◥TALK◥15%◣bitcointalk(💬) est✪2014★yr4✪ [btc]💬

Quote from: mmedinas on April 19, 2018, 03:29:29 AM

Hello.

i will try to release the new wallet with the checkpoint fix until sunday. Linux and Windows versions.

Dear friend
Please share to me and all member here about your link! I still want to sync my wallet and hold this coin!

i don't understand the terms used "no longer solvent";
from what I could briefly gather ... there was a hardfork? and cryptopia doesn't want to handle a coin swap

List of Legendary Bitcointalk posts

First Post ever from Satoshi himself: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg28#msg28

Post from Hal Finny: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.0

Guy who invented Hodling: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=375643.0

Post that caught Ross Ulbricht (DPR) (Founder of Silkroad): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=47811.msg568744#msg568744

First Time PoS mentioned: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27787.0

Get 5 Bitcoins for free faucet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183.0

Archive of early Mailing List: https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/

Some weird fact: Hal Finney died in 2014 but the last time someone used his Bitcointalk account was in 2017 🤔 Here is the proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2436

First purchase for bitcoin--2 pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=137.0

The famous 'We are the New Wealthy Elite' post - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12156.0

Thread where a guy was auctioning 10,000 bitcoins for $50 but NOBODY wanted to pay that much - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92.0

guy who bought 259684 BTC for under $3000: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20207.0

first reported major theft of Bitcoins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=16457.0

Gavin helping the CIA: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.0

I see this topic were I posted before.
Now I work on a restart of StakeCoin.
StakeCoin is more then 3 years old and was almost dead.
I minted 2 years and bought a large share on Novaexchange for almost nothing.
Most of my coins I give to the new community in a airdrop.
People have to start the wallet and get 100 STK.
Check the topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3275292.msg34144658#msg34144658
Before we had only 5-10 nodes and now more then Peercoin!
Check: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/stk/#!extraction

The goal is 1000 nodes in a few month and good website.
After that we try to find a good exchange and hope we sustain value.

People can also get STK by doing tasks like tweets and retweets.

The main thing distinguishing a blockchain from a normal database is that there are specific rules about how to put data into the database. That is, it cannot conflict with some other data that’s already in the database (consistent), it’s append-only (immutable), and the data itself is locked to an owner (ownable), it’s replicable and available. Finally, everyone agrees on what the state of the things in the database are (canonical) without a central party (decentralized).

+airdropped
+Polo
+yearsago

TALK
(consistent)

Quote from: four3200 on May 19, 2018, 12:38:39 PM

Thanks for sharing the experience. Just have to be patient and wait couple of days.

+airdropped
wasTALK in 2014

Some WAVES drropping
https://wavescommunity.com/may-airdrop/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=airdrop_may_eng_retargeting&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI94_rlpOP2wIVRo2OCh1oawXsEAEYASAAEgJtXPD_BwE

Quote from: QuantumMechanic on July 11, 2011, 04:12:45 AM

I've got an idea, and I'm wondering if it's been discussed/ripped apart here yet:

I'm wondering if as bitcoins become more widely distributed, whether a transition from a proof of work based system to a proof of stake one might happen. What I mean by proof of stake is that instead of your "vote" on the accepted transaction history being weighted by the share of computing resources you bring to the network, it's weighted by the number of bitcoins you can prove you own, using your private keys.

For those that don't want to be actively verifying transactions, and so that not all private keys need to be facing the network, votes could be delegated to other addresses via some kind of nonstandard Bitcoin transaction. In this way, voting power would accumulate with trusted delegates instead of miners. New bitcoins and transaction fees could be randomly and periodically distributed to delgates, weighted by the number of votes they've accumulated, thereby incentivising diversity of the delegates and direct voters.

If the implementation could be done, it proved to maintain at least a similar level of privacy and trustworthiness, and it only minimally complicated the UX, I'm thinking that a proof of stake based fork could out-compete a proof of work one due to much lower transaction fees, since its network wouldn't need to support the cost of the miners' computing resources. (Note that the vote delegation scheme has bandwith/storage overhead that would offset these savings by some amount which would hopefully be relatively small.)

Some other potential improvements this system could offer:

Possibly quicker, more definite confirmation of transactions, depending on how it can be implemented.
The "voting power" may be more trustworty, since it would accumulate in a bottom-up fashion via a network of trust, instead of in the somewhat arbitrary way it accumulates now. (Note the potential problem of vote-buying here.)
It would remove the physical point of failure of bitcoin mining equipment, which can be confiscated or made illegal to run.
It could be used to provide stakeholders a means of making their voices heard (via the delegated voting system it establishes) when it comes to proposals for software updates and protocol changes.

Anyway, I just wanted to throw the idea out here to see if there are any obvious reasons why it couldn't be implemented, and to hopefully spark a discussion amongst those better qualified than me.

Cheers.

BE list / project CHC

https://lafuhosting.top
etc

stakePools
https://cryptounited.net/coinvoting/ -caution-
posw -fail?-
iSpace - Cool

Check EnergyCoin?
Also a good pos coin.

See startpost

Quote from: energycoin.operations on April 18, 2015, 01:23:53 PM

• Website https://www.energycoinfoundation.org/en/ online! April 2018
• EnergyParty webwallet @ www.EnergyExchange.eu Dec 2017

Have a great day,

Jan

Thanks for visiting our Topcoin thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=765196

We would love to be considered as an addition to the list!

crymzyn Grin

Quote from: four3200 on May 13, 2018, 02:10:48 PM

Great list, thanks for posting bro, some truly historic moments!

Oh, Is there anyway to find out if I was apart of the airdrop for talk? or just forget about it? Roll Eyes

Quote from: alvaaretha on June 01, 2018, 02:18:34 PM

Oh, Is there anyway to find out if I was apart of the airdrop for talk? or just forget about it? Roll Eyes

were you here in 2014?
Cry

proof of stake gets you TALK Grin

Quote from: musicmeetstheblockchain on April 12, 2017, 06:57:50 AM

------------------
------------------ o o o ------------------
------------------

BLOCKPOOL (BPL) TEC Now Live (May 1st - June 30th 2017)

https://blockpool.io/tec.html

BLOCKPOOL (BPL) SPECIFICATION

• 201 delegates
• 15 second block times
• 25 million tokens + forging rewards of 5% Annual decreasing
1% per year until 1% Annual then switching to a fixed block
reward of .1 BPL/Block thereafter.
• 50.25 minute rounds
• Consensus System: DPoS (Delegated Proof Of Stake)
• Official Ticker: BPL

List of tokens accepted for TEC*

ADC, ADZ, ARK
BITB, BTC, BCY, BLK, BRK, BSD, BTS
CLAM, CLOAK, CRBIT
DASH, DCR, DGB, DGC, DGD, DOGE
EMC, ETH, ETC, EXP
FCT
GAME, GCR, GLD, GRC, GNT
ICN
LBC, LEO, LSK, LTC
MAID, MAX, MLN, MSC, MONA, MUE
NAV, NMC, NVC, NBT, NXS, NXT
OMNI, POT, PPC, PIVX, PSB, RBY, RDD, REP
SBD, SDC, SC, SJCX, SNGLS, SLS*, START, STEEM, SYS
UNIT, USDT, VRC,VTC, VOX
WDC
XBC, XCP, XMR, XMY, XPM, XRP, XSPEC, XZC
ZEC

------------------
------------------ o o o ------------------
------------------

so blockpool is copy of Ark?
dPOS seems to be the next step, building website and high thru put (free no fee) portals, see steem.(EOS)

http://netcoin.io/fairweight/

whisper down the lane;

vintage
original
survivor chains

0r

CLASSIC CRYPTO COIN COLLECTION

000000 BTC 2009-01-09 02:54:25
47417 LTC October 09, 2011
101820 PEER August 19, 2012
178286 FTC April 16, 2013
209508 DIGITAL May 18, 2013
218852 fst May 29, 2013
235870 emd July 31, 2014 724463
267545 zeta August 03, 2013
330956 pxc November 11, 2013
349198 stable November 27, 2013
349198 stable November 27, 2013
361813 DOGE December 08, 2013
368153 lotto December 12, 2013
380130 cat December 21, 2013 441402
383068 meow December 24, 2013 @ 448003
379236 EARTH December 20, 2013
389403 MOON December 28, 2013
389070 paul December 28, 2013
391192 tips December 30, 2013
399658 42 January 05, 2014
407705 klondike January 09, 2014
400893 smart January 06, 2014
408268 DiGi January 10, 2014
411065 q2c January 11, 2014 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1645566.0
430091 leaf January 24, 2014
447657 KARMA February 03, 2014
438150 MAX January 29, 2014
446703 RIE February 03, 2014
435170 huc January 27, 2014
446062 auro February 02, 2014
483515 myrd February 23, 2014
494708 emc2 March 01, 2014
506774 hvy March 08, 2014
577267 bool April 20, 2014
624778 blz May 25, 2014
658117 UFO June 19, 2014
252896 sex July 09, 2013 locked @ http://sexcoinforum.org
587080 SYS April 27, 2014 = moolah aug16 1500btc
306894 blake October 07, 2013
259764 spots fork July 21, 2013
270852 secure August 09, 2013
202417 frk May 11, 2013
243911 global June 26, 2013

644498 rzr June 08, 2014
600639 uro May 08, 2014
525926 grs March 22, 2014 Grøstl
466621 rbbt February 15, 2014
552561 Quebec April 01, 2014 x11
579973 karma April 22, 2014
508849 mza March 10, 2014 661322
504265 888 March 06, 2014
400753 bat January 06, 2014
665858 GCN June 25, 2014

345619 NXT November 25, 2013
395761 XCP January 02, 2014

397679 micro January 03, 2014
413978 ultra
424421 ca$h January 20, 2014
423597 RDD January 20, 2014
426303 nem January 21, 2014
426324 pot January 21, 2014
450381 MINT February 05, 2014
460037 panda February 11, 2014
464743 flap February 14, 2014
469640 BC 602041 February 16, 2014
483847 c2.0 February 23, 2014
487212 fair February 25, 2014
487814 ziet February 26, 2014
503236 ecc March 06, 2014
509499 flt March 10, 2014
566870 asia April 11, 2014
568517 white April 13, 2014
573232 cinni April 16, 2014
600322 liberty May 08, 2014
618377 crypt 618377 May 20, 2014
618552 super May 21, 2014
419873 CON January 17, 2014 @ 605442
459622 ruby February 11, 2014 pos?
460037 panda2 February 11, 2014
568517 white April 13, 2014
591114 NAUT May 21, 2014 pos
245086 cgb June 28, 2013
143221 nova February 11, 2013 (xorxor Balthazar)
464476 pnd February 14, 2014
441760 sat January 31, 2014 556105

549485 bplus March 30, 2014 714606
486600 edu February 25, 2014
589008 enrg April 29, 2014 pow/pos scrypt
619210 talk May 21, 2014 NIST5
558012 MC April 05, 2014 (the official Mastercoin Foundation)
595999 AC May 04, 2014
303749 hobo September 27, 2013 (Tranz
424421 cash January 20, 2014
554412 gulden April 02, 2014
603757 cure May 10, 2014
580725 dmd April 22, 2014
400389 cache January 05, 2014

balance BOT

http://lamboindex.com/

Constructing algorithms to address this issue should meet the 4 following requirements:

Fairness: The fairest instance is not picking between two assets. This means if there are only enough funds to make one trade, the fairest option is to pick neither. (however, this may not be desired from the user standpoint)

Deterministic: The algorithm should be consistent. It should work every single time. Every reachable state should be predictable.

Usability: An algorithm can be fair and deterministic, but not usable. The algorithm needs to be usable and desirable. It should produce results that the user wants to see.

Economical: Any method used shouldn’t require excessive trades to fit one of the previous requirements. The algorithm should optimize for the smallest amount of fees possible.

https://hackernoon.com/portfolio-rebalancing-algorithms-in-crypto-a7c91c15b1a7