Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Hueristic]

Rekt it baby.

Haha, luv it!

Chose "86-90%" and see I'm actually in the majority this time.

[1714208413]

1714208413

[1714208413]

1714208413

[1714208413]

1714208413

[alevlaslo]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg50732546#msg50732546

[Toxic2040]

A new higher high gainz some new medium fibs   some consolidation and it may just continue higher gentlemen  #dyor

12h


hopium

we might just drift up towards the 200 MA and see another golden cross
3d

#stronghands'19

[kenzawak]

Good night guys... 5,5k in the morning ?

Fuck, it worked !!! 

[ivomm]

Good mornign WO gang! It is so nice to wake up 6% richer! 6k in sight!

[Lambie Slayer]

Its a BTCull Market ya know. 

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Good night guys... 5,5k in the morning ?

Fuck, it worked !!! 

Do it again, do it again

[Majormax]

Tyler Jerkstore can go screw a light socket too!

Looks like a creepy, old pedophile.

This prediction is as hazardous as saying the bottom is in 100%. In fact it is nonsense : the two probabilities are mutually exclusive.

99% and 100% likelihoods are opinions of conviction which are usually wrong. Reading most of the comment over the last few days, it seems opinion is polarised.


Using a standard contrarian analysis here, the low will not be $1000, but the bottom may not yet be in.

From $6k + there could be a final low of ~2k.  That will make all consensus wrong, as it usually is.

I don't have an opinion either way, just trying to bounce off the whole range of views.

[JSRAW]

I have weak heart and confused mind so every stage looks trap to me and for me actual bull market starts from $15 k.

[JSRAW]

I think there is consensus among scholars nowadays that the indeuropean religions have a common origin in the religion of the jamna/yamna culture that populated euroasia some 3500-2500 years ago.

The authors name is Anders Kaliff, the books name is "Källan på botten av tidens brunn" (The spring at the bottom of the well of time, with the under title "indoeuropean roots to proto Norse religion"). I don,t think it's available in English, but some of his other books and papers are. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Books-Anders-Kaliff/s?rh=n%3A266239%2Cp_27%3AAnders+Kaliff

Thanks, quoting for future reference. book is unavailable right now......

[Syke]

Good mornign WO gang! It is so nice to wake up 6% richer! 6k in sight!

6k was so boring it lasted so long last time. Let's blow past 6k and never look back.

[DaRude]

New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

You are assuming a lot, aren't you?

You are assuming that the trust story is actually true, and if it were true, then whoever has the keys can do whatever the fuck they want with the coins, including dumping them all.

We don't need to DAO hardfork in bitcoin.  This is not ethereum, and the mere fact that some goofball like craig might gain access to such coins should NOT worry anyone.

It's a hypothetical based on their claims, would it be better if it was reworded to: what if two billionairs are not completely insane and actually have some logic to their madness? I'm having a hard time explaining their actions and timing, so dismissing it off to their stupidity feels like an easy way out. To me that's the biggest risk holding BTC back right now, everything else seems to be going as planned. Trusts cannot do anything with assets they hold but beneficiary can do whatever the fuck they want, and in the wrong hands BTC1MM can do a lot of damage. But as i answered my own question, if that has any merit to being true their first step would be proving that he's Satoshi in the eyes of the government. And if that were to actually happen we would most certainly fork to original and Satoshi's frozen stash chains the next day and then market would assign risks appropriately.

[HairyMaclairy]

Good bye 5400.

We'll meet again.

Good to see you again. I missed you 5400.  

Dear 5400.  I really enjoyed spending time with you.  But I’m just not ready for a commitment. 

[JSRAW]

Good bye 5400.

We'll meet again.

Good to see you again. I missed you 5400.  

Dear 5400.  I really enjoyed spending time with you.  But I’m just not ready for a commitment. 

Lets breakup with this mark , move on forward and never see each other in our my lifetime.

[HairyMaclairy]

New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

You are assuming a lot, aren't you?

You are assuming that the trust story is actually true, and if it were true, then whoever has the keys can do whatever the fuck they want with the coins, including dumping them all.

We don't need to DAO hardfork in bitcoin.  This is not ethereum, and the mere fact that some goofball like craig might gain access to such coins should NOT worry anyone.

It's a hypothetical based on their claims, would it be better if it was reworded to: what if two billionairs are not completely insane and actually have some logic to their madness? I'm having a hard time explaining their actions and timing, so dismissing it off to their stupidity feels like an easy way out. To me that's the biggest risk holding BTC back right now, everything else seems to be going as planned. Trusts cannot do anything with assets they hold but beneficiary can do whatever the fuck they want, and in the wrong hands BTC1MM can do a lot of damage. But as i answered my own question, if that has any merit to being true their first step would be proving that he's Satoshi in the eyes of the government. And if that were to actually happen we would most certainly fork to original and Satoshi's frozen stash chains the next day and then market would assign risks appropriately.

Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence

[El duderino_]

I have weak heart and confused mind so every stage looks trap to me and for me actual bull market starts from $15 k.

I do understand that, but we are building right here and everything has to go in steady movements, brick by brick so when we enter 15K this time, we can be stronger and able to stay there a bit longer.... every move up is another win bro

Yeah did I forget? Good morning WO's and THX cAPSLOCK for another very nice comment @ . https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=5132225.msg50619911#msg50619911

Come on BTC the greatest thing of our lifetime, but but when Carolina, Vegeta ??

[El duderino_]

Good bye 5400.

We'll meet again.

Good to see you again. I missed you 5400.  

Dear 5400.  I really enjoyed spending time with you.  But I’m just not ready for a commitment. 

Ssssssjjj never challenge the ex-b*tch's

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I have weak heart and confused mind so every stage looks trap to me and for me actual bull market starts from $15 k.

We breach psychological price barriers on the way up. I think $6,000 is one as that’s when we started to drop fast at the peak of the bear market, it was fucking horrible.

$8,000 is a big deal to me, I dunno why but it just seems like a big jump.

$10,000 is obviously a big sticking point, I think there will be people selling when we get there.

Then we have, as you say $15,000. The next one after that is a new ATH.

I’m not selling anything until north of $30,000 - $40,000.  

[Lambie Slayer]

New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

You are assuming a lot, aren't you?

You are assuming that the trust story is actually true, and if it were true, then whoever has the keys can do whatever the fuck they want with the coins, including dumping them all.

We don't need to DAO hardfork in bitcoin.  This is not ethereum, and the mere fact that some goofball like craig might gain access to such coins should NOT worry anyone.

It's a hypothetical based on their claims, would it be better if it was reworded to: what if two billionairs are not completely insane and actually have some logic to their madness? I'm having a hard time explaining their actions and timing, so dismissing it off to their stupidity feels like an easy way out. To me that's the biggest risk holding BTC back right now, everything else seems to be going as planned. Trusts cannot do anything with assets they hold but beneficiary can do whatever the fuck they want, and in the wrong hands BTC1MM can do a lot of damage. But as i answered my own question, if that has any merit to being true their first step would be proving that he's Satoshi in the eyes of the government. And if that were to actually happen we would most certainly fork to original and Satoshi's frozen stash chains the next day and then market would assign risks appropriately.

Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence

Occum's Razor says the simplest explanation that Craig is lying about the trust, is the most likely explanation.

[El duderino_]

Tyler Jerkstore can go screw a light socket too!

Looks like a creepy, old pedophile.

This prediction is as hazardous as saying the bottom is in 100%. In fact it is nonsense : the two probabilities are mutually exclusive.

99% and 100% likelihoods are opinions of conviction which are usually wrong. Reading most of the comment over the last few days, it seems opinion is polarised.


Using a standard contrarian analysis here, the low will not be $1000, but the bottom may not yet be in.

From $6k + there could be a final low of ~2k.  That will make all consensus wrong, as it usually is.

I don't have an opinion either way, just trying to bounce off the whole range of views.