|
anhpt192
|
 |
October 20, 2015, 07:19:24 AM |
|
just bought ~10k @ price 14.6k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HCLivess
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
October 20, 2015, 09:02:32 AM |
|
Here we go, next stop 0.00007
|
|
|
|
Ozcar
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2015, 09:27:37 AM |
|
Does anyone know if the android wallet also acts as a node and receives incentives?
|
|
|
|
|
losk22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 09:42:46 AM |
|
Does anyone know if the android wallet also acts as a node and receives incentives?
It would be nice to have incentives on the android wallet. Android is a "client node" so it doesn't help the network by routing and relaying data. Cool Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
Ozcar
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2015, 09:57:03 AM |
|
Does anyone know if the android wallet also acts as a node and receives incentives?
It would be nice to have incentives on the android wallet. Android is a "client node" so it doesn't help the network by routing and relaying data. Cool Thank you for your support. Ah OK, thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
|
avirdoz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 20, 2015, 01:43:00 PM |
|
My node have not received incentive for five days and always have status: "votecandidate": true.
I restarted node, but it didn't help. What can be wrong? My another node receive few rewards every day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LovSan
|
|
October 20, 2015, 01:59:55 PM
Last edit: October 20, 2015, 02:12:10 PM by LovSan |
|
My node have not received incentive for five days and always have status: "votecandidate": true.
I restarted node, but it didn't help. What can be wrong? My another node receive few rewards every day.
http://vanillacoin.net/wiki/Technologies/Node%20Incentives.mdIs there a guarantee I will be chosen to receive an incentive reward?
No, some peers may not be providing reliable service or have bad luck due to variance. 5 days is really a bad streak, sometimes I don't recieve rewards on one of my nodes for a day or two (rare) max. |
❄❁❇❂❇❃❇❅❇❆❇❈❇❉❇❊❇❋❄♒❇♓❇♉❇♈❇♊❇♋❇♌❇♍❇♎❇♏❇♐❇♑❄❋❇❊❇❉❇❈❇❆❇❅❇❃❇❂❇❁❄ |
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 05:37:17 PM |
|
My node have not received incentive for five days and always have status: "votecandidate": true.
I restarted node, but it didn't help. What can be wrong? My another node receive few rewards every day.
Have you updated to 0.3.8? That was released about 5 days ago. |
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
October 20, 2015, 05:41:47 PM |
|
Also had that issue. Seems like you have to resend the collateral to your default address after certain updates.
|
|
|
|
|
avirdoz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1191
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 20, 2015, 05:41:59 PM |
|
My node have not received incentive for five days and always have status: "votecandidate": true.
I restarted node, but it didn't help. What can be wrong? My another node receive few rewards every day.
Have you updated to 0.3.8? That was released about 5 days ago. Yes. Maybe really bad streak:( |
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 05:56:54 PM |
|
Code reviews pointed out the fact that it wasn't built from the ground up as John claimed.
Not a single code review (that indicates this) has ever surfaced. Trying to manipulate the market with non-facts (again), nice...  Thanks you for your support. So why hasn't there been one? There is one thing being cool and not caring what people think bit there is another thing completely throwing the success of a coin under a bus. Prove critics wrong, community should be the better man....or woman...and pay for one. I Truely can't think of a better FU than buying tons at this low and then laughing your asses off when the price explodes when a peer review shows the coin is unique. |
|
|
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 06:04:58 PM |
|
Code reviews pointed out the fact that it wasn't built from the ground up as John claimed.
Not a single code review (that indicates this) has ever surfaced. Trying to manipulate the market with non-facts (again), nice... Thanks you for your support. So why hasn't there been one? There is one thing being cool and not caring what people think bit there is another thing completely throwing the success of a coin under a bus. Prove critic wrong, community should be the better man....or woman...and pay for one. Poloniex did a code review. That's why Vanillacoin is the only coin other than Bitcoin to require only 1 confirmation on Poloniex. You can test this by going here: https://poloniex.com/public?command=returnCurrencies and searching for minconf":1," You'll get two results, which will be Vanillacoin and Bitcoin. Also, I've typed something similar to this 10+ times already. Inform others please. Thank you |
|
|
|
h1gh1s6
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
October 20, 2015, 06:05:08 PM |
|
Who would you pay for a code review? Someone one BTCtalk with their own agenda? We would need an actual, real, reviewer not associated with crypto, and and that would cost tens of thousands of dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pseudonymdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 06:21:08 PM |
|
Tried him early on (March 3), Vanillacoin is too different from Bitcoin for him to review. He wasn't even sure where to start and wouldn't give me a quote. He just glances at a few things in clones and says if the tiny amount of changes they made will cause any problems. And again, Poloniex did a code review. That's why Vanillacoin is the only coin other than Bitcoin to require only 1 confirmation on Poloniex. You can test this by going here: https://poloniex.com/public?command=returnCurrencies and searching for minconf":1," You'll get two results, which will be Vanillacoin and Bitcoin. Also, I've typed something similar to this 10+ times already. Inform others please. Thank you |
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 07:13:40 PM |
|
I messaged him and asked if he would do one. It's a start I guess. It's the communities responsibility to do this, we don't need to bother JC, he has done the work it's not his role to justify his open source material it's others. Maybe a small Bitcoin fund can be gathered by someone trustworthy in the VNL community. Of course a review could make the price drop but if he finds it legit then it's actually in everyone's best interest to chip a little in. And look if you don't want to support one then let others do so. I'm sure some would prefer to gather more cheap but there are the kind of people who are happy to FUD the coin for their self interests. But I see no reason for those who want this to make it happen. |
|
|
|
|
traumschiff (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
October 20, 2015, 07:32:19 PM |
|
I messaged him and asked if he would do one. It's a start I guess. It's the communities responsibility to do this, we don't need to bother JC, he has done the work it's not his role to justify his open source material it's others. Maybe a small Bitcoin fund can be gathered by someone trustworthy in the VNL community. Of course a review could make the price drop but if he finds it legit then it's actually in everyone's best interest to chip a little in. And look if you don't want to support one then let others do so. I'm sure some would prefer to gather more cheap but there are the kind of people who are happy to FUD the coin for their self interests. But I see no reason for those who want this to make it happen. He isn't competent in this field see pseudonymdude's comment above. He is only knowledged with bitcoin clones. Bitcointalk isn't the place to find a competent review because any good developer would have an agenda and be biased towards their own interest or projects. Problem is (I already explained this on IRC) that any good and recognised cryptographer or P2P system developer would ask for a way higher sum compared to what the community could throw together at these price levels. Imagine the average hourly/weekly pay of a really good specialist in this field and the amount of time needed to review the amount of code (and complexity of it) put down by John. |
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 07:44:23 PM |
|
I messaged him and asked if he would do one. It's a start I guess. It's the communities responsibility to do this, we don't need to bother JC, he has done the work it's not his role to justify his open source material it's others. Maybe a small Bitcoin fund can be gathered by someone trustworthy in the VNL community. Of course a review could make the price drop but if he finds it legit then it's actually in everyone's best interest to chip a little in. And look if you don't want to support one then let others do so. I'm sure some would prefer to gather more cheap but there are the kind of people who are happy to FUD the coin for their self interests. But I see no reason for those who want this to make it happen. He isn't competent in this field see pseudonymdude's comment above. He is only knowledged with bitcoin clones. Bitcointalk isn't the place to find a competent review because any good developer would have an agenda and be biased towards their own interest or projects. Problem is (I already explained this on IRC) that any good and recognised cryptographer or P2P system developer would ask for a way higher sum compared to what the community could throw together at these price levels. Imagine the average hourly/weekly pay of a really good specialist in this field and the amount of time needed to review the amount of code (and complexity of it) put down by John. Ok but where is a solution to the problem that VNL could be the most amazing coin ever made but no one believes in the tech and it dies on the vine? I mean eventually someone else will steal just enough of JC's ideas to make their coin and and not look like it was a direct steal. I see that happening in the next year. I dont see why a review has to cost that much and even if it is flawed it a start to get the ball rolling. |
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2015, 07:48:20 PM |
|
Tried him early on (March 3), Vanillacoin is too different from Bitcoin for him to review. He wasn't even sure where to start and wouldn't give me a quote. He just glances at a few things in clones and says if the tiny amount of changes they made will cause any problems. And again, Poloniex did a code review. That's why Vanillacoin is the only coin other than Bitcoin to require only 1 confirmation on Poloniex. You can test this by going here: https://poloniex.com/public?command=returnCurrencies and searching for minconf":1," You'll get two results, which will be Vanillacoin and Bitcoin. Also, I've typed something similar to this 10+ times already. Inform others please. Thank you Ok fair enough on this particular guy but if Polinex did a 'code review' for nothing then you would think someone would be willing who is trustworthy and wont ask for a million bucks surely??? |
|
|
|
|
traumschiff (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
October 20, 2015, 07:51:12 PM |
|
I dont see why a review has to cost that much and even if it is flawed it a start to get the ball rolling.
Because complex projects/code needs complex reviews from competent people. I support the idea of a review, but people should find someone who fits the needs and not just find someone for the sake of hype. If the community is able to find someone who we can trust and is well recognised I'm all up for the idea. I think a price rise with the future release of DarkPP and some changes that will make Vanillacoin scale even better will make it possible for us to gather a bigger sum on a crowdfunding. Also I feel that node incentives will have a healthy effect on the long-term price (which we might not sense just yet). |
|
|
|
|
