GPUMAX | The Bitcoin Mining Marketplace

[pirateat40]

Update

The following action has been taken against the following pool:

• Slush - Rate limited due to connection issues

. . .

Slush is the last pool I would want to rate limit, but its causing issues with our miners.  Our miners come first.

[Starlightbreaker]

Update

The following action has been taken against the following pool:

• Slush - Rate limited due to connection issues

. . .
https://i.imgur.com/xzmuf.png

you're still using a pool with a fee? what is this, 2011? oh well, at least it's not deepbit.

once you know how to work around it....the fee is no longer a concern.

 

[grue]

Anyone noticed why the max payout you can set to is 0.000050 BTC, but the purchase price is 0.000055? Shouldn't you be able to set it to  0.000055 and still get shares?

[pirateat40]

Anyone noticed why the max payout you can set to is 0.000050 BTC, but the purchase price is 0.000055? Shouldn't you be able to set it to  0.000055 and still get shares?

What and we make no money?  What's your account email, ill FIX it for you.

[jamesg]

Anyone noticed why the max payout you can set to is 0.000050 BTC, but the purchase price is 0.000055? Shouldn't you be able to set it to  0.000055 and still get shares?

Grue, gpumax.com is a "for profit" venture. It is a win (miners), win (purchasers), win (pirateat40) situation.

Please don't complain that you're making more than PPS.

[pirateat40]

You don't want the BIG hashers ^^^^^^^  to get mad now do you?

[grue]

Anyone noticed why the max payout you can set to is 0.000050 BTC, but the purchase price is 0.000055? Shouldn't you be able to set it to  0.000055 and still get shares?

Grue, gpumax.com is a "for profit" venture. It is a win (miners), win (purchasers), win (pirateat40) situation.

Please don't complain that you're making more than PPS.

Nah, i'm happy with 130%+ PPS. Was just curious.

[Starlightbreaker]

• Bitlc.net - Banned <<< lol

why did you change it from "can't take the heat"?

btw, just making sure, the pool speed limit is per purchase right?

[pirateat40]

• Bitlc.net - Banned <<< lol

why did you change it from "can't take the heat"?

btw, just making sure, the pool speed limit is per purchase right?

Cause Jine has not talked to me since the issue.

Per purchase correct.

[cablepair]

starlightbreaker: ive always wondered what that picture is on your hop all the pools logo

is that dude holding a broomstick?

(genuinely curious)

[Starlightbreaker]

• Bitlc.net - Banned <<< lol

why did you change it from "can't take the heat"?

btw, just making sure, the pool speed limit is per purchase right?

Cause Jine has not talked to me since the issue.

Per purchase correct.

i guess i have to triple stack then. :/

starlightbreaker: ive always wondered what that picture is on your hop all the pools logo

is that dude holding a broomstick?

(genuinely curious)

broomstick indeed.

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/x-all-the-y

[slider1978]

starlightbreaker: ive always wondered what that picture is on your hop all the pools logo

is that dude holding a broomstick?

(genuinely curious)

I always thought it was a pool hopping scepter  

[cablepair]

• Bitlc.net - Banned <<< lol

why did you change it from "can't take the heat"?

btw, just making sure, the pool speed limit is per purchase right?

Cause Jine has not talked to me since the issue.

Per purchase correct.

i guess i have to triple stack then. :/

starlightbreaker: ive always wondered what that picture is on your hop all the pools logo

is that dude holding a broomstick?

(genuinely curious)

broomstick indeed.

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/x-all-the-y

nice

lol

you just opened me up to a whole world of shit I never new existed
thanks.



(from http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/x-all-the-y)


ok ok lets stop posting off topic before I get in trouble for starting the whole thing 

[Starlightbreaker]

lol.

now back to topic.

once you go public, are you gonna limit number of accounts per user?

[Turbor]

There seems to be some sort of longpoll (or other connection) issue between GPUMAX and the ZTEX mining software. I get lots of rejects and overflows. BitMinter and EMC work without problem. I have no idea what the problem is. The poll loop time jumps up and also getwork and submit time. If i ping the pool the timing is about 200ms. That's not brilliant but should work ? No problems with cgminer and my 3 GPUs.

Here is what i get with BitMinter and EMC.

Code:

bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.02%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=208.0MH/s,  submitted 18 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.03
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.99%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=209.9MH/s,  submitted 16 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.94
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 15ms (USB: 0ms network: 15ms)   getwork time: 144ms  su
bmit time: 293ms
Total hash rate: 417.9 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 409.5 MH/s
 --------
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.12%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=207.8MH/s,  submitted 15 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.03
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.46%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=211.0MH/s,  submitted 9 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.91
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 15ms (USB: 0ms network: 15ms)   getwork time: 179ms  su
bmit time: 280ms
Total hash rate: 418.8 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 404.5 MH/s
 --------
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.26%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=207.5MH/s,  submitted 11 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.01
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.96%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=210.0MH/s,  submitted 11 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.91
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 16ms (USB: 0ms network: 16ms)   getwork time: 187ms  su
bmit time: 287ms

And now GPUMAX

Code:

bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Using LongPolling URL http://gpumax.com:8332
/listenChannel
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=200.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=200.0MH/s,  submitted 1 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.36
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=200.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=200.0MH/s,  submitted 0 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.00
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 145ms (USB: 0ms network: 145ms)   getwork time: 1416ms
 submit time: 1078ms
Total hash rate: 400.0 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 71.6 MH/s
 --------
Warning: jsonParse: Parameter `data' not found
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 204.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 204.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=204.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=204.0MH/s,  submitted 16 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.00
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=204.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=204.0MH/s,  submitted 13 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.77
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 475ms (USB: 0ms network: 475ms)   getwork time: 1730ms
 submit time: 2104ms
bus-0-0: Warning: 10 overflows occured. This is usually caused by a slow network
 connection.
Total hash rate: 408.0 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 357.9 MH/s
 --------
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 208.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 208.00MHz
New block detected by block monitor
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 212.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 212.00MHz
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 208.00MHz

[pirateat40]

There seems to be some sort of longpoll (or other connection) issue between GPUMAX and the ZTEX mining software. I get lots of rejects and overflows. BitMinter and EMC work without problem. I have no idea what the problem is. The poll loop time jumps up and also getwork and submit time. If i ping the pool the timing is about 200ms. That's not brilliant but should work ? No problems with cgminer and my 3 GPUs.

Here is what i get with BitMinter and EMC.

Code:

bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.02%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=208.0MH/s,  submitted 18 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.03
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.99%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=209.9MH/s,  submitted 16 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.94
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 15ms (USB: 0ms network: 15ms)   getwork time: 144ms  su
bmit time: 293ms
Total hash rate: 417.9 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 409.5 MH/s
 --------
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.12%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=207.8MH/s,  submitted 15 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.03
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.46%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=211.0MH/s,  submitted 9 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.91
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 15ms (USB: 0ms network: 15ms)   getwork time: 179ms  su
bmit time: 280ms
Total hash rate: 418.8 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 404.5 MH/s
 --------
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=208.00MHz,  errorRate=0.26%,  maxErrorRate
=0.74%,  hashRate=207.5MH/s,  submitted 11 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.01
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=212.00MHz,  errorRate=0.96%,  maxErrorRate
=1.86%,  hashRate=210.0MH/s,  submitted 11 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.91
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 16ms (USB: 0ms network: 16ms)   getwork time: 187ms  su
bmit time: 287ms

And now GPUMAX

Code:

bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Using LongPolling URL http://gpumax.com:8332
/listenChannel
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=200.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=200.0MH/s,  submitted 1 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.36
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=200.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=200.0MH/s,  submitted 0 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.00
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 145ms (USB: 0ms network: 145ms)   getwork time: 1416ms
 submit time: 1078ms
Total hash rate: 400.0 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 71.6 MH/s
 --------
Warning: jsonParse: Parameter `data' not found
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 204.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 204.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: f=204.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=204.0MH/s,  submitted 16 new nonces,  luckFactor=1.00
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: f=204.00MHz,  errorRate=0.00%,  maxErrorRate
=0.00%,  hashRate=204.0MH/s,  submitted 13 new nonces,  luckFactor=0.77
bus-0-0: poll loop time: 475ms (USB: 0ms network: 475ms)   getwork time: 1730ms
 submit time: 2104ms
bus-0-0: Warning: 10 overflows occured. This is usually caused by a slow network
 connection.
Total hash rate: 408.0 MH/s
Total submitted hash rate: 357.9 MH/s
 --------
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 208.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 208.00MHz
New block detected by block monitor
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 212.00MHz
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-06: Set frequency to 212.00MHz
New block detected by long polling
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d3-0001-02-05: Set frequency to 208.00MHz

It's not really a problem as much as it is people buying shares on pools that can't handle the load which we are still fine turning to protect our miners.  Updates coming soon will address this and make buyers pay for rejects on pools that have issues so the miners are not penalized for it.

EDIT: We get a lot of pools ops testing their system which is not something miners should have to pay for with rejects and stales.

[Turbor]

Looks like ztex has to perform some magic to make this run

[Starlightbreaker]

btw, your limit didn't work.

still able to boost slush for ~300 gh/s

[pirateat40]

btw, your limit didn't work.

still able to boost slush for ~300 gh/s

Yea, its more of a baseline, its hard to limit based on GH.

[cablepair]

woohoo just won 100 btc betting on the oscars!!!