Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:51:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 [301] 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too  (Read 1601093 times)
Havek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 01:30:05 PM
 #6001

I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent.  So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent.  So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?
1714150308
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150308

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150308
Reply with quote  #2

1714150308
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 01:41:32 PM
Last edit: September 23, 2013, 01:55:21 PM by os2sam
 #6002

I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent.  So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent.  So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?

That is why it is editable.  So yes it should.  I don't think he changed it back?!?

I remember it was a big deal a couple years ago when Tycho implemented it.

Now all you have to do is wait till you meet the .01 minimum again.  Smiley

Edit: below is the link to the announcement of Full-Precision payouts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Havek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 02:12:10 PM
 #6003

Oh, cool thanks!
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
September 23, 2013, 02:30:11 PM
 #6004

I have done that in the past, and it rounds to the bitcent.  So this time I just left it blank and it gave me the nearest bitcent.  So if I manually type down to the Satoshi it'll work?

That is why it is editable.  So yes it should.  I don't think he changed it back?!?

I remember it was a big deal a couple years ago when Tycho implemented it.

Now all you have to do is wait till you meet the .01 minimum again.  Smiley

Edit: below is the link to the announcement of Full-Precision payouts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742


os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 02:45:20 PM
 #6005

From graphic
.00983712 BTC

Are you saying your expecting to be able to do a manual payout?  If so that is less the .01.

If you are saying that you can't do a manual payout until it reach's .01 then I concur.

I'm just not sure what you mean?

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
September 23, 2013, 02:47:00 PM
 #6006

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742

was it ever implemeted? at the moment it is not.

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 02:50:13 PM
 #6007

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg365742#msg365742

was it ever implemeted? at the moment it is not.

All I can say this is what Tycho said

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3889.msg372652#msg372652

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 23, 2013, 09:16:13 PM
 #6008

Why does deepbit have to solve a block for confirmations to start rolling. Actually blockchain.info doesn't even see the transaction. It's relatively large too 1.47 BTC...

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 10:38:53 PM
 #6009

Why does deepbit have to solve a block for confirmations to start rolling. Actually blockchain.info doesn't even see the transaction. It's relatively large too 1.47 BTC...

This has been explained multiple times by several different people in the last 2 to 4 pages of post's in this thread.  Just look back a little and you will see them.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 12:10:31 AM
 #6010

But I use bitcoind 0.8.1 and smaller sums confirms directly, does bitcoind automatically add fees? how come I don't see them? Also why doesn't blockchain.info show the transaction as unconfirmed instead of not found?

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
September 24, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
 #6011

But I use bitcoind 0.8.1 and smaller sums confirms directly, does bitcoind automatically add fees? how come I don't see them? Also why doesn't blockchain.info show the transaction as unconfirmed instead of not found?
because Deepbit was doing their thing was before blockchain.info existed
Deepbit mine their own transactions so the probably aren't announced to the network like a standard bitcoind would
blockchain.info is a private business, unfortunately showing correct statistics is not money making and thus lacks support/development....

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 07:21:14 AM
 #6012

That makes no sense. Either the transaction is broadcasted on the network or it's not. My bitcoind sees the unconfirmed transaction therefore so does blockchain.info ones too. Unless thay have some custom bitcoind that works differently, but I have seen unconfirmed transactions there too.

I'm just curious how the bitcoin protocol works in this instance, I don't understand why deepbit has the only bitcoind that accepts to confirm it's own transactions, why can't another bitcoind confirm these transactions, it makes no sense to me. Can someone that truly understands the fee system explain?

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 07:26:15 AM
 #6013

That makes no sense. Either the transaction is broadcasted on the network or it's not. My bitcoind sees the unconfirmed transaction therefore so does blockchain.info ones too. Unless thay have some custom bitcoind that works differently, but I have seen unconfirmed transactions there too. I'm just curious how the bitcoin protocol works in this instance, I don't understand why deepbit has the only bitcoind that accepts to confirm it's own transactions, why can't another bitcoind confirm these transactions, it makes no sense to me. Can someone that truly understands the fee system explain?

Deepbit used to be large enough to guarantee it would mine many blocks per day.  As a result, Tycho decided to simply use his own pool to make the first confirmation on pool payouts, guaranteeing he would never have to pay a transaction fee.  BTC Guild did this at one point as well, since it makes economic sense.  If you are constantly creating new blocks, why pay a fee that might go to another pool?  That only lasted a brief period (late 2011), and isn't done anymore by BTC Guild [the total fees paid are miniscule and miner's shouldn't be forced to wait hours just so the pool can save a couple pennies a day].

Whether or not he broadcasts them at all, I don't know.  It's possible Deepbit does broadcast the payment transactions with no fee attached, but because the transaction violates the "no fee" criteria of the network, the nodes connected to Deepbit will not accept/relay the transaction, so it never reaches blockchain.info or your own personal bitcoin node because of that.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 07:47:14 AM
Last edit: September 24, 2013, 08:00:55 AM by rupy
 #6014

See that's the problem it DOES reach my bitcoind. So maybe my bitcoind is a first degree node to deepbit then, what are the odds? The fee system is so obscure. I never paid any fee ever, but if there is a no-fee thing, then wouldn't all my non fee transactions be stuck too?

Does the bitcoind add a fee always, without me knowing it. It can't right? Then either the sum left on my account would be lower or the recipient would get less than I send.


BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 08:07:36 AM
 #6015

See that's the problem it DOES reach my bitcoind. So maybe my bitcoind is a first degree node to deepbit then, what are the odds? The fee system is so obscure. I never paid any fee ever, but if there is a no-fee thing, then wouldn't all my non fee transactions be stuck too?

Does the bitcoind add a fee always, without me knowing it. It can't right? Then either the sum left on my account would be lower or the recipient would get less than I send.



Fees are applied on a variety of criteria, including transaction size (in bytes), extremely small outputs (dust), and using inputs which have not had enough confirmations (anti-spam).  If it is reaching you're bitcoind, that part is a little more confusing.  I know blockchain.info will eventually "forget" a transaction if it hasn't been confirmed after a certain length of time.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2013, 08:51:50 AM
 #6016

Ok, I think we need to dust off the fee system so that everyone can see it. Can you point me to the source for the fee logic or is it spread out over multiple places? I can't read C++ code with global variables that I don't know where they are, it's like php to me! Wink

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
September 24, 2013, 09:07:46 AM
 #6017

Ok, I think we need to dust off the fee system so that everyone can see it. Can you point me to the source for the fee logic or is it spread out over multiple places? I can't read C++ code with global variables that I don't know where they are, it's like php to me! Wink
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees
the Bitcoin wiki is full of useful info Smiley

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 26, 2013, 09:14:35 AM
Last edit: September 26, 2013, 06:35:55 PM by rupy
 #6018

Ok, so my transaction is still unconfirmed after last nights block.

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
conceptxp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 26, 2013, 06:52:48 PM
 #6019

I have payment that have not been paid since 9/23/2013.

Please check on it.

https://blockexplorer.com/tx/ceb71bb71e87f8cdf9fa3791e3c581c865a5bf777b0d807d34c80edb65da7005 (it shows invalid payment.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



However I just sent another payment to my self for 0.01 it sends out to my wallet instantly

https://blockexplorer.com/tx/1289dc85c635fc4b319a126bdf7c1d65770efcb7652558fa3abee7b152c734a7 (it shows invalid payment.)
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 07:27:23 AM
 #6020

Hey pool owners; anytime you want to get out of the potato couch is a good time.

The limbo transactions are piling up here.

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
Pages: « 1 ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 [301] 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!