated so smoothly  in the IOT / connected vehicles/ smart city echo system.

they are  estimating billions of  things connected  by 2020 and blockchain will be used as  backbone instead of deploying  centralized nodes around the end users.

now the thing is that corporations are already starting to  build private blockchains to accommodate this. Basically  a virtual currency will be used to pay inside those chains. there are a lot examples on this if we search.

Do you find feasible to try to tackle the IOT market?

this could be huge.

indeed, public ledger needs to exist .

As  for security, if you cannot see within verge blockchain the real IP s of the users, maybe verge can be considered an alternative to the private chains.

I think that selling the dummy Ip s/public ledger idea for IOT is easier that those for person privacy.

Some people can consider that privacy is not that important and also that those that think too much of this  are going into the conspiracy theory zone.

Which is not true, why not keeping it invisible but legal (because of the public ledger) if it`s possible, but it is what it is and  this thinking might block easy adoption.

Thus this idea with IOT which  screams end user security/privacy.

PS: verge can go for combined "human" and "things privacy"  , not sure about the branding/ specialization aspect  in respect with the market info overflow.
this can be further on discussed.

cheers

[Dogedarkdev]

Hi Dev,

Hope you  will find some time to address this , still curious to see your thoughts.



Hey Sunerok,

would  like to see your view&Verge community on this:

I just realized that loopback - dummy IPs -  on the user side, but public ledger  can be integrated so smoothly  in the IOT / connected vehicles/ smart city echo system.

they are  estimating billions of  things connected  by 2020 and blockchain will be used as  backbone instead of deploying  centralized nodes around the end users.

now the thing is that corporations are already starting to  build private blockchains to accommodate this. Basically  a virtual currency will be used to pay inside those chains. there are a lot examples on this if we search.

Do you find feasible to try to tackle the IOT market?

this could be huge.

indeed, public ledger needs to exist .

As  for security, if you cannot see within verge blockchain the real IP s of the users, maybe verge can be considered an alternative to the private chains.

I think that selling the dummy Ip s/public ledger idea for IOT is easier that those for person privacy.

Some people can consider that privacy is not that important and also that those that think too much of this  are going into the conspiracy theory zone.

Which is not true, why not keeping it invisible but legal (because of the public ledger) if it`s possible, but it is what it is and  this thinking might block easy adoption.

Thus this idea with IOT which  screams end user security/privacy.

PS: verge can go for combined "human" and "things privacy"  , not sure about the branding/ specialization aspect  in respect with the market info overflow.
this can be further on discussed.

cheers

im not so sure i understand. are you suggesting we run verge's blockchain through the internet of things? if so, it's not really a great idea. no one is going to want to install verge on their washing machine/dishwasher/thermostat/etc. as it stands right now, the internet of things is not very secure and is often exploited to perform attacks. (see here: http://www.npr.org/2016/10/22/498954197/internet-outage-update-internet-of-things-hacking-attack-led-to-outage-of-popula) also, most devices on the iot do not have an option to install additional software. please clarify what you are explaining.

[coinfused.so]

Is that Verge QT for osx the electrum version?
Only getting 1 connection, not seeing how many blocks it is downloading?
Keeps out of sync!

same here... ;/ trying to sync for 3 days now

[Dogedarkdev]

Is that Verge QT for osx the electrum version?
Only getting 1 connection, not seeing how many blocks it is downloading?
Keeps out of sync!

same here... ;/ trying to sync for 3 days now

try syncing bitcoin, takes over a week lol

you can go to vergecurrency.de and download the chain instead. there's even instructions there.

[A_McGriff]

Hi Dev,

Hope you  will find some time to address this , still curious to see your thoughts.



Hey Sunerok,

would  like to see your view&Verge community on this:

I just realized that loopback - dummy IPs -  on the user side, but public ledger  can be integrated so smoothly  in the IOT / connected vehicles/ smart city echo system.

they are  estimating billions of  things connected  by 2020 and blockchain will be used as  backbone instead of deploying  centralized nodes around the end users.

now the thing is that corporations are already starting to  build private blockchains to accommodate this. Basically  a virtual currency will be used to pay inside those chains. there are a lot examples on this if we search.

Do you find feasible to try to tackle the IOT market?

this could be huge.

indeed, public ledger needs to exist .

As  for security, if you cannot see within verge blockchain the real IP s of the users, maybe verge can be considered an alternative to the private chains.

I think that selling the dummy Ip s/public ledger idea for IOT is easier that those for person privacy.

Some people can consider that privacy is not that important and also that those that think too much of this  are going into the conspiracy theory zone.

Which is not true, why not keeping it invisible but legal (because of the public ledger) if it`s possible, but it is what it is and  this thinking might block easy adoption.

Thus this idea with IOT which  screams end user security/privacy.

PS: verge can go for combined "human" and "things privacy"  , not sure about the branding/ specialization aspect  in respect with the market info overflow.
this can be further on discussed.

cheers

im not so sure i understand. are you suggesting we run verge's blockchain through the internet of things? if so, it's not really a great idea. no one is going to want to install verge on their washing machine/dishwasher/thermostat/etc. as it stands right now, the internet of things is not very secure and is often exploited to perform attacks. (see here: http://www.npr.org/2016/10/22/498954197/internet-outage-update-internet-of-things-hacking-attack-led-to-outage-of-popula) also, most devices on the iot do not have an option to install additional software. please clarify what you are explaining.

I think i was able to decipher what he was asking....

....or maybe not...

but to me i could see Verge as the backbone for a lot of "Internet of Things" transactions because of the coin supply, open ledger, and anonymity.
Once Verge implements smart contracts, IOT transactions with Verge will be possible.

I was also pondering the idea of Verge's blockchain being used in the autodriving infrastructure, Tesla, Inc. is developing. Elon Musk would be wise to break from the pack and create an ICO through the Verge network (so would a lot of businesses). For autocars he would want the information flow to be on the darknet so as not to allow hackers to identify any single person's vehicle for attack.

Just throwing it out there, knowing you VergeDEV though, you've already got something up your sleeve in this regard.
But one thing at a time right?

Loving all the development at XVG!

This VentureBeat article helped me understand IOT and blockchain alot better:
https://venturebeat.com/2016/11/20/how-blockchain-can-change-the-future-of-iot/