[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[bleexrossignol]

dan.... the english one ?

[coinerer]

BlockNet Market Cap of 2500 BTC for new coin-token is one of the biggest market cap for IPO-ICO-ITO ever.

It will not see me before very big dip comparable with Quarks dip.

[coinerer]

VIA had IPO of 600 BTC (I think) and what has happened?

Pump?

And now?

[silvermetal]

dan.... the english one ?

Oh I thought so...but his name is dandaman3452 at reddit...hm I am confused lol

[bleexrossignol]

dan.... the english one ?

Oh I thought so...but his name is dandaman3452 at reddit...hm I am confused lol

if it's dandaman, it will easier to trust him (he had very good ideas for qurk)

[JimmyTaylor]

Fast forward 1 year tons of CPU coins but none of them resistent against botnets, GPUs, and large mining farms.

Quark made history in the entry of CPU and fast confirmations. Today magi solved all of the major problems that we find when trying to mine coins.

Anti-botnet, anti farms, anti GPU.

Coin magi vs quark.

[dan7777777]

Here are my posts going back 8 months.

http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/search?q=dan7777777

Not much more I can do now.  If you don't trust me, that's your problem.  I have done nothing wrong. 

[silvermetal]

dan.... the english one ?

Oh I thought so...but his name is dandaman3452 at reddit...hm I am confused lol

if it's dandaman, it will easier to trust him (he had very good ideas for qurk)

I agree, too many sockpuppets here. That makes it difficult to distinguish who is real, and who is really thinking for Quark (and not for himself).
I must admit, because I thought it was dandaman who proposed the blocknet, I thought it was a good idea for Quark.
Now I don't know anymore . Better to do your own research

[dan7777777]

dan.... the english one ?

Oh I thought so...but his name is dandaman3452 at reddit...hm I am confused lol

if it's dandaman, it will easier to trust him (he had very good ideas for qurk)

I agree, too many sockpuppets here. That makes it difficult to distinguish who is real, and who is really thinking for Quark (and not for himself).
I must admit, because I thought it was dandaman who proposed the blocknet, I thought it was a good idea for Quark.
Now I don't know anymore . Better to do your own research

See post above.

I have to say, I don't feel very welcome in this thread.  Does every new poster get treated like this? 

The BLOCKNET thread and Stealth thread have been much more helpful to me and helped me work through some problems I was having.   But whatever. Not jumping through any more hoops.

[bleexrossignol]

dan.... the english one ?

Oh I thought so...but his name is dandaman3452 at reddit...hm I am confused lol

if it's dandaman, it will easier to trust him (he had very good ideas for qurk)

I agree, too many sockpuppets here. That makes it difficult to distinguish who is real, and who is really thinking for Quark (and not for himself).
I must admit, because I thought it was dandaman who proposed the blocknet, I thought it was a good idea for Quark.
Now I don't know anymore . Better to do your own research

See post above.

I have to say, I don't feel very welcome in this thread.  Does every new poster get treated like this? 

The BLOCKNET thread and Stealth thread have been much more helpful to me and helped me work through some problems I was having.   But whatever. Not jumping through any more hoops.

"Does every new poster get treated like this?  " => + 1
the "quark community" is schizophrenic ....
they want new projects and criticize new members and new ideas
it's why nothing is done

you can try to post here http://quarktalk.cc/

[Netnox]

@dan7777777 nice idea Blocknet, it can bring some activity in quark so indeed better than nothing, also you are certainly welcome here. Digitalindustry had many sock puppet accounts where we had to deal with. Anyway good work

[reRaise]

So i got an answer from Blocknets dev on asking what the steps are in adding Quark, his reply:

any particular tech innovation planned or existing in the wallet which would fit into the blocknet idea?

He is talking about Quark here, i would like to have some input from you guys on Quarks innovation planned or existing in the wallet? As far as i know the wallet is just the standard one, since the new wallet 0.9.2 Max is working on with some possible added features isn't ready yet.

I just searched Reddit and the features in the new wallet was described to be, but i don't know if you can call these innovations:

Makefiles updated
Chain parameters
Synchronised Checkpoints
Configuration files
SHA2 POW hashing replaced with Quark hashing
Some translations from "Bitcoin" to "Quark"
Graphics
Payment server

I will also forward him this link to read http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/2ir59j/quark_phylosophy_or_why_does_it_differ_from/

Does anyone knows the update on the new wallet? Last time it was in test phase, also if there are any other Quark techs planned or worth mentioning please say it so i can forward it.

I replied back already, lets see what he sais

Update

Blocknets dev replied

Good stuff, I have relayed this to the foundation and we will vet this out and vote on it

[dan7777777]

Maybe send this to them:

I think quark has 9 9 rounds of hashing from 6 unique hashing functions. 3 rounds deliver a random hashing function. Even though most believe the SHA2 is sufficient at present, technology is always changing and improving. Just one of Quark's algos, SHA-3, was developed after SHA-2 in case it was somehow comprised in the future. The multiple hash gives a further layer of security against unknowns that will enter the market down the road.


Quark's average confirmation time is a blazing .64 minutes or less than 40 seconds


 See more at: http://www.quarkcoins.com/bitcoin-vs-quarkcoin.html#sthash.iwQrdDJV.dpuf

[reRaise]

Maybe send this to them:

I think quark has 9 9 rounds of hashing from 6 unique hashing functions. 3 rounds deliver a random hashing function. Even though most believe the SHA2 is sufficient at present, technology is always changing and improving. Just one of Quark's algos, SHA-3, was developed after SHA-2 in case it was somehow comprised in the future. The multiple hash gives a further layer of security against unknowns that will enter the market down the road.


Quark's average confirmation time is a blazing .64 minutes or less than 40 seconds


 See more at: http://www.quarkcoins.com/bitcoin-vs-quarkcoin.html#sthash.iwQrdDJV.dpuf

Already sent everything to him and also mentioned ShaqFu. Quark has the second highest market cap behind xcurrency form their added coins so it will add a big amount to their total market cap too + they get more supporters aswell. He already replied, see quote below

Good stuff, I have relayed this to the foundation and we will vet this out and vote on it

[Hilux74]

Here are my posts going back 8 months.

http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/search?q=dan7777777

Not much more I can do now.  If you don't trust me, that's your problem.  I have done nothing wrong. 

I'd say if you have a BTC post count of 0 when you appear and made multiple posts on a side project like BLOCKNET you appear to be a sockpuppet.  With a post count of 0 its a good idea to include a reference like above if you are an active member from another forum so these kinds of mixups do not happen.  I do not visit reddit, perhaps it doesn't have as many douchey sockpuppets as BTC, here at BTC it is an infestation and 99 out of 100 if it looks like a sockpuppet it is a sockpuppet.

So in light of your above post, sorry for calling you a sockpuppet.

I still think BLOCKNET looks iffy.  And it appears that changes do need to be made to the Quark wallet code to allow integration into BLOCKNET so if the community decides that it wants to be part of BLOCKNET I hope someone goes over that code with a fine tooth comb to make sure no funny business could result.

[Netnox]

Maybe send this to them:

I think quark has 9 9 rounds of hashing from 6 unique hashing functions. 3 rounds deliver a random hashing function. Even though most believe the SHA2 is sufficient at present, technology is always changing and improving. Just one of Quark's algos, SHA-3, was developed after SHA-2 in case it was somehow comprised in the future. The multiple hash gives a further layer of security against unknowns that will enter the market down the road.


Quark's average confirmation time is a blazing .64 minutes or less than 40 seconds


 See more at: http://www.quarkcoins.com/bitcoin-vs-quarkcoin.html#sthash.iwQrdDJV.dpuf

Already sent everything to him and also mentioned ShaqFu. Quark has the second highest market cap behind xcurrency form their added coins so it will add a big amount to their total market cap too + they get more supporters aswell. He already replied, see quote below

Good stuff, I have relayed this to the foundation and we will vet this out and vote on it

Sounds good, ask him like hilux said if there is need to edit the quark code or wallet code so we can update Max on Blocknet.

[bleexrossignol]

found this on worldcoinforum about blocknet
http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/6209-discussion-supernet-blocknet-internetofcoins-multigateway/

maybe we should open a new topic about it and discuss with other serious communities

[reRaise]

Maybe send this to them:

I think quark has 9 9 rounds of hashing from 6 unique hashing functions. 3 rounds deliver a random hashing function. Even though most believe the SHA2 is sufficient at present, technology is always changing and improving. Just one of Quark's algos, SHA-3, was developed after SHA-2 in case it was somehow comprised in the future. The multiple hash gives a further layer of security against unknowns that will enter the market down the road.


Quark's average confirmation time is a blazing .64 minutes or less than 40 seconds


 See more at: http://www.quarkcoins.com/bitcoin-vs-quarkcoin.html#sthash.iwQrdDJV.dpuf

Already sent everything to him and also mentioned ShaqFu. Quark has the second highest market cap behind xcurrency form their added coins so it will add a big amount to their total market cap too + they get more supporters aswell. He already replied, see quote below

Good stuff, I have relayed this to the foundation and we will vet this out and vote on it

Sounds good, ask him like hilux said if there is need to edit the quark code or wallet code so we can update Max on Blocknet.

Done

[Netnox]

found this on worldcoinforum about blocknet
http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/6209-discussion-supernet-blocknet-internetofcoins-multigateway/

maybe we should open a new topic about it and discuss with other serious communities

I think we should go for it, imo it's beneficial to Quark.

- The Blocknet expands a coin’s user base. It is analogous to a product’s reach once it has a retail website, versus before it has one.
- The Blocknet is a revenue-generating platform for cryptocurrencies to offer their services.
- The above two factors significantly increase the use-value of a coin, and, by implication, will significantly increase its price.
- It can benefit from Blocknets tech features

Once we are added we can open a new Topic regarding Blocknet

[Netnox]

found this on worldcoinforum about blocknet
http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/6209-discussion-supernet-blocknet-internetofcoins-multigateway/

maybe we should open a new topic about it and discuss with other serious communities

I think we should go for it, imo it's beneficial to Quark.

- The Blocknet expands a coin’s user base. It is analogous to a product’s reach once it has a retail website, versus before it has one.
- The Blocknet is a revenue-generating platform for cryptocurrencies to offer their services.
- The above two factors significantly increase the use-value of a coin, and, by implication, will significantly increase its price.
- It can benefit from Blocknets tech features

Once we are added we can open a new Topic regarding Blocknet

+100

Rusty any reply from Max? I'm going to email him and ask the status on the 0.9.2 wallet