antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 02:24:06 PM |
|
I will add some more algos.
I'm Planning to add Bitcredits and scryptn.
bitcredits ? what is that ? SHHH.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 02:36:26 PM |
|
Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results. Are there any other coins that are using this algo? If not, I will remove the support in my fork
unfortunately i do not know of any others ... but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ... tanx sp ... #crysx I might add scrypt-n.. Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there.. Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash. tanx sp ... we are one of the donors ... but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ... would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ... tanx again ... #crysx Yes for me too. It would be easier if sp put them into one miner. How about it sp. Then non donors would have SPR. I agree to keep them separate. Or one miner that has all algo's for people that contributed and one that has all algo's except the special algo that people didnt. ie release 44 is for general people and a lets say 44srp that has 44 + SRP miner in it for people that contribute like me. That way I don't have to switch miners. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 02:38:35 PM |
|
I will add some more algos.
I'm Planning to add Bitcredits and scryptn.
bitcredits ? what is that ? SHHH. Yes what is it?
|
|
|
|
hack_
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 02:46:03 PM |
|
I will add some more algos.
I'm Planning to add Bitcredits and scryptn.
bitcredits ? what is that ? SHHH. Yes what is it? The future, that guy is amazing.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 04:38:53 PM |
|
Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results. Are there any other coins that are using this algo? If not, I will remove the support in my fork
unfortunately i do not know of any others ... but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ... tanx sp ... #crysx I might add scrypt-n.. Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there.. Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash. tanx sp ... we are one of the donors ... but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ... would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ... tanx again ... #crysx Yes for me too. It would be easier if sp put them into one miner. How about it sp. Then non donors would have SPR. I agree to keep them separate. Or one miner that has all algo's for people that contributed and one that has all algo's except the special algo that people didnt. ie release 44 is for general people and a lets say 44srp that has 44 + SRP miner in it for people that contribute like me. That way I don't have to switch miners. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) agreed ... would be quite beneficial to have two miners available ... one public - the other with optimized code for the donors ... its a pain in the rear end to continue changing miners to mine different coins when sp's ccminer can do it all AND do it well ... we are more than happy to pay for the privilege ... cant wait to see what wolfs miner will look ( and perform ) like when he is finished it ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 08:09:25 PM |
|
I ported smolens skein implementation in smelter (AMD opencl) to cuda, and it is faster. Quark +20khash or more. one rig is up 75KHASH per card (750ti)
@git release 45 beta
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 08:48:57 PM |
|
I ported smolens skein implementation in smelter (AMD opencl) to cuda, and it is faster. Quark +20khash or more. one rig is up 75KHASH per card (750ti)
@git release 45 beta
I currently have my 6x750ti FTW running Quark at 36600+ kh/s with this build. The rig reached this rate in less than 10 minutes. I will check back later... --scryptr
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2015, 10:49:32 PM Last edit: April 15, 2015, 11:03:52 PM by scryptr |
|
I ported smolens skein implementation in smelter (AMD opencl) to cuda, and it is faster. Quark +20khash or more. one rig is up 75KHASH per card (750ti)
@git release 45 beta
I currently have my 6x750ti FTW running Quark at 36600+ kh/s with this build. The rig reached this rate in less than 10 minutes. I will check back later... --scryptr GTX 960 Win 7 x64-- Mining Quark with the v44 release executable, I am getting 9190kh/s on a stable overclock of +80 core, +240 memory. This is with a 2GB GTX SSC 960. I can get 9500+ kh/s with higher overclocks, but the performance is unstable, and crashes frequently. Computer load can reduce perfomance to 7xxx kh/s. Lighter computer loads, like browsing highly programmed websites, result in 87xx kh/s. My 6x750ti FTW Linux rig with v45 beta is cruising at 36600kh/s still. Mining is the only real load on the rig. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 05:03:13 AM |
|
Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results. Are there any other coins that are using this algo? If not, I will remove the support in my fork
unfortunately i do not know of any others ... but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ... tanx sp ... #crysx I might add scrypt-n.. Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there.. Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash. tanx sp ... we are one of the donors ... but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ... would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ... tanx again ... #crysx Yes for me too. It would be easier if sp put them into one miner. How about it sp. Then non donors would have SPR. I agree to keep them separate. Or one miner that has all algo's for people that contributed and one that has all algo's except the special algo that people didnt. ie release 44 is for general people and a lets say 44srp that has 44 + SRP miner in it for people that contribute like me. That way I don't have to switch miners. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) agreed ... would be quite beneficial to have two miners available ... one public - the other with optimized code for the donors ... its a pain in the rear end to continue changing miners to mine different coins when sp's ccminer can do it all AND do it well ... we are more than happy to pay for the privilege ... cant wait to see what wolfs miner will look ( and perform ) like when he is finished it ... #crysx Right now, it's using CPU for the hashing part, and is pretty buggy - but does work. ok - so would this mean that one couldnt use the computer while its mining? ... we have dedicated miners - so its not so much an issue - but thought id ask for those who use their machine when mining ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 05:04:34 AM |
|
I ported smolens skein implementation in smelter (AMD opencl) to cuda, and it is faster. Quark +20khash or more. one rig is up 75KHASH per card (750ti)
@git release 45 beta
I currently have my 6x750ti FTW running Quark at 36600+ kh/s with this build. The rig reached this rate in less than 10 minutes. I will check back later... --scryptr GTX 960 Win 7 x64-- Mining Quark with the v44 release executable, I am getting 9190kh/s on a stable overclock of +80 core, +240 memory. This is with a 2GB GTX SSC 960. I can get 9500+ kh/s with higher overclocks, but the performance is unstable, and crashes frequently. Computer load can reduce perfomance to 7xxx kh/s. Lighter computer loads, like browsing highly programmed websites, result in 87xx kh/s. My 6x750ti FTW Linux rig with v45 beta is cruising at 36600kh/s still. Mining is the only real load on the rig. --scryptr sounds good - will have to try when i have get back into the ofice ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 05:45:13 AM |
|
Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results. Are there any other coins that are using this algo? If not, I will remove the support in my fork
unfortunately i do not know of any others ... but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ... tanx sp ... #crysx I might add scrypt-n.. Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there.. Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash. tanx sp ... we are one of the donors ... but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ... would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ... tanx again ... #crysx Yes for me too. It would be easier if sp put them into one miner. How about it sp. Then non donors would have SPR. I agree to keep them separate. Or one miner that has all algo's for people that contributed and one that has all algo's except the special algo that people didnt. ie release 44 is for general people and a lets say 44srp that has 44 + SRP miner in it for people that contribute like me. That way I don't have to switch miners. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) agreed ... would be quite beneficial to have two miners available ... one public - the other with optimized code for the donors ... its a pain in the rear end to continue changing miners to mine different coins when sp's ccminer can do it all AND do it well ... we are more than happy to pay for the privilege ... cant wait to see what wolfs miner will look ( and perform ) like when he is finished it ... #crysx Right now, it's using CPU for the hashing part, and is pretty buggy - but does work. ok - so would this mean that one couldnt use the computer while its mining? ... we have dedicated miners - so its not so much an issue - but thought id ask for those who use their machine when mining ... #crysx Of course you can - the CPU mining part will be removed, it only exists right now to ensure the correctness of Stratum code. The buggy part is that I seem to randomly get low diff share errors from the pool until new work is received and the miner threads start on a new job - then it's magically fixed... ok - strange ... would that be considered a 'restart' of sorts? ... where the code gets stuck on a part of the code and when new data is received - it moves on to the new data ... im talking gibberish here - as im not a developer - but that seems quite odd it would 'fix' itself when new data arrives ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 05:57:50 AM |
|
I just put the data of a 750ti light overclock in a Myriadcoin Profitability Calculator I I can boost the hashrate from 60 to 82 MHASH(36.6%) it will be more profitable than mining qubit.
Klaus_t did it. almost. 30% faster. 70-80MHASH on the 750ti (depending on the level of overclock) Download the ccminer tvpruvot 1.6.1, or build my 45 beta@git.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 05:58:58 AM |
|
I just put the data of a 750ti light overclock in a Myriadcoin Profitability Calculator I I can boost the hashrate from 60 to 82 MHASH(36.6%) it will be more profitable than mining qubit.
Klaus_t did it. almost. 30% faster. 70-80MHASH on the 750ti (depending on the level of overclock) Download the ccminer tvpruvot 1.6.2, or build my git. sp - do you mine on yaamp to test these results? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 06:00:21 AM |
|
Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results. Are there any other coins that are using this algo? If not, I will remove the support in my fork
unfortunately i do not know of any others ... but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ... tanx sp ... #crysx I might add scrypt-n.. Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there.. Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash. tanx sp ... we are one of the donors ... but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ... would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ... tanx again ... #crysx Yes for me too. It would be easier if sp put them into one miner. How about it sp. Then non donors would have SPR. I agree to keep them separate. Or one miner that has all algo's for people that contributed and one that has all algo's except the special algo that people didnt. ie release 44 is for general people and a lets say 44srp that has 44 + SRP miner in it for people that contribute like me. That way I don't have to switch miners. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) agreed ... would be quite beneficial to have two miners available ... one public - the other with optimized code for the donors ... its a pain in the rear end to continue changing miners to mine different coins when sp's ccminer can do it all AND do it well ... we are more than happy to pay for the privilege ... cant wait to see what wolfs miner will look ( and perform ) like when he is finished it ... #crysx Right now, it's using CPU for the hashing part, and is pretty buggy - but does work. ok - so would this mean that one couldnt use the computer while its mining? ... we have dedicated miners - so its not so much an issue - but thought id ask for those who use their machine when mining ... #crysx Of course you can - the CPU mining part will be removed, it only exists right now to ensure the correctness of Stratum code. The buggy part is that I seem to randomly get low diff share errors from the pool until new work is received and the miner threads start on a new job - then it's magically fixed... ok - strange ... would that be considered a 'restart' of sorts? ... where the code gets stuck on a part of the code and when new data is received - it moves on to the new data ... im talking gibberish here - as im not a developer - but that seems quite odd it would 'fix' itself when new data arrives ... #crysx It is a restart of sorts, as the miner threads all stop, get the new info, create the block header, and begin hashing that new one. ok - so i guess a debug of where in the code it stops to see what is happening is a good thing - yes? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 06:01:52 AM |
|
I just put the data of a 750ti light overclock in a Myriadcoin Profitability Calculator I I can boost the hashrate from 60 to 82 MHASH(36.6%) it will be more profitable than mining qubit.
laus_t did it. almost. 30% faster. 70-80MHASH on the 750ti (depending on the level of overclock) ownload the ccminer tvpruvot 1.6.2, or build my git. sp - do you mine on yaamp to test these results? ... #crysx No. Skein cannot be mined at yaamp. you need to use a pool. like this one: https://dgb-skein.theblocksfactory.com/Digibyte is a multi-algorithm coin. Right now mining dgb-skein is 200% more profitable than dgb-groest by using the new kernal.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 06:10:32 AM |
|
CGminer skein(AMD)
got this from an old thread:
Brand Model Hashrate Settings Approx. SKC Yield per day 5770 55 MH/s --- XFX 6850 70 MH/s --- XFX 6870 90 MH/s --- HD 5850 150 MH/s poclbm --- HD 5870 114 MH/s -I 11 --- HD 5870XT 100 MH/s -I 10 --shaders 1600 --thread-concurrency 8000 --gpu-threads 1 --- HD 7970 213 MH/s -I 11 --- Gigabyte HD 7970GE 220 MH/s GPU/Mem Clock 1100/1000 --- XFX R9 290 225 MH/s -I 13 (GPU/Mem Clock 1120/1250) 1,617.369
looks like the old AMD cards are doing bether, but the 750ti is faster per watt.
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 06:44:15 AM |
|
The buggy part is that I seem to randomly get low diff share errors from the pool until new work is received and the miner threads start on a new job - then it's magically fixed...
Getting such errors too. Perhaps servers start enforcing new work and diff immediately, without waiting for mining.notify.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 07:22:46 AM |
|
I just put the data of a 750ti light overclock in a Myriadcoin Profitability Calculator I I can boost the hashrate from 60 to 82 MHASH(36.6%) it will be more profitable than mining qubit.
laus_t did it. almost. 30% faster. 70-80MHASH on the 750ti (depending on the level of overclock) ownload the ccminer tvpruvot 1.6.2, or build my git. sp - do you mine on yaamp to test these results? ... #crysx No. Skein cannot be mined at yaamp. you need to use a pool. like this one: https://dgb-skein.theblocksfactory.com/Digibyte is a multi-algorithm coin. Right now mining dgb-skein is 200% more profitable than dgb-groest by using the new kernal. tanx sp ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 07:39:08 AM |
|
The buggy part is that I seem to randomly get low diff share errors from the pool until new work is received and the miner threads start on a new job - then it's magically fixed...
Getting such errors too. Perhaps servers start enforcing new work and diff immediately, without waiting for mining.notify. Tried that. I'm sure you mean the cleanjobs parameter to be true, rather than mining.notify - you don't have new work until you've gotten mining.notify! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I suspect that mining.set_difficulty is enforced instantly, pool sets his diff variable, sends mining.set_difficulty and mining.notify at once. Have to write logging code to be sure. When pool balancing will be done, I'll try to suspend pool that changes difficulty for short time and dispatch hashpower to other pools. The server can adjust the difficulty required for miner shares with the "mining.set_difficulty" method. The miner should begin enforcing the new difficulty on the next job received. Some pools may force a new job out when set_difficulty is sent, using clean_jobs to force the miner to begin using the new difficulty immediately.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
smolen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2015, 08:15:59 AM |
|
That's the thing - I'm not getting any diff change notifications. The difficulty stays the same during the errors, and when they clear - I double-checked.
Oops, what is that pool? (sp_, sorry for hijacking the thread)
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
|