SRBMiner-MULTI AMD & NVIDIA & INTEL & CPU miner

[doktor83]

SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4

Haven algorithm updated and ready for the fork. You can start using it now, it will auto-switch after fork

https://mega.nz/folder/qVIgxAwB#kKmgCDICmQwbdVvMb-tAag

[Acex29]

SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4

Haven algorithm updated and ready for the fork. You can start using it now, it will auto-switch after fork

https://mega.nz/folder/qVIgxAwB#kKmgCDICmQwbdVvMb-tAag

cool, great update

[BoozyTalking]

Hi, Doktor83! Will you plan to fix RandomX Huge/Large pages allocation for Intel I5 processors windows 7?
Coz it not work.

Code:

CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670 CPU @ 3.40GHz [L3:6144 KB][L2:256 KB][L1:32 KB]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algorithm               : randomx
Gpu mining              : disabled
Cpu mining              : enabled
Huge-pages              : enabled
HW-Aes                  : available
Startup monitor         : enabled

[2020-07-23 11:01:07] Initialising dataset & cache & vm

[2020-07-23 11:01:07] Couldn't allocate 2129920 kB in large-page memory. Using slower allocation

Code:

[2020-07-23 11:01:15] Dataset & Cache & VM initialized in 7709 ms

[doktor83]

Hi, Doktor83! Will you plan to fix RandomX Huge/Large pages allocation for Intel I5 processors windows 7?
Coz it not work.

There is nothing to fix specifically for that processor or win7, miner uses windows mechanisms to allocate mem in huge pages, so it should work same with every cpu
First make sure you have enough RAM (4gb for example), and that you tried to run miner after computer restart, so that there are still free pages available for miner to allocate.

[BoozyTalking]

I have 8Gb RAM, try run it right after computer restart - same result.

[SCF0]

After upgrading to SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4 I get CL_COMPILE_PROGRAM_FAILURE on a Radeon 290 and the miner exits afterwards. With 1.9.3 everything worked fine. I tried to mine Haven but when I try to run other algorithms I get the same error on 1.9.4. I use the 20.4.2 WHQL driver on Windows 10 if that matters.

Oh and I replied here as the update was announced here. I wonder if discussion regarding SRBMiner-CN should rather go to its own thread.

[BoozyTalking]

If you think i'm wrong about miner, just for example XMRigCC:

Intel core i5:

Code:

* ABOUT        XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670 CPU @ 3.40GHz (1) x64 AES
                  L2:1.0 MB L3:6.0 MB 4C/4T NUMA:1
* DONATE       1%
* ASSEMBLY     auto:intel
* POOL #1      ********** algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 08:44:58.286] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.202]  net  use daemon ********* TLSv1.2 ***********
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.206]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "f4fa3fae42315e4ad55027451ececc9768d2b7403e5a8ef859dd1ab83df9a152"
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.208]  net  new job from ******** target 0000054899c39bd5 algo rx/0 height 119123
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.211]  msr  service WinRing0_1_2_0 is already exists
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.215]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (4 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.685]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 0% 0/1168 +JIT (468 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.523]  rx   dataset ready (7836 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.524]  cpu  use profile  *  (1 thread) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.526]  cpu  READY threads 1/1 (1) huge pages 100% 1/1 memory 2048 KB (1 ms)

and even old Intel Xeon E5520 (which even not support intel optimization):

Code:

* ABOUT      XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (1) x64 -AES
                  L2:1.0 MB L3:8.0 MB 4C/8T NUMA:1
* DONATE    1%
* ASSEMBLY   auto:none
* POOL #1    ********* algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 08:40:56.331] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.269]  net  use daemon ******** TLSv1.2 ***********
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.271]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "f4fa3fae42315e4ad55027451ececc9768d2b7403e5a8ef859dd1ab83df9a152"
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.272]  net  new job from ********** target 0000054899c39bd5 algo rx/0 height 119123
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.282]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (8 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.375]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 0% 0/1168 +JIT (90 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.746]  rx   dataset ready (13367 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.748]  cpu  use profile  rx/0  (2 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.800]  cpu  READY threads 2/2 (2) huge pages 100% 2/2 memory 4096 KB (50 ms)

[yadacoin.io]

YadaCoin may be interested in integrating our algo into your miner. We're a RandomX variant. Is it possible for our coin to be integrated into your main release?

[doktor83]

If you think i'm wrong about miner, just for example XMRigCC:

Intel core i5:

Code:

* ABOUT        XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670 CPU @ 3.40GHz (1) x64 AES
                  L2:1.0 MB L3:6.0 MB 4C/4T NUMA:1
* DONATE       1%
* ASSEMBLY     auto:intel
* POOL #1      ********** algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 08:44:58.286] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.202]  net  use daemon ********* TLSv1.2 ***********
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.206]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "f4fa3fae42315e4ad55027451ececc9768d2b7403e5a8ef859dd1ab83df9a152"
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.208]  net  new job from ******** target 0000054899c39bd5 algo rx/0 height 119123
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.211]  msr  service WinRing0_1_2_0 is already exists
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.215]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (4 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 08:44:59.685]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) [b]huge pages 0% 0/1168[/b] +JIT (468 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.523]  rx   dataset ready (7836 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.524]  cpu  use profile  *  (1 thread) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 08:45:07.526]  cpu  READY threads 1/1 (1) huge pages 100% 1/1 memory 2048 KB (1 ms)

and even old Intel Xeon E5520 (which even not support intel optimization):

Code:

* ABOUT      XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (1) x64 -AES
                  L2:1.0 MB L3:8.0 MB 4C/8T NUMA:1
* DONATE    1%
* ASSEMBLY   auto:none
* POOL #1    ********* algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 08:40:56.331] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.269]  net  use daemon ******** TLSv1.2 ***********
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.271]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "f4fa3fae42315e4ad55027451ececc9768d2b7403e5a8ef859dd1ab83df9a152"
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.272]  net  new job from ********** target 0000054899c39bd5 algo rx/0 height 119123
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.282]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (8 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 08:40:57.375]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) [b]huge pages 0% 0/1168[/b] +JIT (90 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.746]  rx   dataset ready (13367 ms)
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.748]  cpu  use profile  rx/0  (2 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 08:41:10.800]  cpu  READY threads 2/2 (2) huge pages 100% 2/2 memory 4096 KB (50 ms)

Sorry but you are wrong, you can see in the log you pasted that xmrig also isn't allocating the dataset in huge pages ( huge pages 0% 0/1168 ). It should be huge pages 100% 1168/1168.
Like you see lower there : READY threads 2/2 (2) huge pages 100% 2/2 that the scratchpad for the threads was allocated in HP.

[doktor83]

YadaCoin may be interested in integrating our algo into your miner. We're a RandomX variant. Is it possible for our coin to be integrated into your main release?

Hi, can you give me a link to your github so i can see the changes you made with RX ? Also is there a stratum pool for your coin ?

[BoozyTalking]

I will not argue with you about allocated or not in huge(large) pages, but XMRigCC hashing 2x times faster then SRBminer on this processors, so looks like it use huge pages.

This is how log looks on Intel Celeron without enough L3 cache size:

Code:

* ABOUT        XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (1) x64 -AES
                   L2:2.0 MB L3:0.0 MB 4C/4T NUMA:1
* DONATE       1%
* ASSEMBLY     auto:none
* POOL #1      ********* algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 17:10:29.950] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.777]  net  use daemon ************ TLSv1.2 *************
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.780]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "***************************"
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.781]  net  new job from ******** target 000009375d366e6c algo rx/0 height 119187
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.784]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (4 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.791]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 0% 0/1168 +JIT (4 ms)
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.601]  rx   dataset ready (23806 ms)
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.604]  cpu  use profile  rx/0  (2 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.647]  cpu  READY threads 2/2 (2) huge pages 0% 0/2 memory 4096 KB (40 ms)

[yadacoin.io]

YadaCoin may be interested in integrating our algo into your miner. We're a RandomX variant. Is it possible for our coin to be integrated into your main release?

Hi, can you give me a link to your github so i can see the changes you made with RX ? Also is there a stratum pool for your coin ?

Our changes:
https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/compare/7567cef4c6192fb5356bbdd7db802be77be0439b...575d33f8620557e0b2cd0069d09a19a43f4aaede#diff-9e23bd2bad82d05cb017e4933a8c7b66

We have not implemented a stratum pool yet. Is it required? If so, we can make it happen.

[doktor83]

I will not argue with you about allocated or not in huge(large) pages, but XMRigCC hashing 2x times faster then SRBminer on this processors, so looks like it use huge pages.

This is how log looks on Intel Celeron without enough L3 cache size:

Code:

* ABOUT        XMRigCC/2.7.0  gcc/10.1.0 (RELEASE)
* LIBS         libuv/1.38.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1g hwloc/2.2.0
* HUGE PAGES   permission granted
* CPU          Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (1) x64 -AES
                   L2:2.0 MB L3:0.0 MB 4C/4T NUMA:1
* DONATE       1%
* ASSEMBLY     auto:none
* POOL #1      ********* algo rx/0
* COMMANDS     hashrate, pause, resume, quit
[2020-08-06 17:10:29.950] CC feature is disabled.
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.777]  net  use daemon ************ TLSv1.2 *************
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.780]  net  fingerprint (SHA-256): "***************************"
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.781]  net  new job from ******** target 000009375d366e6c algo rx/0 height 119187
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.784]  rx   init dataset algo rx/0 (4 threads) seed 4181a493b397a733...
[2020-08-06 17:10:30.791]  rx   allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 0% 0/1168 +JIT (4 ms)
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.601]  rx   dataset ready (23806 ms)
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.604]  cpu  use profile  rx/0  (2 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2020-08-06 17:10:54.647]  cpu  READY threads 2/2 (2) huge pages 0% 0/2 memory 4096 KB (40 ms)

Maybe hashes 2x faster but still the dataset is not allocated in huge pages. ( huge pages 0% 0/1168 )

Look how that line  should look when dataset is allocated successfully in HP mem.

[doktor83]

YadaCoin may be interested in integrating our algo into your miner. We're a RandomX variant. Is it possible for our coin to be integrated into your main release?

Hi, can you give me a link to your github so i can see the changes you made with RX ? Also is there a stratum pool for your coin ?

Our changes:
https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/compare/7567cef4c6192fb5356bbdd7db802be77be0439b...575d33f8620557e0b2cd0069d09a19a43f4aaede#diff-9e23bd2bad82d05cb017e4933a8c7b66

We have not implemented a stratum pool yet. Is it required? If so, we can make it happen.

If you want to attract more miners then yes, and my miner doesn't support solo mining, only stratum

[VictorGT]

Hi doktor83,

Scala (XLA) changes mining algorithm a week ago. No more Defyx, now is Panthera algo.

May you want to update your miner?. SRBminer was really faster than official miner on Defyx  .

[doktor83]

Hi doktor83,

Scala (XLA) changes mining algorithm a week ago. No more Defyx, now is Panthera algo.

May you want to update your miner?. SRBminer was really faster than official miner on Defyx  .

Next release will contain the change (but its ~ same speed as xlarig unfortunately) and also a ton of new stuff. Just need a few more weeks 

[VictorGT]

Great. I will like a lot to test beta version if you need betatesters 

[SCF0]

doktor83,

sorry for bugging once again, but please respond to the issue about SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4 I reported here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190081.msg54900572#msg54900572

SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4 is still the fastest option on some CN altcoins that are somewhat viable on older hardware so it would be sad to lose this option.

[yadacoin.io]

Looks like a great miner. We might be interested in integrating our coin with your miner.

[doktor83]

doktor83,

sorry for bugging once again, but please respond to the issue about SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4 I reported here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190081.msg54900572#msg54900572

SRBMiner-CN 1.9.4 is still the fastest option on some CN altcoins that are somewhat viable on older hardware so it would be sad to lose this option.

Hi, sorry i missed your message.
1.9.4 is just a quick patch for Haven, and yes i probably screw up some things.. Im not maintaining the CN version anymore, just wanted to give an option for XHV miners who want to continue using SRBMiner.
For all the rest algorithms just use 1.9.3 version.