GPUMAX | The Bitcoin Mining Marketplace

[aseldon]

heheh damn I have been missing out

I set mine at .00004 weeks ago and have been so busy I have not paid any attention to it

excuse my ignorance but gigavps: how are you determining the exact amount?

thanks

+1 I'd love to know how people are able to find out the current price.

[1713559261]

1713559261

[1713559261]

1713559261

[1713559261]

1713559261

[1713559261]

1713559261

[bulanula]

heheh damn I have been missing out

I set mine at .00004 weeks ago and have been so busy I have not paid any attention to it

excuse my ignorance but gigavps: how are you determining the exact amount?

thanks

+1 I'd love to know how people are able to find out the current price.

It is nothing short of Voodoo.

You need to have a feel for the price and smell it from the air

GPUMAX is awesome !

Is there going to be some announcement or was that just a fake rumour ?

[amazingrando]

I wish we had more insight into what is going on on the demand side.  I can sent my price per share down to 0.00004 and I'm still not leasing any shares, which probably means that there's a hold up on the demand side.  It would be good to know if your price is too high or if demand is help up because purchases are pending.

[JWU42]

excuse my ignorance but gigavps: how are you determining the exact amount?

thanks

Go to Purchases...Purchase Shares...

See current pricing

[cablepair]

excuse my ignorance but gigavps: how are you determining the exact amount?

thanks

Go to Purchases...Purchase Shares...

See current pricing

thanks did not know that

[imsaguy]

So on top of those 15-20k writes per second, you want to add an extra check to each one to tell if the share is stale.  If it's so trivial, why don't you buy Pirate an extra server to handle the added load?

What are you saying, pirate is checking 20K shares per second for stales by hand when he is awake?
Let me rephrase the question: what is it you can check manually by looking at a screen, that you can not monitor automatically relatively easily ?

Have you heard about the dog/cat captchas?  Evidently, computers suck at telling the difference between a picture of a cat and a picture of a dog.  There are certain tasks that are better suited for the human eye than a computer. 

[miscreanity]

I may have failed a turing test here.

[yochdog]

I think it would be nice if bitcoin payouts showed up in the "transactions" area. That could be an easy way to see the history of payments...

Yea, they will.  Don't you worry my friend.

Any movement on this? 

[SgtSpike]

I wish we had more insight into what is going on on the demand side.  I can sent my price per share down to 0.00004 and I'm still not leasing any shares, which probably means that there's a hold up on the demand side.  It would be good to know if your price is too high or if demand is help up because purchases are pending.

Or it means that they are sleeping, thus not processing purchases...

[jamesg]

excuse my ignorance but gigavps: how are you determining the exact amount?

There have been excellent suggestions given by jimbit in this thread. Also, anyone can see the purchase price and deduce a reasonable idea of share value without too much headache.

As for bitlane's suggestion that large miners have a lot of workers, I used to do that to monitor my farm back when it was small and I had no clue about what I was doing (not that I have much more of a clue now). I now use monitoring tools and 1 or 2 workers.

[GenTarkin]

Just wanted to post some quick feedback. Ive noticed a behavior change when mining on GPUmax. It seems when there is a new block found. My cgminer spams about 10-15 LP requests against GPUmax over the course of a couple seconds. Didnt do this before, started as of last night. Any updates cause this or something?

[bitlane]

As for bitlane's suggestion that large miners have a lot of workers, I used to do that to monitor my farm back when it was small and I had no clue about what I was doing (not that I have much more of a clue now). I now use monitoring tools and 1 or 2 workers.

Are you using a local proxy ? or simply common worker account(s) ?

[yochdog]

Anyone else having problems getting logged in? 

[jddebug]

Anyone else having problems getting logged in? 

Yep, its been down for a while now.

[Internet151]

Anyone else having problems getting logged in? 

Yep, its been down for a while now.

[P4man]

If I enter the IP gpumax.com resolves to (184.173.241.234), the worker reports dead.
Im guessing thats because of load balancing. Is there another IP we can use to avoid DNS problems?

[jamesg]

If I enter the IP gpumax.com resolves to (184.173.241.234), the worker reports dead.
Im guessing thats because of load balancing. Is there another IP we can use to avoid DNS problems?

GPUMAX is working fine for me.

[P4man]

If I enter the IP gpumax.com resolves to (184.173.241.234), the worker reports dead.
Im guessing thats because of load balancing. Is there another IP we can use to avoid DNS problems?

GPUMAX is working fine for me.

I didnt say it wasnt working. I said it doesnt work if you replace the URL with the IP the URL resolves to, so Im asking if there is another IP I can use instead.

0   http://184.173.241.234:8332   Dead         
1   http://gpumax.com:8332   Alive

[tnkflx]

If I enter the IP gpumax.com resolves to (184.173.241.234), the worker reports dead.
Im guessing thats because of load balancing. Is there another IP we can use to avoid DNS problems?

GPUMAX is working fine for me.

I didnt say it wasnt working. I said it doesnt work if you replace the URL with the IP the URL resolves to, so Im asking if there is another IP I can use instead.

0   http://184.173.241.234:8332   Dead         
1   http://gpumax.com:8332   Alive

That's probably due to using Apache virtual hosts. Can be perfectly normal...

[drakahn]

It seems to be working well for the last few hours, hopefully nothing changes,