[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[yellowduck2]

It will happen soon. Don't worry.

- daWallet

How many days, weeks, months?

To add on

White paper ?
Road Map ?

[omskbear]

It will happen soon. Don't worry.

- daWallet

How many days, weeks, months?

To add on

White paper ?
Road Map ?

I hope that there will be some important changes that will bring interest to the coin. White paper and road Map  its too small, now we need only real change, not plans.

[daWallet]

It will happen soon. Don't worry.

- daWallet

How many days, weeks, months?

To add on

White paper ?
Road Map ?

I hope that there will be some important changes that will bring interest to the coin. White paper and road Map  its too small, now we need only real change, not plans.

First of all, I was talking about a new OP.

I have also a wishlist, but we're still looking for people who want to join and help out. If a whitepaper is "too small" in your opinion you can write one today and post it.

The most important issue is to find a core developer who wants to update the Burst from 1.2.3 to at least 1.5.15.
To wait until NXT slowly dies and hope that developers go to Burst seems not to be good enough

Everybody of you can help - ask around. What holds Burst together is not a so-called Promo or DevTeam - it's the community. You are part of it.

[Cobra98]

When mining is it better to have say a 2tb drive as 1 huge plot or broken down to say 2 1tb drives or 4 500gb drives? Is more miners searching smaller plots better or worse than 1 miner with a huge plot? I'm still new to burst mining and trying to get most efficiency from what storage I have. I currently have 1 2.1tb, 1 1.8tb and 2 900gig drives. All are physical drives, no partitions or split plots of any kind and the 900's once in a while find smaller deadlines while the bigger ones r still searching. I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive so its searching 4 at a time. Btw seen a few days ago had a 17 deadline that was over 100,000 share, not sure what it meant but thought it was cool to be on top of the share list.

[Blago]

When mining is it better to have say a 2tb drive as 1 huge plot or broken down to say 2 1tb drives or 4 500gb drives? Is more miners searching smaller plots better or worse than 1 miner with a huge plot? I'm still new to burst mining and trying to get most efficiency from what storage I have. I currently have 1 2.1tb, 1 1.8tb and 2 900gig drives. All are physical drives, no partitions or split plots of any kind and the 900's once in a while find smaller deadlines while the bigger ones r still searching. I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive so its searching 4 at a time. Btw seen a few days ago had a 17 deadline that was over 100,000 share, not sure what it meant but thought it was cool to be on top of the share list.

"I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive..." - it's very bad.
Better use one miner with config:
d: 2.1 Tb
e: 1.8 Tb
f: 0.9 Tb
g: 0.9 Tb

"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots","G:\\plots"]  (4 threads)
or
"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots+G:\\plots"] (3 threads)

better to have 1 huge optimized/merged plot per drive.

[notabeliever]

When mining is it better to have say a 2tb drive as 1 huge plot or broken down to say 2 1tb drives or 4 500gb drives? Is more miners searching smaller plots better or worse than 1 miner with a huge plot? I'm still new to burst mining and trying to get most efficiency from what storage I have. I currently have 1 2.1tb, 1 1.8tb and 2 900gig drives. All are physical drives, no partitions or split plots of any kind and the 900's once in a while find smaller deadlines while the bigger ones r still searching. I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive so its searching 4 at a time. Btw seen a few days ago had a 17 deadline that was over 100,000 share, not sure what it meant but thought it was cool to be on top of the share list.

"I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive..." - it's very bad.
Better use one miner with config:
d: 2.1 Tb
e: 1.8 Tb
f: 0.9 Tb
g: 0.9 Tb

"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots","G:\\plots"]  (4 threads)
or
"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots+G:\\plots"] (3 threads)

better to have 1 huge optimized/merged plot per drive.

Blago It seems Cobra was successful with his setup. Is their a long term issue with his setup because thisa guy said he was on the top of the pool so he is fast

[haitch]

When mining is it better to have say a 2tb drive as 1 huge plot or broken down to say 2 1tb drives or 4 500gb drives? Is more miners searching smaller plots better or worse than 1 miner with a huge plot? I'm still new to burst mining and trying to get most efficiency from what storage I have. I currently have 1 2.1tb, 1 1.8tb and 2 900gig drives. All are physical drives, no partitions or split plots of any kind and the 900's once in a while find smaller deadlines while the bigger ones r still searching. I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive so its searching 4 at a time. Btw seen a few days ago had a 17 deadline that was over 100,000 share, not sure what it meant but thought it was cool to be on top of the share list.

"I run 4 blago miners each pointing to each drive..." - it's very bad.
Better use one miner with config:
d: 2.1 Tb
e: 1.8 Tb
f: 0.9 Tb
g: 0.9 Tb

"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots","G:\\plots"]  (4 threads)
or
"Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots+G:\\plots"] (3 threads)

better to have 1 huge optimized/merged plot per drive.

Blago It seems Cobra was successful with his setup. Is their a long term issue with his setup because thisa guy said he was on the top of the pool so he is fast

NotABeliever, I was using Blago's miner to mine over 100TB over multiple drives - the multiple threads within one instance of the miner (eg "Paths":["D:\\plots","E:\\plots","F:\\plots","G:\\plots"])  is much more efficient than multiple instances of the miner, each mining one drive/directory. And to see how that's performing: http://burst.ninja

H.

[notabeliever]

Note I have 5.4 TB and run it as Both of you suggested however my nonce are not matching Cobras unless its because I have 2 cores and he has 4 cores? I was going to say the difference is I run one instance of Blago miner and he runs 4 instances.

[Cobra98]

Well I guess it's time for an experiment lol. I wish I had the space u have haitch but unfortunately right at 6tb is all I had available without any out of pocket expenses, just drives I had handy. I have been on pool.burstcoin.de mostly since starting burst mining the 1st week of Oct. and up to 26,835 burst so far. Approximately 11,000 from saturday the 24th to today the 31st. I am going to stop using the 4 miners with 4 drives and do 1 miner with all the drives combined and see what comes from it for the next week.

Here is how my current setup looks right before going to the 1 miner only.

[Blago]

Well I guess it's time for an experiment lol. I wish I had the space u have haitch but unfortunately right at 6tb is all I had available without any out of pocket expenses, just drives I had handy. I have been on pool.burstcoin.de mostly since starting burst mining the 1st week of Oct. and up to 26,835 burst so far. Approximately 11,000 from saturday the 24th to today the 31st. I am going to stop using the 4 miners with 4 drives and do 1 miner with all the drives combined and see what comes from it for the next week.

Here is how my current setup looks right before going to the 1 miner only.

every instance of miner uses 2 threads (Sender, GetMiningInfo) + X*Paths, so  threads = 4*(2+1) = 12  (+ 4*used_RAM,  + 4*Net_Connections )
one instance of miner uses threads = 1*(2+4) = 6.


Also, pools have penalty (ban):
 to prevent user spamming low share, we implement share penalty of -0.001 on each submission for miners who submit nonce that has higher deadline than their (current round) own best deadline, as spamming low share is no use since pool will always pick one best deadline for every submitted nonce per round.

[Cobra98]

Well I guess it's time for an experiment lol. I wish I had the space u have haitch but unfortunately right at 6tb is all I had available without any out of pocket expenses, just drives I had handy. I have been on pool.burstcoin.de mostly since starting burst mining the 1st week of Oct. and up to 26,835 burst so far. Approximately 11,000 from saturday the 24th to today the 31st. I am going to stop using the 4 miners with 4 drives and do 1 miner with all the drives combined and see what comes from it for the next week.

Here is how my current setup looks right before going to the 1 miner only.

Also, pools have penalty (ban):
 to prevent user spamming low share, we implement share penalty of -0.001 on each submission for miners who submit nonce that has higher deadline than their (current round) own best deadline, as spamming low share is no use since pool will always pick one best deadline for every submitted nonce per round.

Is there a way to setup the miner to only submit your own best deadline to avoid the penalty?

[Blago]

Is there a way to setup the miner to only submit your own best deadline to avoid the penalty?

run 1 instance of miner for all plots. Miner sends only deadline, which less preveosly deadline

[BurstIncomeAsset]

Big news for INCOME, only less than 6% of the IPO is left to distribute, the price went down a little bit, but now it's the time to buy INCOME as the price is very cheap now.

However the market is almost free to trade now, and since there is very few % left to distribute, very tiny distorsions left, thus INCOME can go to the moon anytime now:

https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-income-asset-decentralized-referral-empire-based-income.839/page-7

[BurstIncomeAsset]

[ANN] CHEAP asset

Description:

It's a fundraiser for INCOME ASSET with the starting price of 1 BURST, so it can't go lower. After all the ICO assets will be sold the price can only go higher, so it's the perfect speculative asset. It helps both fund INCOME ASSET and it's a good speculative asset for early investors.

The asset itself is also backed by 10,000 INCOME assets, that are permanently "burned" on the CHEAP's main address. These 10,000 assets won't be moved from there, and it will serve as the backing for CHEAP. Plus the dividends it will get for that 10,000 INCOME + the current BURST balance will also continuously grow. This way the value of CHEAP will grow aswell.

I gave myself 1 million CHEAP, 16% of the total supply, so that I will hold it too, and probably invest in it later.

CHEAP asset is not a dividend paying asset.

CHEAP is the perfect asset to "go to the moon"!

Asset Info:
Ticker/Name: Cheap
Asset ID: 4267876427937004537
Total Shares: 6,000,000
Shares Owned by Me: 1,000,000 (16.66%)
Dividends: No
Main BURST address: BURST-Q8CQ-RRKW-BDQN-BBJYP
Backing: 10,000 INCOME assets burned on the main address + The dividends it gets from that via BURST


Read more here:
https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-cheap-asset.872/#post-6251

[haitch]

This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on October 30th unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC.

Which exchange?  I'm guessing it's not Polo, as that's had BTC0.22486507 in the last 24 hours.

C-CEX.com @CryptoCurrEncyX
Delisting list is being corrected all the time. If You don't see delisting red flag on coin - this coin will not be delisted.

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-BURST

The C-CEX delisting was avoided. The Bitrex delisting will also be avoided.

H.

Bitrex no longer threatening to delist.

H.

[Erkallys]

[ANN] CHEAP asset

Description:

It's a fundraiser for INCOME ASSET with the starting price of 1 BURST, so it can't go lower. After all the ICO assets will be sold the price can only go higher, so it's the perfect speculative asset. It helps both fund INCOME ASSET and it's a good speculative asset for early investors.

The asset itself is also backed by 10,000 INCOME assets, that are permanently "burned" on the CHEAP's main address. These 10,000 assets won't be moved from there, and it will serve as the backing for CHEAP. Plus the dividends it will get for that 10,000 INCOME + the current BURST balance will also continuously grow. This way the value of CHEAP will grow aswell.

I gave myself 1 million CHEAP, 16% of the total supply, so that I will hold it too, and probably invest in it later.

CHEAP asset is not a dividend paying asset.

CHEAP is the perfect asset to "go to the moon"!

Asset Info:
Ticker/Name: Cheap
Asset ID: 4267876427937004537
Total Shares: 6,000,000
Shares Owned by Me: 1,000,000 (16.66%)
Dividends: No
Main BURST address: BURST-Q8CQ-RRKW-BDQN-BBJYP
Backing: 10,000 INCOME assets burned on the main address + The dividends it gets from that via BURST


Read more here:
https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-cheap-asset.872/#post-6251

If this asset has no benefits, I doubt that people will want to buy it. Why not add a low interest, like 1% per month ? The more it is, highrt the price will be !

[harihebat]

[ANN] CHEAP asset

Description:

It's a fundraiser for INCOME ASSET with the starting price of 1 BURST, so it can't go lower. After all the ICO assets will be sold the price can only go higher, so it's the perfect speculative asset. It helps both fund INCOME ASSET and it's a good speculative asset for early investors.

The asset itself is also backed by 10,000 INCOME assets, that are permanently "burned" on the CHEAP's main address. These 10,000 assets won't be moved from there, and it will serve as the backing for CHEAP. Plus the dividends it will get for that 10,000 INCOME + the current BURST balance will also continuously grow. This way the value of CHEAP will grow aswell.

I gave myself 1 million CHEAP, 16% of the total supply, so that I will hold it too, and probably invest in it later.

CHEAP asset is not a dividend paying asset.

CHEAP is the perfect asset to "go to the moon"!

Asset Info:
Ticker/Name: Cheap
Asset ID: 4267876427937004537
Total Shares: 6,000,000
Shares Owned by Me: 1,000,000 (16.66%)
Dividends: No
Main BURST address: BURST-Q8CQ-RRKW-BDQN-BBJYP
Backing: 10,000 INCOME assets burned on the main address + The dividends it gets from that via BURST


Read more here:
https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-cheap-asset.872/#post-6251

just bought a very little portion for burst support

[BurstIncomeAsset]

If this asset has no benefits, I doubt that people will want to buy it. Why not add a low interest, like 1% per month ? The more it is, highrt the price will be !

There is no income stream for this asset, so I dont know where you think that 1% will come from.

This is a purely speculative asset with INCOME backing it, as the dividends will be paid for those INCOME, the BURST balance, alongside with the INCOME value will go up. This will give CHEAP it's value.

Instead of dividing that in dividends, it is kept on the main address forever, and people could speculate on that.

I think this is the perfect recipe for a "going to the moon" asset, since it's ultra cheap, and can only go higher.

just bought a very little portion for burst support

Thanks for support!

[stacey2911]

If this asset has no benefits, I doubt that people will want to buy it. Why not add a low interest, like 1% per month ? The more it is, highrt the price will be !

There is no income stream for this asset, so I dont know where you think that 1% will come from.

This is a purely speculative asset with INCOME backing it, as the dividends will be paid for those INCOME, the BURST balance, alongside with the INCOME value will go up. This will give CHEAP it's value.

Instead of dividing that in dividends, it is kept on the main address forever, and people could speculate on that.

I think this is the perfect recipe for a "going to the moon" asset, since it's ultra cheap, and can only go higher.

just bought a very little portion for burst support

Thanks for support!

I just snapped up ~30000, love the work your doing with Income

[Erkallys]

Finally I bought some CHEAP to support you and INCOME to replace my Burstbank.de shares. I hope you were right in your predictions !