Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2021, 01:29:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: New ATH today?
Yes - 25 (75.8%)
No - 8 (24.2%)
Total Voters: 33

Pages: « 1 ... 19919 19920 19921 19922 19923 19924 19925 19926 19927 19928 19929 19930 19931 19932 19933 19934 19935 19936 19937 19938 19939 19940 19941 19942 19943 19944 19945 19946 19947 19948 19949 19950 19951 19952 19953 19954 19955 19956 19957 19958 19959 19960 19961 19962 19963 19964 19965 19966 19967 19968 [19969] 19970 19971 19972 19973 19974 19975 19976 19977 19978 19979 19980 19981 19982 19983 19984 19985 19986 19987 19988 19989 19990 19991 19992 19993 19994 19995 19996 19997 19998 19999 20000 20001 20002 20003 20004 20005 20006 20007 20008 20009 20010 20011 20012 20013 20014 20015 20016 20017 20018 20019 ... 29706 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25462167 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (157 posts by 13+ users deleted.)
Jacques_Bittard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10

.


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:18:26 AM

It's no point in trying to argue that the hashrate will drop together with the price.
We can jut look at the hashrate history and see that IT DOES NOT DROP together with the price: https://charts.bitcoin.com/chart/hash-rate

Miners are tied down and they continue production with a loss, just because they share the same foolish dream, that bitcoin is too big to fail. But the costs will eventually payed one way or another.
1634736591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634736591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634736591
Reply with quote  #2

1634736591
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1634736591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634736591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634736591
Reply with quote  #2

1634736591
Report to moderator
1634736591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634736591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634736591
Reply with quote  #2

1634736591
Report to moderator
1634736591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634736591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634736591
Reply with quote  #2

1634736591
Report to moderator
criptix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:21:26 AM

Which is why difficulty can fall my dear boy.  

Difficulty may fall, but the amount of equipment built won't fall. Bitcoiners are dumb thinking that difficulty just drops and some people just turn off their machinery. Who will those people be? Most of the bitcoin mining is done by specialized mining companies, that have a very specific business plan and expectations. These companies will go as much in debt as possible, just to keep the machines alive, because considering production logic, just turning off the purchased machinery is the worst option.
First ones to fall will be those, who will run out of credit and their collected coins "that were meant to be sold in better times" will be dumped on the market by bankruptcy proceedings. This will in turn create a chain reaction of price dropping more together with difficulty.
Bitcoin mining is heavily flawed because it's too expensive and it's attributes create an instability timebomb. Satoshi may have been a good coder but he was pretty dumb in economics and finance.

PoW mining would only work if it wouldn't be cheaper to mass-produce coins. Then decentralization would also work. Rewarding mass production PoW mining is idiocy at it's best.

The bigger the mining operation the greater part of mined coins get wold asap to pay mining expenses.

Private miners are the people who holdand sit on losses.

Coins will only be sold if the current price is in a profitable level. If it isn't, then those coins are stored and the expenses are covered with debt.
This will create an illusion of bigger value, since the coins are stored not sold, but this illusion will drop very quickly as soon as the miners run out of credit before the coins become profitable again.


Yep and this is much more likely for private miners then big mining operations.

The expenses and possible losses are much greater for big mining operations.

Mining at a loss is not feasible and will inevitably lead to closure which leads to lower difficulity and to new mining operations.

The mining space is not homogenous.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:21:34 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their revenue, you numpty.  Those miners should’ve been paid off a long time ago. Once it stops being profitable, they can just walk away.

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.
Jacques_Bittard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10

.


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:24:24 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 4918


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:25:17 AM

Pigs will always get slaughtered, and everyone who expected the bullrun to just continue after 2017 Dec, were greedy little pigs who got what they deserve. Same here, with pigs thinking that every little spike upwards marks a trend reversal to a new bullrun. These pigs will also get slaughtered. Everything is the same as 2014.

I nominate JayJuanGee for Lord of the Pigs.

Explain ur selfie roachie poachie.

What makes me a BIG pig, exactly?   

Don't I have a sustainable strategy that involves accumulation of BTC by buying when the price goes down and selling when the price goes up?  Is there something greedy about that?

Am I not gambling on every little turn of the BTC price by attempting to bet everything in one direction or another, but instead I am employing, incrementalism in my buy/sell approach, no?

Are you dissing me, because I don't buy into your more, supposedly conservative, PM point of view that actually doesn't really seem to hold value too well?

It seems that I don't follow your specific "knowledgeable" writings enough in order to understand how you would be arriving at your seemingly nonsensical conclusion to classify me as a kind of BIG pig within the subject matter of this thread.  Explain ur selfie.
Jacques_Bittard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10

.


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:27:23 AM

Pigs will always get slaughtered, and everyone who expected the bullrun to just continue after 2017 Dec, were greedy little pigs who got what they deserve. Same here, with pigs thinking that every little spike upwards marks a trend reversal to a new bullrun. These pigs will also get slaughtered. Everything is the same as 2014.

I nominate JayJuanGee for Lord of the Pigs.

Explain ur selfie roachie poachie.

What makes me a BIG pig, exactly?   

Don't I have a sustainable strategy that involves accumulation of BTC by buying when the price goes down and selling when the price goes up?  Is there something greedy about that?

Am I not gambling on every little turn of the BTC price by attempting to bet everything in one direction or another, but instead I am employing, incrementalism in my buy/sell approach, no?

Are you dissing me, because I don't buy into your more, supposedly conservative, PM point of view that actually doesn't really seem to hold value too well?

It seems that I don't follow your specific "knowledgeable" writings enough in order to understand how you would be arriving at your seemingly nonsensical conclusion to classify me as a kind of BIG pig within the subject matter of this thread.  Explain ur selfie.

I think that with less caffeine you would be normal.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:28:13 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

I can keep the entire Bitcoin network afloat on my laptop with a low enough difficulty. What’s your point?
Jacques_Bittard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10

.


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:29:21 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

I can keep the entire Bitcoin network afloat on my laptop with a low enough difficulty. What’s your point?

My point is that you probably will in the future.
criptix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:29:31 AM

$300 ETH soon

Yep we back at .055 again.

Im seeing that we might even retest .045 lol coz btc is going down.

#rip eth

Maybe you are saying this wrong?

Surely, there is a certain dynamic in which surely bitcoin is the leader, but still bitcoin seems to have some trouble recovering in part because there seems to be some need to shake some of these snot-nosed 13 year olds.... so if weak hands are being shook in the alts - including ETH.. then bitcoin is drug down a bit with them... even while bitcoin remains the pillar of fundamentals.. .. so yeah.... how far will bitcoin be drug down in this quagmire?  Will ETH find a bottom that is in the triple digits... or does it have to go lower..?  If ETH goes that low, will it drag bitcoin down with it too, somewhat?  

At some point bitcoin is likely to recover based on fundamentals, but many of the shit coin scams may bounce back with it, unless the pain of this particular correction is more harsh and enduring upon those shit coins.

Wrt ETH i think it was obvious because majority of the ICO's will need to liquidate at one point which would lead to a fall.

Shitcoins are just a way to increase your BTC holdings - in the future i imagine only a handful on altcoins that will survive:

Micro transactions, anonymity, smart conracts and x.
pacman7331
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 118



View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:31:18 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

HOLY FUCK!!!
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:31:48 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

I can keep the entire Bitcoin network afloat on my laptop with a low enough difficulty. What’s your point?

My point is that you probably will in the future.

It will be just me and my 5 million pals. Which apparently will not include you.

I would be OK if Bitmain went broke.
Jacques_Bittard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10

.


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:36:21 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

Exactly. There is no option for stability and keeping present value. It either has to expand, or it will start shrinking very quickly. It's really like a pyramid scheme in that manner.
If coin production would cost less, then the price would drop as long as the speculators are selling and then it would stop. With high production costs it won't stop, but will squeeze every juice out of this thing as possible.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 4918


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:46:13 AM

There is a break down on a weak bear flag which has confirmed the process, expect Bitcoin to drop up to 7,200$ (or even more) but we can expect Bitcoin to bounce right back up again in 7,400$ (although this bounce probability is low). The MACD bullish crossover was not enough to stop the break down formed in the hourly chart but the crossover is a sign that Bitcoin could be back on a bullish trend in a short period. Cutting losses now might now be a good option as we don't know how deep will it fall or will it even fall.

Everything that you say makes sense, except for your seemingly nonsensical assertion about "cutting losses"... that seems stupid, from my perspective.

Why would anyone sell based on if there is uncertainty about the price going down, instead of just preparing to buy if the price goes lower?  In other words, if you were going to sell, you should have already sold ... but I know peeps like to wait until they see down movement and then sell, which seems to be very risky for causing selling towards the bottom rather than the opposite of buying as it goes down.

Anyhow, just a differing approach, I suppose... so I won't harp on your point, here, too much.    for now...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Dakustaking76
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 575
Merit: 267


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:48:27 AM

Maybe someone remember we dipped to €4700 2 months ago ore something
That was the bottom, maybe iT Will break this time?


I hope not Ofcourse But were still bleeding in 3 months now...
pacman7331
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 118



View Profile
March 29, 2018, 07:57:47 AM
Last edit: March 29, 2018, 08:15:20 AM by pacman7331

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

Exactly. There is no option for stability and keeping present value. It either has to expand, or it will start shrinking very quickly. It's really like a pyramid scheme in that manner.
If coin production would cost less, then the price would drop as long as the speculators are selling and then it would stop. With high production costs it won't stop, but will squeeze every juice out of this thing as possible.

There is stability for those who bought at 250.
They couldn’t care less if it was 20k or 7k.
But, People invest in bitcoin because of the volitility.

I don’t care if mining plantations go into debt.
They don’t have to do that.  But the price of mining sets the bottom price of bitcoin’s value.
If it goes below yea they have to either get a loan or stop mining. Thus the price will either bottom or go down and bring difficulty down.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 08:11:36 AM
Merited by criptix (1)

When the pink wojacks appear on /biz/ is usually a sign of a local bottom. About now it may make a double bottom.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 4918


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 08:11:56 AM

Pigs will always get slaughtered, and everyone who expected the bullrun to just continue after 2017 Dec, were greedy little pigs who got what they deserve. Same here, with pigs thinking that every little spike upwards marks a trend reversal to a new bullrun. These pigs will also get slaughtered. Everything is the same as 2014.

I nominate JayJuanGee for Lord of the Pigs.

Explain ur selfie roachie poachie.

What makes me a BIG pig, exactly?   

Don't I have a sustainable strategy that involves accumulation of BTC by buying when the price goes down and selling when the price goes up?  Is there something greedy about that?

Am I not gambling on every little turn of the BTC price by attempting to bet everything in one direction or another, but instead I am employing, incrementalism in my buy/sell approach, no?

Are you dissing me, because I don't buy into your more, supposedly conservative, PM point of view that actually doesn't really seem to hold value too well?

It seems that I don't follow your specific "knowledgeable" writings enough in order to understand how you would be arriving at your seemingly nonsensical conclusion to classify me as a kind of BIG pig within the subject matter of this thread.  Explain ur selfie.

I think that with less caffeine you would be normal.

How would you know what is normal or not?  Are you distractedly referring to my avatar again?  GET A FUCKING GRIP... trolltard, I mean, Jacques Bittard, retard....
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 4918


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 08:14:34 AM

$300 ETH soon

Yep we back at .055 again.

Im seeing that we might even retest .045 lol coz btc is going down.

#rip eth

Maybe you are saying this wrong?

Surely, there is a certain dynamic in which surely bitcoin is the leader, but still bitcoin seems to have some trouble recovering in part because there seems to be some need to shake some of these snot-nosed 13 year olds.... so if weak hands are being shook in the alts - including ETH.. then bitcoin is drug down a bit with them... even while bitcoin remains the pillar of fundamentals.. .. so yeah.... how far will bitcoin be drug down in this quagmire?  Will ETH find a bottom that is in the triple digits... or does it have to go lower..?  If ETH goes that low, will it drag bitcoin down with it too, somewhat?  

At some point bitcoin is likely to recover based on fundamentals, but many of the shit coin scams may bounce back with it, unless the pain of this particular correction is more harsh and enduring upon those shit coins.

Wrt ETH i think it was obvious because majority of the ICO's will need to liquidate at one point which would lead to a fall.

Shitcoins are just a way to increase your BTC holdings - in the future i imagine only a handful on altcoins that will survive:

Micro transactions, anonymity, smart conracts and x.


All fine and dandy to have various altcoins serving as testbeds for the various technological and practical concepts of microtransactions, anonymity, smart contracts, etc.. but bitcoin can do all of that, too, no?
pacman7331
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 118



View Profile
March 29, 2018, 08:18:09 AM
Last edit: March 29, 2018, 08:35:27 AM by pacman7331

Maybe someone remember we dipped to €4700 2 months ago ore something
That was the bottom, maybe iT Will break this time?


I hope not Ofcourse But were still bleeding in 3 months now...

The 6k usd bitcoin was based in a lot of FUD everyone banning it.
So for us to go below we need more fud.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 4918


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 29, 2018, 08:19:06 AM

Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

Exactly. There is no option for stability and keeping present value. It either has to expand, or it will start shrinking very quickly. It's really like a pyramid scheme in that manner.
If coin production would cost less, then the price would drop as long as the speculators are selling and then it would stop. With high production costs it won't stop, but will squeeze every juice out of this thing as possible.

Do you realize, you seemingly dimwitted trolljob, that there has been a price battle in bitcoin that has been going on for several years now, and it has periods of greater intensity.

Furthermore, with s-curve adoption, there are going to be a large number of price finding attempts at various points, which just means both up and down volatility.. while at the same time upwards price appreciation, that is still manipulated down from time to time, even while the price is largely heading exponentially upwards...

Hopefully, you are smart enough to both get paid in bitcoin for your stupid-ass trolling job, and not to really buy into the bullshit that you are propagating because you really cannot believe the nonsense that you are attempting to spread, can you?
Pages: « 1 ... 19919 19920 19921 19922 19923 19924 19925 19926 19927 19928 19929 19930 19931 19932 19933 19934 19935 19936 19937 19938 19939 19940 19941 19942 19943 19944 19945 19946 19947 19948 19949 19950 19951 19952 19953 19954 19955 19956 19957 19958 19959 19960 19961 19962 19963 19964 19965 19966 19967 19968 [19969] 19970 19971 19972 19973 19974 19975 19976 19977 19978 19979 19980 19981 19982 19983 19984 19985 19986 19987 19988 19989 19990 19991 19992 19993 19994 19995 19996 19997 19998 19999 20000 20001 20002 20003 20004 20005 20006 20007 20008 20009 20010 20011 20012 20013 20014 20015 20016 20017 20018 20019 ... 29706 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!