Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bitserve]

Eth lagging badly

Whilst ETC is almost at ATH already..... eth/etc flippening?

[1713977705]

1713977705

[1713977705]

1713977705

[1713977705]

1713977705

[Paashaas]

BCash is a shitcoin just like all the other Bitcoin XXX....

[Paashaas]

Eth lagging badly

ETH is one major shithole and it will not going anywhere.

ETH is NOT decentralised, ETH is NOT a world super computer. I'm wiping my ass off with diarrhea with ETH  Undecided

Rootstock will bring a real smart contract platform to Bitcoin.

[moneyForjam]

Maybe Eth will do better when it gets over $1k

[realr0ach]

BCash is a shitcoin just like all the other Bitcoin XXX....

All 1400 coins released are valueless, imaginary tokens.  Barbarians asked for gold and silver to not sack Rome.  Under no circumstance will you ever see the US govt say to some nation:  "Hey fags, give us your shitcoins or we're launching the nukes, bitchez", because...they can just create their own new shitcoin out of thin air.  It's valueless fiat currency 2.0.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

I don't like to be very specific to avoid profiling (as if anyone would be interested in profiling me... call me paranoid). I will try though:

1) $100K would be ok. ...

I hope that has covered all the questions without giving more information about me than I would be confident. Oh and I already have a nice home, fine car and am completely DEBT FREE (Not thanks to Bitcoin as I have never cashed out a single penny yet). And no children nor family to support. That makes my current needs very modest and easy to fullfill, even if for the rest of my lifetime (not there YET... unless I were to die in a decade or two).

I think that you have adequately answered all of the questions. so thanks for that.  I don't really believe that we need to disclose any of our specific BTC holdings in order to discuss at what levels of prices would allow us to make substantial life changes due to BTC price rises (or anticipated rises). 

Sometimes you will find me and others baiting posters into disclosing aspects of their BTC holdings and surely any of us will understand if you keep some of your specifics private.

I believe that with a large number of traditional investments, they theorize that you should be able to withdraw around 4% per year from your investment in order to maintain the principle in the long run...   It is possible that bitcoin could perform so well that it allows for higher withdrawal rate levels that would still preserve the principle - including the possibility of 10% per year withdrawals... but conservatively 4% is usually safe with a traditionally diversified portfolio of investments....

so one thing is withdrawing and maintaining the principle, and another thing is if you decide to draw down on your principle as well of course none of us will live for ever and one of the most certain things in our life is that we are going to die.. not meaning to end on a negative note.


NOT.

[explorer]

BCash is a shitcoin just like all the other Bitcoin XXX....

Wow.  that list is getting a bit long!

[JayJuanGee]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149230;sa=showPosts
TERA's old account is in use again. stolen?

The writing style does not seem like Tera..... I suppose that the account may have been sold?    She can report that, and maybe admins will freeze usage account?  but if they have no way of verifying who is the real Tera, then they might let it keep operating with the new owner... then we might get a publicly displayed battle between Tera and Tera2, perhaps?

Perhaps some DT members would flag the Tera account if admins won't recover it.

I am not sure what is exactly going on with Tera because sometimes what happens is that the member is not sufficiently persistent in the attempt to get the account back - or let the stolen account stay in the hands of the other for too long, and thereafter it becomes more ambiguous regarding who is the original owner. 

DT members do flag accounts as stolen, that is for sure... can also hit the report button in order to attempt to get attention to moderators... but if you are not the real owner, then it becomes harder for you to prove that the account seems different.

Some kind of similar thing happened with AdamstgBit.  He was not persistent in trying to get the account back, but part of his reason was that he also became disgruntled towards forum admins, too.

[moneyForjam]

wishing I had 1btc for every word JayJuanGee typed

[JayJuanGee]

I don't know if moderators can edit (rather than delete) posts, but it would be nice to go through all of jbreher's contributions - some of which raise valid points and contain factually correct, useful information - and

s/Bitcoin Segwit/Bitcoin/g
s/Bitcoin Cash/BCash/g

with a FTFY note in the end, for correctness and clarity.

No sorry the mods can't do that. I remember serious legal threats on another forum when a mod actually altered someone else's post.

This raises a question I've pondered a bit. A few days ago someone requested that the OP of this thread be updated with links to more modern charting tools, etc.

That's not a bad suggestion. However, I'm more of the frame of mind that the OP is basically still Adam's, and should remain untouched for historical purposes anyway.

I agree that you should leave the whole of Adam's OP untouched.  However, I also think that it would be good if you could put your own expectations in the OP - probably before the Text of the OP of Adam...

Probably, give your short rendition of the history and when you took it over.

 You could even say something like I agree with everything that Adam said - except and then list all of the exceptions or the new guidelines that you would like to notify and maybe there would not be too many exceptions - because you do seem to have carried out the largely hands off (except for obvious trollers) tradition pretty well.  At the same time, I would hope that you would NOT get too rough on us... ... We would not want you to transform yourself into anything close to resembling a Meuh6879 - hahahahahaha..


Edit: Bitserve beat me to it, and used way fewer words, too... go figure.

[JayJuanGee]

Is JayJuanGee really pretending he's some type of financial or economics genius now because he was accidentally on the right side of a pump and dump? LOL.

Well, Roachie Poachie.. let me 'splain sum ting 2 u.

Wat's ever u dooo, u do NOTS wanna get's ur selfie, roachie poachied.

Udder dan dat, no muchie 'splainin can b dun nor neeeded. 

 

[HairyMaclairy]

Say nothing at all.   Let newcomers figure it out. Sink or swim.  

[nathalie20]

BCash is a shitcoin just like all the other Bitcoin XXX....

Wow.  that list is getting a bit long!

WHAT? So much shit already arisen? Bitcoin is one and stick to it. 11500$ is a great price. But the war has only just begin

[grn]

[edited out]

I don't like to be very specific to avoid profiling (as if anyone would be interested in profiling me... call me paranoid). I will try though:

1) $100K would be ok. ...

I hope that has covered all the questions without giving more information about me than I would be confident. Oh and I already have a nice home, fine car and am completely DEBT FREE (Not thanks to Bitcoin as I have never cashed out a single penny yet). And no children nor family to support. That makes my current needs very modest and easy to fullfill, even if for the rest of my lifetime (not there YET... unless I were to die in a decade or two).

I think that you have adequately answered all of the questions. so thanks for that.  I don't really believe that we need to disclose any of our specific BTC holdings in order to discuss at what levels of prices would allow us to make substantial life changes due to BTC price rises (or anticipated rises). 

Sometimes you will find me and others baiting posters into disclosing aspects of their BTC holdings and surely any of us will understand if you keep some of your specifics private.

I believe that with a large number of traditional investments, they theorize that you should be able to withdraw around 4% per year from your investment in order to maintain the principle in the long run...   It is possible that bitcoin could perform so well that it allows for higher withdrawal rate levels that would still preserve the principle - including the possibility of 10% per year withdrawals... but conservatively 4% is usually safe with a traditionally diversified portfolio of investments....

so one thing is withdrawing and maintaining the principle, and another thing is if you decide to draw down on your principle as well of course none of us will live for ever and one of the most certain things in our life is that we are going to die.. not meaning to end on a negative note.


NOT.

Dumbass

[JayJuanGee]

wishing I had 1btc for every word JayJuanGee typed

one satoshi might be sufficient to make you a fiat millionaire in a relatively short period of time.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

I don't like to be very specific to avoid profiling (as if anyone would be interested in profiling me... call me paranoid). I will try though:

1) $100K would be ok. ...

I hope that has covered all the questions without giving more information about me than I would be confident. Oh and I already have a nice home, fine car and am completely DEBT FREE (Not thanks to Bitcoin as I have never cashed out a single penny yet). And no children nor family to support. That makes my current needs very modest and easy to fullfill, even if for the rest of my lifetime (not there YET... unless I were to die in a decade or two).

I think that you have adequately answered all of the questions. so thanks for that.  I don't really believe that we need to disclose any of our specific BTC holdings in order to discuss at what levels of prices would allow us to make substantial life changes due to BTC price rises (or anticipated rises). 

Sometimes you will find me and others baiting posters into disclosing aspects of their BTC holdings and surely any of us will understand if you keep some of your specifics private.

I believe that with a large number of traditional investments, they theorize that you should be able to withdraw around 4% per year from your investment in order to maintain the principle in the long run...   It is possible that bitcoin could perform so well that it allows for higher withdrawal rate levels that would still preserve the principle - including the possibility of 10% per year withdrawals... but conservatively 4% is usually safe with a traditionally diversified portfolio of investments....

so one thing is withdrawing and maintaining the principle, and another thing is if you decide to draw down on your principle as well of course none of us will live for ever and one of the most certain things in our life is that we are going to die.. not meaning to end on a negative note.


NOT.

Dumbass

Which part?  Are you signing and referring to yourself, or did you have some kind of an emotional outburst that you could not contain?.

Might you NOT understand that a large portion of any battle when interacting through quasi-anonymous forums is not to lose your cool? 

The principle seems to apply in real life interactions, too... that is assuming that you are a person rather than a bot.

[wugibugi]

Breaking 24777$ prediction game      FINAL LIST       

UPDATE     AND GOOD LUCK  !!!

lets keep the price going almost half way of the target to reach here

Can you insert my vote for 20/7/18?
Thanks

[Toxic2040]

    FINAL LIST       

Can you insert my vote for 20/7/18?
Thanks

Its the goose's game..but, it pretty much says right there..

Otherwise..welcome to the Wall...now go away and make sure you bring cookies next time.

[jbreher]

Really, why are we arguing ANYTHING when CONSENSUS already spoke?

Well, it would seem to be because you barged into a conversation where I was trying to get my accuser to clarify their accusation. We wouldn't be arguing anything at all if you had not.

BTAIM, your points all seem to come down to some magic power of consensus. Is it your assertion that any use of a coin other than that gifted with the consensus of the majority is inherently a scam? If not, I fail to see what your point is. If so, I'll just call you a petty tyrant for forcing others to conform to your desires and be on my way.

[jbreher]

The bottom line is that if the wallet you use can't process pre-fork coins then it is not bitcoin.

Relevance?

Everyone who had coins before the fork.

I still don't see what you're getting at.

Look we all see through you. Just fuck off.

Haha. See through me? What do you see on the other side? Can you substantiate it with anything other than your superman x-ray specs? Just fuck off yourself.

This is the problem with arguing on the internet. If we were all meeting in person, this is the point where you would be punched in the face for being unable to take a hint. And not even necessarily by me.

People like you never admit fault or that the opposition has a point, you just keep talking and talking until people get tired. Doesn't work in the real world, does work where no physical contact is possible. This is your home field.

The thing is, even if we were all meeting in person, I might be tolerated in some small fashion. But even people who don't like me don't like you. You are simply not welcome here.

waaah.