Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2019, 04:52:41 AM *
News: 10th anniversary art contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Oct. 5 Closing Price:
$0 - 5 (3.5%)
<$8,000 - 38 (27%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 16 (11.3%)
$8,500-$9,000 - 10 (7.1%)
$9,000-$9,500 - 13 (9.2%)
$9,500-$10,000 - 12 (8.5%)
$10,000-$10,500 - 10 (7.1%)
$10,500-$11,000 - 5 (3.5%)
$11,000-$11,500 - 2 (1.4%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 4 (2.8%)
>$12,000 - 17 (12.1%)
>$20,000 - 9 (6.4%)
Total Voters: 141

Pages: « 1 ... 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 [19659] 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 19673 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 19680 19681 19682 19683 19684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 19708 19709 ... 25270 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21406607 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (109 posts by 22 users deleted.)
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 775


HODL.


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:26:53 PM

[19:12:24] · <ben_vulpes> https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06038 << "on a subset of 3,759 contracts which we sampled for concrete validation and manual analysis, we reproduce real exploits at a true positive rate of 89%, yielding exploits for 3,686 contracts"
[19:20:00] · <shinohai> I'm sure with time they can get that number closer to 100% (http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-19#1785157)

If someday Bitcoin does another 10x I will "retire" and devote all my time to exploit research on blockchain/smart contracts field. That's when I will start to have real fun.

Someone got to teach the shitcoiners why "ol' stupid bitcorn" isn't turing complete. Pain is a great way to learn Grin (makes the lessions stick)

Turing complete is ok.... on SIDECHAINS. Main layer has to be simple and secure.
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
1571547161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571547161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571547161
Reply with quote  #2

1571547161
Report to moderator
cofefeGandalf
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 11


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:29:25 PM

[19:12:24] · <ben_vulpes> https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06038 << "on a subset of 3,759 contracts which we sampled for concrete validation and manual analysis, we reproduce real exploits at a true positive rate of 89%, yielding exploits for 3,686 contracts"
[19:20:00] · <shinohai> I'm sure with time they can get that number closer to 100% (http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-19#1785157)

If someday Bitcoin does another 10x I will "retire" and devote all my time to exploit research on blockchain/smart contracts field. That's when I will start to have real fun.

Someone got to teach the shitcoiners why "ol' stupid bitcorn" isn't turing complete. Pain is a great way to learn Grin (makes the lessions stick)

Turing complete is ok.... on SIDECHAINS. Main layer has to be simple and secure.

Exactly.

edit: Someone knows when rootstock is supposed to go live / be widely available?
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 2388


Be a bank.


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:30:08 PM

https://bitcoiin2gen.pr.co/163919-zen-master-steven-seagal-has-become-the-brand-ambassador-of-bitcoiin2gen
shoulda stayed in the kitchen


HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1640


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:32:27 PM

Elwar:  can you create colored coins or ERC-20 style tokens?

Colored coins might be possible but a smart contract would still be required. I wouldn't use an ethereum token because I don't want to go down that path and confuse users with ethereums.


Great.  Let me explain myself.  Global equity markets are going to slowly transition onto public blockchains.  It’s going to start this year.  We need to be able to offer equity instruments (eg shares) on Bitcoin or a side chain or second layer. If we don’t, another public blockchain will fill the hole.

The Gibraltar Stock Exchange will probably be the first to offer regulated securities on a public blockchain. Others will follow quickly.  Eventually LSE, NYSE etc will see the writing on the wall.
bitebits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1070


Bitcoin != exchange rate


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:40:11 PM

Bitcoin is up 4.5% today
GBTC is down 4.72% today, shrinking that premium (by 10% in one day).

Interesting.

Any recent ETF news perhaps?
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1022


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:47:44 PM
Merited by 600watt (1), infofront (1), BTCMILLIONAIRE (1)

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW. Any defense of Ver's scamming attempt with the site that carries Bitcoin + ".com" in the URL to confuse the newbies in mixing up BTC and BCash is just insulting the intelligence of everyone here. You may pretend it's not obvious scam to you, but nobody believes you. Your posts show enough intelligence that you can not be that naive, you are either trolling or have some agenda with Roger, both very irritating. Don't turn yourself into a laughing stock light that silver fetishists whom no one believes he has no agenda, but spreads metal propaganda here out of his true love for our well being.
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 138



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:59:01 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree. It is the longest valid chain.  What is valid is up to the collective of users, and different users can have different preferences. Luckily, there is a clear leader in terms of number of users and market cap. However, if bitcoin (core) and bitcoin cash had an equal amount of supporters, we might have a hard time determining which one would be named bitcoin.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1189



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:04:04 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree. It is the longest valid chain.  What is valid is up to the collective of users, and different users can have different preferences. Luckily, there is a clear leader in terms of number of users and market cap. However, if bitcoin (core) and bitcoin cash had an equal amount of supporters, we might have a hard time determining which one would be named bitcoin.
The one that supports pre-fork coins. This is not difficult.
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1022


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:04:07 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree.

Bitcoin White paper, first paragraph, Abstract:

Quote
Abstract. ..., accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

I don't get how can you disagree with the definition?

Edit: Section 4. is even more explicit:
Quote
The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it.

If this isn't proof that using the word "Bitcoin" for anything other then BTC is a scam, I don't know what is.
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 138



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:07:02 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree.

Bitcoin White paper, first paragraph, Abstract:

Quote
Abstract. ..., accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

I don't get how can you disagree with the definition?
First of all, I don't read the white paper as gospel.  But even if you do, also in abstract: "As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network,  they'll  generate the  longest  chain  and  outpace attackers." Therefore the abstract itself already says that the longest chain rule is conditional.
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1022


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:11:36 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree.

Bitcoin White paper, first paragraph, Abstract:

Quote
Abstract. ..., accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

I don't get how can you disagree with the definition?
First of all, I don't read the white paper as gospel.  But even if you do, also in abstract: "As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network,  they'll  generate the  longest  chain  and  outpace attackers." Therefore the abstract itself already says that the longest chain rule is conditional.

Edit from above:
Section 4. is even more explicit:
Quote
The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it.

If this isn't proof that using the word "Bitcoin" for anything other then BTC is a scam, I don't know what is.

It's not "gospel", it's definition. You can define other things yourself, but give Satoshi Nakamoto the right to define what Bitcion is.
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 775


HODL.


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:14:48 PM

This is ridiculous. The concept of the "longest chain" only has a meaning considering the same difficulty. When you change that (at that point we are talking about a completely different thing longest or not) you can easily get a longer chain with ANY PoW you want. That's exactly what Bcash did, and now it doesn't matter how long they get, because they are using a lower diffculty and... a smaller accumulated proof of work.
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 138



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:16:25 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree.

Bitcoin White paper, first paragraph, Abstract:

Quote
Abstract. ..., accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

I don't get how can you disagree with the definition?
First of all, I don't read the white paper as gospel.  But even if you do, also in abstract: "As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network,  they'll  generate the  longest  chain  and  outpace attackers." Therefore the abstract itself already says that the longest chain rule is conditional.

Edit from above:
Section 4. is even more explicit:
Quote
The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it.

If this isn't proof that using the word "Bitcoin" for anything other then BTC is a scam, I don't know what is.

It's not "gospel", it's definition. You can define other things yourself, but give Satoshi Nakamoto the right to define what Bitcion is.
I would bet that the majority of Core devs disagree with your definition, as would most users if push came to shove (if miners went a different direction from user needs) but hey, I'll try not to derail the thread for 2 nights in a row, so I'll quit this discussion.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1189



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:19:11 PM

This is ridiculous. The concept of the "longest chain" only has a meaning considering the same difficulty. When you change that (at that point we are talking about a completely different thing longest or not) you can easily get a longer chain with ANY PoW you want. That's exactly what Bcash did, and now it doesn't matter how long they get, because they are using a lower diffculty and... a smaller accumulated proof of work.
That is what proof of work means. The amount of processing power put into it.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1189



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:20:40 PM

Bitcoin.com is not a scam, it is a URL. What is scammy about that? Further, in what way does the existence of such make me a scammer?

jbreher, just stop it.

By definition in the Whitepaper Bitcoin is the chain with greatest accumulated PoW.
I disagree.

Bitcoin White paper, first paragraph, Abstract:

Quote
Abstract. ..., accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

I don't get how can you disagree with the definition?
First of all, I don't read the white paper as gospel.  But even if you do, also in abstract: "As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network,  they'll  generate the  longest  chain  and  outpace attackers." Therefore the abstract itself already says that the longest chain rule is conditional.

Edit from above:
Section 4. is even more explicit:
Quote
The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it.

If this isn't proof that using the word "Bitcoin" for anything other then BTC is a scam, I don't know what is.

It's not "gospel", it's definition. You can define other things yourself, but give Satoshi Nakamoto the right to define what Bitcion is.
I would bet that the majority of Core devs disagree with your definition, as would most users if push came to shove (if miners went a different direction from user needs) but hey, I'll try not to derail the thread for 2 nights in a row, so I'll quit this discussion.
It doesn't matter who disagrees. The inventor defines what his creation is. If other people change it, then it is something else.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1640


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:20:52 PM

Can we go back to arguing about child support?  
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 138



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:21:37 PM

Can we go back to arguing about child support?  
Grin
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1022


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:21:41 PM

This is ridiculous. The concept of the "longest chain" only has a meaning considering the same difficulty. When you change that (at that point we are talking about a completely different thing longest or not) you can easily get a longer chain with ANY PoW you want. That's exactly what Bcash did, and now it doesn't matter how long they get, because they are using a lower diffculty and... a smaller accumulated proof of work.

It's obvious that Satoshi thought about all this when he repeated the definition several times, including: "The longest chain which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it" in section 4.

He had hard-forks in consideration, so the only thing that he thought of worthy differentiating between forks is what he stated above. There's no other way to be sure which chain is Bitcoin.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1189



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:21:57 PM

Can we go back to arguing about child support?  
Annoying but necessary. Alimony, on the other hand...
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 775


HODL.


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:25:38 PM

Can we go back to arguing about child support?  

As long as they are YOUR childs OR ones you FREELY AND CONCIOUSLY opt to support, everything is ok Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 [19659] 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 19673 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 19680 19681 19682 19683 19684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 19708 19709 ... 25270 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!