Wekkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:30:42 PM |
|
Ha ha, seeing that Lambo makes be bullish again 
|
|
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:36:37 PM |
|
My dick is bigger than yours as well... ha ha ha
Yes it is and its gold plated  LOL - the reason for HODLING is not to pay taxes to corrupt governments. but if you trade and earn more than % tax ?
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:41:01 PM |
|
My dick is bigger than yours as well... ha ha ha
Yes it is and its gold plated  LOL - the reason for HODLING is not to pay taxes to corrupt governments. but if you trade and earn more than % tax ? if you're one of the 15 (10? 5? 1?) percent of traders which are profitable - congratulations!
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:45:01 PM |
|
Ha ha, seeing that Lambo makes be bullish again  How about a nice Corvair instead.  
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 4935
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:53:26 PM |
|
if you're one of the 15 (10? 5? 1?) percent of traders which are profitable - congratulations!
yep, the more you trade, the less likely is that you would be profitable. that is, if you are human and not an algo. re gold: maybe not a bad idea, but how would I know that it is real gold and not fake with all these cases of high quality fake gold spreading lately. Bitcoin cannot be fake. Re lambo- nice ride, congrats.
|
|
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 06:53:56 PM |
|
My dick is bigger than yours as well... ha ha ha
Yes it is and its gold plated  LOL - the reason for HODLING is not to pay taxes to corrupt governments. but if you trade and earn more than % tax ? if you're one of the 15 (10? 5? 1?) percent of traders which are profitable - congratulations! haha thanks, i know... some people cant trade
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 07:06:42 PM |
|
yep, the more you trade, the less likely is that you would be profitable. that is, if you are human and not an algo.
re gold: maybe not a bad idea, but how would I know that it is real gold and not fake with all these cases of high quality fake gold spreading lately. Bitcoin cannot be fake.
Re lambo- nice ride, congrats.
Bars are easier to fake, there are dodgy coins out there but they are easy to spot. The colour + coin details are always off. If your a newbie just avoid ebay & alibaba and you'll be fine  Just stick to main dealers like apmex etc. or if you want to buy directly with BTC I have used silvergoldbull. A good rule of thumb is to buy coins from your country for greatest liquidity e.g Eagles + Buffalos in the US, Britannias & sovereigns in the UK. If your goal is to hoard metals to prepare for a potential financial apocalypse, I'm not sure buying national minted coins is the best strategy. Don't those coins sell for a rather high premium over spot since they are considered collectibles? Same goes for trying to hoard gold in the form of jewelry. Also, Bitcoin can be "faked" to the unwary. e.g Bitcoin Cash.
|
|
|
|
|
flynn
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 07:32:41 PM |
|
Ha ha, seeing that Lambo makes be bullish again  How about a nice Corvair instead.   looks like a NSU TT to me
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2856
Merit: 14094
“They have no clue”
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 07:33:58 PM |
|
What's up with that new poll, it's a bit weird ?
YEAH very weird but don't like don't look or participate.... same for those that don't like BTC and prefer FIAT system and banks
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:00:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
serveria.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1348
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:19:02 PM |
|
Latest from Masterluc (google translate):
"As I wrote, the price can rebound from the level of ~ 6000, drawing a double bottom. It would be a Paschal miracle. Technically, however, the price is in the progressing bearish zone, below the most important curves, the fall potential (theoretically up to $ 3000) has not yet been exhausted. The situation on Wall Street is also not encouraging.
In the long run, buying at current levels is very profitable, I believe.
Something like this."
However I have to add this guy's latest predictions were mostly wrong (at least if we speak about the timing).
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:27:11 PM Last edit: April 01, 2018, 08:37:18 PM by HairyMaclairy |
|
For those of you comparing gold to bitcoin, don’t. The gold price is suppressed because gold is too easy to mine with modern mining techniques. Gold has a supply problem, there is too much of it. We have mined far more gold since 1950 than we have in all of history, and that has flooded the market. The best estimates currently available suggest that around 190,040 tonnes of gold has been mined throughout history, of which around two-thirds has been mined since 1950. Source: https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/gold-mining/how-much-gold-has-been-mined Further there are too many planned mine expansions. A single planned mine expansion in Australia (BHP Olympic Dam) would yield 15,000 tonnes of gold and 90,000 tonnes of silver. That’s almost 10% of historical global supply from a single mine. No market can absorb that type of new supply without collapsing the price. So ignore the 4th dimension conspiracy bullshit, because the author doesn’t know how supply and demand works in the gold market. Bitcoin is scarce. Gold is as common as dirt.
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 4197
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:38:15 PM |
|
When infofront takes April fool's to the next level...  Good afternoon all. Bitcoin has had a nice rebound this morning to bring us out of the desert of despair back towards the 7k mark. We might test this level at 6.9k as shorters try to scalp some profits I believe but the trend upwards has begun.  Posting this because..well...I like rockets. :p 
|
|
|
|
Biro Bob
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:49:57 PM |
|
F*** i have the badest morning ever ...... lost coins
Uh what happened? How did you lose coins ? i don't know WO toke some i guess i just Politeness: 164 fMerit: 280 Imagination: 40 Virtue: 11 COINS : 88 ?? Karma: 1 Maybe it’s for playing WO Top Trumps?
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 08:56:04 PM |
|
that poll is hilarious.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 09:05:34 PM |
|
I’m sorry guys the rebound from $6400 was mechanical buying.
Shorts being liquidated and buy stop orders being triggered.
It’s not a real rally imho, it’s just market mechanics.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 09:17:43 PM |
|
What's up with that new poll, it's a bit weird ?
YEAH very weird but don't like don't look or participate.... same for those that don't like BTC and prefer FIAT system and banks The only choice infofront's poll is missing is the coveted "It already has!" slot for the BCash true beliebers 
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 4935
|
 |
April 01, 2018, 09:20:15 PM |
|
An interesting take on bitcoin (it could have been posted here, but it is a first time I have seen it): https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/john-pfeffer/An+Investor%27s+Take+on+Cryptoassets+v6.pdfMajor points: 1. $4.4-9.9 tril final value for the store of value use, but could rapidly (months) increase to $1.5 tril (which is about $112K or $86k fully diluted). My opinion: he wrote it when btc was at 15-17K, so run up in months to $1.5 tril would be postponed, most likely. 2. An interesting comparison with AMZN, which was $107 in 2000 but was $1600 recently. In between AMZN declined to $5-6. The author says that if you calculate by dec 2017 AMZN price, it increased "only" by 14% yearly between buying during internet "bubble" peak and Dec 2017. I recalculated to the recent AMZN peak of $1600 and it is rather 16.5% yearly. However, if you count from 2001 AMZN low of 5.76, you'll get 39.5% yearly return from 2001-2018. Well , 39.5 is much better than 14-16.5%, but even 16.5% is OK. I guess my point is that those who bought at $17-20K would be similar to investors who bought AMZN at around $100 in 2000 and those who bought either earlier (up to btc $1000) or later (at the bottom whenever it comes) would be in a similar situation to AMZN buyers at either IPO or in 2001. They would just have to wait maybe a decade or so. The upper target in the article is 260-800K/btc.
|
|
|
|
|