[ANN]PECULIUM - First Saving System in Crypto Driven by AI

[BaliScript]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

[Sozialtourist]

Peculium has been a good one, i kept getting the newsletter for weeks and i think that the ico will be successfull.
I got only one simple question, what exchangers will add the token as soon as the ico ends?
thanks

We wont know what exchanges will add peculium untill ICO finishes

yea. i will suggest that as the ico closing date is gradually coming to an end, they should create a pool for the community to vote for an exchange between now and january ending or ico ending. so that they can ensure they get listed on an exchange where most of thier investors are.

This sounds like a great idea, not only would another exchange be good, but you're letting the investors decide your "first" exchange listing.

This would be great for the project and the community - both are winners, would be good if this could be made possible - as everyone would be a "winner" in my eyes....

I guess they are already negotiating with several exchanges. It's not that easy like saying: 'Community voted for the tokens to be listed on Binance - Tomorrow it will be listed on Binance.' This all takes time but I am sure we'll see some good exchanges that'll add PCL after the ICO.

I dont know if it is true but I heard that exchanges flat-out ask 10-20 BTC payment for the listing of a new coin

That's true and it's why a lot of smaller projects wait for community votes to get on to some of the larger exchanges, there is currently a vote for Peculium to get listed on Cobinhood please vote here:

https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

Cobinhood is a brand new exchange. I am surprised to see that Peculium wants to get listed there. Atleast couple of days back, they don't want to talk about small exchanges. I think they want to make use all possible ways to list everywhere.

Yes Cobinhood is still a pretty new and small exchange, but just look at KuCoin. It's also a pretty new exchange but gained a lot of interest and popularity over the last weeks. Who knows, maybe Cobinhood will also get more popular soon. Then it's good that the tokens are already listed there. Soo: Vote for PCL!

[phantam]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

[Nathan01]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.

[ibininja]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.

Dude majority of the ICO review videos are useless. I actually tried to reach to some and guess the pricing they ask? 4 BTC + average of 10k in fiat for an "unbiased" review. We know it is not going to be neutral that is for sure. so don't take those videos seriously

[jamzzz123]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.

Dude majority of the ICO review videos are useless. I actually tried to reach to some and guess the pricing they ask? 4 BTC + average of 10k in fiat for an "unbiased" review. We know it is not going to be neutral that is for sure. so don't take those videos seriously

Wow you serious?? Is there that much manipulation and people paying that sort of money for a "review" or "promotion" that is bloody crazy... I guess similar to John McAfee with his tweets. Crazy money for some sort of 'marketing'

[exuberant112]

Continued info about international crypto funds for corporate and government investment :

I have been sent a press release by Blockchain EXPO giving the dates on which The Cryptocurrency And BlockChain Conference delegation will be visiting each locale, with the  intent to spread information and drum up further support for cryptocurrency commercial operations.  The people who are invited to these conferences are all heavily invested financial staff of big corporations, bank agents, politicians, and the heads of other businesses who wish to be involved with future projects.  This is more compelling evidence of what I was saying earlier about the movement of financial institutions of these countries into crypto funding.  Here is the date list which is actually 100% confirmed although tickets are invite only so there isn't any way to buy them if you are not already invited to do so.

Manila 25/1/18
Gibraltar 8/2/18
St Petersburg 13/3
Geneva 21/2/18  
Bengaluru 22/2/18
Minsk 27/2/18  
Istanbul 1/3/18
Bangkok 6/3/18
Tallinn 22/3/18
Tel Aviv 28/3/18  
Kiev 29/3/18
Berlin 4/4/18  
Moscow 17/4/18 and 18/4/18  
Prague 17/5/18

Companies that are confirmed to be attending, who have plans for crypto investments this year are as follows (not exhaustive) :

BrickBlock Ltd. (German Crypto company with associated coin)
EasyMINE Ltd. (Polish Crypto farming technology company)
REGA Risk Sharing (European risk management and portfolio investment company)
SingularityU (Think tank for technology and finance segments)
Apla CZS (Cyber Security & commercial platform testing company)
Safello (Network probing and security device company)
BlockGeeksLabs.Net (Website concerning the crypto industry)
TenX (Cryptocurrency and investment fund business)
Tachyonic LLC (Legal management company of high value investments internationally)
Lynx Capita (Another high value investment company)
GrandCentral.Trading (Web platform for crypto trading)
Mathias Sundin (Parliament member for Sweden, Chairman of BitCoin Exchange & Co-Partner of WARP Institute)
Georgio Ballini (UN Ambassador and trade relations expert)
Fernando Guiterrez (European Parliament member and trade expert)
Carolina Martowicz (IBM Co Director & Co Founder of their Academy Of Technology)
Sofya Blakstaad (Advisor to Stokholm Fintek Exchange)
Eric Benz (Manager and Tech Director at CryptoPay)

So there you have it, officially recognisable evidence that these countries and the commercial operations hailing from them are getting BIG into crypto investments this year and next year - with the intent of building a new industry and markets in there (farming, trading, investment).  More than likely this is something the PCL team know about and might well be in attendance at!  Of course though as with industry secrets nobody will be telling.

But since I am not able to attend I can happily confirm this information from the official invite.

Here is a note taken from the invite :

"We  focus on Sweden and foreign projects implementing Blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Experts  share their experience of implementing Blockchain in governmental institutions (Govtech), banking system, trading, media, healthcare and other spheres. We  discuss all the aspects of creating innovative IT products – from the emergence of idea to entering the market.

The main participants are IT developers, entrepreneurs, investors, software and equipment manufacturers. The speakers are managers of the well-known companies and representatives of governmental authorities."

[Bonanzacoin]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.

Dude majority of the ICO review videos are useless. I actually tried to reach to some and guess the pricing they ask? 4 BTC + average of 10k in fiat for an "unbiased" review. We know it is not going to be neutral that is for sure. so don't take those videos seriously

Wow you serious?? Is there that much manipulation and people paying that sort of money for a "review" or "promotion" that is bloody crazy... I guess similar to John McAfee with his tweets. Crazy money for some sort of 'marketing'

well u gotta weed out the hype ones, still good reviews out there. Even when paid.

[faulerwilli]

Actually, there is now the possibility for us, as the community, to help getting the PCL tokens listed on the Cobinhood exchange: https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

Have never heard of this Exchange. it's funny, I often get to know new exchanges only in this way that they appear in ICO threads. Find it is not a bad thing that Peculium is initially listed on small exchanges. The big ones are not accepting any new customers right now and the traffic is not that big with the small ones. However, it does not look like Peculium has a chance of a quick listing, the first place already has a big lead

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I thought there was an airdrop of pcl to some bitcointalk users
What happens to that?

[therhslv]

I thought there was an airdrop of pcl to some bitcointalk users
What happens to that?

I did got my airdrop of Peculium tokens , they are in my wallet already like for 2 months , got 5k of them and 1k Incoming from website airdrop

[kaar]

PECULIUM is the first savings management platform to take advantage of the blockchain technology driven by AI. It revolutionizes savings management by deploying immutable Smart-Contracts over Ethereum blockchain.

Rating to Peculium seems to be below :

https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7

https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8

https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10

https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68

 

This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.

I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.

And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.

you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.

Dude majority of the ICO review videos are useless. I actually tried to reach to some and guess the pricing they ask? 4 BTC + average of 10k in fiat for an "unbiased" review. We know it is not going to be neutral that is for sure. so don't take those videos seriously

Wow you serious?? Is there that much manipulation and people paying that sort of money for a "review" or "promotion" that is bloody crazy... I guess similar to John McAfee with his tweets. Crazy money for some sort of 'marketing'

Yeah almost all of the ICO rating sites are either getting paid to shill ICO's or are invested in some and want to create hype around them. Always do your own research, I don't even bother entering those sites.

[cryptossi]

Peculium has been a good one, i kept getting the newsletter for weeks and i think that the ico will be successfull.
I got only one simple question, what exchangers will add the token as soon as the ico ends?
thanks

We wont know what exchanges will add peculium untill ICO finishes

yea. i will suggest that as the ico closing date is gradually coming to an end, they should create a pool for the community to vote for an exchange between now and january ending or ico ending. so that they can ensure they get listed on an exchange where most of thier investors are.

This sounds like a great idea, not only would another exchange be good, but you're letting the investors decide your "first" exchange listing.

This would be great for the project and the community - both are winners, would be good if this could be made possible - as everyone would be a "winner" in my eyes....

I guess they are already negotiating with several exchanges. It's not that easy like saying: 'Community voted for the tokens to be listed on Binance - Tomorrow it will be listed on Binance.' This all takes time but I am sure we'll see some good exchanges that'll add PCL after the ICO.

I dont know if it is true but I heard that exchanges flat-out ask 10-20 BTC payment for the listing of a new coin

That's true and it's why a lot of smaller projects wait for community votes to get on to some of the larger exchanges, there is currently a vote for Peculium to get listed on Cobinhood please vote here:

https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

Cobinhood is a brand new exchange. I am surprised to see that Peculium wants to get listed there. Atleast couple of days back, they don't want to talk about small exchanges. I think they want to make use all possible ways to list everywhere.

It's a small exchange but if you look at their slack/telegram they have been asking people to vote all day, the only condition is that you need 10 COBS in your account to post your vote.

[BaliScript]

That's true and it's why a lot of smaller projects wait for community votes to get on to some of the larger exchanges, there is currently a vote for Peculium to get listed on Cobinhood please vote here:

https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

But if ICOs collect millions from their token sales, why dont they just pay the exchanges? I dont understand this. PEculium raised already a lot of money

[cryptossi]

That's true and it's why a lot of smaller projects wait for community votes to get on to some of the larger exchanges, there is currently a vote for Peculium to get listed on Cobinhood please vote here:

https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

But if ICOs collect millions from their token sales, why dont they just pay the exchanges? I dont understand this. PEculium raised already a lot of money

Maybe it's not budgeted into their expenditure, I don't know maybe you should ask the Peculium team themselves if you really want to find out.

Their telegram page is: https://t.me/joinchat/GdlCOw07yJbs2Pt1H8_zrg

[BaliScript]

That's true and it's why a lot of smaller projects wait for community votes to get on to some of the larger exchanges, there is currently a vote for Peculium to get listed on Cobinhood please vote here:

https://cobinhood.com/campaign/express-voting

But if ICOs collect millions from their token sales, why dont they just pay the exchanges? I dont understand this. PEculium raised already a lot of money

Maybe it's not budgeted into their expenditure, I don't know maybe you should ask the Peculium team themselves if you really want to find out.

Their telegram page is: https://t.me/joinchat/GdlCOw07yJbs2Pt1H8_zrg

No im not gonna ask that It is not only PEculium, I noticed a lot of ICOs are raising millions but not really want to spend it for Exchanges

[Ace44]

This Project looks promising , at start for me looked like another pump and dump airdrop coin But now i see really good potencial , glad i joined airdrop

We all had that initial feeling but the team changed that perception with time and made the community believe in them, it takes brains to pull what they are doing, i'm not trying to be sentimental about the whole project, i'm just been typical

[Owillz]

I thought there was an airdrop of pcl to some bitcointalk users
What happens to that?

I did got my airdrop of Peculium tokens , they are in my wallet already like for 2 months , got 5k of them and 1k Incoming from website airdrop

Wow. Seriously?? They gave out their coin as airdrop  order than the one done on their website?? Didn't even know about that. I missed it. I only received the one they shared to their users in their website. Don't know when we can be able to move them to our mew wallet?

[exuberant112]

  I wonder if the Peculium AI will be expecting the rise in BTC after the Easter holidays, to somewhere near to $1600 - and the associated rises in all other cryptos as a result Also I wonder if this AI will foresee the slight faltering of the ETH rates during this period, as people switch their ETHs into other coins, and other coins into BTCs to withdraw as cash for taking their kids / wives on holiday!

I will be super impressed if they do get this right, if they do better than my own manually drawn prediction chart I will literally be gobsmacked.  Any predicction engine that can beat a relatively experienced human deserves a LOT more attention in the media than Peculium is currently getting.

Let's keep our eyes on that!  So far the hype and the news is all good, well if this challenge can be risen to by Peculium's AI then I would predict a huge flood of investments even at lower bonus values.  Intriguing!

so what i get here is that your own drawn prediction says that PCL will fail? 

No that's not at all what the comment says.  I am saying that if it can predict events that do not exist solely in financial data sets such as sociopolitical events then I will be super impressed because I don't think that is currently something any other AI has or is doing. 

[phantam]

  I wonder if the Peculium AI will be expecting the rise in BTC after the Easter holidays, to somewhere near to $1600 - and the associated rises in all other cryptos as a result Also I wonder if this AI will foresee the slight faltering of the ETH rates during this period, as people switch their ETHs into other coins, and other coins into BTCs to withdraw as cash for taking their kids / wives on holiday!

I will be super impressed if they do get this right, if they do better than my own manually drawn prediction chart I will literally be gobsmacked.  Any predicction engine that can beat a relatively experienced human deserves a LOT more attention in the media than Peculium is currently getting.

Let's keep our eyes on that!  So far the hype and the news is all good, well if this challenge can be risen to by Peculium's AI then I would predict a huge flood of investments even at lower bonus values.  Intriguing!

so what i get here is that your own drawn prediction says that PCL will fail? 

No that's not at all what the comment says.  I am saying that if it can predict events that do not exist solely in financial data sets such as sociopolitical events then I will be super impressed because I don't think that is currently something any other AI has or is doing. 

It predicts within reason based on the example and it's not always right or atleast that was the case when they did the first prediction example thread competition thing. It was quite accurate it had its flaws but was very promising and that was a while ago and according to the team they have made leaps and bounds towards improving it even further