Havek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2013, 01:30:05 PM |
|
I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent. So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent. So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
September 23, 2013, 01:41:32 PM Last edit: September 23, 2013, 01:55:21 PM by os2sam |
|
I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent. So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent. So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?
That is why it is editable. So yes it should. I don't think he changed it back?!? I remember it was a big deal a couple years ago when Tycho implemented it. Now all you have to do is wait till you meet the .01 minimum again. Edit: below is the link to the announcement of Full-Precision payouts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Havek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2013, 02:12:10 PM |
|
Oh, cool thanks!
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
September 23, 2013, 02:30:11 PM |
|
I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent. So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent. So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?
That is why it is editable. So yes it should. I don't think he changed it back?!? I remember it was a big deal a couple years ago when Tycho implemented it. Now all you have to do is wait till you meet the .01 minimum again. Edit: below is the link to the announcement of Full-Precision payouts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
September 23, 2013, 02:45:20 PM |
|
From graphic .00983712 BTC
Are you saying your expecting to be able to do a manual payout? If so that is less the .01. If you are saying that you can't do a manual payout until it reach's .01 then I concur. I'm just not sure what you mean?
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
September 23, 2013, 02:47:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
September 23, 2013, 02:50:13 PM |
|
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 23, 2013, 09:16:13 PM |
|
Why does deepbit have to solve a block for confirmations to start rolling. Actually blockchain.info doesn't even see the transaction. It's relatively large too 1.47 BTC...
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
September 23, 2013, 10:38:53 PM |
|
Why does deepbit have to solve a block for confirmations to start rolling. Actually blockchain.info doesn't even see the transaction. It's relatively large too 1.47 BTC...
This has been explained multiple times by several different people in the last 2 to 4 pages of post's in this thread. Just look back a little and you will see them.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 24, 2013, 12:10:31 AM |
|
But I use bitcoind 0.8.1 and smaller sums confirms directly, does bitcoind automatically add fees? how come I don't see them? Also why doesn't blockchain.info show the transaction as unconfirmed instead of not found?
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
Graet
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 24, 2013, 01:04:31 AM |
|
But I use bitcoind 0.8.1 and smaller sums confirms directly, does bitcoind automatically add fees? how come I don't see them? Also why doesn't blockchain.info show the transaction as unconfirmed instead of not found?
because Deepbit was doing their thing was before blockchain.info existed Deepbit mine their own transactions so the probably aren't announced to the network like a standard bitcoind would blockchain.info is a private business, unfortunately showing correct statistics is not money making and thus lacks support/development....
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:21:14 AM |
|
That makes no sense. Either the transaction is broadcasted on the network or it's not. My bitcoind sees the unconfirmed transaction therefore so does blockchain.info ones too. Unless thay have some custom bitcoind that works differently, but I have seen unconfirmed transactions there too.
I'm just curious how the bitcoin protocol works in this instance, I don't understand why deepbit has the only bitcoind that accepts to confirm it's own transactions, why can't another bitcoind confirm these transactions, it makes no sense to me. Can someone that truly understands the fee system explain?
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:26:15 AM |
|
That makes no sense. Either the transaction is broadcasted on the network or it's not. My bitcoind sees the unconfirmed transaction therefore so does blockchain.info ones too. Unless thay have some custom bitcoind that works differently, but I have seen unconfirmed transactions there too. I'm just curious how the bitcoin protocol works in this instance, I don't understand why deepbit has the only bitcoind that accepts to confirm it's own transactions, why can't another bitcoind confirm these transactions, it makes no sense to me. Can someone that truly understands the fee system explain?
Deepbit used to be large enough to guarantee it would mine many blocks per day. As a result, Tycho decided to simply use his own pool to make the first confirmation on pool payouts, guaranteeing he would never have to pay a transaction fee. BTC Guild did this at one point as well, since it makes economic sense. If you are constantly creating new blocks, why pay a fee that might go to another pool? That only lasted a brief period (late 2011), and isn't done anymore by BTC Guild [the total fees paid are miniscule and miner's shouldn't be forced to wait hours just so the pool can save a couple pennies a day]. Whether or not he broadcasts them at all, I don't know. It's possible Deepbit does broadcast the payment transactions with no fee attached, but because the transaction violates the "no fee" criteria of the network, the nodes connected to Deepbit will not accept/relay the transaction, so it never reaches blockchain.info or your own personal bitcoin node because of that.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:47:14 AM Last edit: September 24, 2013, 08:00:55 AM by rupy |
|
See that's the problem it DOES reach my bitcoind. So maybe my bitcoind is a first degree node to deepbit then, what are the odds? The fee system is so obscure. I never paid any fee ever, but if there is a no-fee thing, then wouldn't all my non fee transactions be stuck too?
Does the bitcoind add a fee always, without me knowing it. It can't right? Then either the sum left on my account would be lower or the recipient would get less than I send.
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
September 24, 2013, 08:07:36 AM |
|
See that's the problem it DOES reach my bitcoind. So maybe my bitcoind is a first degree node to deepbit then, what are the odds? The fee system is so obscure. I never paid any fee ever, but if there is a no-fee thing, then wouldn't all my non fee transactions be stuck too?
Does the bitcoind add a fee always, without me knowing it. It can't right? Then either the sum left on my account would be lower or the recipient would get less than I send.
Fees are applied on a variety of criteria, including transaction size (in bytes), extremely small outputs (dust), and using inputs which have not had enough confirmations (anti-spam). If it is reaching you're bitcoind, that part is a little more confusing. I know blockchain.info will eventually "forget" a transaction if it hasn't been confirmed after a certain length of time.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 24, 2013, 08:51:50 AM |
|
Ok, I think we need to dust off the fee system so that everyone can see it. Can you point me to the source for the fee logic or is it spread out over multiple places? I can't read C++ code with global variables that I don't know where they are, it's like php to me!
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
Graet
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 24, 2013, 09:07:46 AM |
|
Ok, I think we need to dust off the fee system so that everyone can see it. Can you point me to the source for the fee logic or is it spread out over multiple places? I can't read C++ code with global variables that I don't know where they are, it's like php to me! https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_feesthe Bitcoin wiki is full of useful info
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 26, 2013, 09:14:35 AM Last edit: September 26, 2013, 06:35:55 PM by rupy |
|
Ok, so my transaction is still unconfirmed after last nights block.
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 27, 2013, 07:27:23 AM |
|
Hey pool owners; anytime you want to get out of the potato couch is a good time.
The limbo transactions are piling up here.
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
|