[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)

[vuquanict]

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 

[1714529153]

1714529153

[1714529153]

1714529153

[1714529153]

1714529153

[MrTDHP]

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 

A wide range, but my MSI Gaming X gives 590-600 on 100%, +120/+300

[NoOneLt]

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???  

6xGigabyte 1080 auorus, very slight OC 1900/4950 GPU/MEM 70% limit

[wong8632]

May i know the formula of 2% dev-fee.

Is sol/s *0.98 or etc.

Someone can tell me. Thanks!

[bluepr0]

Just a feature request... would be great to get coloured output so it's easier to read

[Jughead1220]

Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash?  Thank you

[bluepr0]

Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash?  Thank you

I know you can do it with EWFB... not sure about this one but it's just a matter of change the pool and try it!

[unique83]

Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash?  Thank you

You can use it for any equihash coin

[Jughead1220]

As I try to run it suprnova in zen cash it gives me "the code execution cannot proceed because VCRUNTIME140.ddl was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem.... I am running win 10. Thank you and sorry for the trouble

[MagicSmoker]

As I try to run it suprnova in zen cash it gives me "the code execution cannot proceed because VCRUNTIME140.ddl was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem.... I am running win 10. Thank you and sorry for the trouble

Did you even do a google search on the missing dll (not ddl)? If you had you would have learned that it is component of the Visual C++ runtime library which can be downloaded from here:

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2977003/the-latest-supported-visual-c-downloads

[Blast77]

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 

I have a rig of 8x 1080 (non-ti), they are Gigabyte GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC.  On average I would say they run in the 560's and 570's.  I have seen them as low as 550's and as high as 590.

Currently: 581 576 576 573 580 576 569 576

[markAVT]

Hi guys! I have a question regarding MSI 1060 6gb Gaming X. Whenever I set my Power Limit(watt) on my MSI 1060 6gb on SMOS using dstm v0.5.7, It always shows "applying limit for GPU1 100" even though I set it to 60w on smos. My 1070 and 1080Ti works fine with the power limit and show on the screen the limit I applied to it....

SMOS OC setting on dstm v0.5.7 https://imgur.com/a/XIf7l

GPU0:1080Ti
GPU1,2: 1060 6G https://imgur.com/a/topF9
GPU3: 1070

I have been searching through reddit but can't find anything regarding this issue.

[SpecterHome]

Hi, DSTM.
Recv 10054 is a network, I think I fix it.
Now 10053 visits me (but its very rare). Is this a network problem too?
Send timeout is network too? (I changed WiFi adapter from noname to HighPower Tplink and dont see send timeout for a couple of days)
2018-01-22 19:11:54|#  recv failed: 10053
2018-01-22 19:11:54|#  reconnecting
2018-01-22 19:12:07|#  connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
2018-01-22 19:12:10|#  server set difficulty to: 0004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0...
2018-01-22 19:12:34|>  GPU0  62C  Sol/s: 332.8  Sol/W: 2.95  Avg: 332.8  I/s: 178.5  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:35|>  GPU2  61C  Sol/s: 301.2  Sol/W: 3.60  Avg: 301.2  I/s: 163.4  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:36|>  GPU1  58C  Sol/s: 293.9  Sol/W: 3.43  Avg: 293.9  I/s: 159.3  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:36|>  GPU3  57C  Sol/s: 316.3  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 316.3  I/s: 167.9  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:38|>  GPU4  60C  Sol/s: 335.4  Sol/W: 3.63  Avg: 335.4  I/s: 180.0  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:40|>  GPU5  62C  Sol/s: 296.2  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 296.2  I/s: 162.8  Sh: 2.99   . .   +
2018-01-22 19:12:40|   ========== Sol/s: 1875.8 Sol/W: 3.40  Avg: 1875.8 I/s: 1011.8 Sh: 2.99   . . 
2018-01-22 19:12:45|#  send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:54|   GPU0  63C  Sol/s: 332.2  Sol/W: 2.94  Avg: 332.5  I/s: 176.8  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:55|   GPU2  61C  Sol/s: 302.7  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 302.0  I/s: 160.9  Sh: 1.49   . .   +
2018-01-22 19:12:55|#  send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56|#  send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56|   GPU1  61C  Sol/s: 291.8  Sol/W: 3.42  Avg: 292.9  I/s: 156.7  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:56|   GPU3  58C  Sol/s: 309.3  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 312.8  I/s: 165.8  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:12:58|   GPU4  60C  Sol/s: 339.4  Sol/W: 3.53  Avg: 337.4  I/s: 177.5  Sh: 1.50   . .   +
2018-01-22 19:13:00|   GPU5  63C  Sol/s: 289.6  Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 292.9  I/s: 161.0  Sh: 5.98   . .   +++
2018-01-22 19:13:00|   ========== Sol/s: 1865.0 Sol/W: 3.34  Avg: 1870.4 I/s: 998.5  Sh: 8.97   . . 
2018-01-22 19:13:08|#  send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:14|   GPU0  63C  Sol/s: 327.1  Sol/W: 2.92  Avg: 330.7  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:13:15|   GPU2  61C  Sol/s: 298.5  Sol/W: 3.44  Avg: 300.8  I/s: 159.9  Sh: 1.99   . .   +
2018-01-22 19:13:16|#  send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:16|   GPU1  61C  Sol/s: 293.8  Sol/W: 3.41  Avg: 293.2  I/s: 156.1  Sh: 0.00   . .   
2018-01-22 19:13:16|   GPU3  59C  Sol/s: 319.4  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 315.0  I/s: 165.4  Sh: 0.00   . .   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
========== Sol/s: 1882.1 Sol/W: 3.31  Avg: 1864.7 I/s: 1005.4 Sh: 6.80   0.99 100
2018-01-23 19:52:16|   GPU2  61C  Sol/s: 301.5  Sol/W: 3.33  Avg: 300.9  I/s: 163.1  Sh: 1.07   0.99 94 
2018-01-23 19:52:16|   GPU3  59C  Sol/s: 321.4  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 309.2  I/s: 168.6  Sh: 1.16   0.99 78 
2018-01-23 19:52:16|   GPU0  63C  Sol/s: 327.6  Sol/W: 3.04  Avg: 328.6  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 1.17   0.99 183
2018-01-23 19:52:28|cudaMemcpy 2 failed
This is an overclocking problem, I think? But what GPU? The numeration is similar to 0123?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And thew last question. My First rig running on a 0.5.7 and has a brilliant lost shares (0.6%)
uptime:     1 days  14:14:29
contime:     1 days  14:14:26
version:   zm 0.5.7
server:   eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ID   DEVICE NAME   °C   ∅ SOL/S   ∅ SOL/W   ∅ WATT   SHARES   LAT
0   GeForce GTX 1070   58   478.96   3.37   142.23   3962 / 26   78
1   GeForce GTX 1070   58   470.71   3.31   142.18   3917 / 26   78
2   GeForce GTX 1070   58   467.81   3.30   141.56   3911 / 30   78
3   GeForce GTX 1070   59   460.86   3.24   142.21   3843 / 30   78
4   GeForce GTX 1070   60   471.97   3.69   127.96   3979 / 22   78
Total   -   2350.32   3.38   696.13   19612 / 134   78
The second rig running on a 0.5.8 and has more than a 1 percent of lost shares, I change on 0.5.7 and will see (for now less than 1 percent).
Thanks.

[fecker]

Charging 2% here from all profits is just ridiculous , this guy is making millions monthly yet he hides behind anonymity and brilliant "customer service" (yes, you are paying him).

This pretty much.

Here its a working program for fee remove

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2800586.0

I DO hope you can get it working under Windows 10. Cheers 

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 

Yes, standard 1080 FE, running 0.9V(85% TDP), can get ez 2000MHz, but doing 1974MHz, watercooled, keeping it at about 37C, XOC bios(may affect sols in a negative way), +550 on mems.
Doing 570Sols with EKWB. DSTM is not good for GDDR5X cards(1080, 1080Ti).
If you can do 570 with EKWB with 0 fee, why would u do 570 x 0.98 (2% fee)= 558.6 with DSTM? Doesnt make sense.

[Kejvu]

anyone knows what is best mining pool for ZEN? Most profitable?

[siforek]

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

[betopica]

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

[siforek]

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

Yep same motherboard, never had this issue with any other miner but I'd love to get it working & get the extra sols. Anyone else have any ideas?

[MinerGTX]

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

I have the same problem.  With time, the miner just gets slower and slower... as if some lint was accumulating...but no errors are displayed, so I am blind to what's going on inside.

P.S.
Running 7x Nvidia 1080Ti, no overclocking, fans at 100%, temperatures no more than 63ºC

[jpl]

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

I have the same problem.  With time, the miner just gets slower and slower... as if some lint was accumulating...but no errors are displayed, so I am blind to what's going on inside.

P.S.
Running 7x Nvidia 1080Ti, no overclocking, fans at 100%, temperatures no more than 63ºC

All of you with slow miners.. have you installed Visual C++ runtime library? (from the Readme?),.. and how much ram do you have.  My miner with dstm runs great.