Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 08:39:25 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Price Target for Nov. 30, 2024:
<$75K - 2 (2.9%)
$75K to $80K - 1 (1.5%)
$80K to $85K - 2 (2.9%)
$85K to $90K - 8 (11.8%)
$90K to $95K - 12 (17.6%)
$95K to $100K - 12 (17.6%)
>$100K - 31 (45.6%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 25521 25522 25523 25524 25525 25526 25527 25528 25529 25530 25531 25532 25533 25534 25535 25536 25537 25538 25539 25540 25541 25542 25543 25544 25545 25546 25547 25548 25549 25550 25551 25552 25553 25554 25555 25556 25557 25558 25559 25560 25561 25562 25563 25564 25565 25566 25567 25568 25569 25570 [25571] 25572 25573 25574 25575 25576 25577 25578 25579 25580 25581 25582 25583 25584 25585 25586 25587 25588 25589 25590 25591 25592 25593 25594 25595 25596 25597 25598 25599 25600 25601 25602 25603 25604 25605 25606 25607 25608 25609 25610 25611 25612 25613 25614 25615 25616 25617 25618 25619 25620 25621 ... 33938 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26494910 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 4756


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:41:59 AM

Congratulations to the Vegeta meme winner!
Missed you both by a fucking second.

Now if we look closely, AlcoHoDL's Bitstamp screenshot is a few seconds earlier that ivomm's.
That's because ivomm edited the Vegeta post to add the Bitstamp screenshot after he posted the Vegeta.

I was thinking about that tbh. Whether I should do the same or not.
I'm not trying to say ivomm did something wrong, I'm just stating the facts, cos LFC asked for a clear picture.
For myself they are both winners.

I also thought about this, but decided it would not be fair to use BitcoinTalk's grace period to edit my post and add the screenshot after the fact.

So I just posted both in one shot, and NEVER hit the Edit button. The timestamps on the screenshots confirm this as you say.

Anyway, it's LFC's call.

And strictly speaking, the game is still on!
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 08:44:02 AM



You are in fact too early. The price was not OVER $9000. Wink
Damn! that was too close. It took me few minutes to figure out! How come it did not cross $9k!
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 4756


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:47:27 AM

You are in fact too early. The price was not OVER $9000. Wink
Damn! that was too close. It took me few minutes to figure out! How come it did not cross $9k!

It's because of the big walls at round numbers. It's more difficult to cross round numbers like $9000, $10000, etc.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1539


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:48:45 AM
Merited by infofront (1), FullNode (1)

Congratulations to the Vegeta meme winner!
Missed you both by a fucking second.

Now if we look closely, AlcoHoDL's Bitstamp screenshot is a few seconds earlier that ivomm's.
That's because ivomm edited the Vegeta post to add the Bitstamp screenshot after he posted the Vegeta.

I was thinking about that tbh. Whether I should do the same or not.
I'm not trying to say ivomm did something wrong, I'm just stating the facts, cos LFC asked for a clear picture.
For myself they are both winners.

I also thought about this, but decided it would not be fair to use BitcoinTalk's grace period to edit my post and add the screenshot after the fact.

So I just posted both in one shot, and NEVER hit the Edit button. The timestamps on the screenshots confirm this as you say.

Anyway, it's LFC's call.

And strictly speaking, the game is still on!

I can confirm I saw your post with the graph and no graph on Ivom's one. Unfortunately I didn't quote his post to see if maybe he added an image that wasn't being displayed for some reason. Next time I refreshed it was there.

Anyway, from what I SAW, you had the price graph (which also seems to have been snapshoted at an earlier time) and Ivomn didn't.

Maybe Ivomn can confirm if he added the graph later or not. Also even if he did... maybe that is in accordance to the rules? Donno, LFC's call!

And also, has the price CROSSED $9K? LOL

P.S.: This is my nº 5000 shitpost!!!! WEEEEEEEEEEEEE Tongue
Cryptotourist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 755


Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:54:14 AM

I can confirm I saw your post with the graph and no graph on Ivom's one. Unfortunately I didn't quote his post to see if maybe he added an image that wasn't being displayed for some reason. Next time I refreshed it was there.

Exactly what I saw also.
Obviously we were both trying to post a Vegeta meme at that time.

Guys, it was $9k, not over $9k.
If I was LFC, the GAME would be ON. Grin
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1539


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:55:07 AM

You are in fact too early. The price was not OVER $9000. Wink
Damn! that was too close. It took me few minutes to figure out! How come it did not cross $9k!

It's because of the big walls at round numbers. It's more difficult to cross round numbers like $9000, $10000, etc.

Considering BTC wasn't able to surpass the wall at exactly $9000 I guess it cannot be considered it "crossed" it, yeah.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2702
Merit: 13408


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:55:30 AM
Merited by LFC_Bitcoin (1)

Though I think LFC meant 9K maybe written a bit wrong

But we get the point not??

Also clever notice by vroom, but I think he meant 9K

Aaaaaand damn ivomm was fast
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10458


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:55:42 AM
Merited by Globb0 (5), El duderino_ (5), ivomm (2), Hueristic (1), BitcoinGirl.Club (1), AlcoHoDL (1), bitserve (1), makrospex (1)

OK!
After talking about this privately with a couple of high ranking WO’s we declare ivomm as the winner.

Please PM me a bitcoin address.

(I meant $9000 hence the Vegeta meme - sorry about the ‘over’ confusion/technicality)

Edit - Just saw this

Congratulations to the Vegeta meme winner!
Missed you both by a fucking second.

Now if we look closely, AlcoHoDL's Bitstamp screenshot is a few seconds earlier that ivomm's.
That's because ivomm edited the Vegeta post to add the Bitstamp screenshot after he posted the Vegeta.

I was thinking about that tbh. Whether I should do the same or not.
I'm not trying to say ivomm did something wrong, I'm just stating the facts, cos LFC asked for a clear picture.
For myself they are both winners.

AlcoHoDL - Also winner - Please PM with address.
I can’t decide or split you!
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 08:57:29 AM

OK!
After talking about this privately with a couple of high ranking WO’s we declare ivomm as the winner.

Please PM me a bitcoin address.

(I meant $9000 hence the Vegeta meme - sorry about the ‘over’ confusion/technicality)
WEEEEE!!!
It was fun. Congrats ivomm.
makrospex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 317


nothing to see here


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:59:01 AM

OK!
After talking about this privately with a couple of high ranking WO’s we declare ivomm as the winner.

Please PM me a bitcoin address.

(I meant $9000 hence the Vegeta meme - sorry about the ‘over’ confusion/technicality)

Edit - Just saw this

Congratulations to the Vegeta meme winner!
Missed you both by a fucking second.

Now if we look closely, AlcoHoDL's Bitstamp screenshot is a few seconds earlier that ivomm's.
That's because ivomm edited the Vegeta post to add the Bitstamp screenshot after he posted the Vegeta.

I was thinking about that tbh. Whether I should do the same or not.
I'm not trying to say ivomm did something wrong, I'm just stating the facts, cos LFC asked for a clear picture.
For myself they are both winners.

clearly deserved it. We don't even know if it was 0.00001 over $9k, so...
Congrats Smiley
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10458


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 08:59:14 AM
Merited by BitcoinGirl.Club (2), bitserve (1)

OK!
After talking about this privately with a couple of high ranking WO’s we declare ivomm as the winner.

Please PM me a bitcoin address.

(I meant $9000 hence the Vegeta meme - sorry about the ‘over’ confusion/technicality)
WEEEEE!!!
It was fun. Congrats ivomm.

And AlcoHoDL

I edited post
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 08:59:38 AM

Aaaaaand damn ivomm was fast
It's because I was too lazy to leave my bed 😉
Anyway, the patience was well paid. And good work LFC.
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 09:01:33 AM

AlcoHoDL - Also winner - Please PM with address.
I can’t decide or split you!
Congrats AlcoHoDL!
LFC gone extra mile!!

And AlcoHoDL

I edited post

And gave you my last two LOL

LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10458


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 09:03:14 AM

AlcoHoDL - Also winner - Please PM with address.
I can’t decide or split you!
Congrats!
LFC gone extra mile!!

And AlcoHoDL

I edited post

And gave you my last two LOL



It I was running mic’s game there would be ONE winner Cheesy
Cryptotourist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 755


Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 09:04:41 AM

I can’t decide or split you!

Nicely done, player. Cool
makrospex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 317


nothing to see here


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 09:07:01 AM

AlcoHoDL - Also winner - Please PM with address.
I can’t decide or split you!
Congrats!
LFC gone extra mile!!

And AlcoHoDL

I edited post

And gave you my last two LOL



It I was running mic’s game there would be ONE winner Cheesy

It is one.
But it's two prices.
imho
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 09:07:21 AM

It I was running mic’s game there would be ONE winner Cheesy
When it's split of a second then it's hard to decide but I am blown away with your move of making both of them winners. This is next level.
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785


Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 09:10:50 AM
Last edit: May 15, 2023, 11:05:58 AM by BitcoinGirl.Club

Mempool is pumping LOL



https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,2h

rdbase
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1585


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2020, 09:12:23 AM

Congratulations to the Vegeta meme winner!
Missed you both by a fucking second.

Now if we look closely, AlcoHoDL's Bitstamp screenshot is a few seconds earlier that ivomm's.
That's because ivomm edited the Vegeta post to add the Bitstamp screenshot after he posted the Vegeta.

I was thinking about that tbh. Whether I should do the same or not.
I'm not trying to say ivomm did something wrong, I'm just stating the facts, cos LFC asked for a clear picture.
For myself they are both winners.
I like LFC decision to split it not equally but to give each $50.
That is classy man! Good on you for hodling the competition keeping us on our toes and out of HODL sleep
as El Duderino would say r.i.p McGossens..
you will be missed and we barely even knew you.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11177


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 09:12:37 AM



Edit:  By the way my sub $9k incremental sell orders just filled, next ones at $9,200-ish.... easy peasy... little by little.. sell, sell, sell as the price goes up, but only a little.  That's the mindless system that always attempts to stay ahead of the price moves... The price comes to your sell/buy orders, you do not go to the price..  It's making money in your sleep (kind of), as long as the underlying asset ultimately goes up..

Mines too. Now putting some buy orders at around $8.5-8.6K for the same amount.

Same as you, this has nothing to do with where I do think the price is going next. Scalping needs no feelings. It only needs some (almost unpredictible) sideways volatility.

Yep.. in these order settings, we are attempting to take advantage of BTC's almost inevitable short-term volatility like unemotional bots in regards to setting our orders.. and even willing to leave all of the fiat behind, in the event that BTC prices just happen to go shooting all the way to $20k or some other ungodly and non-returnable spot. 

Currently, my buy/sell spread is a bit larger than yours which causes it to fill less often on the swings, and surely that part is discretionary and one that I have been attempting to move more and more towards increasing the spreads (sometimes I will adjust them back to smaller amounts, but I am happy with my current spreads), and so in that regard, my buy orders that correspond with the sub $9k sales start at a bit above $8,100..... .  My increments tend to be in the $200 to $250 range currently, but if the price goes down, the increments start to get smaller and if the price goes up, they tend to increase to $500 and then $1,000 and then even greater than that by the time we get back to the ATH territory.. (that is if we get there)

Sometimes I will go back and readjust some of the buy orders that I already set that go further back and were based on earlier sales in order to balance out my buy back amounts or my buy back increments... so sometimes I might go back to reset the increments and the amounts for all of the buy orders down to $7k or $6k  or some other price point in order to attempt to even them out in a way that makes me feel MOAR gooder in a kind of discretionary way.. or even in a way that considers or reconsiders whether I am covered all the way back down to $4k or $3k or whatever extreme low that I don't consider to be likely but I consider to be necessary to consider preparing for, just in case. 

Also, at some point, I might decide to discontinue preparing for $4k or $3k and only prepare for $6k, but surely we are NOT even close to being at a place where i would decide to discontinue preparing for $4k or $3k.  Maybe if we get above $15k, I might decide to ONLY prepare for $5k.. Will cross that bridge when we get there (if we get there).

By the way, when i started doing this, at $250-ish, my spreads were only like  $20 and my increments might have been $5 or so.  Of course, prices have caused my increments and my spreads to get BIGGER, but in early days of my trading, I also had a lot of tighter increments and even lower profit margins because I wanted to get a lot of practice.  After a while, I felt that I did not need as much practice, so part of the justification for increasing the spreads and the increments.
Pages: « 1 ... 25521 25522 25523 25524 25525 25526 25527 25528 25529 25530 25531 25532 25533 25534 25535 25536 25537 25538 25539 25540 25541 25542 25543 25544 25545 25546 25547 25548 25549 25550 25551 25552 25553 25554 25555 25556 25557 25558 25559 25560 25561 25562 25563 25564 25565 25566 25567 25568 25569 25570 [25571] 25572 25573 25574 25575 25576 25577 25578 25579 25580 25581 25582 25583 25584 25585 25586 25587 25588 25589 25590 25591 25592 25593 25594 25595 25596 25597 25598 25599 25600 25601 25602 25603 25604 25605 25606 25607 25608 25609 25610 25611 25612 25613 25614 25615 25616 25617 25618 25619 25620 25621 ... 33938 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!