Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2018, 08:22:36 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.1 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 210358 times)
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 385


View Profile
June 07, 2018, 08:58:28 AM
 #3301

Hi DSTM! can I find out if Zhash(144.5) support will be and how soon?
ZHash is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).
It would be possible to make ZM compatible.

1529655756
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529655756

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529655756
Reply with quote  #2

1529655756
Report to moderator
1529655756
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529655756

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529655756
Reply with quote  #2

1529655756
Report to moderator
The World's Betting Exchange

Bet with play money. Win real Bitcoin. 5BTC Prize Fund for World Cup 2018.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1529655756
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529655756

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529655756
Reply with quote  #2

1529655756
Report to moderator
teammaf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 02:20:53 AM
 #3302

Yeah any word from the DEV/Dev's of coins about the potential Equihash forks? Is it going to be the same for all coins or whos using what and will you be on board with your miner.


When all is said and done, more is said than done.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 106


View Profile
June 08, 2018, 10:40:56 PM
 #3303

msi gtx Duke 1080 OC +150 core +600 mem @ 70% Power

GPU0  52C  Sol/s: 580.0  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 580.0
d4v1dv00
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 09, 2018, 12:51:49 PM
 #3304

Try run with config file, without additional command line params.

I just tried it with this line in the zm.cfg file: intensity=0:0.5

Its still around 25% loaded with about a quarter of the Sol/s.

I share the same here.
chaostic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 2


View Profile
June 09, 2018, 03:35:44 PM
 #3305

msi gtx Duke 1080 OC +150 core +600 mem @ 70% Power

GPU0  52C  Sol/s: 580.0  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 580.0

You must be aiming for conserving power because my 1070 ti gets 560ish souls 194/900 89% TPD 4 souls/watt is nice tho i guess
Elange
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 09, 2018, 10:32:19 PM
 #3306

Hi DSTM.

Is it possible to use same GPU numbering as system (Linux for me?). Its too hard to identify GPUs if a GPU throws an error.
Also, is it possible to keep the old format for --temp-limit NN to apply it to ALL GPUs?

Thanks!
EPEMA
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 4


View Profile
June 11, 2018, 11:45:55 AM
 #3307

Hi DSTM! can I find out if Zhash(144.5) support will be and how soon?
ZHash is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).
It would be possible to make ZM compatible.
I join the question of ZHash support (Equihash 144,5)
 We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team ...
WR-104
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2018, 07:37:01 PM
 #3308

Quote
GPU0  63C  75% |  536.7 Sol/s   540.8 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.36 S/W  158 W |  0.35  100  124
plz tell me what is 75% in this output?
Morama
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 11, 2018, 07:49:11 PM
 #3309

Quote
GPU0  63C  75% |  536.7 Sol/s   540.8 Avg   289.0 I/s | 3.36 S/W  158 W |  0.35  100  124
plz tell me what is 75% in this output?
Fan Speed Smiley

6-GPU Rigs: Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 5 / MSI Z97-G45
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 106


View Profile
June 11, 2018, 09:51:09 PM
 #3310

msi gtx Duke 1080 OC +150 core +600 mem @ 70% Power

GPU0  52C  Sol/s: 580.0  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 580.0

You must be aiming for conserving power because my 1070 ti gets 560ish souls 194/900 89% TPD 4 souls/watt is nice tho i guess

Yup.  Trying to keep the Efficiency high.  Doesn't make sense to burn more power these days for a few additional Sols.
hnbee
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 11, 2018, 10:52:45 PM
 #3311

It will be great if you adapt the miner to ZHash.

Honeybee Token | hnbee.io
jack09006
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 12, 2018, 04:24:51 AM
 #3312

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...
rbrtbnnrmn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 12, 2018, 11:40:17 PM
 #3313

0.6.0 works great with simplemining on various pools. when i try to use 0.6.1 it does not seem to work very well. most of the cards are under performing by quite a bit. any ideas what is going on ?  all the same 1070 8gb cards and overclock settings

0.6.0


_ GPU3 53C Sol/s: 442.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 448.3 I/s: 240.2 Sh: 47.18 1.00 21
_ GPU0 54C Sol/s: 443.3 Sol/W: 4.25 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 238.6 Sh: 57.57 1.00 31
_ GPU4 54C Sol/s: 436.4 Sol/W: 4.23 Avg: 433.9 I/s: 233.2 Sh: 57.55 1.00 29
_ GPU8 59C Sol/s: 432.2 Sol/W: 4.22 Avg: 433.8 I/s: 233.6 Sh: 63.42 1.00 21
_ GPU9 46C Sol/s: 451.3 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 448.4 I/s: 240.9 Sh: 41.52 1.00 22
_ GPU2 53C Sol/s: 439.0 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 442.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 51.86 1.00 28
_ GPU5 51C Sol/s: 446.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.9 I/s: 239.6 Sh: 33.41 1.00 27
_ GPU7 55C Sol/s: 443.6 Sol/W: 4.24 Avg: 444.8 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 49.51 1.00 28
_ GPU6 51C Sol/s: 450.1 Sol/W: 4.29 Avg: 448.9 I/s: 239.1 Sh: 37.95 1.00 21
_ GPU1 52C Sol/s: 444.8 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.7 I/s: 238.8 Sh: 39.03 1.00 21
_ GPU10 54C Sol/s: 448.8 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 55.26 1.00 39
_ GPU11 47C Sol/s: 442.8 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 450.3 I/s: 241.1 Sh: 43.83 1.00 29
========== Sol/s: 5322.0 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 5336.0 I/s: 2855.5 Sh: 578.09 1.00 26


0.6.1

_ GPU6 52C 70% | 391.1 Sol/s 391.1 Avg 208.5 I/s | 3.73 S/W 108 W | 59.79 100 27
_ GPU3 53C 70% | 455.7 Sol/s 455.7 Avg 245.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 102 W | 50.63 100 28
_ GPU1 52C 70% | 454.2 Sol/s 454.2 Avg 243.7 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 76.15 100 29
_ GPU4 54C 70% | 454.8 Sol/s 454.8 Avg 238.6 I/s | 4.34 S/W 104 W | 78.39 100 26
_ GPU7 55C 70% | 150.2 Sol/s 150.2 Avg 82.0 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 25.24 100 32
_ GPU8 59C 70% | 373.5 Sol/s 373.5 Avg 199.9 I/s | 3.42 S/W 97 W | 39.10 100 31
_ GPU2 53C 70% | 449.7 Sol/s 449.7 Avg 241.4 I/s | 4.36 S/W 103 W | 39.05 100 24
_ GPU0 54C 70% | 458.9 Sol/s 458.9 Avg 243.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 73.80 100 26
_ GPU5 51C 70% | 164.1 Sol/s 164.1 Avg 85.8 I/s | 1.90 S/W 90 W | 25.29 100 28
_ GPU9 46C 70% | 145.3 Sol/s 145.3 Avg 77.3 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 18.40 100 24
_ GPU10 54C 70% | 372.3 Sol/s 372.3 Avg 200.5 I/s | 3.44 S/W 112 W | 53.06 100 28
_ GPU11 45C 70% | 128.4 Sol/s 128.4 Avg 69.6 I/s | 1.52 S/W 78 W | 16.02 100 24
============== | 3998.3 Sol/s 3998.3 Avg 2136.2 I/s | 3.25 S/W 1200 W | 554.91 100 27
paranoid247
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2018, 01:57:03 AM
 #3314

anyone else noticed the price drop in zec. how low will it go with asic mining taking over?
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 11


View Profile
June 13, 2018, 05:12:16 AM
 #3315

anyone else noticed the price drop in zec. how low will it go with asic mining taking over?

Yep.. both my miners are almost 1000 sol/s lower.. but the graph on flypool looks higher.  Not sure what is up.

I bet Nviidia is in on this too.  Why would they not be.   They want us to buy newer cards to drive up their stocks, especially since it's a slow time on their graphs on the 'in between' of new cards coming out. 
paranoid247
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2018, 08:01:49 AM
 #3316

further pushes out the roi on my 3 GTX 1080's
CarlOrff
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 384



View Profile
June 13, 2018, 09:27:44 AM
 #3317

@DSTM
I use your miner since the begining.

For information : with the last version, the 6.1, I have some disconnections by my pool (4 or 5 since the release of this version, the pool is SuprNova) that I haven't with previous versions. I am back to the 6.0 : not matter.

My Request : I am a BTCz supporter and I mine only this EquiHash coin, not others. This coin will fork on sunday because the ASICs. The fork is a variant of EquiHash : ZHash. It would be nice if your miner would be ZHash compatible. If not, I will mine BTCz with an other miner, but I would be sad to leave you ;-).

Bitcoin + privacy respect = BitcoinZ (topic BitcoinZ)
The only decentralized crypto that complements Bitcoin on privacy.
You missed Bitcoin in 2009 ? Do not miss BitcoinZ in 2018 !
chaostic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 2


View Profile
June 13, 2018, 04:46:54 PM
 #3318

0.6.0 works great with simplemining on various pools. when i try to use 0.6.1 it does not seem to work very well. most of the cards are under performing by quite a bit. any ideas what is going on ?  all the same 1070 8gb cards and overclock settings

0.6.0


_ GPU3 53C Sol/s: 442.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 448.3 I/s: 240.2 Sh: 47.18 1.00 21
_ GPU0 54C Sol/s: 443.3 Sol/W: 4.25 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 238.6 Sh: 57.57 1.00 31
_ GPU4 54C Sol/s: 436.4 Sol/W: 4.23 Avg: 433.9 I/s: 233.2 Sh: 57.55 1.00 29
_ GPU8 59C Sol/s: 432.2 Sol/W: 4.22 Avg: 433.8 I/s: 233.6 Sh: 63.42 1.00 21
_ GPU9 46C Sol/s: 451.3 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 448.4 I/s: 240.9 Sh: 41.52 1.00 22
_ GPU2 53C Sol/s: 439.0 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 442.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 51.86 1.00 28
_ GPU5 51C Sol/s: 446.9 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.9 I/s: 239.6 Sh: 33.41 1.00 27
_ GPU7 55C Sol/s: 443.6 Sol/W: 4.24 Avg: 444.8 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 49.51 1.00 28
_ GPU6 51C Sol/s: 450.1 Sol/W: 4.29 Avg: 448.9 I/s: 239.1 Sh: 37.95 1.00 21
_ GPU1 52C Sol/s: 444.8 Sol/W: 4.28 Avg: 447.7 I/s: 238.8 Sh: 39.03 1.00 21
_ GPU10 54C Sol/s: 448.8 Sol/W: 4.21 Avg: 445.0 I/s: 236.8 Sh: 55.26 1.00 39
_ GPU11 47C Sol/s: 442.8 Sol/W: 4.33 Avg: 450.3 I/s: 241.1 Sh: 43.83 1.00 29
========== Sol/s: 5322.0 Sol/W: 4.26 Avg: 5336.0 I/s: 2855.5 Sh: 578.09 1.00 26


0.6.1

_ GPU6 52C 70% | 391.1 Sol/s 391.1 Avg 208.5 I/s | 3.73 S/W 108 W | 59.79 100 27
_ GPU3 53C 70% | 455.7 Sol/s 455.7 Avg 245.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 102 W | 50.63 100 28
_ GPU1 52C 70% | 454.2 Sol/s 454.2 Avg 243.7 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 76.15 100 29
_ GPU4 54C 70% | 454.8 Sol/s 454.8 Avg 238.6 I/s | 4.34 S/W 104 W | 78.39 100 26
_ GPU7 55C 70% | 150.2 Sol/s 150.2 Avg 82.0 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 25.24 100 32
_ GPU8 59C 70% | 373.5 Sol/s 373.5 Avg 199.9 I/s | 3.42 S/W 97 W | 39.10 100 31
_ GPU2 53C 70% | 449.7 Sol/s 449.7 Avg 241.4 I/s | 4.36 S/W 103 W | 39.05 100 24
_ GPU0 54C 70% | 458.9 Sol/s 458.9 Avg 243.5 I/s | 4.36 S/W 104 W | 73.80 100 26
_ GPU5 51C 70% | 164.1 Sol/s 164.1 Avg 85.8 I/s | 1.90 S/W 90 W | 25.29 100 28
_ GPU9 46C 70% | 145.3 Sol/s 145.3 Avg 77.3 I/s | 1.61 S/W 95 W | 18.40 100 24
_ GPU10 54C 70% | 372.3 Sol/s 372.3 Avg 200.5 I/s | 3.44 S/W 112 W | 53.06 100 28
_ GPU11 45C 70% | 128.4 Sol/s 128.4 Avg 69.6 I/s | 1.52 S/W 78 W | 16.02 100 24
============== | 3998.3 Sol/s 3998.3 Avg 2136.2 I/s | 3.25 S/W 1200 W | 554.91 100 27


It looks like the OverClock settings did not apply, try reapplying clock settings, I have had this happen to me a few times on 0.6.1 with windows, i Reapply clock settings etc... and it generally will fix it sometimes i reboot just to refresh things then reapply clocks, try that man =p
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 11


View Profile
June 14, 2018, 05:24:55 AM
 #3319

I'd like to see some asic miners reply here.. and to see if they are actually mining zcash. 
BlackwidowZA
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 14, 2018, 06:42:01 AM
 #3320

I'd like to see some asic miners reply here.. and to see if they are actually mining zcash. 


Well I am still waiting for my Z9 but will be pointing it to ZEN to get enough coins for my node
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!