Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining

[iambitcoin5]

I bet you're tempted after considering what I've just suggested. It gives you a chance to attempt to plead innocence while allowing you to step out of the absolute criminal fraud realm and into the, "Hey, we're just providing a game and we don't hide that fact", 'grey area' of justification.

Games tend to have rules. This one only has admin's whim.

Out of curiosity is there a meaning behind your username " suchmoon" or is it random? And yes this is a real question not trolling lol. Just asking cause its different.

[1714700914]

1714700914

[1714700914]

1714700914

[dyask]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

The stream of deposits into scrypt.cc is tiny,  a lot of worrying make sure people depositing 0.00096 BTC or 0.00719 BTC know that they aren't likely to ever get the BTC back!

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ
b088eefcd57abfea8eff8b646f663f18372662227a618a2e646554552c4b7300
8505f5da6eeb5e24f9f8a9bce58bb904676e3806580701e7ff1577c9d79a830f

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past. 

[LMGTFY]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

The stream of deposits into scrypt.cc is tiny,  a lot of worrying make sure people depositing 0.00096 BTC or 0.00719 BTC know that they aren't likely to ever get the BTC back!

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ
b088eefcd57abfea8eff8b646f663f18372662227a618a2e646554552c4b7300
8505f5da6eeb5e24f9f8a9bce58bb904676e3806580701e7ff1577c9d79a830f

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past. 

dyask, can I ask what the point of this post was? Leaving aside whether 200 BTC is or isn't a considerable sum of money, there are threads on bitcointalk where people are worried because they've not received 0.001 BTC for their involvement in signature campaigns - what may be chump-change to you may well not be to other people. It does matter whether it's a scam - people have lost money, and it's entirely reasonable to take action to prevent further people losing money (even if you think the money they're losing is insignificant). Your post reminds me of ThorSWO's recent posts, and not in a positive way.

[dyask]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

The stream of deposits into scrypt.cc is tiny,  a lot of worrying make sure people depositing 0.00096 BTC or 0.00719 BTC know that they aren't likely to ever get the BTC back!

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ
b088eefcd57abfea8eff8b646f663f18372662227a618a2e646554552c4b7300
8505f5da6eeb5e24f9f8a9bce58bb904676e3806580701e7ff1577c9d79a830f

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past. 

dyask, can I ask what the point of this post was? Leaving aside whether 200 BTC is or isn't a considerable sum of money, there are threads on bitcointalk where people are worried because they've not received 0.001 BTC for their involvement in signature campaigns - what may be chump-change to you may well not be to other people. It does matter whether it's a scam - people have lost money, and it's entirely reasonable to take action to prevent further people losing money (even if you think the money they're losing is insignificant). Your post reminds me of ThorSWO's recent posts, and not in a positive way.

Unless scrypt.cc comes back, the game is already over.   Saying it is worth worrying about 0.001 BTC is silly because there really isn't anything that can be done with $.25.    From here the real actions will be either legal or shady ones like DOX'ing, etc.   It just depends how much people are pissed off or hurt.

For myself, I don't have enough skin in the game to worry about it.   If there is a large enough group so make a legal action cheap enough, maybe.   

Anyway, there isn't any amount of posting here that is going to change anything.   Right now people are throwing in pennies at best.   It isn't an investment of any type at these levels, it is now just an empty eggshell. 

I'm just putting some perspective on this issue.   As far as legal action there could be enough.   There was likely more than 10000 BTC milked from scrypt.cc.   So there is something there.    However down that road, they people out 0.001 BTC would still be out 0.001 BTC.   

[LMGTFY]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

The stream of deposits into scrypt.cc is tiny,  a lot of worrying make sure people depositing 0.00096 BTC or 0.00719 BTC know that they aren't likely to ever get the BTC back!

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ
b088eefcd57abfea8eff8b646f663f18372662227a618a2e646554552c4b7300
8505f5da6eeb5e24f9f8a9bce58bb904676e3806580701e7ff1577c9d79a830f

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past. 

dyask, can I ask what the point of this post was? Leaving aside whether 200 BTC is or isn't a considerable sum of money, there are threads on bitcointalk where people are worried because they've not received 0.001 BTC for their involvement in signature campaigns - what may be chump-change to you may well not be to other people. It does matter whether it's a scam - people have lost money, and it's entirely reasonable to take action to prevent further people losing money (even if you think the money they're losing is insignificant). Your post reminds me of ThorSWO's recent posts, and not in a positive way.

Unless scrypt.cc comes back, the game is already over.   Saying it is worth worrying about 0.001 BTC is silly because there really isn't anything that can be done with $.25.    From here the real actions will be either legal or shady ones like DOX'ing, etc.   It just depends how much people are pissed off or hurt.

For myself, I don't have enough skin in the game to worry about it.   If there is a large enough group so make a legal action cheap enough, maybe.   

Anyway, there isn't any amount of posting here that is going to change anything.   Right now people are throwing in pennies at best.   It isn't an investment of any type at these levels, it is now just an empty eggshell. 

I'm just putting some perspective on this issue.   As far as legal action there could be enough.   There was likely more than 10000 BTC milked from scrypt.cc.   So there is something there.    However down that road, they people out 0.001 BTC would still be out 0.001 BTC.   

Respectfully, I think you're missing the point. 25c may not be much to you, but Bitcoin (and crypto in general) is not restricted to the First World. People worried about 0.001 BTC aren't going to be reassured by the prospect of legal redress, no matter how pissed off or hurt they are.

Posting here can change one thing - it can alert potential "investors" that they'll probably lose their money. That seems an entirely reasonable thing to do, and I'm surprised some people are dismissing this.

[dyask]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!  

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.  

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.  

The stream of deposits into scrypt.cc is tiny,  a lot of worrying make sure people depositing 0.00096 BTC or 0.00719 BTC know that they aren't likely to ever get the BTC back!

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ
b088eefcd57abfea8eff8b646f663f18372662227a618a2e646554552c4b7300
8505f5da6eeb5e24f9f8a9bce58bb904676e3806580701e7ff1577c9d79a830f

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past.  

dyask, can I ask what the point of this post was? Leaving aside whether 200 BTC is or isn't a considerable sum of money, there are threads on bitcointalk where people are worried because they've not received 0.001 BTC for their involvement in signature campaigns - what may be chump-change to you may well not be to other people. It does matter whether it's a scam - people have lost money, and it's entirely reasonable to take action to prevent further people losing money (even if you think the money they're losing is insignificant). Your post reminds me of ThorSWO's recent posts, and not in a positive way.

Unless scrypt.cc comes back, the game is already over.   Saying it is worth worrying about 0.001 BTC is silly because there really isn't anything that can be done with $.25.    From here the real actions will be either legal or shady ones like DOX'ing, etc.   It just depends how much people are pissed off or hurt.

For myself, I don't have enough skin in the game to worry about it.   If there is a large enough group so make a legal action cheap enough, maybe.  

Anyway, there isn't any amount of posting here that is going to change anything.   Right now people are throwing in pennies at best.   It isn't an investment of any type at these levels, it is now just an empty eggshell.  

I'm just putting some perspective on this issue.   As far as legal action there could be enough.   There was likely more than 10000 BTC milked from scrypt.cc.   So there is something there.    However down that road, they people out 0.001 BTC would still be out 0.001 BTC.  

Respectfully, I think you're missing the point. 25c may not be much to you, but Bitcoin (and crypto in general) is not restricted to the First World. People worried about 0.001 BTC aren't going to be reassured by the prospect of legal redress, no matter how pissed off or hurt they are.

Posting here can change one thing - it can alert potential "investors" that they'll probably lose their money. That seems an entirely reasonable thing to do, and I'm surprised some people are dismissing this.

Respectively, anyone that has access to scrypt.cc has a great deal more than $.25 invested in that access.   That isn't a first world issue.   Sure kids haven't paid anything, but someone has paid for them.   All the time I hear about people mining with "free" electricity.   Get real, someone is paying the real costs.   Also most of the people screaming about tiny amounts of BTC are from first world countries.  

In fact at nearly 500 pages, the information is in the thread.   The constant drone of warnings is just noise at this point.   Not that there is a lot of other information in this thread.    

It is your right to post warning after warning and believe you are changing the world.  It is also my right to realize how silly and pointless it is.    

[LMGTFY]

Respectively, anyone that has access to scrypt.cc has a great deal more than $.25 invested in that access.  

I thought your issue was that the amounts involved now were insignificant (I disagreed). If that isn't, in fact, your view then I apologise for misinterpreting your original post.

That isn't a first world issue.

Well, my argument was that this affects people outside the First World. I'm not sure I'd go as far as saying this isn't a First World issue - there are people in my city where 25c is a lot of money (I live in the UK, where the main opposition party has just elected a leader on an anti-austerity ticket. I suspect my city is worse off than many UK cities, but poverty is increasing in the UK).

Sure kids haven't paid anything, but someone has paid for them.   All the time I hear about people mining with "free" electricity.   Get real, someone is paying the real costs.  

Not sure what you're saying here, or how it relates to my point. I'm concerned for people who have or who are considering paying into scrypt.cc, not random others with "free" electricity.

Also most of the people screaming about tiny amounts of BTC are from first world countries.  

Ah, I clearly don't have access to the same data you do. Could you link me to it? Thanks!

In fact at nearly 500 pages, the information is in the thread.   The constant drone of warnings is just noise at this point.   Not there is a lot of other information in this thread.    

It is your right to post warning after warning and believe you are changing the world.  It is also my right to realize how silly and pointless it is.    

I'm not posting warning after warning: I'm challenging anyone who attempts to minimise or obfuscate the risks. Realise all you like, and posting here is your right, but if you post your thoughts expect to be challenged. Back to my original question - what do you get out of your post?

[dyask]

Hmmm sorry the UK isn't a 1st world country? ... I thought it was.  

Seriously?   If people are investing in scrypt.cc with money that is important to them, then warnings aren't going to address that issue.   The amount doesn't really matter.  

As far as where I hear about people screaming over tiny amounts.   Well I read about it in English in various crypto forums.    

I doubt there are legal lottery tickets anywhere in the world that can be bought for 0.001 BTC right now.   Now that is also throwing your money away!   Where is the outrage and the postings against that?    

Anyway get back to your happy warning posting if you want.   I was just being practical.   As far as scrypt.cc goes, the BTC is gone unless something drastic changes.   There isn't any real amount of BTC going in and there isn't much coming out.    Most of the BTC is simply gone.   

[LMGTFY]

Hmmm sorry the UK isn't a 1st world country? ... I thought it was.  

I don't think you've understood what I'm saying. My original point was that not everyone lives in the First World, and for those people (who don't live in the First World) 25c may well be a lot of money. Additionally, there are also people in the First World - in the UK for example - for whom 25c is significant.

Seriously?   If people are investing in scrypt.cc with money that is important to them, then warnings aren't going to address that issue.   The amount doesn't really matter.  

Some people will certainly disregard warnings. Other people will miss warnings, or see posts such as yours, and not realise just how risky scrypt.cc is. Another group will do due diligence and avoid it like the plague. Amazingly, not everyone is the same. People live in different parts of the world, have different standards of living, and have different expectations. For many people "cloud mining" has an entirely different meaning to "gambling", for example.

As far as where I hear about people screaming over tiny amounts.   Well I read about it in English in various crypto forums.

One thing many people do have in common, despite everything else, is language. Many Africans use French on the Internet, for example. English is far more widely used, particularly among people from Asia. Dig deeper into the English voices, and many times you'll find someone from India.
   

I doubt there are legal lottery tickets anywhere in the world that can be bought for 0.001 BTC right now.   Now that is also throwing your money away!   Where is the outrage and the postings against that?    

In the UK - and in other countries where lotteries are legal - lotteries are regulated to ensure that they're run fairly and that the lottery operator pays out when they've promised to pay out. I don't find that particularly outrageous. And lotteries tend to be marketed as "lotteries", not "cloud mining" or something similar.

Anyway get back to your happy warning posting if you want.   I was just being practical.   As far as scrypt.cc goes, the BTC is gone unless something drastic changes.   There isn't any real amount of BTC going in and there isn't much coming out.    Most of the BTC is simply gone.   

What practical purpose did your post serve? (Sorry, I realise this is the third time I've asked this question but I'm hopeful that if I keep asking it in slightly different ways you might answer).

[Meepers]

Got my 3 withdraws yesterday.
Very awsome  

You are a Liar.
From my last 10 withdrawals only 3 were executed. The last - 15 days ago.

I could care less about your withdraws.
I recieved 3 yesterday.
According to the blockchain a few thousand transactions were made yesterday.

From my last 25 withdraw requests, only 1 has been executed. The rest were returned to sender. And one - for 10 BTC - was marked as processed/executed but never received.

[suchmoon]

What practical purpose did your post serve? (Sorry, I realise this is the third time I've asked this question but I'm hopeful that if I keep asking it in slightly different ways you might answer).

And I ask you - "What practical purpose did your posts serve?"
Дaвнo yжe я вocxищaюcь вaшeгo мacтepcтвa pитopики, aнглийcкoгo язьiкa и вaшиx cпocoбнocтeй aнaлизa и cинтeзa, кoтopиe нaмнoгo вишe чeм вcex пишyщиx здecь. Hy, пoчeмy тepяeтe cвoe вpeмя здecь? Haивнo дyмaть, чтo ктo тo пpoчecть вac и oткaжeтcя игpaть в scrypt.cc

I don't think that's naive. If this thread is left to dyask and ThorSWO one might think that scrypt.cc is perhaps just having some temporary issues. This thread needs eloquent rational posters like LMGTFY to provide a different perspective.

[suchmoon]

I bet you're tempted after considering what I've just suggested. It gives you a chance to attempt to plead innocence while allowing you to step out of the absolute criminal fraud realm and into the, "Hey, we're just providing a game and we don't hide that fact", 'grey area' of justification.

Games tend to have rules. This one only has admin's whim.

Out of curiosity is there a meaning behind your username " suchmoon" or is it random? And yes this is a real question not trolling lol. Just asking cause its different.

It's a play on Doge memes. I started mining around the time Dogecoin was booming (end of 2014).

[shane]

OP not online in long time
Summary - ScryptCC   
Name:   ScryptCC
Posts:   16
Activity:   16
Position:   Newbie
Date Registered:   February 01, 2014, 07:25:22 PM
Last Active:   May 01, 2015, 05:51:47 AM
ICQ:   
AIM:   
MSN:   
YIM:   
Email:   support@scrypt.cc
Website:   

why this thread still life ?

[suchmoon]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

Is that your new angle of defense for this scam? If someone had invested X and admin scammed them for Y (via outright theft and devaluation of KHS/MHS) then X - Y being a small amount means everybody should just walk away?

Will you walk away if Chris says tomorrow that your "shares" and "boards" are worth 40k satoshi per MH/s and you'll only get them if new BTC deposits are sufficient for him to pay it out?

[ThorSWO]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

Is that your new angle of defense for this scam? If someone had invested X and admin scammed them for Y (via outright theft and devaluation of KHS/MHS) then X - Y being a small amount means everybody should just walk away?

Will you walk away if Chris says tomorrow that your "shares" and "boards" are worth 40k satoshi per MH/s and you'll only get them if new BTC deposits are sufficient for him to pay it out?

Marcelo is not responsible for the MHS prices.
It's a market and users set the prices.

[kken01]

Marcelo is not responsible for the MHS prices.
It's a market and users set the prices.

oh really?
what created the KHS market in the first place?

[LMGTFY]

What practical purpose did your post serve? (Sorry, I realise this is the third time I've asked this question but I'm hopeful that if I keep asking it in slightly different ways you might answer).

And I ask you - "What practical purpose did your posts serve?"

I believe there's value in holding posters to account (by the same token, I should expect to be held to account for my posts). In dyask's case it leads to interesting conversations. I don't think I'm going to convince dyask to tone down their posts, but I can at least try.

Hold me accountable?   Since when do I just make random unaccountable posts?   

Tone down my posts?   Am I causing a riot?  Maybe there is too much vulgar language in my posts?

I sincerely feel there are just a lot of people here that don't like it when people think for themselves!       See my negative trust?   I got that for pointing out ThePhwner had some incorrect information in his scam claims against scrypt.cc.   My point was valid so he tried to brand me as supporting a scam instead of saying thanks for correcting his error.   There is sort of a Nazi like mindset in trying to keep people politically correct with self appoint enforcers. 

Well, remember the post where I asked you what purpose it served? And then I asked again? And again? And see how when ddalex asked me the same question, I answered? I guess that's what I mean by holding to account.

As far as I know you're not causing a riot, and I've seen no vulgar language (and wouldn't care if I had). Your posts appear naive, but I'm fairly certain you're not naive. Your posts put a positive spin on negative situations, and that's what I'd like to see toned down.  Comments like this...

Maybe the fires will be stoked up again, but right now the embers are barely glowing.   No one there probably thinks of it as an investment anymore, it is just a game at this point.   It no longer matters if it is a scam or not.   That time is past. 

... serve to minimise the issue. It may not matter to you, but it matters to other people. While scrypt.cc portrays itself as "cloud mining" it doesn't much matter what you and I realise, or think, or believe, it is.

By all means think for yourself. Just don't be surprised when you put your thoughts in writing and other people - also thinking for themselves - question you. Otherwise we'd end up with people running around saying all sorts of nonsense (I'll avoid breaking Godwin's Law by making a historical comparison).

So... what purpose did your post serve?

[ThorSWO]

Marcelo is not responsible for the MHS prices.
It's a market and users set the prices.

oh really?
what created the KHS market in the first place?

Marcelo created the market and sold his hash.
That doesn't mean he's responsible for the prices.
I can sell MHS at whatever price I wish.
So can you.

[suchmoon]

Marcelo is not responsible for the MHS prices.
It's a market and users set the prices.

Marcelo is responsible for every aspect of the MHS value, from rewards to the ability to withdraw.

It's a great cop out - make the site as dysfunctional as possible instead of simply running away with the money and then blame the "market" for devaluing everyone's "investments".

Doesn't make it less of a scam, but nice try.

[dyask]

At this point all the MHs at scrypt.cc is worth less than 200 BTC.   That is 200 BTC spread over many dozens of accounts.   There isn't anything there!   

All this jumping up and down and screaming over 200 BTC!   It is actually pretty funny.   

My LTCgear accounts have more involved than that!   I'm not even a large player at LTCgear!     All of this fighting over crumbs on the plate.   

Is that your new angle of defense for this scam? If someone had invested X and admin scammed them for Y (via outright theft and devaluation of KHS/MHS) then X - Y being a small amount means everybody should just walk away?

Will you walk away if Chris says tomorrow that your "shares" and "boards" are worth 40k satoshi per MH/s and you'll only get them if new BTC deposits are sufficient for him to pay it out?

1) How is pointing out something is basically dead defending it?  Maybe you are upset because I pointed out something you hadn't thought of?  

2) I have enough "invested" with LTCgear that it is worth some type of legal recovery.   The value of my MH/s at LTCgear is really zero at this point, vapor unless I feed him 129 BTC.   (Close to the current size of scrypt.cc)    Chris "owes" me more than 30000 LTC, you do the math, but it is more than a few BTC!    

There are probably people that have lost enough at scrypt.cc to organize some kind of legal recovery.   We'll see what happens with that.   In the meantime enjoy kicking the dead guy!   Heck you are still kicking Josh from GAW too even though there is a good chance he is headed to prison.    Maybe you should start kicking Mt. Gox too?   Mark could use some love as he is sitting in a Japanese jail waiting for his trail.  There is greater than a 90% conviction rate in Japan.  

Well I guess there is a chance that scrypt.cc will come back.  If it does or doesn't, it won't likely because of anything posted in this thread!  Just being a little pragmatic here.