Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 04:51:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 [475] 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 ... 849 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!!  (Read 946566 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
serdan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 01:38:45 AM
 #9481

LOL on this one.

http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n579/proxysquid_serdan/LOL_zps7da3b205.jpg
1715359866
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715359866

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715359866
Reply with quote  #2

1715359866
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715359866
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715359866

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715359866
Reply with quote  #2

1715359866
Report to moderator
1715359866
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715359866

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715359866
Reply with quote  #2

1715359866
Report to moderator
1715359866
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715359866

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715359866
Reply with quote  #2

1715359866
Report to moderator
nanoprobe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000


Traveling in subspace


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 01:40:27 AM
 #9482

ULTRABAMT

Bamt Ultracoin version  

I have just released  my custom   Bamt   With scrypt-jane cgminer  3.7.2    

this is a quick modification of the existing bamt 1.4 for  79xx cards

the 1.3  version   for  r9 series is coming soon,

This is for peoples who dont want to deal with linux commands and just want something plug&play

I hope it will help,  this is my small contribution to the Ultracoin scene

Enjoy


UltraBamt 1.4 https://mega.co.nz/#!JV9DyBgS!Ig7iqwsri6Ijcp055HZNtgNsVcUilE1mLJKew6xEXVs

Root Password  1234

Thanks. I'll be looking for the R9 version.

You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
lightsout
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:03:50 AM
 #9483

leetpools

i get 50% of fhat i should get, by pool, anyother good pool?
50% according to what? How are you measuring this? Just curious.
laterbreh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:15:41 AM
 #9484

leetpools

i get 50% of fhat i should get, by pool, anyother good pool?
50% according to what? How are you measuring this? Just curious.

Under statistics > Pool, next to your name there is an estimated daily utc at that hashrate at that difficulty if all stays constant.

sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:17:52 AM
 #9485

LOL on this one.



looks like someone is tryng to zig zag his way to profit  Grin
heydude
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:31:20 AM
 #9486

Hurry ! Hurry ! ... last call for UTC boat ...  Grin

Btc : 19z2ZcvsVJZ83NsUeLv2iYXw4T1J41KJ4Q
dcgirl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:32:12 AM
 #9487

LOL on this one.



looks like someone is tryng to zig zag his way to profit  Grin

Except they were buying high and selling low. I think a bot screwed up until it finally ran out of coins.
utclover
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 04:38:54 AM
 #9488

UTC/BTC PREDICTION

Utc current graph



Utc graph this week will look like this



Just telling you whats exactly is going to happen so you can anticipate it
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 12, 2014, 04:47:44 AM
 #9489

Just telling you whats exactly is going to happen so you can anticipate it

Looks more like dislocated right shoulder to me from TA point of view  Grin
MasterCATZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 426
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 05:17:07 AM
Last edit: March 12, 2014, 05:46:20 AM by MasterCATZ
 #9490

Fair enough.. However the R7 240 only has 320 stream processors, the 7750 only 512. This allows much lower TC without errors for some reason. The 290 has 2560 stream processors. With a TC of 28000, a lookup gap of 2 and intensity down at 12 it only manages 75KH/s. Any increase in intensity then causes hw errors.

Using my earlier config of TC 42000, lookup gap 3 and intensity 19, i can get nearly 150KH/s. Increasing system RAM to 8GB and lowering lookup gap back to 2 gives me around 190KH/s.. (getting a new board in the next couple of days with more RAM on it - YAY!!)  

You obviously don't realize that thread-concurrency actually has nothing to do with shader count when it comes to scrypt-chacha.  Thread-concurrency only sets the scratchpad buffer size (TC*128 / (1024/LG) = #MB in the buffer (with some rouding on Lookup gaps not evenly divisible into 1024).  I don't use thread-concurrency actually - my dev version (The 3_4_3-Testing branch on my github) finally supports setting just a buffer size - internally, it does set the TC value which is what gets passed to the scrypt-chacha openCL kernel program though.  So my command line looks really strange compared to yours I'm sure

yacminer -d 0,1 --remove-disabled --scrypt-chacha --worksize 128 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 --raw-intensity 640 --buffer-size 1520 --lots-of-other-stuff

You are right about one thing - with 4 GB of system RAM, I cannot allocate enough system memory to allocate 3.6 GB per card when initializing them.  I can, however, allocate 1.5GB 2 times on each card just fine without any loss in performance (from what a colleague has tested on the same card allocating the whole buffer for 1 thread - he also gets 2.9 KH/sec).

With that said, the one thing from above that allows you to do that is :
-g 2
This runs two separate threads within the miner.  You cut your TC in half and then subtract a bit for headroom to ensure it isn't putting one of your threads in dynamic GPU memory.  If you aren't using YACMiner, you're missing out on being able to fine tune your intensity using --raw-intensity.  Using a miner with just -I, I would have to choose -I 9 (which correlates to --raw-intensity 512), I would be losing performance as I am able to launch an additional 128 shader threads per thread per card(128*2*2 = 512 shader threads, or roughly 25% performance).  Now, this card, even at N=14 it is actually shader limited.  On cards with higher shader counts, you do need to be able to set a higher buffer-size (meaning more system ram), or increase the LG (as you are doing), or run more threads (-g 2).  

Experiment - tuning cards for high N factor takes experience, patience, and a willingness to try lots of different configurations.  In my case, I found a better way to control the GPU and made the correlation to how it works at higher N factors.  I made the software updates, and those are available to anyone.


O mighty Thirtybird GOD of Hash speed !!

Still trying to sort out maximum hash speeds from my R9 290's

 (TC*128 / (1024/LG) = #MB in the bufferYACMiner

what is  the 128 ? is that work size ?

128*2*2 = 512 shader threads
whats the 2x2

YACMiner would that work with https://phpminer.com/
or is their any web tools available for YACMiner rigs ?

you might be able to explain this to me

R9 290's HW error TC 32765 any intensity above I 12 hash speed around 80 kh/s
yet
no HW error when TC 42000 I 20 ?? at around 160 kh/s

now your saying if I add GPU threads I must halve TC ? ( in the past I only dropped I 1 level )
another thing that’s got me stumped I have multiple identical rigs and I found with TC 42000 I 20
 if I used 2x threads and dropped I to 19 my reject rate dropped kh/s same and if I used 4x threads dropping I 2 levels  reject rate dropped even more same hash speed


also with YACMiner

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure <options>


what are the options ??

I am assuming same as cgminer

CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native -I/opt/AMDAPP/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib" ./configure --enable-opencl --enable-gpu --enable-scrypt-chacha --enable-scrypt

Huh


configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-gpu, --enable-scrypt-chacha


Configuration Options Summary:

  curses.TUI...........: FOUND: -lncurses
  OpenCL...............: NOT FOUND. GPU mining support DISABLED
configure: error: No mining configured in

also tried

CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" ./configure --enable-scrypt

I had the same issue with cgminer not seeing GPU's but the --enable-gpu option fixed that for me ..


 sudo apt-get install ocl-icd-opencl-dev
dwolfx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 05:27:30 AM
 #9491

OK EVERYONE GET OFF NITRO POOL RIGHT NOW ATLEAST HALF OF YOU GO JOIN OTHER POOLS.
WE ARE ALL STEPPING ON EACHOTHERS TOES HERE.
THE ENTIRE POINT OF CRYPTO IS TO BE DE-CENTRALIZED,

You are hurting other pools by mining on Nitro , what is so hard to understand?


If it doesn't change, the only pool left will be ...nitro because as it stands it is becoming increasingly difficult to mine on any other pool.

having such a large % of miners on one pool causes orphans on all other pools, other pools are solving work before nitro and their work is getting thrown out because nitro didn't get the memo.

As it stands tomorrow I have to stop mining this coin because
1) Any coin that has only one pool is essentially doomed to fail so there is no point in mining it.
2) mining on other pools atm sucks with the amount of orphans nitro is causing.


By mining on nitro, you are ensuring this coin dies.


Nitro needs to raise fees to 15% to re-distribute the network a little, it just has to happen, there are other good pools out there, there is no reason for everyone to bum rush one single pool.

Leetpools!
MasterCATZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 426
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 05:56:15 AM
 #9492

ULTRABAMT

Bamt Ultracoin version  

I have just released  my custom   Bamt   With scrypt-jane cgminer  3.7.2    

this is a quick modification of the existing bamt 1.4 for  79xx cards

the 1.3  version   for  r9 series is coming soon,

This is for peoples who dont want to deal with linux commands and just want something plug&play

I hope it will help,  this is my small contribution to the Ultracoin scene

Enjoy


UltraBamt 1.4 https://mega.co.nz/#!JV9DyBgS!Ig7iqwsri6Ijcp055HZNtgNsVcUilE1mLJKew6xEXVs

Root Password  1234


unless its 64 bit not worth it , we need to access our RAM 32 bit is limited to UNDER 4 gig

i was planing on doing mine today .. but playing with  ./yacminer atm
FredDag
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 436
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:10:29 AM
 #9493

OK EVERYONE GET OFF NITRO POOL RIGHT NOW ATLEAST HALF OF YOU GO JOIN OTHER POOLS.
WE ARE ALL STEPPING ON EACHOTHERS TOES HERE.
THE ENTIRE POINT OF CRYPTO IS TO BE DE-CENTRALIZED,

You are hurting other pools by mining on Nitro , what is so hard to understand?


If it doesn't change, the only pool left will be ...nitro because as it stands it is becoming increasingly difficult to mine on any other pool.

having such a large % of miners on one pool causes orphans on all other pools, other pools are solving work before nitro and their work is getting thrown out because nitro didn't get the memo.

As it stands tomorrow I have to stop mining this coin because
1) Any coin that has only one pool is essentially doomed to fail so there is no point in mining it.
2) mining on other pools atm sucks with the amount of orphans nitro is causing.


By mining on nitro, you are ensuring this coin dies.


Nitro needs to raise fees to 15% to re-distribute the network a little, it just has to happen, there are other good pools out there, there is no reason for everyone to bum rush one single pool.

What dwolfx said.

I'm ready to start mining UTC but have put it off until nitro sorts its shit out and the pools are better balanced.
 
daniel32768
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:31:18 AM
 #9494

Lol @ Nitro

Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)    32 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)    30 seconds

I would mine l33tpools (they are in fact my failover) but i don't like the damn mobile interface style. I am always searching the buttons first before clicking them.
I like the neat, classic pool interface (like, for example, nitro's)
I consider myself a medium-sized miner, pushing almost 2 ultracoin MH.

I know this centralization is bad for our beloved coin, and i wouldn't mind nitro going as high as 10% fee to "spread the love", maybe 1% more per day until it reaches that (of course notifying everyone by email). Maybe there is just no other way. Registrations are closed now but ... isn't the damage already done ?

My .2 UTC.

PS : liked & shared FB page
laterbreh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:41:29 AM
 #9495

Lol @ Nitro

Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)    32 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)    30 seconds

I would mine l33tpools (they are in fact my failover) but i don't like the damn mobile interface style. I am always searching the buttons first before clicking them.
I like the neat, classic pool interface (like, for example, nitro's)
I consider myself a medium-sized miner, pushing almost 2 ultracoin MH.

I know this centralization is bad for our beloved coin, and i wouldn't mind nitro going as high as 10% fee to "spread the love", maybe 1% more per day until it reaches that (of course notifying everyone by email). Maybe there is just no other way. Registrations are closed now but ... isn't the damage already done ?

My .2 UTC.

PS : liked & shared FB page

Hi, we have actually re-enabled the classic mobile interface while we work out the kinks with the other. Thanks for your feedback.

daniel32768
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:51:07 AM
 #9496

Caterpie69 i don't think that would work. Miners wouldn't even bother because their hash power would fall back to next big pool (automatically)
And now, this next big pool would have the majority of the hash power.



Hi, we have actually redone the mobile interface to the classic while we work on fixing the issues on the mobile version Smiley

Can i access the "standard" interface somehow ? a hidden folder ? a hidden parameter Smiley ?

PS : Even on mobile i hate mobile versions of almost any site. I use the "Full version" link or in case there isn't one i use chrome and "Request desktop site".
I am a power user and like to have many options and many small things instead of big, shiny, less useful/powerful buttons.
laterbreh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:54:25 AM
Last edit: March 12, 2014, 07:07:05 AM by laterbreh
 #9497

Caterpie69 i don't think that would work. Miners wouldn't even bother because their hash power would fall back to next big pool (automatically)
And now, this next big pool would have the majority of the hash power.



Hi, we have actually redone the mobile interface to the classic while we work on fixing the issues on the mobile version Smiley

Can i access the "standard" interface somehow ? a hidden folder ? a hidden parameter Smiley ?

PS : Even on mobile i hate mobile versions of almost any site. I use the "Full version" link or in case there isn't one i use chrome and "Request desktop site".
I am a power user and like to have many options and many small things instead of big, shiny, less useful/powerful buttons.

Yes, on your mobile set it to "Request Desktop Site" and it will work.

I will implement a full site link, but our template is responsive and will "look" like a mobile site on your phone regardless. Sad thing is, it seems to work better than our mobile version using the responsive templates we have for it. Happy to have your input.

daniel32768
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 07:05:56 AM
 #9498

I am on a desktop not a mobile device. Site looks "mobile" in all 3 major browsers.
laterbreh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 07:07:59 AM
 #9499

I am on a desktop not a mobile device. Site looks "mobile" in all 3 major browsers.

We have a responsive grid, and it scales to resolution.

Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 07:27:06 AM
 #9500

moved 100% to leet. actually paying faster/more probably due to 2% on nitro. who's with me?

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
Pages: « 1 ... 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 [475] 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 ... 849 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!