Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bitserve]

Has anybody here ever bought BSV?

Please, be honest guys. I could do with a good laugh.

Don't be coy. You *know* I did.

Laugh all you want.

Just getting started.

Looks like it turned out to be a good trade (speculation wise) but... I have to ask, you still a firm believer of BSV?

I mean, considering who are the main promoters (CSW, Ayre, etc) and all the circus that surrounds them... Haven't you had a second thought on the matter?

Don't you think it is a house of cards about to fall any moment from now?

OTH, I still think what you are doing is hedging a more than profitable position in any case. Which could be reasonable in YOUR case. Insurance has a cost.

[JayJuanGee]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

I am skeptical that there would be more than one gal/chick in the whole of crypto...  

Perhaps everyone else knows this too, so that is why no one here has been able to dance into an attempted answer of your question, so far...  You have really stumped the chumps, this time.     

[bitserve]

^ Please don't feed the troll. Thanks. ^

[bitebits]

This is big:

A new Bitcoin boom?Grayscale reports record crypto investments for 2019

Digital currency manager Grayscale took in $607 million of investments in 2019, an amount that outstripped its collective inflows of the previous five years.

From their report:

Most significant asset raising year in Grayscale’s history: Investment for FY19, totaled $607.7 million, surpassed combined investment into all Grayscale’s products from 2013 through 2018.
Largest quarterly investment to Grayscale® Bitcoin Trust ever: With $193.8 in 4Q19, investment into Grayscale Bitcoin Trust exceeded the $171.7 million in investment raised in 3Q19.

The current situation is this one:



Please note the relative size of Bitcoin Investments comparet to shitcoins.

So back of the envelope calculations:

USD 607 millions@BTCUSD8,000 means roughly 75,000 bitcoins were bought this year.
After the halving each year 6.25*24*365 Bitcoins will be mined.
This means Greyscale alone more than 20% of Bitcoins.

How cannot be bullish?
This is Stock to Flow in full power!

Maths are hard
6.25*6*24*365

but yeah the point stands. Can't wait till ETF

Source: https://grayscale.co/insights/grayscale-q4-2019-digital-asset-investment-report/

(you can enter fake data to download the full pdf report)

[Cryptotourist]

You must be a faggot, didn't you say when you first appeared, that the offer is on limited time, and once expired you would go - never to be seen again?

How are we supposed to trust you, you toothless faggot?
(don't get confident now, I was just making a point)

[Cryptotourist]

^ Please don't feed the troll. Thanks. ^

I'll ignore him now.

edit:

[d_eddie]

....... the real value of the BTC is definitely BTC+BCH+BSV (+BTG and other offsprings), so they say, which is at least true for unclaimed coins mined before the chainsplit(s).......

Seems like a real erroneous way of thinking about these matters.

Who fucking cares if some coins share a transactional history with bitcoin?  It is nearly irrelevant.  It does not mean much if anything in terms of actual value.  We should have learned that, after the bcash fork.

I think @makrospex's assessment is correct.  Consider the difference in value between btc in addresses that haven't moved since before the bch fork and btc minted today.  You can still extract BCH, BSV, BTG, and so on from the former, but not from the latter.

Which of course doesn't imply bcash & co. are more than altcoins.

[VB1001]

Ha ha, I hear the hammer, it's on its way.

[VB1001]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

[d_eddie]

You must be a faggot, didn't you say when you first appeared, that the offer is on limited time, and once expired you would go - never to be seen again?

How are we supposed to trust you, you toothless faggot?
(don't get confident now, I was just making a point)

Hard sarcastic blow!
Toothless faggot delivers...


...better you-know-whats




#haiku

TL;DR Being toothless can be a selling point sometimes.

[d_eddie]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

[d_eddie]

Who is US ? Your headmates ?

Or the United States (to inflate USD just a little bit more)? 

[VB1001]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

lol, I explained myself badly, the first one who would have said that the WO symbol was in the picture, I, would have given him 1 sM.

[buyinbtc]

$100,000.00 per BTC ?
Keep day dreaming, you need US for that to happen !

Who is US ? Your headmates ?

Lol, can imagine his reaction to your comment being this:

[kurious]

From V8 (who is just being launched into cyberspace):

https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/former-cftc-chair-launches-the-digital-dollar-project.htm

[kurious]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

From V8, somewhere out in the ether:


"The one on the left with no clothes on is Leah Wald
https://twitter.com/LeahWald

and the one in the yellow is Elizabeth Stark
https://twitter.com/starkness


Leah Wald (@LeahWald) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Leah Wald (@LeahWald). Entrepreneur x #Bitcoin Enthusiast | Co-founder of @Veterati | fmr Economist at @WorldBank | Writer for @Forbes | Partner at Lucid Investments. Singapore

elizabeth stark (@starkness) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from elizabeth stark (@starkness). big fan of the internet. like building things. cofounder @lightning labs, fellow @coincenter. taught @stanford + @yalelawtech. sf + brooklyn"

[Cryptotourist]

TL;DR Being toothless can be a selling point sometimes.

Yeah, so much for the toothbrush position.
I wonder if there's another urban sex act term, which defines the toothless situation of our cuntonian friend.

Epiphany! Sperm boarding.

[kurious]

Channeling one more from V8 (seems he can't do the WO with his space suit on):

https://static.bitwiseinvestments.com/Research/Bitwise-Research-ETF-Trends-2020.pdf

v bullish

"Among the surveyed advisors who have allocations to crypto in client portfolios, 42% intend to increase their clients’ allocation to crypto in the next 12 months, and 58% intend to hold that position steady. None of the advisors with positions today intend to decrease or eliminate their position in the next year."

[JayJuanGee]

Channeling one more from V8 (seems he can't do the WO with his space suit on):

https://static.bitwiseinvestments.com/Research/Bitwise-Research-ETF-Trends-2020.pdf

v bullish

"Among the surveyed advisors who have allocations to crypto in client portfolios, 42% intend to increase their clients’ allocation to crypto in the next 12 months, and 58% intend to hold that position steady. None of the advisors with positions today intend to decrease or eliminate their position in the next year."

I quickly glanced at that publication/survey.

My main criticism of the whole survey and approach would be its failure/refusal to distinguish bitcoin from crypto or at least define what the fuck is "crypto."  

So in some sense we don't really know what the fuck they are asking about in their survey questions, do we?  

Implicitly they are referring to bitcoin, but that surely seems a bit unclear from the wording of the vast majority of their questions.. with this amorphous concept of "crypto".

[rdbase]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here).  Relevant crypto women, on the other hand, are rare enough, so the two visible chicks made me curious. I wondered if they're just random bimbos with photoshopped bodies or actual significant voices in the choir.

From V8, somewhere out in the ether:


"The one on the left with no clothes on is Leah Wald
https://twitter.com/LeahWald

and the one in the yellow is Elizabeth Stark
https://twitter.com/starkness

Leah Wald (@LeahWald) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Leah Wald (@LeahWald). Entrepreneur x #Bitcoin Enthusiast | Co-founder of @Veterati | fmr Economist at @WorldBank | Writer for @Forbes | Partner at Lucid Investments. Singapore

elizabeth stark (@starkness) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from elizabeth stark (@starkness). big fan of the internet. like building things. cofounder @lightning labs, fellow @coincenter. taught @stanford + @yalelawtech. sf + brooklyn"

So this is a "Wheres waldo?" of the cryptoworld type meme. Very interesting now to look at it more in-depth.
Thanks!
I knew I merited it for some reason I didnt realize at the time other than for entertainment purposes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53615001#msg53615001

7 pages of this photo and nobody saw the WO, just come to the girls.

The WO sign is so prominent in the foreground that it seemed to need no additional highlight (especially here). 

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure it went unnoticed, if someone had commented, I would have won 1 sM.

I didn't merit you only because I'm short, and you're well above 1k already!

I gave him 3.