surfguy72
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 02:46:57 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. When does the registry number get assigned? I know its the reservation process that's been completed not registration. Believe we are in a 90 day period right now. He's been able to get this far, I'm sure he'd appreciate your help if that's possible. I'd hunt for his updates hurried, but on my android and its being funny. *** Actually cryptoseo captured it well http://whitecoin.info/news/official-registration-whitecoin-foundation-formalized/
|
|
|
|
malbee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 02:55:30 PM |
|
Mongonzo as whitecoin is a registered foundation could you please give us(the community) the registration number and where we can go to check the legitimacy of this. So far we only have your word on this and it would be nice for the community to be able to check up themselves to see how legit your claims are. A phone number of the office where you registered and some details we can use to verify your claims would be nice and maybe put some members(the community) at ease.
malbee, eddienova , GRV and CryptoSEO do not reply to me or try and do your usual tactic of doing a +1 on a old post to try hide my questions and do not say I am trying to FUD either like you guys do to anyone who has valid concerns. I am sick and tired of you guys constantly putting anyone down and calling them names because they don't do agree with your own personal opinion and +1 on everything like you lot do blindly without question.
To the guys mentioned above, hide my post or anyone else's in future that I think has valid points and I will just +1 their posts like you guys do and turn this thread into a bigger joke than it has already become this last week.
Look forward to your reply mongonzo so I can go verify this foundation myself like many others will do hopefully too.
Come on Kestrel....you asked a valid, logical, constructive question. And, I hope it has been answered to your satisfaction. I will add to surfguy's link and suggest you click on the "Name Reservation Request Status" link. Then just search for the name... There is a difference in motive that I hope you can see. I read every post in this thread...and the motive of the poster becomes obvious... Some have a logical well thought out motive like your question above. Some people have a motive of disruption and will not respond to logic no matter how you try to reason with them. I will admit that I have been guilty of loosing my "e-temper" at times and post snide responses when I should probably not respond at all. If we have someone like you, who has a valid question, feel like he is going to get commented out, then we've gone to far...and for that I apologize.
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 02:55:40 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. Hi Kestrel, Our official status right now is "Reserved with conditions", which means that the government has granted us the right to operate under the name "The WhiteCoin Foundation" for 90 days until our registration goes through the final submission and approval process. As has been previously shown to you, this can be verified at the Access Nova Scotia website. So what does "Reserved with Conditions" mean? Essentially: It means we're anticipated to meet all of the requirements of registration in the eyes of the registry of joint stocks employees who looked over our file, and that we've been granted a 90 day period to begin operations and submit any paperwork for final approval. When I began the process of registration over two months ago, we were initially met with a very large amount of questions by the Nova Scotian Government representatives I spoke with. When I asked for our name to be reserved, I was originally advised against doing so until I'd done the following: - Contacted a lawyer for legal advice (done)
- Researched the various acts we could register under (Association, Society, Co-op, company, etc) (done)
- Ensure we have access to $50K CDN in either assets or funding should we wish to operate as a Foundation under the Societies Act (done)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Finances Office of Nova Scotia (Done, they had no objection but many questions)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Service Nova Scotia and Joint Stocks Office (Done, they were of great help in guiding us through this process)
What all this means is that no matter what, even if we decide to register under a different act, the government felt we had our ducks enough in a row to reserve our name and grant us the ability to operate under it free of charge. In a worst case scenario, we'll have to pay a one time $50-$75 CDN fee to finalize the process should it be determined we'd be better off operating as a Ltd. or at the federal level. Bill C-31 has presented some interesting developments in this regard, which is why we will be using this 90 day period to operate to its full extent. We need to be flexible during the period that the government is looking at how or if it intends to regulate the operation of cryptocurrencies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Best regards, Chris
|
|
|
|
Kestrel71
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 03:16:58 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. Hi Kestrel, Our official status right now is "Reserved with conditions", which means that the government has granted us the right to operate under the name "The WhiteCoin Foundation" for 90 days until our registration goes through the final submission and approval process. As has been previously shown to you, this can be verified at the Access Nova Scotia website. So what does "Reserved with Conditions" mean? Essentially: It means we're anticipated to meet all of the requirements of registration in the eyes of the registry of joint stocks employees who looked over our file, and that we've been granted a 90 day period to begin operations and submit any paperwork for final approval. When I began the process of registration over two months ago, we were initially met with a very large amount of questions by the Nova Scotian Government representatives I spoke with. When I asked for our name to be reserved, I was originally advised against doing so until I'd done the following: - Contacted a lawyer for legal advice (done)
- Researched the various acts we could register under (Association, Society, Co-op, company, etc) (done)
- Ensure we have access to $50K CDN in either assets or funding should we wish to operate as a Foundation under the Societies Act (done)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Finances Office of Nova Scotia (Done, they had no objection but many questions)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Service Nova Scotia and Joint Stocks Office (Done, they were of great help in guiding us through this process)
What all this means is that no matter what, even if we decide to register under a different act, the government felt we had our ducks enough in a row to reserve our name and grant us the ability to operate under it free of charge. In a worst case scenario, we'll have to pay a one time $50-$75 CDN fee to finalize the process should it be determined we'd be better off operating as a Ltd. or at the federal level. Bill C-31 has presented some interesting developments in this regard, which is why we will be using this 90 day period to operate to its full extent. We need to be flexible during the period that the government is looking at how or if it intends to regulate the operation of cryptocurrencies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Best regards, Chris I have a few more questions but am being hassled by the wife as we have to do family stuff today and she refuses to leave me at home on my own. Thanks for the replys though and I will get back to this thread when I can.
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 03:30:41 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. Hi Kestrel, Our official status right now is "Reserved with conditions", which means that the government has granted us the right to operate under the name "The WhiteCoin Foundation" for 90 days until our registration goes through the final submission and approval process. As has been previously shown to you, this can be verified at the Access Nova Scotia website. So what does "Reserved with Conditions" mean? Essentially: It means we're anticipated to meet all of the requirements of registration in the eyes of the registry of joint stocks employees who looked over our file, and that we've been granted a 90 day period to begin operations and submit any paperwork for final approval. When I began the process of registration over two months ago, we were initially met with a very large amount of questions by the Nova Scotian Government representatives I spoke with. When I asked for our name to be reserved, I was originally advised against doing so until I'd done the following: - Contacted a lawyer for legal advice (done)
- Researched the various acts we could register under (Association, Society, Co-op, company, etc) (done)
- Ensure we have access to $50K CDN in either assets or funding should we wish to operate as a Foundation under the Societies Act (done)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Finances Office of Nova Scotia (Done, they had no objection but many questions)
- Seek comment from the Minister of Service Nova Scotia and Joint Stocks Office (Done, they were of great help in guiding us through this process)
What all this means is that no matter what, even if we decide to register under a different act, the government felt we had our ducks enough in a row to reserve our name and grant us the ability to operate under it free of charge. In a worst case scenario, we'll have to pay a one time $50-$75 CDN fee to finalize the process should it be determined we'd be better off operating as a Ltd. or at the federal level. Bill C-31 has presented some interesting developments in this regard, which is why we will be using this 90 day period to operate to its full extent. We need to be flexible during the period that the government is looking at how or if it intends to regulate the operation of cryptocurrencies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. Best regards, Chris I have a few more questions but am being hassled by the wife as we have to do family stuff today and she refuses to leave me at home on my own. Thanks for the replys though and I will get back to this thread when I can. I'll be happy to answer them, enjoy your family time today kestrel I'm about to take some personal time to do the same. Hope everyone enjoy's their sunday! I'll be back online tonight to finalize our big release about bill c-31. BTW: If anyone is looking for something to do to help whitecoin this afternoon, we could always add to our Canadian Media list. I've got about 200 reporters on it now, but they are mostly political/government news oriented. If anyone feels like searching Canadian newspaper and media outlets for business and technology reporters email addresses, it'll help us even further. Mainstream places I have yet to scour through for their business & tech reporters: - The Globe and Mail
- The National Post
- Global Television
- CTV News
You can email your findings or list to chris@whitecoin.infoThanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
WhiteNotWright
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 03:35:23 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. +1 This is a very important question so thank you for the query as it has been my central focus over the past several weeks. I think the foundation is starting to understand a little more how the transparency aspect will be required with extra sharp focus on communication. This is all now starting to unfold but unfortunately has taken a little bit to comb through all the chaff. These serve as the cornerstones of a legit operating foundation. I think the work in this specific area is actually something positive for the community. Unfortunately, it still leaves the issue of a developer and getting access to the WC code to enhance it other than starting a new coin. Not sure how we are to get beyond that impasse however. Waiting for those results to determine our direction.
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 03:44:35 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. +1 This is a very important question so thank you for the query as it has been my central focus over the past several weeks. I think the foundation is starting to understand a little more how the transparency aspect will be required with extra sharp focus on communication. This is all now starting to unfold but unfortunately has taken a little bit to comb through all the chaff. These serve as the cornerstones of a legit operating foundation. I think the work in this specific area is actually something positive for the community. Unfortunately, it still leaves the issue of a developer and getting access to the WC code to enhance it other than starting a new coin. Not sure how we are to get beyond that impasse however. Waiting for those results to determine our direction. Some good nuggests in here. One challenge I'm trying to beat is what is the best structure for the PR/communications team to ensure transparency and effectiveness. The WCF DEV them does have access to the code, though.
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 04:09:25 PM |
|
The website with which the process may of been started on is a good start now all we need is the relevant info(registration details) to go check on it's progress ourselves. What are these final steps too as I am of course interested in this like many here. I am sure mongonzo will tell us all the Registry Number and what these final steps will entail when he reads my posts. I will have many more questions later on regarding certain aspects of the white coin foundation and it's members but I believe one step at a time so I can research properly is the way forward. +1 This is a very important question so thank you for the query as it has been my central focus over the past several weeks. I think the foundation is starting to understand a little more how the transparency aspect will be required with extra sharp focus on communication. This is all now starting to unfold but unfortunately has taken a little bit to comb through all the chaff. These serve as the cornerstones of a legit operating foundation. I think the work in this specific area is actually something positive for the community. Unfortunately, it still leaves the issue of a developer and getting access to the WC code to enhance it other than starting a new coin. Not sure how we are to get beyond that impasse however. Waiting for those results to determine our direction. Some good nuggests in here. One challenge I'm trying to beat is what is the best structure for the PR/communications team to ensure transparency and effectiveness. The WCF DEV them does have access to the code, though. That's correct. The Dev team has full access to whitecoin's code and owns its github account. The original dev's github is still intact but not in use by us.
|
|
|
|
mickyd
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2014, 09:56:51 PM |
|
ive been holding 100k WC from the beginning watching the coin fall wonder if it ever gonna go back up to the highers price as it was at first??? if it dies my wallet dies with it WC to the end...
That's awesome, glad to hear you're with us no matter what. If we keep working together as we have been, a price rise is inevitable. We're in this for the long haul, and our good reputation continues to move forward. As far as I'm concerned, there will be no end to WC. We will continue to adapt and evolve with the cryptocurrency market and industry for years to come. +1
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 03:36:27 AM |
|
in the wake of recent vrc fiasco (vrc dev conspiring with mintpal to save their hides and rolling back entire blockchain), this dependence on "exchanges" goes against the idea of decentralization. technically speaking how hard would it be to implement decentralized p2p exchange directly in wallet?
An idea totally worth exploring
|
|
|
|
Iffy
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 06:45:13 AM Last edit: July 14, 2014, 08:35:15 AM by Iffy |
|
in the wake of recent vrc fiasco (vrc dev conspiring with mintpal to save their hides and rolling back entire blockchain), this dependence on "exchanges" goes against the idea of decentralization. technically speaking how hard would it be to implement decentralized p2p exchange directly in wallet?
An idea totally worth exploring Take a look at Emunie then .. That is what Dan is creating right now. Oh and technically speaking it is beyond the scope of most coders. It is something I do not believe Mindfox is capable of doing, else someone like SunnyKing would have easily added it to XPM or some such already. No I am not trying to slam Mindfox or question their skills. I have been part of the Emunie community for over a year and am a founding member, I get to see what is going on daily. I have a great deal of understanding on what such a thing takes to create.
|
|
|
|
crucial
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 12:59:21 PM |
|
Potential Market Delisting for July 14th on bittrex ?
|
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 02:13:41 PM |
|
That's incorrect, WC is not in the list of coins in the OP you linked to. WC is no longer in contention for short term removal as far as I know, and we have maintained some volume on bittrex. Bittrex has recently indicated a change in policy when it comes to de-listing as well, we would be given plenty of heads up if we needed to move more volume over there.
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 02:32:18 PM |
|
That's incorrect, WC is not in the list of coins in the OP you linked to. WC is no longer in contention for short term removal as far as I know, and we have maintained some volume on bittrex. Bittrex has recently indicated a change in policy when it comes to de-listing as well, we would be given plenty of heads up if we needed to move more volume over there. I'm seeing it on there, I thought we'd stayed them off for awhile. Either way, just hurt pride from me, loosing bittrex won't break us.
|
|
|
|
WhiteNotWright
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 02:39:30 PM |
|
That's incorrect, WC is not in the list of coins in the OP you linked to. WC is no longer in contention for short term removal as far as I know, and we have maintained some volume on bittrex. Bittrex has recently indicated a change in policy when it comes to de-listing as well, we would be given plenty of heads up if we needed to move more volume over there. OK, did not know a change in policy existed there, thus some communication failures along the way. From the link I went to in reference of this query, I found the following to include WC as of that posting and had thought someone mentioned that previously as well. Good to know the coin is sticking around. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FLy8spgG.jpg&t=665&c=6u9NFUxO5370iQ)
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 02:50:11 PM |
|
That's incorrect, WC is not in the list of coins in the OP you linked to. WC is no longer in contention for short term removal as far as I know, and we have maintained some volume on bittrex. Bittrex has recently indicated a change in policy when it comes to de-listing as well, we would be given plenty of heads up if we needed to move more volume over there. OK, did not know a change in policy existed there, thus some communication failures along the way. From the link I went to in reference of this query, I found the following to include WC as of that posting and had thought someone mentioned that previously as well. Good to know the coin is sticking around. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FLy8spgG.jpg&t=665&c=6u9NFUxO5370iQ) (W)Right you are! Heh Yeah I see it in the replies down there now too. They did consider us for removal but I think once they saw we have an established community, etc, they just quietly took us off the removal list without comment.
|
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 04:22:14 PM |
|
Haha, yay for price jumps if you've bought in, but 700 right to 400 yikes. And little volume. A nice slow gradual increase is surfs up!
|
|
|
|
ryanb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2014, 04:27:07 PM |
|
Are we going to see 5000 satoshi any time soon?
|
|
|
|
|