os2sam
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
 |
October 22, 2013, 01:02:39 AM |
|
adjusted staged work up by 20 in cgminer and all is good again  Uh, how do you do that exactly? I thought ST: or Staged Work was just a status? |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
juhakall
|
|
October 22, 2013, 01:24:32 AM |
|
adjusted staged work up by 20 in cgminer and all is good again Uh, how do you do that exactly? I thought ST: or Staged Work was just a status? Presumably with the queue setting. |
I'm currently developing an experimental social AI platform
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
October 22, 2013, 01:41:03 AM |
|
The share of the pie is always proportional to your speed if you mine long enough.
You just answered your question ... 'your speed compared to the network speed', so a stable pool adds to the income by reducing the downtime So you like that Deepbit is a small pool, thus it is less DDOSed, so less downtime? What about higher variance, large periods to find a block, thus unpredictable payouts? When DeepBit were big, people hated on them for that. Now they're small, people hate on them for that too. Do you have a constructive criticism to offer? There is no hate, just wonder how people tolerate the large variance and the waiting between payouts. It was my preferred pool back in 2011 when it was the biggest one. |
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
October 22, 2013, 01:43:34 AM |
|
adjusted staged work up by 20 in cgminer and all is good again Uh, how do you do that exactly? I thought ST: or Staged Work was just a status? Presumably with the queue setting. The range for the queue is 1-10. So how could he adjust it up by 20? I set mine up to 5 from the default 1 to see what happens. Thanks, Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
Nemesis
|
|
October 22, 2013, 04:08:58 AM |
|
PPL hate on them because of the operator's ego.
The dumbass didnt want to vote and tried to control the network. I'm glad hes failed.
|
|
|
|
|
Gixer1970
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
October 22, 2013, 06:22:23 AM |
|
When writing a config file in cgminer it can only be set 1 - 10 but in the AI it can be set higher. Yes the queue. I have it actually set at 30 now as it only takes a few seconds to use this staged work before awaiting more work, and sometimes I am still not get 100% work utility. May adjust further later on today.
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
October 22, 2013, 09:32:45 AM |
|
When writing a config file in cgminer it can only be set 1 - 10 but in the AI it can be set higher. Yes the queue.
Thanks for the tip. I'll tinker around with it a bit. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:53:33 AM
Last edit: October 24, 2013, 08:09:16 AM by KNK |
|
I have a problem with the shares being accounted, not sure if it's just for the stats or the miner is working for nothing. It shows average speed, but no shares are registered and the worker's rate shows 0 MH/s with 100% stale.
Is it a pool problem or miner problem? It's cgminer 3.6.4 from fresh git
EDIT: It does work fine with two other pools, so it seems it's not the miner
|
|
|
|
Gixer1970
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:22:41 AM |
|
Am running 3 6 4 also and no errors. What are you mining with ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:14:20 AM |
|
Now it is OK.
The account was unused for some time, so probably it just needed a full hour of mining to catchup.
|
|
|
|
Gixer1970
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:18:59 AM |
|
Happy days |
|
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
October 24, 2013, 11:02:51 AM |
|
Small toy - Jalapeno ... not flashed yet - will need to wait till the weekend
|
|
|
|
grimphantom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
October 25, 2013, 03:45:34 PM |
|
iam having the same sort of problem KNK , my speed is showing correct but it says my worker is not connected , and have been mining for well over an hour now . did you get your sorted ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:15:24 PM |
|
Yes, it just needs some time ... can't say it's exactly 1h
|
|
|
|
grimphantom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:55:21 PM |
|
its ok , got it working , just had to join a team and it was sorted |
|
|
|
|
Gixer1970
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
October 26, 2013, 07:20:10 AM |
|
Hope it was team UnitedKingdom  |
|
|
|
|
Gixer1970
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
October 26, 2013, 06:12:02 PM |
|
Another block. Seems to be every 7 days now. Still a nice payout and worth the wait |
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
October 26, 2013, 06:20:33 PM |
|
Another block. Seems to be every 7 days now. Still a nice payout and worth the wait OK, I reset my clock. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
October 27, 2013, 06:58:30 PM |
|
how about reducing payout to 0,005 B atleast, as its value and diff increases its stupid to have this 0,01 B withdraw limit
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
October 27, 2013, 07:03:02 PM |
|
how about reducing payout to 0,005 B atleast, as its value and diff increases its stupid to have this 0,01 B withdraw limit
Are you willing to pay the transaction fee? |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
