[DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated

[novacadian]

Thanks both Qtera and K1773R. Will grab them from the site.

- Nova

[1714312383]

1714312383

[1714312383]

1714312383

[1714312383]

1714312383

[1714312383]

1714312383

[markm]

The receiver_0.csv is the minimum that must be included with a distribution I think, because I am am pretty sure it is where the code gets the URLs that it uses to go get such files.

Usually though I thought we include most of the receiver files when packaging a distribution.

Each cycle when Unthinkingbit tells me to generate the new files for the new cycle I upload them to

http://galaxies.mygamesonline.org/ then the admins of the other URLs grab them from there once Unthinkingbit has checked them.

(Plus in theory those other admins also check them, or at least hopefully we have enough admins that on any given cycle someone at least does check them. )

-MarkM-

[sdp]

Can we add OpenEuphoria to the list of supported projects?

www.openeuphoria.org

sdp

[novacadian]

The receiver_0.csv is the minimum that must be included with a distribution I think, because I am am pretty sure it is where the code gets the URLs that it uses to go get such files.

Usually though I thought we include most of the receiver files when packaging a distribution.

Each cycle when Unthinkingbit tells me to generate the new files for the new cycle I upload them to

http://galaxies.mygamesonline.org/ then the admins of the other URLs grab them from there once Unthinkingbit has checked them.

(Plus in theory those other admins also check them, or at least hopefully we have enough admins that on any given cycle someone at least does check them. )

-MarkM-

Yeah, got the needed file from http://devcoin.darkgamex.ch/ . Now decided to compile my own and downloaded the package from https://github.com/sidhujag/devcoin-wallet . Folowing the instructions to the point when qmake is to be run and get the error:

Code:

Project MESSAGE: Building with UPNP support
Removed plural forms as the target language has less forms.
If this sounds wrong, possibly the target language is not set or recognized.

Any insights?

- Nova

[markm]

At some point the miniUPNP library changed so some coins use one syntax (number of args to function) some use other, maybe you just aren't using the particular miniUPNP library that version of that coin wants?

I have never had miniUPNP work with any modem any local ISP has ever given us so I just compile without UPNP support entirely.

( make USE_UPNP= -f makefile.myversionofunix coind )

(Or hack up a makefile.myversionofunix that sets USE_UPNP empty in the makefile, if as e.g. for Fedora I have to hack up a makefile anyway.)

Looks like maybe the miniUPNP you are linking against might include language-translation support? Never seen this error myself but as I said I leave out miniUPNP.

-MarkM-

[sidhujag]

Use qmake USE_UPNP=-
To omit upnp from qt build.

[teknomen]

when i try to add a new article !!

http://www.shy22.com/upfiljpg/eph25766.jpg

[notabot]

when i try to add a new article !!

http://www.shy22.com/upfiljpg/eph25766.jpg

^^ That has been ongoing for awhile, no idea why, maybe an arbitrary word limit... Apart from not being able to contribute content, AFAIK there are issues with signing up new recipients. But if no one new can get added to the receiver files then how will bounties for wallets, etc, get completed? Also being a closed ecosystem of recipients earning devcoins isn't right.

Maybe fork devcoin into two coins, devcoin2 and wikicoin, and holders could redeem their dvc into which ever direction they wish. Devcoin2 could include bounties to benefit crypto in general, and wikicoin could include many types of media. Just food for thought and conversation, but sometimes change is good, better than stagnating.

[develCuy]

Spliting an already small market won't make a change. What devcoin needs is to be used by more people, rather than splitting in two coins IMHO.

Maybe fork devcoin into two coins, devcoin2 and wikicoin, and holders could redeem their dvc into which ever direction they wish. Devcoin2 could include bounties to benefit crypto in general, and wikicoin could include many types of media. Just food for thought and conversation, but sometimes change is good, better than stagnating.

[RJF]

Spliting an already small market won't make a change. What devcoin needs is to be used by more people, rather than splitting in two coins IMHO.

Maybe fork devcoin into two coins, devcoin2 and wikicoin, and holders could redeem their dvc into which ever direction they wish. Devcoin2 could include bounties to benefit crypto in general, and wikicoin could include many types of media. Just food for thought and conversation, but sometimes change is good, better than stagnating.

Agreed. Splitting will only produce a second coin with no market.

[sidhujag]

Spliting an already small market won't make a change. What devcoin needs is to be used by more people, rather than splitting in two coins IMHO.

Maybe fork devcoin into two coins, devcoin2 and wikicoin, and holders could redeem their dvc into which ever direction they wish. Devcoin2 could include bounties to benefit crypto in general, and wikicoin could include many types of media. Just food for thought and conversation, but sometimes change is good, better than stagnating.

I wonder if a self limiting supply i was proposing was done that it would have been in a lot better shape by now

[weisoq]

That has been ongoing for awhile, no idea why, maybe an arbitrary word limit... Apart from not being able to contribute content, AFAIK there are issues with signing up new recipients. But if no one new can get added to the receiver files then how will bounties for wallets, etc, get completed? Also being a closed ecosystem of recipients earning devcoins isn't right.

Maybe fork devcoin into two coins, devcoin2 and wikicoin, and holders could redeem their dvc into which ever direction they wish. Devcoin2 could include bounties to benefit crypto in general, and wikicoin could include many types of media. Just food for thought and conversation, but sometimes change is good, better than stagnating.

I'm having the same problem. Had a look through the admin settings re. dokuwiki and nothing obvious so must be at the server end (no. of connections, webserver security?)

[wiser]

I'm having trouble editing some of my pages on the Devtome. I'm told I don't have permission. However, I can edit some of the pages. I can also access the admin side.

I was able to add some content to the Devtome and create a new page, but I can't add it to my invoice page.

It looks like others have had this problem too, so I just wanted to chime in and say so am I and ask if there are any updates on this.

Thanks

This is the exact text of the error message I'm getting:

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /doku.php on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

[novacadian]

I'm having trouble editing some of my pages on the Devtome. I'm told I don't have permission. However, I can edit some of the pages. I can also access the admin side.

I was able to add some content to the Devtome and create a new page, but I can't add it to my invoice page.

It looks like others have had this problem too, so I just wanted to chime in and say so am I and ask if there are any updates on this.

Thanks

This is the exact text of the error message I'm getting:

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /doku.php on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Have been having computer problems on my end yet shall try to look into this asap.

- Nova

[weisoq]

Perhaps related to server modsecurity?
https://www.dokuwiki.org/faq:mod_security

[wiser]

Have been having computer problems on my end yet shall try to look into this asap.
- Nova

Thanks. Could you post here when you have it resolved?

[sulfurtank]

I'm having trouble editing some of my pages on the Devtome. I'm told I don't have permission. However, I can edit some of the pages. I can also access the admin side.

I was able to add some content to the Devtome and create a new page, but I can't add it to my invoice page.

It looks like others have had this problem too, so I just wanted to chime in and say so am I and ask if there are any updates on this.

Thanks

This is the exact text of the error message I'm getting:

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /doku.php on this server.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Devtome management seemed to be looking for this, since they obviously knew about tons of issues. Really, if they were indifferent they wouldn't have burnt every last interest I had invested in site. And the truth is, I would call for no more of justice, should I only be restored of my writer account.

[novacadian]

Hunterbunter is trying to raise the DevTome Admin about the error/permission issue. Will post with any news.

- Nova

[wiser]

Hunterbunter is trying to raise the DevTome Admin about the error/permission issue. Will post with any news.

- Nova

Thanks for the update. Looking forward to some good news.

[alyssa85]

Just a heads up to people about cex.io and ghash.io (ghash used to merge mine devcoin):

http://blog.cex.io/news/altcoins-removal-and-multipool-suspension-14762

GHash.IO Multipool Suspension

December 1st, 2015, GHash.IO Multipool will be discontinued. There is no need to change mining settings for the Multipool, as all shares will be automatically redirected to LTC+DOGE mining pool. Those users who are already mining on Multipool and LTC+DOGE pool simultaneously, please make sure that workers on both pools are titled differently.

December 15th, 2015, trading pairs with following altcoins will be removed from CEX.IO exchange: IXC, DVC, POT, ANC, MEC, WDC, FTC, DGB, USDE, MYR, AUR.

I hope this doesn't affect us too badly - I don't know if any other pools merge mine DVC. (If anyone has more knowledge about DVC's mining, please chip in).