Scientific proof that God exists?

[qwik2learn]

Quantum non-local consciousness could possibly extend outside the brain, potentially enabling spiritual connection, telepathy, after-life, reincarnation and cosmic wisdom. This is Pandora’s Box to mainstream science which can’t explain consciousness in the brain.
Cosmology also points to intelligence, if not consciousness, intrinsic to the universe.
https://www.choprafoundation.org/spirituality/is-the-universe-conscious-by-stuart-hameroff/

The "quantum soul" hypothesis:
http://www.newdualism.org/papers/S.Hameroff/QSoulchap.pdf

[CWX]

oh my god...

[BADecker]

Quantum non-local consciousness could possibly extend outside the brain, potentially enabling spiritual connection, telepathy, after-life, reincarnation and cosmic wisdom. This is Pandora’s Box to mainstream science which can’t explain consciousness in the brain.
Cosmology also points to intelligence, if not consciousness, intrinsic to the universe.
https://www.choprafoundation.org/spirituality/is-the-universe-conscious-by-stuart-hameroff/

The "quantum soul" hypothesis:
http://www.newdualism.org/papers/S.Hameroff/QSoulchap.pdf

This is absolutely true. The only thing about it is that our present terminology doesn't explain it properly. Why not? Because science has very little understanding of what soul and spirit are all about. Generally, science doesn't accept these things at all.

It's kinda like parallel universes. Parallel universes would have to exist in something like the aether. But science doesn't have a handle on the aether almost at all. Standard science suggests that the aether doesn't exist.

But that is kinda the way science has to be. We need something solid, and science tries to keep it that way. At least until they want to ignore things that prove a whole lot of what is known as science theory is impossible.

[BADecker]

oh my god...

Oh my scientifically proven to exist God.   

[Vod]

Oh my scientifically proven to exist God.   

If only...

The debate about whether god exists could be solved instantly if we found any proof at all.

[skillink]

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

[BCEmporium]

Oh my scientifically proven to exist God.   

If only...

The debate about whether god exists could be solved instantly if we found any proof at all.

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

[sirazimuth]

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

[Vod]

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy.

[Flying Hellfish]

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

Your religion teaches incest??  

Can you even stop to think for just one second what would have happend to the gene pool if our species was inbreeding for centuries (let alone millenniums...)

[BCEmporium]

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy.

I can confirm that the Tooth Fairy is real. I've found a dollar under my pillow on multiple occasions. Does that mean that God has already been proven?

[parliament96]

if that was true than everybody believe god but no science can prove that .it like a spiritual thing

[Astargath]

There are a ton of ''viable'' hypothesis, so what? Why would you chose some hypothesis when there are already scientific theories that just work better. You are not proving anything here.

Prove it. Prove that parapsychological research is explained better by theories not involving Orch OR and survival. Since the tests can be replicated it should be easy to prove that the mind cannot influence matter, as you claim.

''Theories that support this idea are: Orch OR and survival.'' Orch OR is not a theory, is a hypothesis and I don't see how it directly supports magic but whatever, again and you know this, there is no scientific theory about any of what you mention.

Not true, you are making shit up again. Orch OR is a theory, it makes testable predictions, thus it is a theory. While mainstream theories assert that consciousness emerges as the complexity of the computations performed by cerebral neurons increases, Orch-OR posits that consciousness is based on non-computable quantum processing performed by qubits formed collectively on cellular microtubules.

Survival is a hypothesis, it is useful in explaining the evidence of parapsychology, the two are related and have strong explanatory power. The same cannot be said for mainstream materialist theories. I posted my evidence, so where is yours? You cannot claim that your preferred theory is better without citing evidence for it.

A review of Orch OR theory:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
Connecting QM to the survival of the personality and other parapsychological research:
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a22
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a14
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a23
Tests that you refuse to address or even look at, yet you claim to have a better theory? Prove it!
https://www.quora.com/Is-telekinesis-scientifically-true/answers/17777933

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction  ''is a hypothesis that consciousness in the brain originates from processes inside neurons'' Again, not a theory.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
Hahahaha, Referred to by
Deepak chopra, the guy who says each atom has consciousness??

The official ESA [Physics Dept.] stance is that this is not currently supported.

http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=21877

[sirazimuth]

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy....

...with the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus shortly thereafter...

[BADecker]

if that was true than everybody believe god but no science can prove that .it like a spiritual thing

Scientific proof that God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

...and...

Does God Exist?—Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbxD04LWW10

Does God Exist?—Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 2)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqsfyba4sJA

Does God Exist?—Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zpd9FfiMZg

Does God Exist?—Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 4)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqKblsrNCOo

Does God Exist?—Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 5)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxfGKu7fmXE

[BADecker]

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

Thanks for showing us what you look like ^^^ while you scoff at the proof for the existence of God.

[BADecker]

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

Your religion teaches incest??  

Can you even stop to think for just one second what would have happend to the gene pool if our species was inbreeding for centuries (let alone millenniums...)

There aren't any humans.

Among all 7.4 billion people on earth, there are millions of evolutionary and devolutionary mutations at work right now. Those who have such mutations aren't human. When they mate, they have children who are only partially mutated the way that they are. Then they die, and their pure mutation is lost.

What is incest? There is more incest going on right now than there ever was at the time of Adam and Eve.

Just think. If evolution happened, some mutated critter, who was just a tiny bit different than his fellows, mated with a non-mutated critter, to form children who carried the mutation only part way. Then that non-mutated critter died, and left his now imperfect mutation in his kids, so that they destroyed the mutating ability altogether.

The whole idea of evolution is about as stupid as you can get. If it worked at all, we would have dozens, or hundreds, or thousands, or millions of different kinds of intelligent, reasoning, human-like species all around us. But we don't. We only have two:
1. People who believe in God, and;
2. People who don't believe in God.

[PORN_coin]

in my opinion this is not entirely correct

[legenduim]

God exists in you heart. He not far then you can push you hand.
He is the best friend ever.

[BADecker]

in my opinion this is not entirely correct

God exists in you heart. He not far then you can push you hand.
He is the best friend ever.

But where is the scientific proof, one way or the other? Read the OP.