Scientific proof that God exists?

[Vod]

I guess you can "understand" them because you are as mad as they are.

All I can do is smile and wave.

Common sense, after all.

[Przemax]

I guess you can "understand" them because you are as mad as they are.

All I can do is smile and wave.

Common sense, after all.

I don't know what force is stronger in you guys.

1. Hatered of possibility of God existance, or
2. An urge to pathologically lie, or
3. The love of being fooled, or
4. The love to deceit others.

Help me decide.

[Vod]

I don't know what force is stronger in you guys.

1. Hatered of possibility of God existance, or
2. An urge to pathologically lie, or
3. The love of being fooled, or
4. The love to deceit others.

Help me decide.

All we are looking for is proof that your fairy tale is real.

So far, nothing.

[Przemax]

I don't know what force is stronger in you guys.

1. Hatered of possibility of God existance, or
2. An urge to pathologically lie, or
3. The love of being fooled, or
4. The love to deceit others.

Help me decide.

All we are looking for is proof that your fairy tale is real.

So far, nothing.

Here educate yourself. All definition were changed to hide God. Everything in the plain sight is the hardest to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24HOUNSyTC4&list=LLGcGnDqmqwzjeSYLwSRnaLA&index=119

What would you do to hide a tree? Plant it in the forest. Or in case of "academia" plant the fake trees around God and call them a forest of small gods called scientology.

[Vod]

Here educate yourself. All definition were changed to hide God. Everything in the plain sight is the hardest to see.

How do you know what's in plain sight?  You have your head in the sand.

[Przemax]

Here educate yourself. All definition were changed to hide God. Everything in the plain sight is the hardest to see.

How do you know what's in plain sight?  You have your head in the sand.

Ok. Thanks. The answer is point number 4 - Its the love to deceit. Thank you for answering my question.

[Vod]

Ok. Thanks. The answer is point number 4 - Its the love to deceit. Thank you for answering my question.

I only post reality - no one is being deceived.  

Now, do you have any proof your fairy tale exists?

[Astargath]

Ok. Thanks. The answer is point number 4 - Its the love to deceit. Thank you for answering my question.

I only post reality - no one is being deceived.  

Now, do you have any proof your fairy tale exists?

He doesn't and now he is going to ask you to define proof.

[Vod]

Ok. Thanks. The answer is point number 4 - Its the love to deceit. Thank you for answering my question.

I only post reality - no one is being deceived.  

Now, do you have any proof your fairy tale exists?

He doesn't and now he is going to ask you to define proof.

Not a problem - there is no scientific proof of fairy tales - I can go back and forth with them all year.  

[kie]

Its hard to give proofs that god exist.
 God and science cant ride on the same boat.
 Because they always in contrast.
 Nowadays most people believed on any scientific facts than what was on the bible.
 Even though there are no proofs that god exist i still believed in Him.

[Vod]

Its hard to give proofs that god exist.
 God and science cant ride on the same boat.
 Because they always in contrast.
 Nowadays most people believed on any scientific facts than what was on the bible.
Even though there are no proofs that god exist i still believed in Him.

That makes you gullible.   

[mr_enoc]

Do i need to prove that there is one true God and HE really exist? As long as i am believing in him and believe with his promise, don't have to explain about it.

[Astargath]

Do i need to prove that there is one true God and HE really exist? As long as i am believing in him and believe with his promise, don't have to explain about it.

That doesn't mean what you believe is true.

[Vod]

Do i need to prove that there is one true God and HE really exist? As long as i am believing in him and believe with his promise, don't have to explain about it.

You don't need to explain your personal fairy tales, UNLESS you try to push them on others.  Then you can expect people to question your gullibility.

[BADecker]

Do i need to prove that there is one true God and HE really exist? As long as i am believing in him and believe with his promise, don't have to explain about it.

You don't need to explain your personal fairy tales, UNLESS you try to push them on others.  Then you can expect people to question your gullibility.

While this might be true, nobody is doing it. The fact that God exists is proven by science more and more every day.

[BADecker]

Do i need to prove that there is one true God and HE really exist? As long as i am believing in him and believe with his promise, don't have to explain about it.

That doesn't mean what you believe is true.

But science proves God exists way more than science proves that He doesn't exist.

[Vod]

But science proves God exists way more than science proves that He doesn't exist.

Your fairy tale science also believes the tooth fairy exists.

Prove it as per the thread title.  Otherwise, you are just giving away free candy for clean teeth.

[Przemax]

You asked for it.You do not want to give me a definition. I will use a dictionary and choose mine:

proof:

b :  the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning.

Process is like this. 1500 bc was written Bible that describes what God is. It was all proven to be able to exist by science.

This proof is strong because none of the witnesses back then 1500 bc could know it could happen. So by it not contradicting itself is a small proof. No forgery of evidence could be possible, because 1500 we had not know those forces.

Principles of reasoning (deduction) are given in the Exodus. Phareo was proclaiming himself a God. His magicians could make things attributed to God. God was playing with them until they had found that they cannot make life out of dirt.

That's how God see you - Babilonian scientism usurpers. You cannot make life. Hey... you cannot even find how that happened and prove it. Therefore by the principle of reasoning (deduction) the God of Moses is proven. By your unability to create life from dirt.

God sees you that you worship idols that you claim what they do, while they do not. Like wooden statues that are claimed to do something while it was blatantly obvious it was not so. Like quantum physics today. Its only theoretical. Like it was theoretical that carved wood make lighting, or fire or such. By the principle of reasoning(deduction) it is proof of God words remaining true.

Sins against man will be forgiven. Sins of blasphemy (taking place of God) will not be. So it would be wise to repent from your scientism idols.

Do not claim I have to use induction (from observation to reason) as well. I have used deduction and its perfectly logicly fitting with the definition. Principles of reasoning are not violated.

So in summary. Proof by my definition is true when definitions from one statement are the same as in other statements. They fit and interlock eachother therefore they prove eachother.

[qwik2learn]

You asked for it.You do not want to give me a definition. I will use a dictionary and choose mine:

proof:

b :  the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning.

Process is like this. 1500 bc was written Bible that describes what God is. It was all proven to be able to exist by science.

This proof is strong because none of the witnesses back then 1500 bc could know it could happen. So by it not contradicting itself is a small proof. No forgery of evidence could be possible, because 1500 we had not know those forces.

Principles of reasoning are given in the Exodus. Phareo was proclaiming himself a God. His magicians could make things attributed to God. God was playing with them until they had found that they cannot make life out of dirt.

That's how God see you - Babilonian scientism usurpers. You cannot make life. Hey... you cannot even find how that happened and prove it. Therefore by the principle of reasoning the God of Moses is proven. By your unability to create life from dirt.

God sees you that you worship idols that you claim that they do while they do not. By the principle of reasoning it is proof of God words remaining true.

Sins against man will be forgiven. Sins of blasphemy (taking place of God) will not be. So it would be wise to repent from your scientism idols.

You do not know when the OT books were compiled and in fact the Documentary Hypothesis has largely been discredited. What is known is that Bhagavad Gita is dated to around 3200 BC, so why not consider the God of Arjuna since that book is more ancient than the Bible? Why not consider other literature which pours forth wisdom and has less questionable origins? BADecker thinks that the Bible is consistent and factual all the way through from Genesis to Galatians, but you will not go so far? I already showed how Paul invented Christianity so I would suspect that the Documentary Hypothesis is wrong (this is already the consensus of Bible scholars) and that the OT was basically invented too.
You do not know about which sins will be forgiven; did God speak to you specifically about that?

[Przemax]

You asked for it.You do not want to give me a definition. I will use a dictionary and choose mine:

proof:

b :  the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning.

Process is like this. 1500 bc was written Bible that describes what God is. It was all proven to be able to exist by science.

This proof is strong because none of the witnesses back then 1500 bc could know it could happen. So by it not contradicting itself is a small proof. No forgery of evidence could be possible, because 1500 we had not know those forces.

Principles of reasoning are given in the Exodus. Phareo was proclaiming himself a God. His magicians could make things attributed to God. God was playing with them until they had found that they cannot make life out of dirt.

That's how God see you - Babilonian scientism usurpers. You cannot make life. Hey... you cannot even find how that happened and prove it. Therefore by the principle of reasoning the God of Moses is proven. By your unability to create life from dirt.

God sees you that you worship idols that you claim that they do while they do not. By the principle of reasoning it is proof of God words remaining true.

Sins against man will be forgiven. Sins of blasphemy (taking place of God) will not be. So it would be wise to repent from your scientism idols.

You do not know when the OT books were compiled and in fact the Documentary Hypothesis has largely been discredited. What is known is that Bhagavad Gita is dated to around 3200 BC, so why not consider the God of Arjuna since that book is more ancient than the Bible.

According to Bible you rejected God. Yeah. God was speaking to people since begining. I have no reason not to believe it was once a holy book inspired by God. Why would I?

You do not know about which sins will be forgiven; did God speak to you specifically about that?

Yes. I had read it personally. So you can say he spoken to me using the words of High and only priest Jesus. lol