sir_blacks
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 3
|
|
February 19, 2018, 03:00:48 PM |
|
Can someone please explain me one thing. When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate. NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card. If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue. Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s
Defective card?
2018-02-19 17:47:37| ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:47:42| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 700.6 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.9 I/s: 370.6 Sh: 0.18 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:43| GPU1 53C Sol/s: 371.2 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.1 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:47:45| GPU2 68C Sol/s: 756.9 Sol/W: 2.57 Avg: 755.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 + 2018-02-19 17:47:47| GPU3 64C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:48| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 761.2 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.7 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.36 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:47:50| GPU5 61C Sol/s: 754.7 Sol/W: 2.61 Avg: 760.5 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.73 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:53| GPU6 66C Sol/s: 690.1 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 694.7 I/s: 372.7 Sh: 0.36 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:54| GPU7 56C Sol/s: 758.7 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.1 I/s: 407.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:57| GPU8 55C Sol/s: 751.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 754.9 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:59| GPU9 62C Sol/s: 769.0 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 406.4 Sh: 0.91 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:59| ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:48:04| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 693.4 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.6 I/s: 370.9 Sh: 0.17 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:05| GPU1 54C Sol/s: 370.9 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.2 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:48:07| GPU2 69C Sol/s: 748.8 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:09| GPU3 65C Sol/s: 742.9 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.17 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:10| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 753.4 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.3 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:13|> GPU5 61C Sol/s: 745.9 Sol/W: 2.60 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.68 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:15|> GPU6 66C Sol/s: 701.3 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 695.1 I/s: 373.0 Sh: 0.34 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:16|> GPU7 57C Sol/s: 759.3 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.0 I/s: 406.9 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:48:19|> GPU8 55C Sol/s: 758.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 755.1 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:21|> GPU9 62C Sol/s: 758.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.5 I/s: 406.1 Sh: 0.85 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:21| ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92 1.00 184
@Shodo if that card alone run at max speed with out problem i doubt is Defective card or riser ... single issue what came in my mind is Power or miner have issue suport 10 card. Anyway i see you have 10 card, try to run with lower batch like 3 card, 4 card, 5 card & see if that wierd bug it happen & if it apear at some higher combo. IF bug is about to many card then single solution what i have in my mind to run 2 diferite miner sesion like 5 card to a pool 5 other to other pool ... or in any stable combo you find ... same i not think it need to be full restart your rig just stop miner & restart is inaff for testing special i see bug it strike fast under 2-3 min ... cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
giveen1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 03:47:29 PM |
|
GPU1 76C Sol/s: 286.3 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 285.0 I/s: 154.4 Sh: 1.01 1.00 159 + GPU2 78C Sol/s: 288.5 Sol/W: 3.28 Avg: 284.7 I/s: 153.8 Sh: 1.07 1.00 166 GPU0 74C Sol/s: 293.8 Sol/W: 3.26 Avg: 286.5 I/s: 155.0 Sh: 0.80 1.00 157 ++ GPU4 76C Sol/s: 281.8 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 284.2 I/s: 153.0 Sh: 0.91 1.00 141 GPU5 75C Sol/s: 291.0 Sol/W: 3.24 Avg: 284.4 I/s: 153.1 Sh: 1.00 1.00 161 GPU3 77C Sol/s: 287.3 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 285.8 I/s: 155.0 Sh: 1.13 1.00 154 GPU6 77C Sol/s: 283.9 Sol/W: 3.31 Avg: 280.2 I/s: 152.6 Sh: 0.98 1.00 156 ========== Sol/s: 2012.5 Sol/W: 3.27 Avg: 1990.7 I/s: 1076.9 Sh: 6.90 1.00 156
I personally would sacrifice a few sols to keep my temps below 70. I have 3 1060 3gb and get around 275 at stock. Are your cards too close together?
Try dropping your TDP and then upping your core clock to counter it.
|
|
|
|
XFNeo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 03:54:20 PM |
|
Can some one help me with json-rpc request on powershell? I get error like: Exception calling "GetResponse" with "0" argument(s): "The server committed a protocol violation. Section=ResponseStatusLine" When use this code: $url = " http://127.0.0.1:2222" $command = '{"id":1, "method":"getstat"}' $bytes = [System.Text.Encoding]::ASCII.GetBytes($command) $web = [System.Net.WebRequest]::Create($url) $web.Method = "POST" $web.ContentLength = $bytes.Length $web.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" $stream = $web.GetRequestStream() $stream.Write($bytes,0,$bytes.Length) $stream.close() $reader = New-Object System.IO.Streamreader -ArgumentList $web.GetResponse().GetResponseStream() $reader.ReadToEnd() $reader.Close() Or get The server committed a protocol violation. Section=ResponseStatusLine When use this code: $url = " http://127.0.0.1:2222" $command = '{"id":1, "method":"getstat"}' $result = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $Url -Method Post -ContentType "application/json-rpc" -Body $command
|
|
|
|
somethingiswrong
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 05:19:47 PM |
|
Nice job with version 0.6! And thx for the device name in the rpc report Keep it up!
|
|
|
|
crypto4pizza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 05:52:57 PM |
|
Can someone please explain me one thing. When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate. NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card. If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue. Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s
Defective card?
2018-02-19 17:47:37| ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:47:42| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 700.6 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.9 I/s: 370.6 Sh: 0.18 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:43| GPU1 53C Sol/s: 371.2 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.1 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:47:45| GPU2 68C Sol/s: 756.9 Sol/W: 2.57 Avg: 755.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 + 2018-02-19 17:47:47| GPU3 64C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:48| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 761.2 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.7 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.36 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:47:50| GPU5 61C Sol/s: 754.7 Sol/W: 2.61 Avg: 760.5 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.73 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:53| GPU6 66C Sol/s: 690.1 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 694.7 I/s: 372.7 Sh: 0.36 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:54| GPU7 56C Sol/s: 758.7 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.1 I/s: 407.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:57| GPU8 55C Sol/s: 751.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 754.9 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:59| GPU9 62C Sol/s: 769.0 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 406.4 Sh: 0.91 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:59| ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:48:04| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 693.4 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.6 I/s: 370.9 Sh: 0.17 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:05| GPU1 54C Sol/s: 370.9 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.2 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:48:07| GPU2 69C Sol/s: 748.8 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:09| GPU3 65C Sol/s: 742.9 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.17 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:10| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 753.4 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.3 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:13|> GPU5 61C Sol/s: 745.9 Sol/W: 2.60 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.68 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:15|> GPU6 66C Sol/s: 701.3 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 695.1 I/s: 373.0 Sh: 0.34 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:16|> GPU7 57C Sol/s: 759.3 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.0 I/s: 406.9 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:48:19|> GPU8 55C Sol/s: 758.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 755.1 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:21|> GPU9 62C Sol/s: 758.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.5 I/s: 406.1 Sh: 0.85 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:21| ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92 1.00 184
Hash will drop one one card in my rigs whenever I'm connected via an app remotely in Windows 10. Not sure if this is the same scenario you're seeing.
|
|
|
|
korenchkin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 07:12:16 PM |
|
try gpuz,what it says in perfcap reason...
|
|
|
|
wetblanket
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 2
|
|
February 19, 2018, 08:42:11 PM |
|
Can someone please explain me one thing. When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate. NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card. If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue. Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s
Defective card?
2018-02-19 17:47:37| ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:47:42| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 700.6 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.9 I/s: 370.6 Sh: 0.18 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:43| GPU1 53C Sol/s: 371.2 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.1 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:47:45| GPU2 68C Sol/s: 756.9 Sol/W: 2.57 Avg: 755.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 + 2018-02-19 17:47:47| GPU3 64C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:48| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 761.2 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.7 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.36 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:47:50| GPU5 61C Sol/s: 754.7 Sol/W: 2.61 Avg: 760.5 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.73 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:53| GPU6 66C Sol/s: 690.1 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 694.7 I/s: 372.7 Sh: 0.36 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:47:54| GPU7 56C Sol/s: 758.7 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.1 I/s: 407.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:57| GPU8 55C Sol/s: 751.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 754.9 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:47:59| GPU9 62C Sol/s: 769.0 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 406.4 Sh: 0.91 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:47:59| ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99 1.00 184 2018-02-19 17:48:04| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 693.4 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.6 I/s: 370.9 Sh: 0.17 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:05| GPU1 54C Sol/s: 370.9 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.2 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 2018-02-19 17:48:07| GPU2 69C Sol/s: 748.8 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:09| GPU3 65C Sol/s: 742.9 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.17 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:10| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 753.4 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.3 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:13|> GPU5 61C Sol/s: 745.9 Sol/W: 2.60 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.68 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:15|> GPU6 66C Sol/s: 701.3 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 695.1 I/s: 373.0 Sh: 0.34 1.00 172 2018-02-19 17:48:16|> GPU7 57C Sol/s: 759.3 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.0 I/s: 406.9 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 + 2018-02-19 17:48:19|> GPU8 55C Sol/s: 758.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 755.1 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187 2018-02-19 17:48:21|> GPU9 62C Sol/s: 758.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.5 I/s: 406.1 Sh: 0.85 1.00 188 2018-02-19 17:48:21| ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92 1.00 184
Hash will drop one one card in my rigs whenever I'm connected via an app remotely in Windows 10. Not sure if this is the same scenario you're seeing. Sounds like it's pretty common? Maybe Remote Desktop uses the GPU itself as well. (see https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/7eattb/mining_causes_poor_remote_desktop_teamviewer/)
|
Improve mining pool share/hash rates with the aiostratum-proxy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3179895) stratum mining proxy.
|
|
|
powermickel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 08:47:27 PM |
|
Hi. Sorry for this Noob Question but do this miner works on MPH to mine Classic too?
|
|
|
|
haraujo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 09:07:18 PM |
|
Hello guys, I have a question.
If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:
dstm's ZCash Cuda miner: Contains 2% devfee. Nicehash: 2% internal wallet fee
= 4%?
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
February 19, 2018, 09:46:59 PM |
|
How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
February 19, 2018, 09:52:34 PM |
|
How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
I point my rigs at miningrigrentals.com as a free hosted proxy service with backup pool support, easy pool switching without have to edit each individual rig's config and overview dashboard. You never required to list your rig for rent. There is no fee to use our site/service for the miner controls or hash rate graphs.
|
|
|
|
Dr.Cupido
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 10:03:09 PM |
|
This is the result , I am getting in 1070 and 1060 6GB
GPU0 66C Sol/s: 453.4 Sol/W: 3.80 Avg: 458.3 I/s: 243.3 Sh: 1.99 1.00 297 + > GPU1 66C Sol/s: 336.7 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 339.8 I/s: 180.5 Sh: 0.99 1.00 268 > GPU2 62C Sol/s: 347.1 Sol/W: 3.12 Avg: 343.6 I/s: 182.7 Sh: 4.98 1.00 266 +
1060 3GB (hynix)
GPU0 77C Sol/s: 262.5 Sol/W: 3.39 Avg: 278.6 I/s: 139.6 Sh: 1.79 1.00 250 GPU1 77C Sol/s: 277.9 Sol/W: 3.23 Avg: 289.5 I/s: 150.5 Sh: 0.30 1.00 238 GPU2 77C Sol/s: 273.7 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 287.9 I/s: 145.5 Sh: 1.19 1.00 235 GPU3 77C Sol/s: 252.5 Sol/W: 3.46 Avg: 272.2 I/s: 133.4 Sh: 0.30 1.00 234 GPU4 77C Sol/s: 262.1 Sol/W: 3.36 Avg: 278.7 I/s: 142.5 Sh: 1.19 1.00 235 GPU5 77C Sol/s: 279.1 Sol/W: 3.28 Avg: 289.4 I/s: 150.0 Sh: 1.49 1.00 247 GPU6 77C Sol/s: 276.3 Sol/W: 3.19 Avg: 287.5 I/s: 149.1 Sh: 0.30 1.00 247 ========== Sol/s: 1884.1 Sol/W: 3.31 Avg: 1983.9 I/s: 1010.4 Sh: 6.57 1.00 240
Your 3GB 1060s are WAY TO HOT for 24\7. Where are you keeping them? Also your results are too low for a 3GB 1060, something is very wrong with your setup. blame hynix memory 1060 Hynix memory DSTM 6.0 https://www.screencast.com/t/7LXoo6y282Hi. What is your driver version? I have 1060 3gb like yours. When i start zm. Hashrate is 310 sol. Then (after 1-2h) the hashrate will decrease to 260-270 Over 60° the cards start to throttle. Only 1-5 %. At 70° they throttle even more. Keep below 60° to get Full Power. Thats my experience with 3 setups with 1060 3/6GB, 1070TI and 1080TI. And thats why your hashrate goes down after a while, cause VRMs/GPU and MEM is hot and the card slowy begin to throttle. My setup after hours of mining: ID DEVICE NAME °C ∅ Sol/s ∅ Sol/W ∅ Watt 0 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 50 652.34 4.11 158.67 1 GeForce GTX 1060 3G 50 277.33 3.86 71.92 2 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 52 491.61 4.58 107.23 3 GeForce GTX 1060 3G 49 274.56 3.83 71.74 4 GeForce GTX 1060 3G 54 274.18 3.82 71.71 5 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 46 492.15 4.58 107.49 6 GeForce GTX 1060 3G 54 277.34 3.87 71.68 Total - 2739.51 4.09 660.44 The ambient temperature is 12° (thx winter) Im using Win7 and the cards have these settings: GTX 1060 3GB hynix: GPU +240 MEM +400 PL 60% GTX 1070 TI : GPU +180 MEM +600 PL 60% GTX 1080 TI : GPU +160 MEM -100 PL 60% Theres a little room for stability. 1080 Ti runs since 1 year 24/7 with these settings without hassle. I prefer a rock stable system. In a downtime you are losing money. So a little lower performance is okay for me.
|
|
|
|
Dr.Cupido
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 10:12:36 PM |
|
How can I monitor my rigs with this miner? Is there some free software or maybe a web page that I can setup to aggregate all my rigs in one place? Telemetry is nice but I would like to have the same basic thing with all my rigs in one page.
The easy and fast way. Make a html file and paste this. edit ip settings and ur done <html> <head> <title>Mining stats</title> <meta> </head> <frameset rows="50%,50%"> <frameset cols="50%,50%"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.80:2222/"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.99:2222/"> </frameset> <frameset cols="50%,50%"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.90:2222/"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.89:2222/"> </frameset> </frameset> </html>
|
|
|
|
maz_atenzamin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 10:46:47 PM |
|
can somebody help me here please?
|
|
|
|
anotherwave
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 11:19:48 PM |
|
Hello guys, I have a question.
If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:
dstm's ZCash Cuda miner: Contains 2% devfee. Nicehash: 2% internal wallet fee
= 4%?
You don't have to do anything they've already paid themselves.... lol.. but ya those are the fees.. i think nicehash takes more than just %2.. i think its %2 just to deposit into their wallet and then they charge again for a withdrawal i think.. Really you should steer clear of nicehash and use your own wallet and use whattomine to see whats the most profitable for your card/cards..
|
|
|
|
anotherwave
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 11:24:55 PM |
|
1. shares ratio will sometimes be under 1.00 when you have a rejected share.. .99 is not a prob. if its worse than that maybe one of your cards is overclocked a little to much and is producing rejected shares from time to time. 2 i'm not sure about the ping it all depends where you live and your internet connection but 125ms isn't to bad 3. i don't know what you mean by share above target?
|
|
|
|
anotherwave
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 11:31:01 PM |
|
Hi. Sorry for this Noob Question but do this miner works on MPH to mine Classic too? Classic what? zclassic? then yes. This is a equihash miner so it will mine any coin based on the equihash algorithm no matter what pool its on in general..
|
|
|
|
haraujo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2018, 11:39:55 PM |
|
Hello guys, I have a question.
If I use DSTM in NICEHASH, do I need to pay:
dstm's ZCash Cuda miner: Contains 2% devfee. Nicehash: 2% internal wallet fee
= 4%?
You don't have to do anything they've already paid themselves.... lol.. but ya those are the fees.. i think nicehash takes more than just %2.. i think its %2 just to deposit into their wallet and then they charge again for a withdrawal i think.. Really you should steer clear of nicehash and use your own wallet and use whattomine to see whats the most profitable for your card/cards.. Do you recommend any pool to equihash? For my GPU the best at this moment is EQUIHASH.
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
February 19, 2018, 11:57:22 PM |
|
I point my rigs at miningrigrentals.com as a free hosted proxy service with backup pool support, easy pool switching without have to edit each individual rig's config and overview dashboard. You never required to list your rig for rent. There is no fee to use our site/service for the miner controls or hash rate graphs.
That's a great idea, thanks! The easy and fast way. Make a html file and paste this. edit ip settings and ur done <html> <head> <title>Mining stats</title> <meta> </head> <frameset rows="50%,50%"> <frameset cols="50%,50%"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.80:2222/"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.99:2222/"> </frameset> <frameset cols="50%,50%"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.90:2222/"> <frame src="http://172.20.10.89:2222/"> </frameset> </frameset> </html>
Not all my rigs are on the same LAN, but I like the idea
|
|
|
|
maz_atenzamin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 12:16:35 AM |
|
1. shares ratio will sometimes be under 1.00 when you have a rejected share.. .99 is not a prob. if its worse than that maybe one of your cards is overclocked a little to much and is producing rejected shares from time to time. 2 i'm not sure about the ping it all depends where you live and your internet connection but 125ms isn't to bad 3. i don't know what you mean by share above target? thanks, share above target is one type of rejected shares reported by nicehash just like stale shares is another type
|
|
|
|
|