Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 03:43:52 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 254 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 1763775 times)
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:50:25 PM
 #1381

Does anyone know  how to  use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?
1508687032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508687032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508687032
Reply with quote  #2

1508687032
Report to moderator
1508687032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508687032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508687032
Reply with quote  #2

1508687032
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:52:21 PM
 #1382

Does anyone know  how to  use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?

Like this
Code:
@echo off
timeout 30
SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

LOG=%~n0.log

:RESTART
miner --server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --user xxxx --pass x --port 2142 --eexit 3 --log 2 --solver 0
goto :RESTART

each time miner exit, it will restart itself.

Cheers  Wink

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink - Please don't PM about sharing my tools, they're not for share.
ioglnx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:02:16 PM
 #1383

i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*

NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1]
INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1]
GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s
Total speed: 531 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0]
INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0]
INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0]
INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1]
INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0]
INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0]
INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d
INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1]
INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0]
INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0]
GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s
Total speed: 534 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1]
INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0]
INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0]
INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]





This actually not a problem. It happened by many reasons: first low precise of timers, load of pool, and this is not a ping it a time in milliseconds from finding a solution to receive a pool answer.

0.1.0b dont have this behaviour. it just happens with the new.

GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
ivcelmik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:02:56 PM
 #1384

good job


With what solver u get those numbers? can u post an example of ur bat file
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:05:07 PM
 #1385

It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird? Smiley I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal Smiley and thanks for the miner! Smiley

Yes it is normal for modern gpu, solvers 0 and 1 fastest and difference between this solvers very small. But i know about cases when solver 1 will be much faster. It depends on hardware and software os, drivers etc.

Yes, but each time i restart the miner it chooses different solver for the same card even Smiley, also i seem to be getting always better results on solver 0.
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:09:50 PM
 #1386

Final result

6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink - Please don't PM about sharing my tools, they're not for share.
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:12:07 PM
 #1387

Final result

6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance.
I am glad that we can confirm the same results. Solver 0 forced is giving the best results and also two instances do not bring more sols Smiley
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


Get smart !


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:17:58 PM
 #1388

Tested 6*1070 Palit SJS rig , ver. 010 giving me more hash than 020.
I've tried all the solvers , only 1 is working to my cards...
Hurtman
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 124


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:18:46 PM
 #1389

what are you talking about ? what solvers ? i dont understand without readme file ((
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:21:37 PM
 #1390

Does anyone know  how to  use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?

Like this
Code:
@echo off
timeout 30
SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

LOG=%~n0.log

:RESTART
miner --server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --user xxxx --pass x --port 2142 --eexit 3 --log 2 --solver 0
goto :RESTART

each time miner exit, it will restart itself.

Cheers  Wink
Thanks for the help
I kept finding time based which wasn't what I wanted.
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:24:57 PM
 #1391

@EWBF,

since you added solver's need a way to select solvers for individual cards, claymore's miner does this so he might be able to help since I don't think he has an interest in building CUDA based miners.
skaf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:32:39 PM
 #1392


--solver 0
gpu clock 2140
memory clock 2275
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:32:49 PM
 #1393

what are you talking about ? what solvers ? i dont understand without readme file ((

did you read the help of the miner ?

miner --help

also read up a bit on equihash https://www.cryptolux.org/index.php/Equihash you will get what solvers are  Wink


--solver 0
gpu clock 2140
memory clock 2275

and probably TDP 100% ?

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink - Please don't PM about sharing my tools, they're not for share.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:43:33 PM
 #1394

0.2.0 is 2-4% quicker, on 1070.
skaf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:45:13 PM
 #1395

what are you talking about ? what solvers ? i dont understand without readme file ((

did you read the help of the miner ?

miner --help

also read up a bit on equihash https://www.cryptolux.org/index.php/Equihash you will get what solvers are  Wink


--solver 0
gpu clock 2140
memory clock 2275

and probably TDP 100% ?

TDP ~90%
Hurtman
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 124


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:47:13 PM
 #1396

what are you talking about ? what solvers ? i dont understand without readme file ((

did you read the help of the miner ?

miner --help

also read up a bit on equihash https://www.cryptolux.org/index.php/Equihash you will get what solvers are  Wink


--solver 0
gpu clock 2140
memory clock 2275

and probably TDP 100% ?

Thx  Smiley
reb0rn21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:48:08 PM
 #1397

TDP in % mean nothing at all, some brands on 90% TDP have over 210W and some 150W....
but for sure zcash over 2100mhz you need a lots of volts to be stable, prolly 1.05v or so

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            __¦¦¦__
                        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
            __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                     ¯¯¦¦¦
__¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦
¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦__                               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦__                       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯  ________
¦¦¦       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       ¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯ ¦¦
      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
          ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
              ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                          ¯
Streetlight9
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 10:06:06 PM
 #1398

Final result

6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b

Can I ask what 1070 cards you are using?

Thanks
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 10:07:19 PM
 #1399

This miner 0.2.0 is not  faster than 0.1.0  tested with 2 xgtx 1080 --solver 1/2/3 is also unstable connection lost !!

NO NO NO Temperatures rise to 93° degrees

Miner is not usable, will continue to use 0.1.0


Regards Undecided
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 10:11:07 PM
 #1400

TDP in % mean nothing at all, some brands on 90% TDP have over 210W and some 150W....
but for sure zcash over 2100mhz you need a lots of volts to be stable, prolly 1.05v or so
well if we are going to do this right, use the NVidia-smi utility to figure out the wattage, and compare to the calculated wattage using the input voltage and current, or better yet use a kilowatt meter.  The TDP % is total inaccurate it's just a good guess at best.
Pages: « 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 254 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!