Bitcoin Forum
April 21, 2019, 05:03:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221812 times)
poby
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 11:00:45 PM
 #2621

The miner is now so stable and solid, I doubt there is much more that can be done to improve it.  That being the case, he should probably increase the fee to say 2.5% as the software is well and truly out of beta.  I get hashrates at least 4% better than the nearest competitor so I would accept a higher fee.  Can't say I would like it but I wouldn't complain about it as I am a firm supporter of capitalism and fees should be set as high as the market will bear.  Can't see any reason why he should lower the fee!  Doesn't make any sense at all to do so.
1555866224
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555866224

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555866224
Reply with quote  #2

1555866224
Report to moderator
100% New Software
PC, Mac, Android, & HTML5 Clients
Krill Rakeback
Low Rake
Bitcoin Poker 3.0
Bad Beat Jackpot
SwC Poker Relaunch
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1555866224
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555866224

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555866224
Reply with quote  #2

1555866224
Report to moderator
1555866224
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555866224

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555866224
Reply with quote  #2

1555866224
Report to moderator
gettilee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 01:47:00 AM
 #2622

The miner is now so stable and solid, I doubt there is much more that can be done to improve it.  That being the case, he should probably increase the fee to say 2.5% as the software is well and truly out of beta.  I get hashrates at least 4% better than the nearest competitor so I would accept a higher fee.  Can't say I would like it but I wouldn't complain about it as I am a firm supporter of capitalism and fees should be set as high as the market will bear.  Can't see any reason why he should lower the fee!  Doesn't make any sense at all to do so.

quite the opposite. the intent of a dev(eloper) fee is to develop and improve. if there is no more substantial improvements, then the fee should go down not up. we've been told dstm zm 6.0 would be out for a month now. its not here, why would the dev fee go up?

i'm all for projects removing dev fees from miners at this point. you are a moron if you think that a program author has rights to 2% (or more) of your hardware output without any regular updates/performance increases.
infectious
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 03:36:30 AM
 #2623

The miner is now so stable and solid, I doubt there is much more that can be done to improve it.  That being the case, he should probably increase the fee to say 2.5% as the software is well and truly out of beta.  I get hashrates at least 4% better than the nearest competitor so I would accept a higher fee.  Can't say I would like it but I wouldn't complain about it as I am a firm supporter of capitalism and fees should be set as high as the market will bear.  Can't see any reason why he should lower the fee!  Doesn't make any sense at all to do so.

What are you, his brother?
poby
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 03:40:09 AM
 #2624

The miner is now so stable and solid, I doubt there is much more that can be done to improve it.  That being the case, he should probably increase the fee to say 2.5% as the software is well and truly out of beta.  I get hashrates at least 4% better than the nearest competitor so I would accept a higher fee.  Can't say I would like it but I wouldn't complain about it as I am a firm supporter of capitalism and fees should be set as high as the market will bear.  Can't see any reason why he should lower the fee!  Doesn't make any sense at all to do so.

quite the opposite. the intent of a dev(eloper) fee is to develop and improve. if there is no more substantial improvements, then the fee should go down not up. we've been told dstm zm 6.0 would be out for a month now. its not here, why would the dev fee go up?

i'm all for projects removing dev fees from miners at this point. you are a moron if you think that a program author has rights to 2% (or more) of your hardware output without any regular updates/performance increases.

The sole purpose of a dev fee is to make the programmer as wealthy as possible.  That is the "intent".  That's it.  It's not a charity or a public service, it's supply of a product for whatever price the seller deems adequate.  The user has the sole option to use what is offered or not.

A program author has the absolute right to charge whatever fee he wants.  Nobody is forcing anyone to use his software.  You only have the right to use it or not use it.  Only a "moron" would think they have any right to dictate how much the programmer wishes to charge.
poby
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 03:41:04 AM
 #2625

The miner is now so stable and solid, I doubt there is much more that can be done to improve it.  That being the case, he should probably increase the fee to say 2.5% as the software is well and truly out of beta.  I get hashrates at least 4% better than the nearest competitor so I would accept a higher fee.  Can't say I would like it but I wouldn't complain about it as I am a firm supporter of capitalism and fees should be set as high as the market will bear.  Can't see any reason why he should lower the fee!  Doesn't make any sense at all to do so.

What are you, his brother?

Naah, I'm just a firm believer in capitalism.  Greed is good.  Greed works!  Without greed we would still be living in caves.
cryptoyes
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 259
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 03:57:25 AM
 #2626

The moronic aspect here, which has nothing to do with capitalism, is not which rights the dev or consumer have, but the encouragement of the dev to put up the fees because you can take it (*) ... this is made worse when support for the service provided on a subscription basis is lacking.

(*) Thank god there aren't many believers like you when it comes to politicians and policy makers.
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 04:49:19 AM
 #2627

The moronic aspect here, which has nothing to do with capitalism, is not which rights the dev or consumer have, but the encouragement of the dev to put up the fees because you can take it (*) ... this is made worse when support for the service provided on a subscription basis is lacking.

(*) Thank god there aren't many believers like you when it comes to politicians and policy makers.

+1
zder
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 01:33:43 PM
 #2628

Hi, I try to use --dev option, but it never works for me, can some one give me a sample?

I have tried --dev 0 1   --dev 0,1 , but it doesn't work, it always using all the GPUs.

This command does not work for me, I have 4 GPUs.

zm --server us1-zcash.flypool.org   --temp 65 --port 3333 --dev 0 1  --user t1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.wk1



Thanks!

Zder
coinzoid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 14, 2018, 05:30:33 PM
 #2629

Hello, can we use this miner to mine other Equihash algo coins? For instance ZCL?
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 05:31:19 PM
 #2630

Hello, can we use this miner to mine other Equihash algo coins? For instance ZCL?
Sure you can.
BitcoinSupremo
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 526

★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange


View Profile
February 14, 2018, 05:33:57 PM
 #2631

Switched my GTX 1060 from dual mining and moved on dstm miner in Nicehash, 634 sol/s for 2 cards of 3 GB memory. Pretty impressive and it is paying more now than dual mining. Well done.

matmator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459
Merit: 250

bou !


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 12:34:22 PM
 #2632

hello, how to delete this message please?


go to the moon !!
xyburcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 02:40:52 PM
 #2633

hello, how to delete this message please?



Message you posted here or the error in zm?

you cant delete the pop up error message, only you can stop it from happening by reducing your overclock.

Cheers!

Life is ours, we live it our way.
hyptis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 02:54:56 PM
 #2634

is there intensity parameter for gpu? some of my gpu not utilize full, so its a waste. but i couldn't find the parameter in dstm.
dvince
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 02:56:27 PM
 #2635

script for miner restart after gpu driver crash pls?
marco.ruiz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 03:57:25 PM
 #2636

script for miner restart after gpu driver crash pls?

Code:
:start
zm --server hostname --port port_nr --user user_name [--pass password] [options]
ping 127.0.0.1 -n 10 > nul
goto start

Use a ping after the crash to give it a little time to cool off.
bracinac
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 05:29:48 PM
 #2637

Code:
2036-02-07 07:51:45 AM|# connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
2036-02-07 07:51:46 AM|SSL_connect failed r:2 error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify fail
ed

Other rigs are connected, one refuse and I had to reboot rig.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 08:07:19 PM
 #2638

Sorry for not having answered you recent questions - I was very busy working on 0.6. I'll got through them later.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 08:09:10 PM
Merited by NameTaken (1)
 #2639

New Version 0.6

changelog
- failover pool support
- introduce configuration file
- introduce intensity option
- support per gpu temp-target via cfg-file
- support per gpu intensity via cfg-file
- json-rpc report gpu_name, pci_bus_id, pci_device_id
  gpu_uuid
- improve error reporting
- improve handling of invalid server resposes
- improve reconnection in cases where servers
  become reachable but respond with malformed data
- ui: add colorized output
- web-ui: use dark colors


0.6 contains a huge amount of changes, there are especially quite a lot internal changes - so please test before deploying.
Most notable in this release is failover pool support and the addition of configuration files. You can setup multiple pools in the configuration file. Configured pools are ordered by priority. ZM connects to the highest priority pool which is reachable. If a pool gets unreachable a lower priority pool will be used. ZM reconnects to a higher priority pool automatically if it gets reachable again, accepts your login and responds properly. A bad behaving server (which oscillates between being responsive / unresponsive states) might cause zm to oscillate between the servers - I'll look for ways to improve this in future releases.

There is also a way to reduce the load which is put on the gpu now. It's configured by the intensity option. It takes some time (about 30sec) till it starts reducing the gpu load since it needs to gather performance data first. The intensity option accepts values in the range ]0.0 - 1.0[. A value of 0.5 will roughly put a load of 50%.   

0.6 has also some ui changes. It supports colorized terminal output, webui uses dark colors now, since this was requested multiple times.

There are ofc multiple internal improvements all around the place, most notable better handling of invalid data and improved error reporting.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2018, 08:11:53 PM
 #2640

Woooohoooo! Hell Yeah DSTM! Will test it out right now.
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!