Bitcoin Forum
February 20, 2018, 08:11:15 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 [355] 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated  (Read 663314 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015


yes


View Profile
November 13, 2017, 09:56:25 PM
 #7081

Good work.

Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion★  Anonymity Guaranteed
★  Anonymous and Untraceable
★  Guard Your Privacy
      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
1519157475
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519157475

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519157475
Reply with quote  #2

1519157475
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
develCuy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2017, 09:55:31 PM
 #7082

Supercool! Congrats for betting on Devcoin!

Hello DEV team,

I'm happy to announce that your coin has been listed to ItalYiiMP 2.0 for mining,

to get paid in DVC just set c=DVC as password in your configuration.

As an additional service, the explorer is available at the address http://italyiimp.com/explorer

visit http://italyiimp.com.

best regards.

Ragarg.

sidhujag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 05:22:26 AM
 #7083

Good work.

Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?
No

★☆★Syscoin - Decentralized Marketplace and Multisig Platform
Pay with Bitcoin, ZCash and many more
For more visit Syscoin.org  ★☆★
Guido
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1035
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 25, 2017, 05:49:07 PM
 #7084

coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter  Huh

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/getjoeout
wiser
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1365
Merit: 1002



View Profile WWW
November 26, 2017, 01:51:06 AM
 #7085

coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter  Huh


Thanks for the heads up. That is not a good sign when a site goes down with no explanation. It's especially rough on those who have standing market orders (read, funds held on the exchange).

One practice I do (mostly) is that when I want to trade coins and I'm getting ready to send them to the exchange, I first log in to the exchange and check the deposit address. It's not that I can't have my wallets "remember" various exchanges' deposit addresses. It's that before I send in a bunch more coins I want to make sure the exchange is still there.


R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
November 26, 2017, 03:29:51 AM
 #7086

coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter  Huh


Thanks for the heads up. That is not a good sign when a site goes down with no explanation. It's especially rough on those who have standing market orders (read, funds held on the exchange).

One practice I do (mostly) is that when I want to trade coins and I'm getting ready to send them to the exchange, I first log in to the exchange and check the deposit address. It's not that I can't have my wallets "remember" various exchanges' deposit addresses. It's that before I send in a bunch more coins I want to make sure the exchange is still there.



A wise move wiser...

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
develCuy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2017, 09:24:15 PM
 #7087

coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter  Huh


Any other exchange supporting Devcoin? Otherwise I have good news Tongue

Guido
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1035
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 12:21:31 PM
 #7088

coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter  Huh


Any other exchange supporting Devcoin? Otherwise I have good news Tongue

nope not as far as know
bastards at coingather definitely done a runner by the look
https://news.bitcoin.com/coingather-exchange-has-been-offline-for-days-and-no-one-knows-why/

lost some devcoin and 1 ltc

look in comments, many others lost a LOT

a ton of devcoin was on that exchange and will be dumped cheap when we get a new exchange, which is good news i guess!
or may be gone forever

we really need donate buttons and some bounty lists rather than just huge amounts going to soo-so writers on the wiki etc
there are tens of millions of bloggers, online publishers, musicians etc on the web
more
devcoin in many ways is far better designed and more appropriate than btc and enough coins without silly amounts like ripple which is the ultimate shitcoin

few tools like donate button that works or better still that widget to pay, devcoin used to be on is it coiningy or something? they removed but think devcoin paid to be on there

as soon as such huge amounts stop being given to these average posters etc, you could list a fund like 50k devcoin to first mainstream publisher to accept, 50k to big blogger, 50k (or smaller amounts) to first registered charity to accept and so on, do it for a month


whats the good news?

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/getjoeout
Guido
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1035
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 05:21:44 PM
 #7089

most exchanges you have to pay to get listed on, but don't think so with livecoin

Fastcoin is on livecoin and they seem pretty good and there's a usd market for fst and others
this would be great for devcoin

developer has to apply
https://www.livecoin.net/en/coin-listing


Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/getjoeout
Unthinkingbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 919
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 01, 2017, 07:31:14 AM
 #7090

most exchanges you have to pay to get listed on, but don't think so with livecoin

Fastcoin is on livecoin and they seem pretty good and there's a usd market for fst and others
this would be great for devcoin

developer has to apply
https://www.livecoin.net/en/coin-listing

We need exchanges that list devcoin. Could someone please volunteer to get exchanges to list devcoin, doing whatever application is necessary and giving them whatever help they need?

FuzzyBear
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2017, 02:23:10 PM
 #7091

So the requirements for a listing of devcoin on their site is as follows:

########################################################

If you are a developer or official representative of cryptocurrency asset, you can add this asset to Livecoin. We offer a few options to list a new asset, please contact us via email .

Don't forget to provide the following when you request listing:
1) link to an official git of your node
2) link to an official website
3) link to block chain which must working properly
4) name of asset and trading symbol

By applying a request to add an asset to Livecoin, you as developer agree to report of technical issues with your cryptocurrency, node, block explorer etc. You also agree to notify us of all kind of forks. In case of losing clients' funds due to forks or technical / security issues with block chain or node, you as developer will bear financial responsibility.

Timeline for listing of new asset depends on agreements reached. The shortest term is 1 week.

########################################################

So it seems the person requesting the listing takes responsibility for the code and blockchain.. prob just a legal cover themselves but from the community side should be presented from the lead developer of devcoin or someone willing to take on that role?  

answers to the questions would be as follows? please feel free to correct or update:

1) https://github.com/coinzen/devcoin ??
2) http://devcoin.org/
3) https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dvc/
4) Devcoin (DVC)

Regarding official repo... I have a fork of the coinzen on my account here https://github.com/FuzzyBearBTC/devcoin-1 but I also have another fork from knotwork's cherry picked repo https://github.com/FuzzyBearBTC/devcoin I am concerned at the ownership of the coinzen repo as the forum coinzen has now long gone.  I dont mind hosting the official repo but would like to clear up the old one if not needed etc.

Useful link to their official bitcointalk thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151791.0
I did a little look around also and seemed few people worried this a scam site and complaining of slow transactions and crediting to accounts etc but all seem eventually resolved.  The account LiveCoin on here seems very active and new listsing of coins on site common and they seem to reply to most if not all posts in thier thread, again a good sign Smiley Just dont want this to turn out to be another vircurex or coingather etc....

Fuzzybear

most exchanges you have to pay to get listed on, but don't think so with livecoin

Fastcoin is on livecoin and they seem pretty good and there's a usd market for fst and others
this would be great for devcoin

developer has to apply
https://www.livecoin.net/en/coin-listing

We need exchanges that list devcoin. Could someone please volunteer to get exchanges to list devcoin, doing whatever application is necessary and giving them whatever help they need?

sawa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 02, 2017, 06:30:12 PM
 #7092

I'm worried that my wallet got stuck on block 303999
Though in http://italyiimp.com/explorer it is shown that already the block 305335

If I delete and reload block chain, then on block 303999 I have this error:
Code:
In receiver.h, getIsSufficientAmount rejected the addresses or amounts.
For the given:
Height: 304000
Share: 4500000000000
Step: 4000
The expected addresses are:
The receiverMap shows that they should get 0 coins
The shares per address however are set to 4500000000000
15MZRa1cPUVChs6XpzyAfGox5nvPVpSvok

The given addresses are:
1KZKMYixw4PDtu5ZbKqrahRWeAgputuVoc

The given amounts are:
4500000000000

I have all receiver files:
Code:
.devcoin/receiver# ls
charity            receiver_12.csv  receiver_17.csv  receiver_21.csv  receiver_26.csv  receiver_30.csv  receiver_35.csv  receiver_3.csv   receiver_44.csv  receiver_49.csv  receiver_53.csv  receiver_58.csv  receiver_62.csv  receiver_67.csv  receiver_71.csv  receiver_76.csv                                           
random_number.txt  receiver_13.csv  receiver_18.csv  receiver_22.csv  receiver_27.csv  receiver_31.csv  receiver_36.csv  receiver_40.csv  receiver_45.csv  receiver_4.csv   receiver_54.csv  receiver_59.csv  receiver_63.csv  receiver_68.csv  receiver_72.csv  receiver_7.csv                                             
receiver_0.csv     receiver_14.csv  receiver_19.csv  receiver_23.csv  receiver_28.csv  receiver_32.csv  receiver_37.csv  receiver_41.csv  receiver_46.csv  receiver_50.csv  receiver_55.csv  receiver_5.csv   receiver_64.csv  receiver_69.csv  receiver_73.csv  receiver_8.csv                                             
receiver_10.csv    receiver_15.csv  receiver_1.csv   receiver_24.csv  receiver_29.csv  receiver_33.csv  receiver_38.csv  receiver_42.csv  receiver_47.csv  receiver_51.csv  receiver_56.csv  receiver_60.csv  receiver_65.csv  receiver_6.csv   receiver_74.csv  receiver_9.csv                                             
receiver_11.csv    receiver_16.csv  receiver_20.csv  receiver_25.csv  receiver_2.csv   receiver_34.csv  receiver_39.csv  receiver_43.csv  receiver_48.csv  receiver_52.csv  receiver_57.csv  receiver_61.csv  receiver_66.csv  receiver_70.csv  receiver_75.csv  update_receivers.sh

R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
December 03, 2017, 02:44:35 PM
 #7093

Off topic but please read:

"US Senate Moves to Criminalize Non-Disclosure of Cryptocurrency Ownership"

https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-senate-moves-to-criminalize-non-disclosure-of-cryptocurrency-ownership

Stand up and be heard! Stop this before it starts or we will all suffer the loss. Write, call, blog, post yell and scream. This must never see the light of day. For those of you in the US, it goes against every principle we believe in. Our country was founded on principles diametrically opposed to this proposed law.

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist."

"Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

"Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew."

"Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

I simply can't stress how important it is to stop this nonsense. We are no better than the Nazi's if we enact this. Even if you are NOT in the US, this will effect you in due time if enacted. Make your voices heard!

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
Unthinkingbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 919
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 06:34:33 AM
 #7094

Thanks FuzzyBear for the information.

I see only one tough problem with what they ask:

..
In case of losing clients' funds due to forks or technical / security issues with block chain or node, you as developer will bear financial responsibility.

This is open ended, and could wipe out anyone. It is unreasonable, and I don't think any developer has ever given out money if there was a problem in their code. Is that language in the application for other exchanges?

accountantfuttock
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 01:00:04 PM
 #7095

Does the team have experience in this sphere?
FuzzyBear
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 06, 2017, 07:29:08 PM
 #7096

I think it is just a general clause to try cover themselves should the blockchain fork they want no responsibility for funds lost through a fork or network going wrong.  The actual wording for who can submit a coin is open ended:

"If you are a developer or official representative of cryptocurrency asset, you can add this asset to Livecoin."

So a non developer can submit the application and thus the last clause is invalid? Tongue

I feel it is more them saying if u submit a coin and it is not updated to  avoid security issues or forks and the exchange looses funds then you are responsible for not informing the exchange to update the code or providing the updated code with security patches applied as and when... they want to cover themselves listing any coins that are just going to be under developed and left potentially leaving security risks on their serveres running the exchanges etc...

Anyway I sent them in an application and got this as a reply:

04.12.2017 09:44
Hello.
Unfortunately, this year we no longer accept new assets.

...so maybe try in the new year? or should we look around for other possible listings?

Fuzzybear
Thanks FuzzyBear for the information.

I see only one tough problem with what they ask:

..
In case of losing clients' funds due to forks or technical / security issues with block chain or node, you as developer will bear financial responsibility.

This is open ended, and could wipe out anyone. It is unreasonable, and I don't think any developer has ever given out money if there was a problem in their code. Is that language in the application for other exchanges?


IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


Always ask questions.


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 08:09:38 PM
 #7097

How about bisq? It's the only one I trust actually, apart from localbitcoins of course, but we can't list it there.

Do not trust Yobit scam exchange or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins - they WILL steal from you:
https://translate.google.com/translate?u=https://bitnovosti.com/2017/06/28/stop-this-for-bitcoins-sake/
Always research & use due diligence before investing. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
develCuy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2017, 08:25:56 PM
 #7098

How about bisq? It's the only one I trust actually, apart from localbitcoins of course, but we can't list it there.

More info about Bisq and how to list a new coin there: https://github.com/bisq-network/docs/blob/master/exchange/howto/list-token.adoc

sawa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 06, 2017, 08:27:24 PM
 #7099

I'm worried that my wallet got stuck on block 303999
Though in http://italyiimp.com/explorer it is shown that already the block 305335

If I delete and reload block chain, then on block 303999 I have this error:
Code:
In receiver.h, getIsSufficientAmount rejected the addresses or amounts.
For the given:
Height: 304000
Share: 4500000000000
Step: 4000
The expected addresses are:
The receiverMap shows that they should get 0 coins
The shares per address however are set to 4500000000000
15MZRa1cPUVChs6XpzyAfGox5nvPVpSvok

The given addresses are:
1KZKMYixw4PDtu5ZbKqrahRWeAgputuVoc

The given amounts are:
4500000000000

I have all receiver files:
Code:
.devcoin/receiver# ls
charity            receiver_12.csv  receiver_17.csv  receiver_21.csv  receiver_26.csv  receiver_30.csv  receiver_35.csv  receiver_3.csv   receiver_44.csv  receiver_49.csv  receiver_53.csv  receiver_58.csv  receiver_62.csv  receiver_67.csv  receiver_71.csv  receiver_76.csv                                            
random_number.txt  receiver_13.csv  receiver_18.csv  receiver_22.csv  receiver_27.csv  receiver_31.csv  receiver_36.csv  receiver_40.csv  receiver_45.csv  receiver_4.csv   receiver_54.csv  receiver_59.csv  receiver_63.csv  receiver_68.csv  receiver_72.csv  receiver_7.csv                                            
receiver_0.csv     receiver_14.csv  receiver_19.csv  receiver_23.csv  receiver_28.csv  receiver_32.csv  receiver_37.csv  receiver_41.csv  receiver_46.csv  receiver_50.csv  receiver_55.csv  receiver_5.csv   receiver_64.csv  receiver_69.csv  receiver_73.csv  receiver_8.csv                                            
receiver_10.csv    receiver_15.csv  receiver_1.csv   receiver_24.csv  receiver_29.csv  receiver_33.csv  receiver_38.csv  receiver_42.csv  receiver_47.csv  receiver_51.csv  receiver_56.csv  receiver_60.csv  receiver_65.csv  receiver_6.csv   receiver_74.csv  receiver_9.csv                                            
receiver_11.csv    receiver_16.csv  receiver_20.csv  receiver_25.csv  receiver_2.csv   receiver_34.csv  receiver_39.csv  receiver_43.csv  receiver_48.csv  receiver_52.csv  receiver_57.csv  receiver_61.csv  receiver_66.csv  receiver_70.csv  receiver_75.csv  update_receivers.sh

I added receiver_77.csv from git: //github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity.git, but the synchronization stops at block 303999.
Code:
devcoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 80501,
    "protocolversion" : 70001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 303999,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 4,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 391033605.64058393,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1512497504,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}
As if someone made their receiver_77.csv before that official receiver_77.csv posted to the git: //github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity.zhit and the chain goes on an incomprehensible fork

I before synchronization completely delete the block chain, leave only the devcoin.conf and files in the directory ~/.devcoin/ receiver
Here are all the peers of my wallet:
Code:
devcoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "176.9.25.79:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512590947,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 496044,
        "bytesrecv" : 15553651,
        "conntime" : 1512497634,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "syncnode" : true
    },
    {
        "addr" : "64.71.72.56:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512591250,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591405,
        "bytessent" : 305235,
        "bytesrecv" : 188895,
        "conntime" : 1512497635,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "104.168.155.119:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512591405,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 41469505,
        "bytesrecv" : 629147913,
        "conntime" : 1512497835,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "87.98.182.171:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512590246,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 53465402,
        "bytesrecv" : 855416984,
        "conntime" : 1512553938,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305804,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

Has anyone tried to synchronize blocks from scratch lately?
I think that there is a problem in the DVC network.

FuzzyBear
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 06, 2017, 09:39:09 PM
 #7100

I synced up the other day no issues or problems. did it from scratch on new laptop also.

What version and client you running?  V 0.8.5.1?

Fuzzybear
I'm worried that my wallet got stuck on block 303999
Though in http://italyiimp.com/explorer it is shown that already the block 305335

If I delete and reload block chain, then on block 303999 I have this error:
Code:
In receiver.h, getIsSufficientAmount rejected the addresses or amounts.
For the given:
Height: 304000
Share: 4500000000000
Step: 4000
The expected addresses are:
The receiverMap shows that they should get 0 coins
The shares per address however are set to 4500000000000
15MZRa1cPUVChs6XpzyAfGox5nvPVpSvok

The given addresses are:
1KZKMYixw4PDtu5ZbKqrahRWeAgputuVoc

The given amounts are:
4500000000000

I have all receiver files:
Code:
.devcoin/receiver# ls
charity            receiver_12.csv  receiver_17.csv  receiver_21.csv  receiver_26.csv  receiver_30.csv  receiver_35.csv  receiver_3.csv   receiver_44.csv  receiver_49.csv  receiver_53.csv  receiver_58.csv  receiver_62.csv  receiver_67.csv  receiver_71.csv  receiver_76.csv                                            
random_number.txt  receiver_13.csv  receiver_18.csv  receiver_22.csv  receiver_27.csv  receiver_31.csv  receiver_36.csv  receiver_40.csv  receiver_45.csv  receiver_4.csv   receiver_54.csv  receiver_59.csv  receiver_63.csv  receiver_68.csv  receiver_72.csv  receiver_7.csv                                            
receiver_0.csv     receiver_14.csv  receiver_19.csv  receiver_23.csv  receiver_28.csv  receiver_32.csv  receiver_37.csv  receiver_41.csv  receiver_46.csv  receiver_50.csv  receiver_55.csv  receiver_5.csv   receiver_64.csv  receiver_69.csv  receiver_73.csv  receiver_8.csv                                            
receiver_10.csv    receiver_15.csv  receiver_1.csv   receiver_24.csv  receiver_29.csv  receiver_33.csv  receiver_38.csv  receiver_42.csv  receiver_47.csv  receiver_51.csv  receiver_56.csv  receiver_60.csv  receiver_65.csv  receiver_6.csv   receiver_74.csv  receiver_9.csv                                            
receiver_11.csv    receiver_16.csv  receiver_20.csv  receiver_25.csv  receiver_2.csv   receiver_34.csv  receiver_39.csv  receiver_43.csv  receiver_48.csv  receiver_52.csv  receiver_57.csv  receiver_61.csv  receiver_66.csv  receiver_70.csv  receiver_75.csv  update_receivers.sh

I added receiver_77.csv from git: //github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity.git, but the synchronization stops at block 303999.
Code:
devcoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 80501,
    "protocolversion" : 70001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 303999,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 4,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 391033605.64058393,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1512497504,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}
As if someone made their receiver_77.csv before that official receiver_77.csv posted to the git: //github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity.zhit and the chain goes on an incomprehensible fork

I before synchronization completely delete the block chain, leave only the devcoin.conf and files in the directory ~/.devcoin/ receiver
Here are all the peers of my wallet:
Code:
devcoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "176.9.25.79:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512590947,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 496044,
        "bytesrecv" : 15553651,
        "conntime" : 1512497634,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "syncnode" : true
    },
    {
        "addr" : "64.71.72.56:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512591250,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591405,
        "bytessent" : 305235,
        "bytesrecv" : 188895,
        "conntime" : 1512497635,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "104.168.155.119:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512591405,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 41469505,
        "bytesrecv" : 629147913,
        "conntime" : 1512497835,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305723,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "87.98.182.171:52333",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1512590246,
        "lastrecv" : 1512591406,
        "bytessent" : 53465402,
        "bytesrecv" : 855416984,
        "conntime" : 1512553938,
        "version" : 70001,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 305804,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

Has anyone tried to synchronize blocks from scratch lately?
I think that there is a problem in the DVC network.

Pages: « 1 ... 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 [355] 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!