stereotype
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 10:15:55 AM |
|
Frankly it's astonishing to see such a high number of trolls and fudsters. If, as they suggest, this ship is going down then why are they present in such numbers? They aren't populating other threads in this way which leads us to one conclusion.
ActM and it's prospects are to be taken seriously.
Not astonishing considering they are the best fed trolls and fudsters, ever. Have to question the definition of WHO is a troll, reading this thread.
|
|
|
|
deizel
Member

Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 11:02:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 07:04:02 PM |
|
ActM has too many whales invested for it to go below 0.0025 (That is what is "Guaranteed" before Ken takes his shares.)
Does Whales have an effect at all in the prices when they only hold their shares? I mean there have to be buy or sell orders in order they have an effect. If they dont then a small amount of shares might move the price. Thats why the shareprice isnt of so big matter for the big investors since they plan to earn from dividends and dividends arent influenced directly from shareprice.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 07:57:14 PM |
|
Now we are at 28nm, 65nm will still be viable and there's nothing wrong with them but they won't be able to sustain their farm after so many chips and will be forced to go to 28nm and be late in that as well. This is called logic.
No, actually. That isn't 'logic' at all. Logic is when you take axioms and perform inference to come to conclusions. You've just made a bunch of unsupported claims. All that matters is $/Gh and delivery date. 130nm chips may pay for themselves within a month if they're all up and running by the end of October. 28nm chips may never pay for themselves if they're delivered in February.
|
|
|
|
somestranger
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 08:26:29 PM |
|
All that matters is $/Gh and delivery date. 130nm chips may pay for themselves within a month if they're all up and running by the end of October. 28nm chips may never pay for themselves if they're delivered in February.
GH/W is just as important. If it takes 4x as much power to get the same hashrate then there are going to be issues scaling to compete with companies producing lower power chips. This is likely the reason that ASICMINER is having so much difficulty expanding beyond ~50TH/s -- the amount of power infrastructure required to expand becomes enormous, and LABCOIN will likely face the same issue after its first 50TH/s is deployed.
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:21:51 PM |
|
I've come to the conclusion that trying to persuade these fools is not worth the effort, they simply do not want to listen, for various reasons. You will notice ACtM's chief detractor icebreaker/crumbs has suddenly fallen silent. That's because he has bought low and is now holding ACtM. When he sells after the bounce back he will be here once again driving it down for another go on the see-saw. Pathetic, but made all the more possible by the unfortunate lack of news and the hyping of joke outfits like LabCoin. All par for the course. 
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:25:40 PM |
|
I've come to the conclusion that trying to persuade these fools is not worth the effort, they simply do not want to listen, for various reasons.
You will notice ACtM's chief detractor icebreaker/crumbs has suddenly fallen silent. That's because he has bought low and is now holding ACtM. When he sells after the bounce back he will be here once again driving it down for another go on the see-saw. Pathetic, but made all the more possible by the unfortunate lack of news and the hyping of joke outfits like LabCoin. All par for the course.
Selling high and buying low is how you do it right. That's your Bitcoin Pro Tip for the day Stuart! 
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:27:34 PM |
|
You obviously have no understanding on how much it costs to product a 28nm (NRE) and then continue to pump them out (After NRE).
Why don't you enlighten us then?
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:32:35 PM |
|
Selling high and buying low is how you do it right. That's your Bitcoin Pro Tip for the day Stuart!  Result. You have just destroyed any credibility you may have had on here with that comment. You are here to manipulate price only, and not a single word you say has a grain of honesty or truth about it. Sucker.
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:34:37 PM |
|
Why don't you enlighten us then?
F@ck off Trollie. The LabCoin thread is waiting for more hype.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:34:42 PM |
|
All that matters is $/Gh and delivery date. 130nm chips may pay for themselves within a month if they're all up and running by the end of October. 28nm chips may never pay for themselves if they're delivered in February.
GH/W is just as important. If it takes 4x as much power to get the same hashrate then there are going to be issues scaling to compete with companies producing lower power chips. This is likely the reason that ASICMINER is having so much difficulty expanding beyond ~50TH/s -- the amount of power infrastructure required to expand becomes enormous, and LABCOIN will likely face the same issue after its first 50TH/s is deployed. That's exactly the reason ASICMiner is having such a hard time, the 130-110nm ASICs at this point are useless because by the time they roll out the 40-50TH worth of Hashrate it will be November and at least two 28nm chips will be out on the market, 40-50TH will be a drop in the bucket. All of that time and energy they wasted they could have developed 55nm chips and maybe had them now or "by the end of October" and sure you might be able to get up to 400-500TH with those and maintain a fair market share but then you will reach that position again sometime in February where 200-300TH will be consider a drop in the bucket again. By now you are very far behind because it takes exponentially longer to get 28nm than 55nm, if you had started back when you developed the "130nm" chips you would most certainly be done by now and you can push out around 4-5PH with that technology before reaching those infrastructure issues. And as Ytterbium just stated, time is money and a lot of time and money would been wasted on old tech chips. If we assume the network hash rate is at 1 PH/s by beginning of November, the 50 TH/s is 5% of the network. ActM should be bringing some new hashing power online around this time, increasing their share of the network from 0.043%. LC will have 100x the hashing power as ActM until ActM gets it's 28nm samples hashing in November.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:36:45 PM |
|
Why don't you enlighten us then?
F@ck off Trollie. The LabCoin thread is waiting for more hype. Labcoin doesn't need hype as it actually has chips to bring online, unlike some companies.
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:39:47 PM |
|
Labcoin doesn't need hype as it actually has chips to bring online, unlike some companies.
That's right, they don't need hyped which is why you are on their thread all feckin day and night. So if you like licking their arses so much why don't you feck off to the Labcoin thread? Poisonous little creeps like you are not welcome here.
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:42:09 PM |
|
If we assume the network hash rate is at 1 PH/s by beginning of November,
Anyone entering into a debate on projections with this creep is only helping him plan his strategic attack on the ACtM share price. If you hold ACtM shares and chat to this guy you are as good as burning your own money.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:53:19 PM |
|
If we assume the network hash rate is at 1 PH/s by beginning of November,
Anyone entering into a debate on projections with this creep is only helping him plan his strategic attack on the ACtM share price. If you hold ACtM shares and chat to this guy you are as good as burning your own money. Actually, if they would have took my advice when I first offered it, they would be significantly better off now because ActM has decreased in price and LC has increased since then. Those who ignored my advice are the ones who have burned their own money.
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 09:58:09 PM |
|
Actually, if they would have took my advice when I first offered it, they would be significantly better off now because ActM has decreased in price and LC has increased since then. Those who ignored my advice are the ones who have burned their own money.
Come back in 2months and we will see who has become the expert in burning money. If you can still afford your internet subscription then, maybe you could beg for a few btc on the forums from all the people you have helped out/made bankrupt. lol
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 10:00:52 PM Last edit: September 03, 2013, 10:13:23 PM by Ytterbium |
|
Hey guys, I actually managed to short Activemining! Someone wrote a put option for 0.003 in three days, with a premium of 0.001 with the change I had left over from buying labcoin. If ActiveMining drops below 0.002 in the next couple days I might actually make a few satoshis! Why don't you enlighten us then?
F@ck off Trollie. The LabCoin thread is waiting for more hype. Well, the labcoin thread is full of ActiveMining trolls, hilariously saying Labcoin will crash in a few days on the basis of their chart voodoo while activemining tanks and Labcoin is stable. It's kind of amazing how angry people in here are getting about anyone who tells them ActM isn't a good investment at the moment. Anyone who took Mabsark's advice in the past couple of days would have made money. Why are you people so pissed at him? All that matters is $/Gh and delivery date. 130nm chips may pay for themselves within a month if they're all up and running by the end of October. 28nm chips may never pay for themselves if they're delivered in February.
GH/W is just as important. If it takes 4x as much power to get the same hashrate then there are going to be issues scaling to compete with companies producing lower power chips. This is likely the reason that ASICMINER is having so much difficulty expanding beyond ~50TH/s -- the amount of power infrastructure required to expand becomes enormous, and LABCOIN will likely face the same issue after its first 50TH/s is deployed. That's exactly the reason ASICMiner is having such a hard time, the 130-110nm ASICs at this point are useless because by the time they roll out the 40-50TH worth of Hashrate it will be November and at least two 28nm chips will be out on the market, 40-50TH will be a drop in the bucket. All of that time and energy they wasted they could have developed 55nm chips and maybe had them now or "by the end of October" and sure you might be able to get up to 400-500TH with those and maintain a fair market share but then you will reach that position again sometime in February where 200-300TH will be consider a drop in the bucket again. By now you are very far behind because it takes exponentially longer to get 28nm than 55nm, if you had started back when you developed the "130nm" chips you would most certainly be done by now and you can push out around 4-5PH with that technology before reaching those infrastructure issues. And as Ytterbium just stated, time is money and a lot of time and money would been wasted on old tech chips. No, I said delivery date is money, not "time". In the bitcoin world, today, time is not interchangeable. Six days in July were worth more then six days today, and this month is going to be worth far more then November. I don't understand why this is so difficult for people to understand. The difficulty is going up at a (currently) exponential rate. Getting hash power online today will be worth more then getting it online in November even if the hash power you deploy in November is 'exponentially' more efficient A 28nm design could theoretically be 21 times better then a 130nm design. However, if you get that 130nm design online and hashing when the network is less then 21 times as fast, you're better off. And also, Labcoin has a 65nm design on the way, probably ready by November and only 1/5.4 as many transistors per mm^2. But, ActiveMining isn't even using a true hand-routed ASIC, they are going with an FPGA copy design. It's possible that LC's 65nm chips may be cheaper per GH then ActiveMining's. We won't be able to compare since we don't know ActM's die size, which of course is under NDA. On the other hand I can tell you how large Labcoin's is, (6.5mm) 2
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 10:10:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 10:59:09 PM |
|
If we assume the network hash rate is at 1 PH/s by beginning of November,
Anyone entering into a debate on projections with this creep is only helping him plan his strategic attack on the ACtM share price. If you hold ACtM shares and chat to this guy you are as good as burning your own money. Actually, if they would have took my advice when I first offered it, they would be significantly better off now because ActM has decreased in price and LC has increased since then. Those who ignored my advice are the ones who have burned their own money. Yup. It's kind of amazing, arguing that simply engaging in an open discussion will bring down the price pretty much proves he knows the argument against ActM airtight. Anyway, here's some math. Labcoin's chip are each supposed to be about 2-2.5Gh/s (based on their 2,000 chips, 4-5Th estimates) They're 6.5x6.5mm. HashFast's chips are supposed to be 400Gh/s at 19x19mm. So, HashFast's chips are about 8 the area, and 21x the feature density. So, the HashFast chip should have about 179 times as many 'features'. And it's supposedly about 200 times as fast. So, not counting the transistor switch time, the numbers actually add up pretty closely. Now, let's look at the ActiveMining chip. Supposedly, it's only 20Gh/s. 1/20th as fast as HashFast's. In order to be as space efficient, it would need to be about 4.24x4.24mm. Which is pretty small. Of course, we don't know how big the die actually is, that's all under NDA, of course. But if it's much bigger then 4.24mm then it's not going to be cost competitive with HashFast/Cointerra's designs.
|
|
|
|
Vbs
|
 |
September 03, 2013, 11:19:58 PM |
|
If we assume the network hash rate is at 1 PH/s by beginning of November,
Anyone entering into a debate on projections with this creep is only helping him plan his strategic attack on the ACtM share price. If you hold ACtM shares and chat to this guy you are as good as burning your own money. Actually, if they would have took my advice when I first offered it, they would be significantly better off now because ActM has decreased in price and LC has increased since then. Those who ignored my advice are the ones who have burned their own money. Yup. It's kind of amazing, arguing that simply engaging in an open discussion will bring down the price pretty much proves he knows the argument against ActM airtight. Anyway, here's some math. Labcoin's chip are each supposed to be about 2-2.5Gh/s (based on their 2,000 chips, 4-5Th estimates) They're 6.5x6.5mm. HashFast's chips are supposed to be 400Gh/s at 19x19mm. So, HashFast's chips are about 8 the area, and 21x the feature density. So, the HashFast chip should have about 179 times as many 'features'. And it's supposedly about 200 times as fast. So, not counting the transistor switch time, the numbers actually add up pretty closely. Now, let's look at the ActiveMining chip. Supposedly, it's only 20Gh/s. 1/20th as fast as HashFast's. In order to be as space efficient, it would need to be about 4.24x4.24mm. Which is pretty small. Of course, we don't know how big the die actually is, that's all under NDA, of course. But if it's much bigger then 4.24mm then it's not going to be cost competitive with HashFast/Cointerra's designs. You left heat dissipation out of all your math. Most of these designs will require cooling solutions that are much more expensive than the price of the chip itself. ActM's chips at <15W will only require something like this per chip: 
|
|
|
|
|