Bitcoin Forum
August 26, 2025, 12:00:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 [962] 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3918340 times)
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 02:59:31 PM
 #19221

Based on this post, the ASICMiner Gen3 chips are around 1W/GH, which is nothing special. The pricing is barely competitive with current Bitmain, Coincraft clone, and Spondoolies-Tech offerings. If this is what current shareholders were banking on to lift the share price, I think you better take off the rose colored glasses and think again.

That's not for the chip, that's for the whole miner. The miner isn't an AM product, only the chips are and if people are making miners, they've already bought the chips.

Imo AM just has "bullet proof" working average chips... but in mass quantity! ^^

very average, considering other options on the market.

dont mean to offend FC but chineese dont aim top notch handcrafted quality. they aim quantity. and thats perfectly fine imho ...

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sell.  Cheesy

not if prices are wayy lower than the competition.. Grin Grin Grin

i disagree. running costs are everything.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:35:13 PM
 #19222

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sell.  Cheesy

What do you think AM's J/GH is? According to Rockxie's initial testing, the chips consume 0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s. Who exactly is producing chips with a lower power consumption than that? It's definitely not everyone.
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:39:04 PM
 #19223

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sell.  Cheesy

What do you think AM's J/GH is? According to Rockxie's initial testing, the chips consume 0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s. Who exactly is producing chips with a lower power consumption than that?

Adding other components loss about 1KW/Thash
Tips:this result is not very accurate just for reference.

i'm not going to get into a 'who's got a bigger ....' argument. Look around for yourself.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:45:26 PM
 #19224

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sell.  Cheesy

What do you think AM's J/GH is? According to Rockxie's initial testing, the chips consume 0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s. Who exactly is producing chips with a lower power consumption than that?

Adding other components loss about 1KW/Thash
Tips:this result is not very accurate just for reference.

i'm not going to get into a 'who's got a bigger ....' argument. Look around for yourself.

Yeah, but AM is selling chips, not miners. You can compare other companies miners all you want, that's irrelevant to AM. You need to compare the actual chips. You said that AM's chips had a higher power consumption than everyone else's and refuse to back up your claims when asked, that's just spreading FUD.
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:47:14 PM
 #19225

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sell.  Cheesy

What do you think AM's J/GH is? According to Rockxie's initial testing, the chips consume 0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s. Who exactly is producing chips with a lower power consumption than that?

Adding other components loss about 1KW/Thash
Tips:this result is not very accurate just for reference.

i'm not going to get into a 'who's got a bigger ....' argument. Look around for yourself.

Yeah, but AM is selling chips, not miners. You can compare other companies miners all you want, that's irrelevant to AM. You need to compare the actual chips. You said that AM's chips had a higher power consumption than everyone else's and refuse to back up your claims when asked, that's just spreading FUD.

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:55:28 PM
 #19226

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

As spondoolies biggest fanboy you must be hurting right now seeing $1.4/gh.

Weren't they charging more than $3/gh a week ago?
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 04:58:58 PM
 #19227

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

I'm neither a fanboy nor a "bum-buggerer" and have been extremely critical of AM in the past. I also didn't say that they've got the best chip out there, I pointed out that your claim that everyone else has better chips was simply nonsense.

raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 05:01:28 PM
 #19228

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

As spondoolies biggest fanboy you must be hurting right now seeing $1.4/gh.

Weren't they charging more than $3/gh a week ago?

i do own a spondoolies rig, i also own bfl, BE, garden blades (winter space heaters) and an HF rig that never appeared.
my favourite is the SP10, but your query is totally off topic and I had not instigated any 'competitor' discussion. I merely remarked that contrary to popular belief, AM chips are not the bees knees that you all presume them to be. I totally understand that you couldn't care less about the specs and all you are interested in is your dividends. MY pointing out the facts here, is not going to make your dividends increase, or for that matter, decrease.

carry on.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 05:02:19 PM
 #19229

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

I'm neither a fanboy nor a "bum-buggerer" and have been extremely critical of AM in the past. I also didn't say that they've got the best chip out there, I pointed out that your claim that everyone else has better chips was simply nonsense.



I said nothing of the sort.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 05:17:58 PM
 #19230

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sellCheesy

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

I'm neither a fanboy nor a "bum-buggerer" and have been extremely critical of AM in the past. I also didn't say that they've got the best chip out there, I pointed out that your claim that everyone else has better chips was simply nonsense.

I said nothing of the sort.

Seems legit.

Thanks for giving us the "facts"
Kosmatos
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 05:22:07 PM
 #19231

Where can someone order AM Gen3 chips?
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 05:22:50 PM
 #19232

yeah but more w/GH than any other manufacturer is a quantity which just won't sellCheesy

not at all, just making an observation. fanboys and bum-buggerers will always be fanboys and bum-buggerers.
there are better spec chips out there.

I'm neither a fanboy nor a "bum-buggerer" and have been extremely critical of AM in the past. I also didn't say that they've got the best chip out there, I pointed out that your claim that everyone else has better chips was simply nonsense.

I said nothing of the sort.

Seems legit.

Thanks for giving us the "facts"

the facts are AM chips are 3rd rate.. something that will soon be in rigs that will shortly be powered down - right out of the gate.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
kendog77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 06:02:26 PM
 #19233

the facts are AM chips are 3rd rate.. something that will soon be in rigs that will shortly be powered down - right out of the gate.

I agree. AM Gen3 chips are very average considering all the other options on the market right now.

The Rockminer uses around 1.2W/GH and costs $89 for 37GH! Obviously, this product isn't for serious miners, but that power efficiency is pretty poor considering all the hype around AM Gen3.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=612390.0
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 06:53:32 PM
 #19234

the facts are AM chips are 3rd rate.. something that will soon be in rigs that will shortly be powered down - right out of the gate.

0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s is not 3rd rate at all. That's why you refuse to back up such claims with actual facts - because the facts will show that you're talking out your arse. For example, Spondoolies chip consumes 0.58 J/Gh at 7.5 Gh/s.
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:05:15 PM
 #19235

the facts are AM chips are 3rd rate.. something that will soon be in rigs that will shortly be powered down - right out of the gate.

0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s is not 3rd rate at all. That's why you refuse to back up such claims with actual facts - because the facts will show that you're talking out your arse. For example, Spondoolies chip consumes 0.58 J/Gh at 7.5 Gh/s.

you are comparing a spec on chip alone to a spec within a working miner. please, continue to delude yourself.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
ryepdx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:29:36 PM
 #19236

Honestly, I don't personally care that gen 3 is about average, or "3rd rate." According to the numbers that have been released, AM has already sold enough of these to give us some sweet dividends over the next three months. Enough that, at this current price, I'd be perfectly content if that ended up being *all* they sold from this generation.

Chip specs are really only relevant for prospective buyers. AM has already got enough sales to more than justify their current share price, IMO.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:47:36 PM
 #19237

the facts are AM chips are 3rd rate.. something that will soon be in rigs that will shortly be powered down - right out of the gate.

0.554 J/Gh at 11.52 Gh/s is not 3rd rate at all. That's why you refuse to back up such claims with actual facts - because the facts will show that you're talking out your arse. For example, Spondoolies chip consumes 0.58 J/Gh at 7.5 Gh/s.

you are comparing a spec on chip alone to a spec within a working miner. please, continue to delude yourself.

Nope, they're both specs for the ASICs, not miners.
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 10:31:39 PM
 #19238

bitfury rev 2 'Power consumption as low as 0.45J/GH'  this was at 55nm process
imagine what this wizard could do on 28nm level

Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 12:42:02 AM
 #19239

bitfury rev 2 'Power consumption as low as 0.45J/GH'  this was at 55nm process
imagine what this wizard could do on 28nm level

In other words - 0.45 J/GH when underclocked.
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 12:49:39 AM
 #19240

Based on this post, the ASICMiner Gen3 chips are around 1W/GH, which is nothing special. The pricing is barely competitive with current Bitmain, Coincraft clone, and Spondoolies-Tech offerings. If this is what current shareholders were banking on to lift the share price, I think you better take off the rose colored glasses and think again.

That's not for the chip, that's for the whole miner. The miner isn't an AM product, only the chips are and if people are making miners, they've already bought the chips.

Imo AM just has "bullet proof" working average chips... but in mass quantity! ^^

very average, considering other options on the market.

dont mean to offend FC but chineese dont aim top notch handcrafted quality. they aim quantity. and thats perfectly fine imho ...

Dammit. I don't want any substandard bitcoin in my wallet I don't care how much of it is. Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 [962] 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!