Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 07:31:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 224866 times)
sir_blacks
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 3


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 03:00:48 PM
 #2661

Can someone please explain me one thing.
When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate.
NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card.
If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue.
Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s

Defective card?

2018-02-19 17:47:37|   ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:47:42|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 700.6  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.9  I/s: 370.6  Sh: 0.18   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:43|   GPU1  53C  Sol/s: 371.2  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.1  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:47:45|   GPU2  68C  Sol/s: 756.9  Sol/W: 2.57  Avg: 755.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187 +
2018-02-19 17:47:47|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 735.8  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:48|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.7  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.36   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:47:50|   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 754.7  Sol/W: 2.61  Avg: 760.5  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.73   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:53|   GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 690.1  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 694.7  I/s: 372.7  Sh: 0.36   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:54|   GPU7  56C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.1  I/s: 407.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:57|   GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 751.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 754.9  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 769.0  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 406.4  Sh: 0.91   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:48:04|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 693.4  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.6  I/s: 370.9  Sh: 0.17   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:05|   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 370.9  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.2  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:48:07|   GPU2  69C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:09|   GPU3  65C  Sol/s: 742.9  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.17   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:10|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 753.4  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.3  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:13|>  GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 745.9  Sol/W: 2.60  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.68   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:15|>  GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 701.3  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 695.1  I/s: 373.0  Sh: 0.34   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:16|>  GPU7  57C  Sol/s: 759.3  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.0  I/s: 406.9  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:48:19|>  GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 758.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 755.1  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:21|>  GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 758.5  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.5  I/s: 406.1  Sh: 0.85   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:21|   ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92   1.00 184


@Shodo if that card alone run at max speed with out problem i doubt is Defective card or riser ... single issue what came in my mind is Power or miner have issue suport 10 card. Anyway i see you have 10 card, try to run with lower batch like 3 card, 4 card, 5 card & see if that wierd bug it happen & if it apear at some higher combo. IF bug is about to many card then single solution what i have in my mind to run 2 diferite miner sesion like 5 card to a pool 5 other to other pool ... or in any stable combo you find ... same i not think it need to be full restart your rig just stop miner & restart is inaff for testing special i see bug it strike fast under 2-3 min ...

cheers
1714548719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714548719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714548719
Reply with quote  #2

1714548719
Report to moderator
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714548719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714548719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714548719
Reply with quote  #2

1714548719
Report to moderator
1714548719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714548719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714548719
Reply with quote  #2

1714548719
Report to moderator
giveen1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 03:47:29 PM
 #2662

   GPU1  76C  Sol/s: 286.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 285.0  I/s: 154.4  Sh: 1.01   1.00 159 +
   GPU2  78C  Sol/s: 288.5  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 284.7  I/s: 153.8  Sh: 1.07   1.00 166
   GPU0  74C  Sol/s: 293.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 286.5  I/s: 155.0  Sh: 0.80   1.00 157 ++
   GPU4  76C  Sol/s: 281.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 284.2  I/s: 153.0  Sh: 0.91   1.00 141
   GPU5  75C  Sol/s: 291.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 284.4  I/s: 153.1  Sh: 1.00   1.00 161
   GPU3  77C  Sol/s: 287.3  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 285.8  I/s: 155.0  Sh: 1.13   1.00 154
   GPU6  77C  Sol/s: 283.9  Sol/W: 3.31  Avg: 280.2  I/s: 152.6  Sh: 0.98   1.00 156
   ========== Sol/s: 2012.5 Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 1990.7 I/s: 1076.9 Sh: 6.90   1.00 156

I personally would sacrifice a few sols to keep my temps below 70. I have 3 1060 3gb and get around 275 at stock. Are your cards too close together?

Try dropping your TDP and then upping your core clock to counter it.
XFNeo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 03:54:20 PM
 #2663

Can some one help me with json-rpc request on powershell?
I get error like:
Exception calling "GetResponse" with "0" argument(s): "The server committed a protocol violation. Section=ResponseStatusLine"
When use this code:
$url = "http://127.0.0.1:2222"
$command = '{"id":1, "method":"getstat"}'

$bytes = [System.Text.Encoding]::ASCII.GetBytes($command)
$web = [System.Net.WebRequest]::Create($url)
$web.Method = "POST"
$web.ContentLength = $bytes.Length
$web.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
$stream = $web.GetRequestStream()
$stream.Write($bytes,0,$bytes.Length)
$stream.close()

$reader = New-Object System.IO.Streamreader -ArgumentList $web.GetResponse().GetResponseStream()
$reader.ReadToEnd()
$reader.Close()

Or get The server committed a protocol violation. Section=ResponseStatusLine
When use this code:
$url = "http://127.0.0.1:2222"
$command = '{"id":1, "method":"getstat"}'
$result = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $Url -Method Post -ContentType "application/json-rpc" -Body $command
somethingiswrong
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 19, 2018, 05:19:47 PM
 #2664

Nice job with version 0.6!
And thx for the device name in the rpc report Smiley
Keep it up!
crypto4pizza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 05:52:57 PM
 #2665

Can someone please explain me one thing.
When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate.
NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card.
If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue.
Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s

Defective card?

2018-02-19 17:47:37|   ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:47:42|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 700.6  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.9  I/s: 370.6  Sh: 0.18   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:43|   GPU1  53C  Sol/s: 371.2  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.1  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:47:45|   GPU2  68C  Sol/s: 756.9  Sol/W: 2.57  Avg: 755.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187 +
2018-02-19 17:47:47|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 735.8  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:48|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.7  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.36   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:47:50|   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 754.7  Sol/W: 2.61  Avg: 760.5  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.73   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:53|   GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 690.1  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 694.7  I/s: 372.7  Sh: 0.36   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:54|   GPU7  56C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.1  I/s: 407.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:57|   GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 751.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 754.9  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 769.0  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 406.4  Sh: 0.91   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:48:04|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 693.4  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.6  I/s: 370.9  Sh: 0.17   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:05|   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 370.9  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.2  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:48:07|   GPU2  69C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:09|   GPU3  65C  Sol/s: 742.9  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.17   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:10|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 753.4  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.3  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:13|>  GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 745.9  Sol/W: 2.60  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.68   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:15|>  GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 701.3  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 695.1  I/s: 373.0  Sh: 0.34   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:16|>  GPU7  57C  Sol/s: 759.3  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.0  I/s: 406.9  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:48:19|>  GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 758.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 755.1  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:21|>  GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 758.5  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.5  I/s: 406.1  Sh: 0.85   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:21|   ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92   1.00 184


Hash will drop one one card in my rigs whenever I'm connected via an app remotely in Windows 10.  Not sure if this is the same scenario you're seeing.
korenchkin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 07:12:16 PM
 #2666

try gpuz,what it says in perfcap reason...
wetblanket
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 08:42:11 PM
 #2667

Can someone please explain me one thing.
When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate.
NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card.
If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue.
Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s

Defective card?

2018-02-19 17:47:37|   ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:47:42|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 700.6  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.9  I/s: 370.6  Sh: 0.18   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:43|   GPU1  53C  Sol/s: 371.2  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.1  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:47:45|   GPU2  68C  Sol/s: 756.9  Sol/W: 2.57  Avg: 755.6  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187 +
2018-02-19 17:47:47|   GPU3  64C  Sol/s: 735.8  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:48|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.7  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.36   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:47:50|   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 754.7  Sol/W: 2.61  Avg: 760.5  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.73   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:53|   GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 690.1  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 694.7  I/s: 372.7  Sh: 0.36   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:54|   GPU7  56C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.1  I/s: 407.2  Sh: 0.18   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:57|   GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 751.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 754.9  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.54   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 769.0  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 406.4  Sh: 0.91   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:59|   ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99   1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:48:04|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 693.4  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 698.6  I/s: 370.9  Sh: 0.17   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:05|   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 370.9  Sol/W: 1.96  Avg: 370.2  I/s: 199.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2018-02-19 17:48:07|   GPU2  69C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 755.2  I/s: 405.2  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:09|   GPU3  65C  Sol/s: 742.9  Sol/W: 2.70  Avg: 742.6  I/s: 398.2  Sh: 0.17   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:10|   GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 753.4  Sol/W: 2.71  Avg: 759.3  I/s: 405.8  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:13|>  GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 745.9  Sol/W: 2.60  Avg: 759.6  I/s: 408.4  Sh: 0.68   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:15|>  GPU6  66C  Sol/s: 701.3  Sol/W: 2.83  Avg: 695.1  I/s: 373.0  Sh: 0.34   1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:16|>  GPU7  57C  Sol/s: 759.3  Sol/W: 2.50  Avg: 761.0  I/s: 406.9  Sh: 0.34   1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:48:19|>  GPU8  55C  Sol/s: 758.9  Sol/W: 2.76  Avg: 755.1  I/s: 404.9  Sh: 0.51   1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:21|>  GPU9  62C  Sol/s: 758.5  Sol/W: 2.56  Avg: 759.5  I/s: 406.1  Sh: 0.85   1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:21|   ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65  Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92   1.00 184


Hash will drop one one card in my rigs whenever I'm connected via an app remotely in Windows 10.  Not sure if this is the same scenario you're seeing.

Sounds like it's pretty common? Maybe Remote Desktop uses the GPU itself as well. (see https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/7eattb/mining_causes_poor_remote_desktop_teamviewer/)

Improve mining pool share/hash rates with the aiostratum-proxy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3179895) stratum mining proxy.
powermickel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 08:47:27 PM
 #2668

Hi.
Sorry for this Noob Question  Undecided but do this miner works on MPH to mine Classic too?
haraujo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:07:18 PM
 #2669

Hello guys,
I have a question.

If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:

dstm's ZCash Cuda miner:
Contains 2% devfee.
Nicehash:
2% internal wallet fee

= 4%?
Pustul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:46:59 PM
 #2670

How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
 
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 09:52:34 PM
 #2671

How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
 
I point my rigs at miningrigrentals.com as a free hosted proxy service with backup pool support, easy pool switching without have to edit each individual rig's config and overview dashboard.

Quote
You never required to list your rig for rent. There is no fee to use our site/service for the miner controls or hash rate graphs.
Dr.Cupido
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:03:09 PM
 #2672

This is the result , I am getting in 1070 and 1060 6GB

GPU0  66C  Sol/s: 453.4  Sol/W: 3.80  Avg: 458.3  I/s: 243.3  Sh: 1.99   1.00 297 +
>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 336.7  Sol/W: 3.07  Avg: 339.8  I/s: 180.5  Sh: 0.99   1.00 268
>  GPU2  62C  Sol/s: 347.1  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 343.6  I/s: 182.7  Sh: 4.98   1.00 266 +

1060 3GB (hynix)

   GPU0  77C  Sol/s: 262.5  Sol/W: 3.39  Avg: 278.6  I/s: 139.6  Sh: 1.79   1.00 250
   GPU1  77C  Sol/s: 277.9  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 289.5  I/s: 150.5  Sh: 0.30   1.00 238
   GPU2  77C  Sol/s: 273.7  Sol/W: 3.29  Avg: 287.9  I/s: 145.5  Sh: 1.19   1.00 235
   GPU3  77C  Sol/s: 252.5  Sol/W: 3.46  Avg: 272.2  I/s: 133.4  Sh: 0.30   1.00 234
   GPU4  77C  Sol/s: 262.1  Sol/W: 3.36  Avg: 278.7  I/s: 142.5  Sh: 1.19   1.00 235
   GPU5  77C  Sol/s: 279.1  Sol/W: 3.28  Avg: 289.4  I/s: 150.0  Sh: 1.49   1.00 247
   GPU6  77C  Sol/s: 276.3  Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 287.5  I/s: 149.1  Sh: 0.30   1.00 247
   ========== Sol/s: 1884.1 Sol/W: 3.31  Avg: 1983.9 I/s: 1010.4 Sh: 6.57   1.00 240
Your 3GB 1060s are WAY TO HOT for 24\7. Where are you keeping them?
Also your results are too low for a 3GB 1060, something is very wrong with your setup.

blame hynix memory

1060  Hynix memory  DSTM 6.0
https://www.screencast.com/t/7LXoo6y282
Hi. What is your driver version?
I have 1060 3gb like yours. When i start zm. Hashrate is 310 sol. Then (after 1-2h) the hashrate will decrease to 260-270

Over 60° the cards start to throttle. Only 1-5 %. At 70° they throttle even more. Keep below 60° to get Full Power. Thats my experience with 3 setups with 1060 3/6GB, 1070TI and 1080TI.
And thats why your hashrate goes down after a while, cause VRMs/GPU and MEM is hot and the card slowy begin to throttle.

My setup after hours of mining:

ID   DEVICE NAME          °C   ∅ Sol/s   ∅ Sol/W   ∅ Watt
0   GeForce GTX 1080 Ti    50   652.34   4.11   158.67
1   GeForce GTX 1060 3G   50   277.33   3.86   71.92   
2   GeForce GTX 1070 Ti    52   491.61   4.58   107.23
3   GeForce GTX 1060 3G   49   274.56   3.83   71.74   
4   GeForce GTX 1060 3G   54   274.18   3.82   71.71   
5   GeForce GTX 1070 Ti    46   492.15   4.58   107.49
6   GeForce GTX 1060 3G   54   277.34   3.87   71.68   
Total   -                              2739.51   4.09   660.44   

The ambient temperature is 12° (thx winter)

Im using Win7 and the cards have these settings:

GTX 1060 3GB hynix: GPU +240 MEM +400 PL 60%
GTX 1070 TI : GPU +180 MEM +600 PL 60%
GTX 1080 TI : GPU +160 MEM -100 PL 60%

Theres a little room for stability. 1080 Ti runs since 1 year 24/7 with these settings without hassle. I prefer a rock stable system.
In a downtime you are losing money. So a little lower performance is okay for me.
Dr.Cupido
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:12:36 PM
 #2673

How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
 

The easy and fast way. Make a html file and paste this. edit ip settings and ur done
Code:
<html>
<head>
<title>Mining stats</title>
<meta>
</head>
<frameset rows="50%,50%">
  <frameset cols="50%,50%">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.80:2222/">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.99:2222/">
  </frameset>
  <frameset cols="50%,50%">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.90:2222/">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.89:2222/">
  </frameset>
</frameset>
</html>
maz_atenzamin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 10:46:47 PM
 #2674

Hi guys

quick question about <accepted shares ratio> <network latency in ms>

I have 2 rigs using DSTM on nicehash equihash

1st question, why my accepted shares ratio is 1.00 on one rig and my second rig is always under 1.00
2nd question is latency 125 on nicehash usa normal?
3rd one im also getting share above target once a while, why?

Rig1
https://gyazo.com/52243ff8fc874c5097d35133ce5e81c0

Rig2
https://gyazo.com/4280a16fca0fcef1556a01d7594db706

thanks
maz

can somebody help me here please?
anotherwave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 11:19:48 PM
 #2675

Hello guys,
I have a question.

If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:

dstm's ZCash Cuda miner:
Contains 2% devfee.
Nicehash:
2% internal wallet fee

= 4%?


You don't have to do anything they've already paid themselves.... lol.. but ya those are the fees.. i think nicehash takes more than just %2.. i think its %2 just to deposit into their wallet and then they charge again for a withdrawal i think.. Really you should steer clear of nicehash and use your own wallet and use whattomine to see whats the most profitable for your card/cards..
anotherwave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 11:24:55 PM
 #2676

Hi guys

quick question about <accepted shares ratio> <network latency in ms>

I have 2 rigs using DSTM on nicehash equihash

1st question, why my accepted shares ratio is 1.00 on one rig and my second rig is always under 1.00
2nd question is latency 125 on nicehash usa normal?
3rd one im also getting share above target once a while, why?

Rig1
https://gyazo.com/52243ff8fc874c5097d35133ce5e81c0

Rig2
https://gyazo.com/4280a16fca0fcef1556a01d7594db706

thanks
maz

1. shares ratio will sometimes be under 1.00 when you have a rejected share.. .99 is not a prob. if its worse than that maybe one of your cards is overclocked a little to much and is producing rejected shares from time to time.

2 i'm not sure about the ping it all depends where you live and your internet connection but 125ms isn't to bad

3. i don't know what you mean by share above target?

anotherwave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 11:31:01 PM
 #2677

Hi.
Sorry for this Noob Question  Undecided but do this miner works on MPH to mine Classic too?

Classic what? zclassic?  then yes.  This is a equihash miner so it will mine any coin based on the equihash algorithm no matter what pool its on in general..
haraujo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 11:39:55 PM
 #2678

Hello guys,
I have a question.

If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:

dstm's ZCash Cuda miner:
Contains 2% devfee.
Nicehash:
2% internal wallet fee

= 4%?


You don't have to do anything they've already paid themselves.... lol.. but ya those are the fees.. i think nicehash takes more than just %2.. i think its %2 just to deposit into their wallet and then they charge again for a withdrawal i think.. Really you should steer clear of nicehash and use your own wallet and use whattomine to see whats the most profitable for your card/cards..

Do you recommend any pool to equihash? For my GPU the best at this moment is EQUIHASH.
Pustul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 11:57:22 PM
 #2679

I point my rigs at miningrigrentals.com as a free hosted proxy service with backup pool support, easy pool switching without have to edit each individual rig's config and overview dashboard.

Quote
You never required to list your rig for rent. There is no fee to use our site/service for the miner controls or hash rate graphs.

That's a great idea, thanks!


The easy and fast way. Make a html file and paste this. edit ip settings and ur done
Code:
<html>
<head>
<title>Mining stats</title>
<meta>
</head>
<frameset rows="50%,50%">
  <frameset cols="50%,50%">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.80:2222/">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.99:2222/">
  </frameset>
  <frameset cols="50%,50%">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.90:2222/">
    <frame src="http://172.20.10.89:2222/">
  </frameset>
</frameset>
</html>

Not all my rigs are on the same LAN, but I like the idea
maz_atenzamin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 12:16:35 AM
 #2680

Hi guys

quick question about <accepted shares ratio> <network latency in ms>

I have 2 rigs using DSTM on nicehash equihash

1st question, why my accepted shares ratio is 1.00 on one rig and my second rig is always under 1.00
2nd question is latency 125 on nicehash usa normal?
3rd one im also getting share above target once a while, why?

Rig1
https://gyazo.com/52243ff8fc874c5097d35133ce5e81c0

Rig2
https://gyazo.com/4280a16fca0fcef1556a01d7594db706

thanks
maz

1. shares ratio will sometimes be under 1.00 when you have a rejected share.. .99 is not a prob. if its worse than that maybe one of your cards is overclocked a little to much and is producing rejected shares from time to time.

2 i'm not sure about the ping it all depends where you live and your internet connection but 125ms isn't to bad

3. i don't know what you mean by share above target?




thanks, share above target is one type of rejected shares reported by nicehash just like stale shares is another type
Pages: « 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!