chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:19:17 PM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htmDetails for Transaction Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5 Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57 Total Output 21.49996 XC Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC 1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47 Total Output 2.210008 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC 19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC 20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC 21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC 22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC 23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC 24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 06:54:28 PM |
|
Really? Good to know.
Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected. Right ?
yes Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good. Problem is received coins are reused. Proof : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769I have to prove two address is related. XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC Right ? ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER Right. not from that transaction. Used address by Mixer is related after all. In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear. It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after. So I call it flaw. Ah, so there is no provable direct link thank you 1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine. okay show me the proof of link? http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm1FzikiCbBUM2YnatvHS9ufJtrUqkmuMD8s is mine.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 11, 2014, 09:48:56 PM |
|
sending 0.03 to both address's doesn't count as a LINK but thanks for the XC's Let's post this here before Chaeplin claims that there is a link... He's trying to make a fake link on the blockchain...
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 09:56:05 PM Last edit: June 11, 2014, 10:16:39 PM by chaeplin |
|
Analyzing XC mixer transaction by spamming. Dev refused bounty. and you have address XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV - which made the payment Okay so we know 2 things, XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV SENT a payment to XVrqrpe2ZDmykAnjcAHN6McbuDEjBZSvRZ now - can that be tied back to the original transaction? Hmm. I don't see any link back to the original transaction
maybe this will help original transaction --->>>> which was sent TO this address "XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G" http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18Gso now I've revealed the transaction ^^^^^ with this data you should be able to find the original senders wallet ^^^^^^ then take that original senders wallet and search XVrqrpe2ZDmykAnjcAHN6McbuDEjBZSvRZ for the link what is his point? the mixer address [output] used for this transaction is visible? well of course it yes, we aren't using quantum physics to send the coins, the issue is the mixers input address and original senders output address
since we provided the "last leg"of the TX, he can only back trace to the mixer itself, so far he has NOT Proven anything else
So when you send from original address A to the receiving address D , it goes to the mixer B, the mixer makes a new address C to send the amount to the receiver D? And Chaeplin doesn't get only A?
And chaeplin is adding that the mixer only uses one address for you, so once you know A, you can trace it. Which is what I said before. You have to assume A is known. that is not how the mixer work's The highlevel summary is this The mixer tells the client to send coins to wallet b, however wallet C is used to send coins to the final user, there is NO link from wallet B to wallet C unless somebody manually moves the coins from C to B ah, somebody is spamming that address w/ transactions 0.003 and 0.03 It's me, sorry. Now you get my point. XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G is a NEW address aka wallet b. this is the received mix transaction
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/9bc580ea9b7ec69d53dbc28e9cc42f1ea810925137d6cc8c1011e904f7c18bac#o0
—> block 28768 Hash9bc580ea9b7ec69d53dbc28e9cc42f1ea810925137d6cc8c1011e904f7c18bac Appeared inX11Coin 28768 (2014-06-11 20:21:51) Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs) Total in2.2 Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs) Total out2.19999 Size344 bytes Fee0.00001 Raw transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Amount From address ScriptSig 0 84da450271...:1 0.955069 XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV 71:3044...9b01 33:03eb...cd11 1 1c9523ca31...:1 1.244931 XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV 73:3046...9401 33:03eb...cd11 Outputs
Index Redeemed at input Amount To address ScriptPubKey 0 Not yet redeemed 2.19999 XVrqrpe2ZDmykAnjcAHN6McbuDEjBZSvRZ DUP HASH160 20:cb0b...0bf4 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG
original transaction --->>>> which was sent TO this address "XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G"
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G
—> XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G
Transaction Block Approx. Time Amount Balance Currency 042451b856... 28764 2014-06-11 20:13:06 0.396016 0.396016 XC c9e67b0f21... 28764 2014-06-11 20:13:06 1.803984 2.2 XC
block 28764 to block 28768 * ====> Working block height 28764 has 8 tx
* ====> Searchng XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G
tx: 2 percent 100 value 2.2
*===> block reached
*===> Searchng 28768 : diff : 4
*===> XVrqrpe2ZDmykAnjcAHN6McbuDEjBZSvRZ 2.19999 link is : XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G <----> XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV
Simple python scripts analyze the transaction. Dev wants hard link. Now where is link between XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV and XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G Easy part. Mapping. If there is many transactions, We don't need this. Block explorer will show the link. x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G": 0.003, "XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV":0.003}’ x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G": 0.03, "XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV":0.03}' ! Watch out. ! When coins is spent, hard link will appear. { "account" : "123", "address" : "XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV", "category" : "send", "amount" : -0.00300000, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 34, "blockhash" : "1f986c7643436e328456252db9d0def76a97f9c2bae10e3ee73a9d427f8f149f", "blockindex" : 2, "blocktime" : 1402520792, "txid" : "eaaa2b356d49c2b5953ecbe4ec112ba8a7fd94c73ee6181b7b837749eca5568e", "time" : 1402520581, "timereceived" : 1402520581 }, { "account" : "123", "address" : "XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G", "category" : "send", "amount" : -0.00300000, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 34, "blockhash" : "1f986c7643436e328456252db9d0def76a97f9c2bae10e3ee73a9d427f8f149f", "blockindex" : 2, "blocktime" : 1402520792, "txid" : "eaaa2b356d49c2b5953ecbe4ec112ba8a7fd94c73ee6181b7b837749eca5568e", "time" : 1402520581, "timereceived" : 1402520581 }, { "account" : "123", "address" : "XZvkTGD9hMiRuMByqCkHgRTNAu5J5fWnJV", "category" : "send", "amount" : -0.03000000, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 34, "blockhash" : "1f986c7643436e328456252db9d0def76a97f9c2bae10e3ee73a9d427f8f149f", "blockindex" : 3, "blocktime" : 1402520792, "txid" : "d191290208e31f6cf09c360b9f8bb671cea32dded456f00061a00496c8c60263", "time" : 1402520778, "timereceived" : 1402520778 }, { "account" : "123", "address" : "XYyMMG1VQHyRhAQWGdRQ9AEfdwSuG7w18G", "category" : "send", "amount" : -0.03000000, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 34, "blockhash" : "1f986c7643436e328456252db9d0def76a97f9c2bae10e3ee73a9d427f8f149f", "blockindex" : 3, "blocktime" : 1402520792, "txid" : "d191290208e31f6cf09c360b9f8bb671cea32dded456f00061a00496c8c60263", "time" : 1402520778, "timereceived" : 1402520778 }
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 09:59:54 PM Last edit: June 11, 2014, 10:10:33 PM by chaeplin |
|
~~~
You have missed the point.
|
|
|
|
humanitee
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:26:36 PM |
|
chaeplin's point is that the user is depositing i XC into a new unspent output, which is not moved. Then sometime later but not excessively far in the future i pops out at some other address. He says that this is a link and is correct. The dev wants a physical path to follow when there isn't technically one, yet there is still a path. You just have some patience and some scripting experience.
That is what I gathered, anyway.
|
| | | Fast, Secure, and Fully
Decentralized Trading | BACKED BY: ─────────────────────────
| BINANCE ─────── LAB | & | █████████████████████████████████ █ ███ █▀ ▀█ ███▀▀▀▀▀████████ ████▀▀███▀ █ █ █████ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ ▀ █ ███ █ ██ █▄ ▀█ ██ █ ▄███ ██████ ███ █████ █ ██ ███ █ ████ ████ ▄ ███ █▄ ▄█▄ ▄█▄ ▀ ████▄ ▄█ ██ ██ ████████████████████████████████████████ |
|
|
| Whitepaper Medium Reddit
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:31:21 PM |
|
chaeplin's point is that the user is depositing i XC into a new unspent output, which is not moved. Then sometime later but not excessively far in the future i pops out at some other address. He says that this is a link and is correct. The dev wants a physical path to follow when there isn't technically one, yet there is still a path. You just have some patience and some scripting experience.
That is what I gathered, anyway.
Didn't Chaeplin just send those amounts to both addresses after ATC revealed them?
|
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:32:15 PM |
|
chaeplin's point is that the user is depositing i XC into a new unspent output, which is not moved. Then sometime later but not excessively far in the future i pops out at some other address. He says that this is a link and is correct. The dev wants a physical path to follow when there isn't technically one, yet there is still a path. You just have some patience and some scripting experience.
That is what I gathered, anyway.
Didn't Chaeplin just send those amounts to both addresses after ATC revealed them? Yup. Chaeplin couldn't solve ATC'c challenges.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:34:33 PM |
|
chaeplin's point is that the user is depositing i XC into a new unspent output, which is not moved. Then sometime later but not excessively far in the future i pops out at some other address. He says that this is a link and is correct. The dev wants a physical path to follow when there isn't technically one, yet there is still a path. You just have some patience and some scripting experience.
That is what I gathered, anyway.
Didn't Chaeplin just send those amounts to both addresses after ATC revealed them? Yup. Chaeplin couldn't solve ATC'c challenges. I mean... ya after both sender and receiver's address has been revealed... then he go and make some fake transactions and now he says it's linked..
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:43:51 PM |
|
all these challenge craps is just nonsense when you don't get the solid answer or question. do real challenge and put answer somewhere with TIME STAMP, perhaps youtube video then reveal the video/answer at specific time. if no video or answer with time stamp this mean the code still crackable and if the answer/video reveal then chance the answer is wrong. I never see real solid challenge or answer, all i see is craps throwing arounds. if you have confidence with your coding please do real challenge, upload answer somewhere with time stamp with reputative sites, like youtube or flickr etc..
|
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:44:32 PM |
|
Active spamming. user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./who.py 28617 * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
user@sv2:~/x11coin> x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}' 0a50c8b4408aec0b6acdae11dbd9d88ce4b67092a55cf634ff3cde9d48089784
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 12:03:14 AM Last edit: June 12, 2014, 12:14:05 AM by chaeplin |
|
ref: ver. XCv0.9.1.41x11-coin-1.0
sendfrommixer "1" XH2xAiXB2H6tXSraubgfxWHKRUJR8rWdHm 0.1
Its my mintpal deposit adress and that is working i have now 0.09999 at my mintpal deposit. I have searched a direct link to this transaction but i cant find one with my user perspective. Xnode has been paid for but its not mine i'm curious to know what is the xnode that has been paid for this transaction.
Nice work ATCsecure !
!! http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?95279.htm Hash a57d4def3d08fe7753a77f8ac05b7a757105d72dcf0f33dd6aafd910a51a0ed0 Blockheight 28315 (142 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 03:16:37 Total Output 16.372583 XC Fee 0.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 40f01abd6d11...:0 XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo 16.382583 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XWtcrjseXhMBDBvGPfwXq3SVKhdv7qiLcG 16.310359 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG 0.062224 XC
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93622.htmHash 40f01abd6d11e15a0d722c1419a31358d7b399d5e9a4f3d742959122462a03d6 Blockheight 27754 (703 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-09 19:43:38 Total Output 16.45 XC Fee 0.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 afe2802947d5...:1 XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.46 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 a57d4def3d08... XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo 16.382583 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XHx9XtGvaN5kbzfjpEqgSy4pjw6aU6vjae 0.067417 XC
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93120.htmHash afe2802947d5737695fd90c6fab5061fdb2a75fd8fe2bbf2be34b74f0925d093 Blockheight 27557 (900 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-09 10:10:06 Total Output 32.928647 XC Proof of Stake + Fees 0.028647 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 9ff63a3e7c94...:1 XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 32.9 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 40f01abd6d11... XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.46 XC 1 44f76163aca2... XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.468647 XC
Block 28315 to 28320 * ====> Working block height 28315 has 12 tx * ====> Searchng XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG tx: 2 percent 100 value 0.1 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28320 : diff : 5 *===> XH2xAiXB2H6tXSraubgfxWHKRUJR8rWdHm 0.09999 link is : XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
LINK : http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?95679.htm BLOCK 28460 Details for Transaction Hash 9026a3920f2f91983f448b5d5789e1413ec7fc77d2eb74da3c9a951d16228332 Blockheight 28460 (431 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 12:11:23 Total Output 6.048076 XC Fee 2,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 fc32a52d05e8...:1 XCYKD4UDBAwdSePgW7tfNyBtxLXQzQ2y8p 0.001429 XC 1 05b2f027a8e0...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 45f0ca0cdc8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 d7f735ddc6f6...:1 XKLGYgnbnhTNmA25y97MMy3JnULoME6DhA 0.002811 XC 4 4c539a33adb3...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 ee8c8637ef6a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 3dd4c6f4142d...:2 XSjLtzrRRquusicuUfFMvFbkBJzYe5mHEk 0.003 XC 7 0a17a0ab48af...:0 XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG 0.003 XC 8 8c5e2b1532af...:1 XRV24U9rqSj2zexsj9vHTEyagGAHzyssGh 3.0 XC 9 b8758cba5977...:1 XRV24U9rqSj2zexsj9vHTEyagGAHzyssGh 3.0 XC 10 936f1b732a43...:1 XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG 0.037776 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 7534a7809955... XJptWzwxrgEC1WLhZ4r1LnEPQPZiWm7Hn9 0.010001 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 6.038075 XC
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 12:06:30 AM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htmDetails for Transaction Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5 Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57 Total Output 21.49996 XC Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC 1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47 Total Output 2.210008 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC 19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC 20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC 21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC 22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC 23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC 24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
LINK : http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm BLOCK 28645 http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm BLOCK 28653 Details for Transaction Hash dd438f2fbd86db8daf7b20e32d2306de9963ad68b380208f861633a8d789a070 Blockheight 28645 (246 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 17:06:04 Total Output 2.20999 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 383d04dd517a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 d1f8ecf3a75b...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.049407 XC 2 f596e0666f37...:1 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 0.003 XC 3 551e9a19e1d1...:0 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 0.003 XC 4 4940a1bd5720...:1 XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1 0.847077 XC 5 9cffaed1ea71...:1 XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.147548 XC 6 ab4b6d07d446...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 1.129429 XC 7 27d341cb53c2...:0 XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG 0.003 XC 8 72a8d9397092...:2 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 0.003 XC 9 b83aee2ba80c...:1 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 0.003 XC 10 16139b9176aa...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC 11 0d227a1fcf00...:2 XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa 0.003 XC 12 3680e4bd5360...:1 XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 5802869372cc... XDDiNN2xbNbAnCZGe56sEjEt7w9JThRnoA 0.01 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XHAscCkHdvAkXpCUCrggGasKeoVivs1izo 2.19999 XC
|
|
|
|
|
mav137
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:51:18 AM |
|
its funny how you keep switching threads when the arguments you give are made senseless by the dev, you just start over here.. Either way, it's not relevant anymore, V2 of XC will have even better full anonymity. Don't waste your time on downtalking something that is continuously being improved. There will be a big bounty in 2 week when V2 is finished, and hopefully we attract some serious people that have a critical and constructive look at the technology
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:26:59 AM |
|
its funny how you keep switching threads when the arguments you give are made senseless by the dev, you just start over here.. Either way, it's not relevant anymore, V2 of XC will have even better full anonymity. Don't waste your time on downtalking something that is continuously being improved. There will be a big bounty in 2 week when V2 is finished, and hopefully we attract some serious people that have a critical and constructive look at the technology Never improved
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:49:38 AM Last edit: June 12, 2014, 09:27:16 AM by chaeplin |
|
Ref: Hash7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f Appeared inX11Coin 28533 (2014-06-11 13:25:09) Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs) Total in10 Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs) Total out9.99999 Size345 bytes Fee0.00001 Raw transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Amount From address ScriptSig 0 235b7cba7a...:1 8.329413 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 73:3046...e501 33:03f5...9f33 1 2b46b1f30d...:1 1.670587 XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb 72:3045...3501 33:03f5...9f33 Outputs
Index Redeemed at input Amount To address ScriptPubKey 0 Not yet redeemed 9.99999 XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D DUP HASH160 20:788b...2bb6 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG
* block : 28533 * from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : 9.99999 * Search through pattern user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28500 28590 * ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx * ====> Searchng XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1 tx: 2 percent 94 value 0.006 *===> block reached * ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx * ====> Searchng XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb tx: 2 percent 94 value 0.006 *===> block reached
* ====> Working block height 28531 has 4 tx * ====> Searchng XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa tx: 2 percent 100 value 10.0 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28533 : diff : 2 *===> XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D 9.99999 link is : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa <----> XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
* ====> Working block height 28587 has 5 tx * ====> Searchng XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 tx: 2 percent 100 value 0.15 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28590 : diff : 3 *===> XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz 0.14999 link is : XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 <----> XMDDFuadQFGas9Zn8nTMVFFGz9hUc7Jteo
Possible candidate in 28531 Hash7315a0968d1aa71e01031583446625bde7189bee1642d3c85737a537d7480778 Previous Blockc2ef588b1680c5498151345eacc4a3c363d77d802aff45674a597c3bdbfac00f Next Block7e5eeaeecda5745b32be824e5da54a9a95b5b350126a216bf5499c0f6e5fa2c9 Height28531 Version4 Transaction Merkle Roote9c293aa46b5f2bc684349e6b4accbbb196f36b04742e26d2df53811a2a9fdfd Time1402492966 (2014-06-11 13:22:46) Difficulty0.000 (Bits: 1e047c41) Cumulative Difficulty11 973 042.889 Nonce0 Transactions4 Value out2070.657277 Transaction Fees-1.62137 Average Coin Age9.27782 days Coin-days Destroyed17767.243184 Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed62.9868%
Transactions
Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount) c6d0da399b... 0 0.077 Generation: 1.62137 + -1.62137 total fees Unknown: 0 dcd8718986... -1.62139 0.258 XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 1993.671236 Unknown: 0 XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.64 XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.652626 2c3d8fcfa4... 0.00001 0.229 XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R: 40.99999 XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681 XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 6.635299 633fe22002... 0.00001 0.23 XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681 XZ2zsBE5oqTciM5bkWtPajqqjQKHNv8Cip: 30.99997 XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 3.364701
* multiple tx pattern to same destination * address never used before 28531 * input value matched. from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa. * coin flow : BLOCK 28531 from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa --> BLOCK 28533 * from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : SENDER : XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R : MIXER INPUT : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa / never used before : MIXER OUTPUT : XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb : PAYEE : XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D If outputs of address XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa and XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb are spent as an input for a transaction, Mixer identified. Link from wallet B to wallet C is identified As XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa is nerver used before, check XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa's tx. http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa Transaction Block Approx. Time Amount Balance Currency 2c3d8fcfa4... 28531 2014-06-11 13:22:46 6.635299 6.635299 XC 633fe22002... 28531 2014-06-11 13:22:46 3.364701 10 XC 0d227a1fcf... 28540 2014-06-11 13:39:49 0.003 10.003 XC 07957c70d0... 28555 2014-06-11 14:03:57 0.001 10.004 XC dd438f2fbd... 28645 2014-06-11 17:06:04 (0.003) 10.001 XC fe5ad7f573... 28645 2014-06-11 17:06:04 (0.001) 10 XC 36e6e4f1bb... 28646 2014-06-11 17:08:27 (3.364701) 6.635299 XC d24770a89a... 28653 2014-06-11 17:20:52 (6.635299) 0 XC 8e708043fa... 28847 2014-06-11 22:52:01 0.0001 0.0001 XC
Block 28645 has hard link. http://cryptexplorer.com/block/4255ac4c5e93fa1769f58312d76338779229424538357dc4cf00a07fc1aafb74* Hard Link is real.
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:29:03 AM |
|
I wanted to do a comparison between DRK and XC, and I invite input from anyone. It seems that DRK has an advantage in that it preceded XC and gained a significant following before XC appeared. However after that I'm not sure how it is better.
1. DRK relies on Masternodes. With XC each wallet can act as a node. Better for XC?
2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin) XC has a mixer that is also encrypted? Better for XC?
3. Both coins have talented developers, but XC 's developer has important business experience too, which may help in gaining widespread adoption...?
4. It is claimed that XC is building an entire platform ? Is DRK doing this or seeing it as important?
5. The name Darkcoin is very different in it's connotations to XC 11 coin. Will Darkcoins name possibly impede it's progress?
6. DRK presently trades much bigger volume and is on at least one bigger important exchange
7. XC is a lot cheaper.
I welcome discussion and am happy to be proved wrong if I have got any facts wrong
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:41:16 AM |
|
2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin) XC has a mixer that is also encrypted? Better for XC?
Did you not read the post above yours - XC mixer is flawed - hard link is proven
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:42:25 AM |
|
1. DRK relies on Masternodes. With XC each wallet can act as a node. Better for XC?
Every bitcoin clone relies on dedicated nodes.
|
|
|
|
|