Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2021, 11:45:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: New ATH today?
Yes - 35 (79.5%)
No - 9 (20.5%)
Total Voters: 44

Pages: « 1 ... 23303 23304 23305 23306 23307 23308 23309 23310 23311 23312 23313 23314 23315 23316 23317 23318 23319 23320 23321 23322 23323 23324 23325 23326 23327 23328 23329 23330 23331 23332 23333 23334 23335 23336 23337 23338 23339 23340 23341 23342 23343 23344 23345 23346 23347 23348 23349 23350 23351 23352 [23353] 23354 23355 23356 23357 23358 23359 23360 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 ... 29725 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25464589 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (157 posts by 13+ users deleted.)
mdayonliner
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 407


We are Bitcoin!


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 04:48:17 PM

All those days I thought BSV and BCHSV are two separate shitcoins before today I figured out that Kucoin calls it BCHSV. It's confusing.

Anyway, I used to have this shit bought sometimes in the last year January (that time BCH) and sold them all today with over 60% loss I guess.
Official, it was 62.187% loss LOL
1634946324
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634946324

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634946324
Reply with quote  #2

1634946324
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
bitcoinPsycho
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 853


THE NEXT 2.4 YEARS ARE CRITICAL🍄💊


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 04:50:40 PM

All those days I thought BSV and BCHSV are two separate shitcoins before today I figured out that Kucoin calls it BCHSV. It's confusing.

Anyway, I used to have this shit bought sometimes in the last year January (that time BCH) and sold them all today with over 60% loss I guess.
Official, it was 62.187% loss LOL
At least you got away with 37.813%
IT Could have been worse
VB1001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 2480


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
April 15, 2019, 04:50:52 PM



CMC
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 6959


ATH enthousiast, currently McDonalds enthousiast.


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 04:55:58 PM



CMC

Should be way worse.... this still is a succes for that sh*tcoin
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 2932


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 04:56:10 PM

looks like a lot of the SV selloff is flowing into BCH



 Roll Eyes
kingcolex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 1258



View Profile
April 15, 2019, 04:59:19 PM

looks like a lot of the SV selloff is flowing into BCH



 Roll Eyes
Trading one turd for another, gotta love it.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1515


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:04:35 PM

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2598



View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:11:59 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (1)



CMC

Should be way worse.... this still is a succes for that sh*tcoin



https://twitter.com/krakenfx/status/1117828361269571586
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:12:39 PM

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?
I differentiate between participation and taking over control, which is what was suggested during a Coingeek conference in which the blights of society were supposed to get sufficient tools to keep doing what they have been in a more efficient manner.
This could also be the issue on which CSW and Roger parted and to some extent why I don't have any hard feelings against him. CSW clearly cares about nothing worth caring about, unlike Roger (anti-establishment).

If Roger hadn't teamed up with CSW and Bitmain (phony hash war) I might've very well been persuaded to at least keep sensible portions of both chains in cold storage.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 6959


ATH enthousiast, currently McDonalds enthousiast.


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:13:22 PM

looks like a lot of the SV selloff is flowing into BCH



 Roll Eyes
Trading one turd for another, gotta love it.

Let them remain in the sjalot part of the pool, that where all the turds float Cheesy Cheesy
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 6959


ATH enthousiast, currently McDonalds enthousiast.


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:14:16 PM
Merited by Paashaas (1)


#voted in that 76% Smiley
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 2932


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:16:55 PM

sjalot

I rather like that
silverfuture
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 948
Merit: 1008


central banking = outdated protocol


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:17:50 PM

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1

bitcoinPsycho
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 853


THE NEXT 2.4 YEARS ARE CRITICAL🍄💊


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:19:40 PM

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1


Me
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1493



View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:21:49 PM

Yeah, I dunno. I could see the state dept sitting this one out on 'challenge to any state authority' grounds. It's not going to be high profile stateside, so they can probably take a flyer without any public notice.

If he's blacklisted - as I assume he is - he can't fly from Thailand, but must cross some land border. At least he's a USA citizen, so I don't think the Thai government wants to get into a fight over him. I see a bigger problem for his gf (unfortunately not protected by wife status), who is Thai and could get to be used as an eloquent example.
silverfuture
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 948
Merit: 1008


central banking = outdated protocol


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:27:06 PM

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1


Me

Everyone playing is hoping they find the 400th key at the time of the dip!
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 5489


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:33:50 PM

Battle to go sub 5k right now
JSRAW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1367



View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:38:43 PM

Small battle.... In the end we are going to win an war.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1515


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:40:07 PM

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?
I differentiate between participation and taking over control, which is what was suggested during a Coingeek conference in which the blights of society were supposed to get sufficient tools to keep doing what they have been in a more efficient manner.

You would need to provide more info if you expect me to know what you are talking about. All I have seen from CSW as public pronouncements on changes to the protocol have been to restrict any such protocol changes to be to 'unfucken' (not his term, actually Shadders', I believe) it back to parity with v0.1. Any tools sitting atop such a protocol are just that - not base layer. Accordingly, I don't understand what that has to do with SV. If any public pronouncement has even been made.

I note also that you have not answered the posited question(s).

Quote
If Roger hadn't teamed up with CSW and Bitmain (phony hash war)

Exactly what is a 'phony hash war'? As differentiated, I suppose, from a 'real hash war?
rolling
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824
Merit: 712


View Profile
April 15, 2019, 05:42:56 PM

Looks like CSW is pissed and dumping everything in a fit of rage
Pages: « 1 ... 23303 23304 23305 23306 23307 23308 23309 23310 23311 23312 23313 23314 23315 23316 23317 23318 23319 23320 23321 23322 23323 23324 23325 23326 23327 23328 23329 23330 23331 23332 23333 23334 23335 23336 23337 23338 23339 23340 23341 23342 23343 23344 23345 23346 23347 23348 23349 23350 23351 23352 [23353] 23354 23355 23356 23357 23358 23359 23360 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 ... 29725 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!