portosTCM
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 05:16:13 PM |
|
I tried -li 1 option, but this 'low intensity' i still too high for my desktop, is there any way to further adjust it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 05:20:43 PM |
|
I tried -li 1 option, but this 'low intensity' i still too high for my desktop, is there any way to further adjust it?
You can reduce HashCnt with "-h" option, but it will also reduce hashrate. Anyway, you can try. |
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 05:47:54 PM |
|
Tested Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X
7.0 (765/h) core(1100)-memclock(1680) AMD Catalyst 14.7
8.0 (730/h) core(1100)-memclock(1680) AMD Catalyst 14.9
What if specify "-h 1280"? If you use 4 cards then "-h 1280,1280,1280,1280". |
|
|
|
Captain-Karacho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2014, 06:52:34 PM |
|
Working fine here. Windows 8.1 Running 3 280x Toxics @ 1120c / 1780m [- h 896, -a 4] Power consumption went down 100w while my hashrate went up 100 h/s (33 h/s per card) Good job and cheers for the update  |
|
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 30, 2014, 09:20:42 PM |
|
Working fine here.
Windows 8.1
Running 3 280x Toxics @ 1120c / 1780m [- h 896, -a 4]
Power consumption went down 100w while my hashrate went up 100 h/s (33 h/s per card)
Did you use -a 3 before? |
|
|
|
|
fikie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2014, 11:41:37 PM |
|
7790 with amd 14.7 drivers runs on stock clock. Can you explain why hash rate drops after 5 min. from 200 to 130h 01:14:30:759 7a0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2263 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s
01:14:30:766 7a0 Round
01:14:33:062 5a4 got 253 bytes
01:14:33:064 5a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"01009cf2aca1050085514b48166e71af65ffcccfb248ef8eacbb8e58f10a5220bbf901303238cb000000006e67a70c56983046cb3cbaa8ff6c03f52ded0241f6383f6021af25e7c5c793d701","job_id":"838783647865057","target":"4f360100"}}
01:14:33:067 5a4 parse packet: 253
01:14:33:071 5a4 new buf size: 0
01:14:33:075 5a4 df has same pool, skip
01:14:33:083 5a4 10/01/14-01:14:33 - New job received from xmr.hashinvest.net:1111
01:14:33:087 5a4 Speed: 196 h/s, TotalHashes: 45K, DevHashes: 1K Mining time:
01:14:33:090 5a4 00:03
01:14:33:095 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2280 ms, hashrate = 196 h/s
01:14:33:102 7a4 Round
01:14:36:899 7a0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3714 ms, hashrate = 120 h/s
01:14:36:940 7a0 Dev round
01:14:39:279 a5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 2340
01:14:41:522 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 4490 ms, hashrate = 99 h/s
01:14:41:533 7a4 Round
01:14:45:823 7a0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 4201 ms, hashrate = 106 h/s
01:14:45:830 7a0 Round
01:14:49:553 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3651 ms, hashrate = 122 h/s
01:14:49:560 7a4 Round
01:14:53:235 7a0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3599 ms, hashrate = 124 h/s
01:14:53:252 7a0 Round
01:14:56:844 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3531 ms, hashrate = 126 h/s
01:14:56:851 7a4 Round
01:15:00:489 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3556 ms, hashrate = 125 h/s
01:15:00:501 7a4 Round
01:15:03:976 7a0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3403 ms, hashrate = 131 h/s
01:15:03:987 7a0 Round
01:15:07:592 7a4 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3536 ms, hashrate = 126 h/s
01:15:07:603 7a4 Round |
|
|
|
|
naimc3243
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 12:59:54 AM |
|
fyi I tried kminer-1.2b miner referenced in this thread
My system Windows 8.1 running Cat 13.12 drivers, cpu 1 core sempron 145
3 x 7970 PowerColor cards with Stilt mod bios running 1080/1500
kminer-1.2b give 1627h h/s at 600 watts, dev fee 0.7%
vs
claymore 8 cat 13.12 1620 h/s using 650 watts. dev fee 5%
So kminer1.2b and Claymore 8 are just about the same at mining speed, but dev fee is lower 0.7% vs 5% and uses 50 watts less on my rig.
Nice to see some competition
|
|
|
|
|
|
bensam123
|
|
October 01, 2014, 01:42:39 AM
Last edit: October 01, 2014, 02:22:07 AM by bensam123 |
|
Couple questions:
Do cards from different manufacturers, but from the same model need to be tuned differently? IE 896 was the mentioned optimal number of hashcounts for a 280x, but does that change depending on the manufacturer of the card?
Does the memory type effect hash count as well? Elpedia needs a different hash count then hynix?
Weird shit, seems like -a doesn't do anything anymore for me. I've tried it on a few different machines, it doesn't change anything even though it shows up as changing in the program when it starts. It doesn't change wattage and it doesn't change hash rates. Overall I'm getting more hash with the same power as -a 2 in v7, but I can't change my options.
|
|
|
|
|
beitris.dwlul
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2014, 04:30:51 AM |
|
3% improvement on 2x280x, default clocks, for stability cannot say nothing yet....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilotseye
|
|
October 01, 2014, 10:09:33 AM |
|
doesn't work for me as I am on 14.7 drivers already, guess it only supports 13.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
samaricanin
|
|
October 01, 2014, 12:00:44 PM |
|
doesn't work for me as I am on 14.7 drivers already, guess it only supports 13.12
Not working on all cards,for me claymore is better |
|
|
|
Vizierx
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 194
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 12:48:29 PM
Last edit: October 01, 2014, 04:07:24 PM by Vizierx |
|
doesn't work for me as I am on 14.7 drivers already, guess it only supports 13.12
Not working on all cards,for me claymore is better On some of my card i run claymore(r 290) on some kachur(r290 r 270) it is both beta releases and run as is |
|
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:28:16 PM |
|
GPU #0 = Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280X VAPOR-X 3GB GPU #1 = RADEON R9 290 4GB POWERCOLOR PCS When I run Claymore 8, I just noticed this come up Cards available: 2 GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units GPU #1: name: Hawaii, 3072 MB available, 40 units Total cards: 2 Drivers13.12 options VIRTUAL MEMORY SET TO MIN 16GIG MAX 32GIG bat filesetx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 cd c:\claymore NsGpuCNMiner.exe -h 896,1088 -li 0 -o stratum+tcp://pool -u wallet -p x -li 0 -h (detected by Claymore) GPU #0 896 GPU #1 1088 GPU #1 Has 4096 Memory, what is going on? Also I see that the Memory usage in GPU-Z shows the cards are not using all the memory right now. Approx 1 gig less than detected in Claymores. GPU-Z screenshots showing the cards info: GPU #0 https://i.imgur.com/Ie7fEM6.pngGPU #1 https://i.imgur.com/lFsTlqH.png |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:33:28 PM |
|
GPU #0 = Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280X VAPOR-X 3GB
GPU #1 = RADEON R9 290 4GB POWERCOLOR PCS
When I run Claymore 8, I just noticed this come up
Cards available: 2
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
GPU #1: name: Hawaii, 3072 MB available, 40 units
Total cards: 2
It's ok, for 4GB cards OpenCL allows 3GB only for using. If v8 is slower than v7 for 290 card, try HashCnt = 1280 for it, for your system with GPU #0 280x and GPU #1 290 it is "-h 896,1280". |
|
|
|
|
Xdragon
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:38:13 PM |
|
fyi I tried kminer-1.2b miner referenced in this thread
My system Windows 8.1 running Cat 13.12 drivers, cpu 1 core sempron 145
3 x 7970 PowerColor cards with Stilt mod bios running 1080/1500
kminer-1.2b give 1627h h/s at 600 watts, dev fee 0.7%
vs
claymore 8 cat 13.12 1620 h/s using 650 watts. dev fee 5%
So kminer1.2b and Claymore 8 are just about the same at mining speed, but dev fee is lower 0.7% vs 5% and uses 50 watts less on my rig.
Nice to see some competition
for me claymore 8.0 works better, speed is almost the same, but temps, and power consumption are less on claymore. |
|
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:42:34 PM |
|
GPU #0 = Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280X VAPOR-X 3GB
GPU #1 = RADEON R9 290 4GB POWERCOLOR PCS
When I run Claymore 8, I just noticed this come up
Cards available: 2
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
GPU #1: name: Hawaii, 3072 MB available, 40 units
Total cards: 2
It's ok, for 4GB cards OpenCL allows 3GB only for using. If v8 is slower than v7 for 290 card, try HashCnt = 1280 for it, for your system with GPU #0 280x and GPU #1 290 it is "-h 896,1280". Thanks for the quick reply, The cards are using ~1GIG less memory than what it shows Claymore has available to it. GPU #0 https://i.imgur.com/si7N8jZ.pngGPU #1 https://i.imgur.com/BJEBCXQ.png |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:47:06 PM |
|
The cards are using ~1GIG less memory than what it shows Claymore has available to it.
It's ok too. |
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 07:55:54 PM |
|
The cards are using ~1GIG less memory than what it shows Claymore has available to it.
It's ok too. I'll take your word for it  The -h changes gave me around 20 more h/s , Thanks. Do you use IRC? |
|
|
|
|
gregor12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 04:54:23 AM |
|
fyi I tried kminer-1.2b miner referenced in this thread
My system Windows 8.1 running Cat 13.12 drivers, cpu 1 core sempron 145
3 x 7970 PowerColor cards with Stilt mod bios running 1080/1500
kminer-1.2b give 1627h h/s at 600 watts, dev fee 0.7%
vs
claymore 8 cat 13.12 1620 h/s using 650 watts. dev fee 5%
So kminer1.2b and Claymore 8 are just about the same at mining speed, but dev fee is lower 0.7% vs 5% and uses 50 watts less on my rig.
Nice to see some competition
Tnx, i just switched to kminer! I get about 50hash less on 290x, but 50hash more on 280x, and ofc only 0.5% fee  |
|
|
|
|
|
