[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative

[pseudonymdude]

I am polo withdrawals VNL, but has been ON HOLD, any brothers know what circumstance

You can withdraw VNL from Poloniex.  If you're having a problem, contact Poloniex support.

[1714681737]

1714681737

[1714681737]

1714681737

[1714681737]

1714681737

[1714681737]

1714681737

[bigfryguy]

silly question, but did you confirm your withdrawal from the meail they sent you?

[ahmed9979]

You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

[hughbt]

Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

[groggin]

You guys really ... PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

 havn't begun the PR. 

VNL code is unique and fundamentally revolutionary. john-connor's work speaks for itself and is monumental, soon the GUI will be getting some of the dev's attention and not long thereafter ... buckle your seatbelt pls

[pseudonymdude]

You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

Again, code is open source and even if you can't read any code, why do you think the code isn't original when:

-Only coin other than Bitcoin that only requires 1 confirmation on Poloniex - I've posted many times how to test this.

-Only coin that has staking mobile wallets that allow you to move your wallet.dat to your PC from your Android and iOS wallets

-Only coin with near-instant 0-confirmation transactions that doesn't use master nodes.  You can receive node incentives if you have 10,000 in collateral, but collateral is not necessary to be a super peer.  You just need an open VNL port, a certain amount of uptime, and possibly a certain amount of bandwidth.

-Only coin that has encrypted connections and gives you a random port if you have no config.dat.  All your ISP will see is normal SSL traffic while monitoring your ports, which is unlike what happens with all other coins.  If you're using Bitcoin and your ISP monitors your ports, it will know you're using port 8333,
which means it knows you're using Bitcoin.

[63296310]

I am polo withdrawals VNL, but has been ON HOLD, any brothers know what circumstance

You can withdraw VNL from Poloniex.  If you're having a problem, contact Poloniex support.

Thank you, has been solved.

[LovSan]

You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

There is no PR at all, just pure non stop development for almost a year already. If you don't remember how it started let me remind you, or you can refresh memories here yourself.

• Closed source
• Minor GUI bugs
• NO console
• NO encryption
• NO UDP
• NO iOS&Android wallets
• NO GPU&FPGA
• NO Crawler
• NO ZeroTime
• NO incentive rewards

Now VNL has everything from the list above in a year and what persons (won't mention names) did themselves in the same timeframe? Were bitching and trolling? Cool stuff nothing to add.

Crypto is full of scammers, vaporware hyped shit, greedy&lame devs and now look at VNL, feel the difference?

This has already been overly discussed. Read all of the source code and then decide for yourself. If you find anything suspicious your next move would be to hire an IP lawyer to verify the claims are valid. This is how these situations are handled in the real world, not on bitcointalk.org by repeating the same non-facts and expecting some result.

Thank you for your support.

https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/221/4-month-timeline/3

[pokeytex]

You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

** YAWN **

[Daveeoff]

Dose anyone know if  vnl.POOL.MN is closed or just down .

[ahmed9979]

Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

I used to be a huge supporter of Vanilla. That was before a few coders came on board and did code review of it and came up with the result that the claims of the code being unique and original and "built from scratch" were most likely to be BS. It's most likely to be a clone of Peercoin and the code was passed through a code converter then all the tags were removed to try to obfuscate that fact.
I can clearly see the results of recent updates, but if John lied about the most basic fundamental fact that he used to promote the coin then I have no reason to trust him or any of you.

[ahmed9979]

You guys really suck at PR. There has been many claims of the code not being original and were backed up with solid proofs, how would you answer them? Does John even care to save the coin's rep?

Again, code is open source and even if you can't read any code, why do you think the code isn't original when:

-Only coin other than Bitcoin that only requires 1 confirmation on Poloniex - I've posted many times how to test this.

-Only coin that has staking mobile wallets that allow you to move your wallet.dat to your PC from your Android and iOS wallets

-Only coin with near-instant 0-confirmation transactions that doesn't use master nodes.  You can receive node incentives if you have 10,000 in collateral, but collateral is not necessary to be a super peer.  You just need an open VNL port, a certain amount of uptime, and possibly a certain amount of bandwidth.

-Only coin that has encrypted connections and gives you a random port if you have no config.dat.  All your ISP will see is normal SSL traffic while monitoring your ports, which is unlike what happens with all other coins.  If you're using Bitcoin and your ISP monitors your ports, it will know you're using port 8333,
which means it knows you're using Bitcoin.

You're talking about the updates that were pushed on later. Clearly John is a great coder.
I was talking about the basic code that he started with. Code reviews pointed out the fact that it wasn't built from the ground up as John claimed.
The fact that the coin was "built from scratch" was what drew most of supporters to it in the first place..

[hughbt]

Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

I used to be a huge supporter of Vanilla. That was before a few coders came on board and did code review of it and came up with the result that the claims of the code being unique and original and "built from scratch" were most likely to be BS. It's most likely to be a clone of Peercoin and the code was passed through a code converter then all the tags were removed to try to obfuscate that fact.
I can clearly see the results of recent updates, but if John lied about the most basic fundamental fact that he used to promote the coin then I have no reason to trust him or any of you.

Few coders came on board, did some code reviewing, there were some claims that it's not unique... bla bla bla There were rumours that there was a rumour, but that was just a bullshit. No one knows who,where and when but in the next sentence you are saying that it's a fact. Apparently you don't even know what you are talking about. I could make Bitcoin's code review and tell you it's not safe and Satoshi was drunk when he code it. Will you believe me? You have no reason to trust him or any of us but you have a reason to believe to some other random guy on bitcointalk. I'm wasting my time... It's probably another Smooth's or Icebreaker's troll account. But I trust you Ahmed, I will sell my VNL, you probably know better than polo.

[traumschiff]

Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

That was before a few coders came on board and did code review

No they didn't, they are no reviewers and they didn't even review the github, most of them even admitted it when questioned. They pointed out 2 files out of a 100 (or 10 lines out of 5k) that are similar because they follow the usual P2P currency architecture. John stated that he was watching Peercoins source while he was doing the coding, but this doesn't support what you and the so-called reviewers are stating. Look at the people making the claims.

[xCore]

Hi BCT !

Additional GUI features are planned for this Q4/2015, like first translations. If you want to help us with that part, please check https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/234/vanillacoin-translations
You can reach me here, on Vanillacoin Forum, or on Freenode if needed.

Thanks in advance, and have a good day/n8.

Regards,

xCore

[DeCrypterManiac]

Bittrex wallet still disabled ?

[xCore]

Bittrex wallet still disabled ?

Just sent an email to check with them, but I know they got the email about 0.3.8 upgrade 4 days ago. I presume it will be enabled soon.

[YAdaminer]

Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

I used to be a huge supporter of Vanilla. That was before a few coders came on board and did code review of it and came up with the result that the claims of the code being unique and original and "built from scratch" were most likely to be BS. It's most likely to be a clone of Peercoin and the code was passed through a code converter then all the tags were removed to try to obfuscate that fact.
I can clearly see the results of recent updates, but if John lied about the most basic fundamental fact that he used to promote the coin then I have no reason to trust him or any of you.

So, you used to be supporter but not any more, right? What are you doing here than anyway? Price is low and you want it a little bit lower to become 'supporter' again or what?
Whatever your reason is you cant change the fact that you act like just another troll and you should know that. If you sold in fear of your doubts then please just move on, there are many coins out there on which you can move price with little FUD and few BTC.

[pseudonymdude]

Also, this coin from the start has been the only coin that automatically burns all tx fees, and they're not sent to a burn address either.

[john-connor]

Code reviews pointed out the fact that it wasn't built from the ground up as John claimed.

Not a single code review (that indicates this) has ever surfaced. Trying to manipulate the market with non-facts (again), nice...

Thanks you for your support.