[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners

[drd]

I have set up Awsome Miner (paid version) on a rig that has three different cards.  I can benchmark all three cards except the third card will not benchmark on CCMiner at all.  I get an error when it starts to benchmark saying Non-existent cuda device #2 specified in -d option

If I remove one of the other two cards, it benchmarks on ccminer without issue.  I have tried swapping positions of the cards on the board buy it still shows this card as the third card and it will not benchmark it.

I saw on another miner where the batch file had a default for ccminer for 2 GPUs.  There was a line that said -selgpucc "0,1" or something like that.  The user changed it to 0,1,2,3 to make it work with 4 gpus.  I have went through all the batch files I could find but I haven't found anything resembling this. 

Hopefully someone can help me solve this.     

[1714843279]

1714843279

[1714843279]

1714843279

[1714843279]

1714843279

[Jan2017]

Do you monitor it with the Cloud Services? It shouldn't be a problem, I can control the rigs with more then 2000 km distance... ;-)

[ComputerNerd972]

Hello everyone, currently having another issue.

For the past few days whenever the miner would open it would fail and try again until it just stops. This is the message it gives:

Code:

*** ccminer 2.2.3 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-12-28 07:55:55] Starting on stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[2017-12-28 07:55:55] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-12-28 07:55:55] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-12-28 07:55:55] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2017-12-28 07:55:56] API open to the network in read-only mode on port 4029
[2017-12-28 07:55:59] Stratum difficulty set to 512 (0.00781)
[2017-12-28 07:55:59] neoscrypt block 22314, diff 418.190
[2017-12-28 07:56:00] GPU #0: Intensity set to 16 (+5), 65536 cuda threads
[2017-12-28 07:56:00] GPU #1: Intensity set to 13 (+5), 8192 cuda threads
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_hash_k4' at line 1519 : an illegal memory access was encountered.

I also get a windows popup message saying "ccminer has stopped working" and prompts me to close the program. Normally after I close the program and reopen it it will start working again.

I have been miner for about a week now with no issues and haven't changed anything. Any ideas??

[ComputerNerd972]

I run AM on my laptop to monitor my rigs.  Now if a rig goes down and restarts while my laptop is away, it's not gonna start mining again until my laptop is back.  I was wondering what would be the affect of running a 2nd copy of AM on one of my rigs concurrently with my laptop?  Is it possible?  The objective is to control the mining from my laptop but to have miners autostart even when my laptop is out of network range.  Is it gonna be a problem having 2 copies of AM monitoring and controlling the miners?

I'm not sure if running a 2nd copy of AM would work correctly. What I'm currently doing is running AM on one of my miners and I have also installed Google Chrome Remote Desktop so I can remotely control it from any of my devices.

If I get a text message from AM saying a miner has failed to start I just open the remote desktop app on my phone to try and fix it. This has been working for me so far and I haven't noticed any difference in hashrate for being installed on the device.

If you find another way please let me know.

[cashen]

I run AM on my laptop to monitor my rigs.  Now if a rig goes down and restarts while my laptop is away, it's not gonna start mining again until my laptop is back.  I was wondering what would be the affect of running a 2nd copy of AM on one of my rigs concurrently with my laptop?  Is it possible?  The objective is to control the mining from my laptop but to have miners autostart even when my laptop is out of network range.  Is it gonna be a problem having 2 copies of AM monitoring and controlling the miners?

I have AM running on one of my rigs and just remote in to that machine using teamviewer to use AM. This way it is always on and managing my rigs.

[tf2addict]

I'm having trouble creating a rule to restart a miner if there have been no shares accepted in the last few minutes.  Would this work:

Accepted (Current) Equals Accepted (8 minutes ago)

[drd]

I have set up Awsome Miner (paid version) on a rig that has three different cards.  I can benchmark all three cards except the third card will not benchmark on CCMiner at all.  I get an error when it starts to benchmark saying Non-existent cuda device #2 specified in -d option

If I remove one of the other two cards, it benchmarks on ccminer without issue.  I have tried swapping positions of the cards on the board buy it still shows this card as the third card and it will not benchmark it.

I saw on another miner where the batch file had a default for ccminer for 2 GPUs.  There was a line that said -selgpucc "0,1" or something like that.  The user changed it to 0,1,2,3 to make it work with 4 gpus.  I have went through all the batch files I could find but I haven't found anything resembling this. 

Hopefully someone can help me solve this.     

I was able to resolve my issue.  When bench marking, I was choosing the card by the card name and clicking benchmark.  The positions of the cards move around depending on the program, but the names do not.  So when I was benchmarking ccminer for my 1070 card, it was actually trying to benchmark my AMD card and would fail.  I had to benchmark all the programs seperatly because my 1070 card would move from position 0 to 1 or position 2 depending on the program.  When your benchmarking, look at the screen that pulls up and verify the correct card is being benchmarked for every software.

[l1one1]

I'm not sure why my profit miners are not switching to the most profitable .

https://i.imgur.com/K5O4oIH.png
https://i.imgur.com/UgigO47.png

I've "restarted" the miners a couple times

I am seeing this same problem on my rigs as well and came here to see if anyone else reported it.   It seems to have started when I upgraded to 4.2.9.     I have been a lurker here for a long time but this bug made me sign up and create an account.

patrike any thoughts?

[Phatboi]

I just started using AM yesterday and it seems to be running as good as my last one (NiceHash). But I am curious on how I can see how much is currently in my balance? Is there a way to see this with AM?

I mean I can see what my projected daily and monthly is, but I am not seeing what is currently in my balance..does that make sense?

[yhbae]

I'm currently on the v4.2.4 which is somewhat old. The AM detects the new version and when I try to update it, after the installation procedure, it still says I'm on v4.2.4. I tried downloading the latest v4.2.9 from the website and installed that. Afterwards, it still says I'm on v4.2.4.

Is the latest version misreporting the version number, or is my app not getting updated? I have setup the exclusion in the Windows defender already - no warnings during the installation.

Thanks.

[Jan2017]

@Phatboi:
AM is the interface, to see your balance you have to look in your wallet or exchange

[Phatboi]

@Phatboi:
AM is the interface, to see your balance you have to look in your wallet or exchange

Ok thank you

[slysir]

Lost all 17 of my miners configurations after reboot. Running Premium Edition 4.2.7  and now AM boots to defaults with no miners or any configuration (just like a clean install). How can I recover my miners configurations?

[jozsefnevarhelyi]

Is this application compatible with xmrig-proxy?

[Tacozzz]

I just installed and benchmarked and set up my workers and after it started mining windows defender scanned Trojan:Win32/Azden.A!cl
Is it just false detection by windows defender?
Thanks for the help

[cashen]

I'm having trouble creating a rule to restart a miner if there have been no shares accepted in the last few minutes.  Would this work:

Accepted (Current) Equals Accepted (8 minutes ago)

this is mine.

[asmoranomar]

I've posted before, but can someone please help me figure out why my benchmarks will not save?

I can edit configurations just fine under options, however whenever I run the benchmark with the proper profile selected and algorithms checked... I click "Save to Profile", the configured hashrate column changes, but no changes are made when I go back into options and look at the profile.

I've uninstalled and reinstalled the software, ran as admin, etc. and I cannot figure out why my benchmarks will not save.  Is there a log somewhere I can submit to have further troubleshooting assistance?

[Phatboi]

I have noticed after using this majority of the day that it doesn't appear that my profit switching is working properly. I only have 3 items checked: NiceHash, ZPool and HashRefinery) and I set the switching interval to 25, just to be different. I have been checking my HashRefinery account all day and it hasn't increased at all. Actually went down some. The other 2 are doing great.

Am I missing something that I need to do?

[wholly]

Hey Guys...

How do I add  Verge-Groestl(XVG) - Myriad-Groestl Algo to Awesome Miner...

Love the software for my miners... but missing a few algo's and coins unfortunately.

Any help great...
thanks in advance

[evolart]

Running into an issue with profit switching with MPH. It is randomly switching to Skein algorithm, which calculates to $3-4 per day, from other algos that are around $30-50 per day. I've currently got the profit switching set at 60 minutes / 5% profit difference.

Has anyone seen similar issues? Is this a problem with MPH or AwesomeMiner, maybe it's how I have profit switching configured? For now, I just turned off Skein in my profit switching profile until I can troubleshoot further. When it was switching to Skein at such a low profitability I would compare to WhatToMine and still see other coins that MPH supports at higher profitability so I'm at a loss why it would switch to Skein...