nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
March 17, 2014, 12:45:24 AM |
|
how many kh/s for 270x ? 130 kh/s or not?
I can only get mine to 85 KHS with 0 hardware errors. 93 kh/s here with 0 HW errors.
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for. Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
Navyman47
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:01:41 AM |
|
Ill tell you why everyone mines @ nitro
cause of the chance to get a full block all for themselfs
i mine with just a 280x and 7850 and i have had a about 5 or 6 of them
this all happened when they did something to speed up the mining
it made the dashboard stats slow which is why blocks can look like there going into the 1000%
but then you get about 15 blocks paid all at once and some ppl get the lucky 50 blocks
sometimes you can get 4 50's in a row
I guess I know where my coins went now.
|
|
|
|
noobyonekenobi
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:09:53 AM |
|
how many kh/s for 270x ? 130 kh/s or not?
I can only get mine to 85 KHS with 0 hardware errors. 93 kh/s here with 0 HW errors. whats your oc settings nano?
|
PS4 Funds for my brother. Help me get it. Thanks! BTC: 1MqhiNvDfSBRzFuXLkdvUfve4zavoFw2f8 UTC: UdGz8AS2tzTnf5qZ59uYbCRbVqEQJZrQC2 LTC: LTUMKwRAkqtvbyA5s8TeNHduvWk9t3DvkN WDC: WjMWs8GUAyJXXtPJRXQXzJ9yjkda1GBbYs
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:12:54 AM |
|
Ill tell you why everyone mines @ nitro
cause of the chance to get a full block all for themselfs
i mine with just a 280x and 7850 and i have had a about 5 or 6 of them
this all happened when they did something to speed up the mining
it made the dashboard stats slow which is why blocks can look like there going into the 1000%
but then you get about 15 blocks paid all at once and some ppl get the lucky 50 blocks
sometimes you can get 4 50's in a row
I guess I know where my coins went now. SXC its not something they "did". All pools do that. If you solve the block seconds after the pool actually starts hashing for it, youll get a majority of the shares. Happens all the time. Maybe you should SWITCH POOLS and you would see that, and help even out the hashrate proportions thats hurting the network.
|
|
|
|
xwebnetwork
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:31:48 AM |
|
DCGirl and I have been talking. She's bringing some serious talent to the table. She already built out that ticker we are using on the site and she is now working on an amazing charting system. Definitely looking forward to it!
Still much work to be done, though, as is the norm for a venture of this scale, but we will keep on perservering; and in the end, success shall be had.
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:33:35 AM |
|
how many kh/s for 270x ? 130 kh/s or not?
I can only get mine to 85 KHS with 0 hardware errors. 93 kh/s here with 0 HW errors. whats your oc settings nano? Here are my config file settings. "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1", "api-listen" : true, "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin", "log" : "5", "no-submit-stale" : true, "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "scrypt" : true, "shares" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "gpu-engine" : "1125-1125", "gpu-fan" : "0-85", "gpu-platform" : "0", "gpu-memclock" : "1425", "gpu-memdiff" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "gpu-vddc" : "0.000", "intensity" : "16", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-cutoff" : "90", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "23576", "no-pool-disable" : true, "scrypt-jane" : true
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for. Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:40:09 AM |
|
DCGirl and I have been talking. She's bringing some serious talent to the table. She already built out that ticker we are using on the site and she is now working on an amazing charting system. Definitely looking forward to it!
Still much work to be done, though, as is the norm for a venture of this scale, but we will keep on perservering; and in the end, success shall be had.
Thanks for all of your work on the website! Its looking amazing!
|
|
|
|
Seio1
|
|
March 17, 2014, 01:55:52 AM |
|
Welcome to everyone! I'm pleased to present to you a story of Ultracoin odyssey! Please watch fullscreen in 720p for the ultra experience! I hope you enjoy it http://youtu.be/Uf6lmz3VVXAIf it's worth anything to help promote Ultracoin, please share it as much as you can. Let the odyssey continue!
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:22:15 AM |
|
Hi Everyone,
I need some help from anyone who's mining with 7950's. I have 4 Sapphire 7950s and I can't get more than 84khs from each one atm. I've searched this post for better settings, but none of them work. I'm using the settings from page 1.
Is this normal or am I missing something?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks
how much memory on mob? 1)Try 925-1100 engine and 1250 mem, also increasing the amount of virtual memory used by windows if you have extra disk space 2) or try increasing thread concurrency to 19712 but you will need to add --lookup-gap 3 with those cards, will proly give you less hashrate but increase in wu with more system ram being used
|
|
|
|
ryj88
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:29:10 AM |
|
My 7850 1G only get 57 kh/s, how can I get more?
|
|
|
|
Mkfly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:38:17 AM |
|
Hi Everyone,
I need some help from anyone who's mining with 7950's. I have 4 Sapphire 7950s and I can't get more than 84khs from each one atm. I've searched this post for better settings, but none of them work. I'm using the settings from page 1.
Is this normal or am I missing something?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks
how much memory on mob? 1)Try 925-1100 engine and 1250 mem, also increasing the amount of virtual memory used by windows if you have extra disk space 2) or try increasing thread concurrency to 19712 but you will need to add --lookup-gap 3 with those cards, will proly give you less hashrate but increase in wu with more system ram being used Hey, Thanks for the response. I have 8GB on the mobo and after reading some of the posts I upped my virtual memory to 22000MB. I'm currently running at 1050/1250. I'll try the 925-1100 range and see if that helps before increasing tc to 19712. With scrypt-jane should I be focusing on WU rather than the hash rate?
|
|
|
|
fiatslugg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:44:36 AM |
|
Welcome to everyone! I'm pleased to present to you a story of Ultracoin odyssey! Please watch fullscreen in 720p for the ultra experience! I hope you enjoy it http://youtu.be/Uf6lmz3VVXAIf it's worth anything to help promote Ultracoin, please share it as much as you can. Let the odyssey continue! Sweet. Really awesome job, I like how you used 'also sprach zarathustra' which conjures the image of an evolutionary superior coin. Small tip heading your way. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
MasterCATZ
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:46:40 AM |
|
guys thanks for the help.I have 3x290 and getting 175kh/s.What should be WU rate for 290s?
u r getting 175 kh/s each of 290 or altogether for 175 kh/s? is that 290 (non x) or 290x? each 175kh/s they are 290 trix oc my r9 290's @ 940 mhz / under volted @ 1.1 V their WU gets around 95% - 105% of my hash speed ( around 170 WU average ) each card is different ... some cards with lower hash speed get heaps of accepted with very low rejects others get higher rejects but higher hash speed ( so they kinda break even ) also a 5 deg variance between cards even tho they are cooled the same
|
|
|
|
MasterCATZ
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:52:21 AM Last edit: March 17, 2014, 03:06:18 AM by MasterCATZ |
|
Hi Everyone,
I need some help from anyone who's mining with 7950's. I have 4 Sapphire 7950s and I can't get more than 84khs from each one atm. I've searched this post for better settings, but none of them work. I'm using the settings from page 1.
Is this normal or am I missing something?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks
how much memory on mob? 1)Try 925-1100 engine and 1250 mem, also increasing the amount of virtual memory used by windows if you have extra disk space 2) or try increasing thread concurrency to 19712 but you will need to add --lookup-gap 3 with those cards, will proly give you less hashrate but increase in wu with more system ram being used Hey, Thanks for the response. I have 8GB on the mobo and after reading some of the posts I upped my virtual memory to 22000MB. I'm currently running at 1050/1250. I'll try the 925-1100 range and see if that helps before increasing tc to 19712. With scrypt-jane should I be focusing on WU rather than the hash rate? always WU , thats what pays the bill's I could overlock my cards for an 10% khs increase .. but only get 1% WU increase ... with an extra 30% more electricity being used amazes me just how much more power hungry the cards get for an 10% / 100 mhz increase ... tho faster ram is more beneficial with scrypt-chacha / N factors 64 bit miner with GPU / CPU mining http://www.cryptoslax.web.id/dl/releases/cryptoslax64-0.3.1-beta1.7z
|
|
|
|
Thirtybird
|
|
March 17, 2014, 02:53:06 AM |
|
My 7850 1G only get 57 kh/s, how can I get more?
overclocking - that's about the top hash for that card. I've got mine to 60 KH/sec overclocked.
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
March 17, 2014, 03:09:48 AM |
|
Hi Everyone,
I need some help from anyone who's mining with 7950's. I have 4 Sapphire 7950s and I can't get more than 84khs from each one atm. I've searched this post for better settings, but none of them work. I'm using the settings from page 1.
Is this normal or am I missing something?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks
how much memory on mob? 1)Try 925-1100 engine and 1250 mem, also increasing the amount of virtual memory used by windows if you have extra disk space 2) or try increasing thread concurrency to 19712 but you will need to add --lookup-gap 3 with those cards, will proly give you less hashrate but increase in wu with more system ram being used Hey, Thanks for the response. I have 8GB on the mobo and after reading some of the posts I upped my virtual memory to 22000MB. I'm currently running at 1050/1250. I'll try the 925-1100 range and see if that helps before increasing tc to 19712. With scrypt-jane should I be focusing on WU rather than the hash rate? I found that 1500 mem was overkill, I got the same results with 1250 mem and less power consumption. Also hashing increased by setting engine at 1100 as opposed to just using the suggested 1044. 925 engine is stock oc for your card so cgminer will use that as a low default anyway but I just use the 925-1100 setting and keep autofan higher at 60-85 to make sure the vrm stays cool. I find at 60% fan cgminer does not need adjust clocks much to maintain target temps. I have yet to see them increase in speed and cards are at 60c or so. The wu is important as any less than 90% of hashing means your are producing garbage but wu can improve significantly with some settings even though hashrate drops a bit. WU seems to be more accurate for each gpu after running the rig for an hour or so don't just check it for comparison after a few minutes of mining.
|
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:26:53 AM |
|
I have earned 14 utc in 6 hours with 524 kh/s isnt that to low ?I mine @leetpools
|
|
|
|
MasterCATZ
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:30:35 AM Last edit: March 17, 2014, 06:55:49 AM by MasterCATZ |
|
yes pretty low I am getting minimum 100 UTC per 1khs at Current Nfactor *edit* for 6 hrs that ok , I was thinking daily at todays difficulty I should be getting around 130 UTC / khs I am trying to keep it over 100 UTC / 1khs or else its costing me to much in electricity I pay over 50 cents per kw here in Australia and have 40kw worth of rigs mining UTC , how ever been turning a couple off lately and running them in eco mode lower core speed / Intensity levels at high difficulties like now I mine harder if difficulty's below 5 well until UTC hits $1 a coin again I really need to start working on a script that can change my mining settings based on Difficulty levels / attainable UTC but been busy setting up PXE bootable cryptoslax miners , that and trying to get Thirtybird/YACMiner working currently mining @ 70% of my potential and should be getting 1900~2100 UTC today @ 15mhs ( out of 20mhs @ current N factor 100mhs scrypt )
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:37:20 AM |
|
yes pretty low
I am getting minimum 100 UTC per 1khs at Current Nfactor
*edit* for 6 hrs that ok , I was thinking daily
i think nitro pool is the best but they dont accept new users unless invited so leetpools come as 2nd pool?Also according to calculator i should have earned 18 utc in 6 hours :/
|
|
|
|
|