|
Depredation
|
|
August 15, 2014, 06:30:29 AM |
|
Selling 50k burst pm me offers
|
|
|
|
hvidgaard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 06:32:38 AM |
|
If I generate plot files of 10GiB, and say 50 of them, it's the same as generating one on 500GiB? It makes it a lot easier to stop and start the generation process, and one machine can create plots full time and then move the plot files to other machines.
|
|
|
|
burstcoin (OP)
|
|
August 15, 2014, 06:51:44 AM |
|
If I generate plot files of 10GiB, and say 50 of them, it's the same as generating one on 500GiB? It makes it a lot easier to stop and start the generation process, and one machine can create plots full time and then move the plot files to other machines.
Yes it's the same. Just make sure the nonce ranges don't overlap.
|
BURST-QHCJ-9HB5-PTGC-5Q8J9
|
|
|
salve80
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
August 15, 2014, 06:59:21 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
|
|
|
|
Sy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:04:02 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Overlapping only wastes diskspace, with one nounce like that, 256kb -> doesnt matter Gap doesn't matter either, its the sum of your nounces, not the range.
|
|
|
|
hvidgaard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:10:49 AM |
|
If I generate plot files of 10GiB, and say 50 of them, it's the same as generating one on 500GiB? It makes it a lot easier to stop and start the generation process, and one machine can create plots full time and then move the plot files to other machines.
Yes it's the same. Just make sure the nonce ranges don't overlap. Thanks, if they do it's only by a single plot, I can live with that Now I have to go on a cleaning mission, my harddrives are running out of space!
|
|
|
|
Mraking
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:11:19 AM |
|
sell 20k=0,1 btc
|
|
|
|
burstcoin (OP)
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:12:17 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Either is fine. Technically, 500000 plots starting from 0 is 0 - 499999, so the second has a gap of 1 in between the first 2, but that doesn't matter. Overlapping is bad since it calculates to the same result in multiple places, wasting disk space and doing unnecessary work. There is no problem with having gaps. This: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4 is just as good as this: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 5000000000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 9898000000 500000 2000 4
|
BURST-QHCJ-9HB5-PTGC-5Q8J9
|
|
|
foodies123
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:35:39 AM |
|
Wait, how is this work globaly verifiable by peers, how do you know my miner isn't modded to just relay random data until something stivks and I get a block ?
|
nope
|
|
|
Sy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:08:24 AM |
|
{ "lastBlock": "16322078320396019945", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1222, "time": 299736, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "54.167.111.103:8123", "numberOfBlocks": 1223, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "70385126787201", "version": "1.0.0" }
Another ~50% increase within ~16h { "lastBlock": "1520116135762103722", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1457, "time": 367546, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62", "numberOfBlocks": 1458, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "105192234724606", "version": "1.0.0" }
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:15:56 AM |
|
{ "lastBlock": "16322078320396019945", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1222, "time": 299736, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "54.167.111.103:8123", "numberOfBlocks": 1223, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "70385126787201", "version": "1.0.0" }
Another ~50% increase within ~16h { "lastBlock": "1520116135762103722", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1457, "time": 367546, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62", "numberOfBlocks": 1458, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "105192234724606", "version": "1.0.0" } when the pools come out, its difficulty will increase more faster ,now only just 5 days since the coin came out,when the difficulty increase until you can only less than 1 block/TB/Month, then the coins value will be enhanced
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:21:01 AM |
|
{ "lastBlock": "16322078320396019945", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1222, "time": 299736, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "54.167.111.103:8123", "numberOfBlocks": 1223, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "70385126787201", "version": "1.0.0" }
Another ~50% increase within ~16h { "lastBlock": "1520116135762103722", "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1457, "time": 367546, "lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62", "numberOfBlocks": 1458, "isScanning": false, "cumulativeDifficulty": "105192234724606", "version": "1.0.0" } when the pools come out, its difficulty will increase more faster ,now only just 5 days since the coin came out,when the difficulty increase until you can only less than 1 block/TB/Month, then the coins value will be enhanced i think its already expensive, since we dont have fractional coin here so coin cap of 2,158,812,800 coins is similar to 21 coin cap of bitcoin style shitcoin ( because of 8 digits fractional ) so i expect the price will be 100 sat btc to 1 burst ( 1million burst = 1 btc )
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:30:47 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Either is fine. Technically, 500000 plots starting from 0 is 0 - 499999, so the second has a gap of 1 in between the first 2, but that doesn't matter. Overlapping is bad since it calculates to the same result in multiple places, wasting disk space and doing unnecessary work. There is no problem with having gaps. This: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4 is just as good as this: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 5000000000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 9898000000 500000 2000 4 So, staggering is best implemented on the same drive. But on multiple drives, you can start from each one at 0 if you wanted to with one large plot for each. If I'm understanding this correctly. I notice that it seems that most people are more successful making smaller multiple plots on hdd's than one larger one. So, the formula for calculating nonce size is this: x=Nonce size f(x)=hdd size in GB (256x)/10^6=f(x) x=[f(x)*10^6]/256
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:33:21 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Either is fine. Technically, 500000 plots starting from 0 is 0 - 499999, so the second has a gap of 1 in between the first 2, but that doesn't matter. Overlapping is bad since it calculates to the same result in multiple places, wasting disk space and doing unnecessary work. There is no problem with having gaps. This: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4 is just as good as this: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 5000000000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 9898000000 500000 2000 4 So, staggering is best implemented on the same drive. But on multiple drives, you can start from each one at 0 if you wanted to with one large plot for each. If I'm understanding this correctly. I notice that it seems that most people are more successful making smaller multiple plots on hdd's than one larger one. So, the formula for calculating nonce size is this: x=Nonce size f(x)=hdd size in GB (256x)/10^6=f(x) x=[f(x)*10^6]/256 its not 10^6 but 1024^2
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:36:52 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Either is fine. Technically, 500000 plots starting from 0 is 0 - 499999, so the second has a gap of 1 in between the first 2, but that doesn't matter. Overlapping is bad since it calculates to the same result in multiple places, wasting disk space and doing unnecessary work. There is no problem with having gaps. This: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4 is just as good as this: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 5000000000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 9898000000 500000 2000 4 So, staggering is best implemented on the same drive. But on multiple drives, you can start from each one at 0 if you wanted to with one large plot for each. If I'm understanding this correctly. I notice that it seems that most people are more successful making smaller multiple plots on hdd's than one larger one. So, the formula for calculating nonce size is this: x=Nonce size f(x)=hdd size (256x)/10^6=f(x) x=[f(x)*10^6]/256 its not 10^6 but 1024^2 That's an approximate, but so this would be the end result then: x=[f(x)*1024kb^2]/256kb
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:41:47 AM |
|
to the DEV ... i musst ask again...
i have this: (overlapping is only bad for diskspace?) run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4
or should i use this? run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 500001 500000 4000 4 (128GB) run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB)
and second. if i have i big gap like this.. do i need ploting the missing file for correct mining or can i move to the next plot? i mean do i ned a coherent chain ?? 1. run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 (128GB) 2. (missing file of 128GB) 3. run_generate.bat <address> 1000001 500000 2000 4 (128GB) 4. (next plot: 1500001 500000 2000 4)
Either is fine. Technically, 500000 plots starting from 0 is 0 - 499999, so the second has a gap of 1 in between the first 2, but that doesn't matter. Overlapping is bad since it calculates to the same result in multiple places, wasting disk space and doing unnecessary work. There is no problem with having gaps. This: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 500000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 1000000 500000 2000 4 is just as good as this: run_generate.bat <address> 0 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 5000000000 500000 4000 4 run_generate.bat <address> 9898000000 500000 2000 4 So, staggering is best implemented on the same drive. But on multiple drives, you can start from each one at 0 if you wanted to with one large plot for each. If I'm understanding this correctly. I notice that it seems that most people are more successful making smaller multiple plots on hdd's than one larger one. So, the formula for calculating nonce size is this: x=Nonce size f(x)=hdd size in GB (256x)/10^6=f(x) x=[f(x)*10^6]/256 its not 10^6 but 1024^2 That's an approximate, but so this would be the end result then: x=[f(x)*1024^2]/256 you should write it f(x) = x*1024^2/256 (for correct mathematical expression), where x is disk size in GB and f(x) is nonce count anyway, more correct and simple equation form is f(x) = x*4096 , where x in GB of disk size
|
|
|
|
coin-cidence
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:46:11 AM |
|
Very unaccurate Burst network estimation at this moment : ~330TB (~60TB more than yesterday), and 0,89 block / TB / day
+- 50% if anybody wants to participate in estimation please send me PM with info: plot size and ID
|
BTC compared to PASC looks like big clumsy dinosaur - still not aware of meteor coming.
|
|
|
shlsumy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:49:12 AM |
|
how i can start generate plat on next HDD?
Cent Os
2-nd HDD mount on
/mnt/disk1/
|
|
|
|
WolfOf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:52:59 AM |
|
Wait, how is this work globaly verifiable by peers, how do you know my miner isn't modded to just relay random data until something stivks and I get a block ?
I also want to know the answer of this question. I dont have the time to debug the program now, but i think that admin will ensure us that everything is ok. And also why i have to send my passphrase to the central server/pool. It,s not secure... That way every pool admin will have the accounts of every user, which is mining...I don't want to speak about hackers... Why dont you send the Burst adress this is from MinerCom.java else if(message instanceof MinerSupr.msgSubmitResult) { System.out.println("Submitting share"); try { ContentResponse response = client.POST(addr + "/burst") .param("requestType", "submitNonce") [b].param("secretPhrase", ((MinerSupr.msgSubmitResult)message).passPhrase)[/b] .param("nonce", Convert.toUnsignedLong(((MinerSupr.msgSubmitResult)message).nonce)) .timeout(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS) .send(); String submitResult = response.getContentAsString(); System.out.println(submitResult); } catch(Exception e) { System.out.println("Error: Failed to submit nonce"); } }
|
|
|
|
|