Sure it is agitating, but can you blame them? They are being systematically denied access to pretty much every online platform.
Pretty sure all that spam will turn people off though. Alot of people who see it in their inbox will probably mark the sending address as a spammer too which will probably end up hurting them more then helping imo I got the spam in my inbox again after looking at one of the Trump brothers mails [don't remember if it was Bevis or Butthead]. I promptly reported it as spam and categorized it for Google AI as 'just spam'. Come to think of it I may have done that a while ago and that could be why Google is 'doing a brother a favor' by shit-canning the disgusting Drumpfstein spam for me. Actually I did read a couple of these spams for the purposes of system analysis. I must say that judging from the textural content of these spams, the 'bitter clingers' who still hold out any hope for Trump are truly the bottom-dwellers in American society with respect to apparent intellect. Thankfully I don't live there any more so their existence is not my problem. The ones on the Dem side are even worse. It pains me to say it since it includes some of my most dear family, but 'it is what it is.' Spam is spam, whether it's "On your political (or whatever)" side or not. If you doubt this, guess if you respond to it, what's the chance the money goes to Your Favorite instead of a Nigerian spammer? 10%? |
|
|
|
Located in Central Park, “El Che” is a sculpture by artist Christian Jankowski. Apparently, it’s not supposed to depict Che himself, but rather a Che impersonator who idolized the actual guy (what?). We’re dealing with people who defaced an Abraham Lincoln statue when going after confederates, so one would think a statue of a person who looks exactly like Che Guevara that says “Viva La Re-Evolucion,” might be a target of people who actually cared about injustice.....
Twitch you've actually redefined Libtard there... |
|
|
|
The wall could be completed?
Has Mexico paid the invoice yet? What if they don't pay by 2024 - should we amend the constitution to allow Trump to get one more term so that he could keep trying? Absolutely! We can't let them get away with that! |
|
|
|
There was no USA in 1619.
Right.. That was England... England had slaves in the Americas longer than the USA did by far.. USA freed the slaves soon after becoming independent... Wanna blame someone for slavery? Blame England.. USA freed em.. Say thank you to USA for freeing slaves, and kicking off the end of most slavery across the west... The USA is GREAT!! Such a great slave freeing nation.. Might be the bestest slave freeing nation that ever did nation or free slaves.. ?? And they still cry about it.. Something tells me these sniveling complaining babies of the Left, aren't the types that one and a third century ago went off to fight the US Civil War. |
|
|
|
...
I particularly like the last line of the speech: "The best is yet to come."
How could things possibly get any better?? I'm sick of winning as it is.
The wall could be completed? The economy could start zooming again? Non-violent drug offenders could be pardoned and released early as the prisons fill up with rioter destroyer haters? Let us count the ways... |
|
|
|
He was black but really white. |
|
|
|
.....
Trump is is lumping the protesters with all the violence, looting and vandalism and also most democrats, and anyone that he doesn't like at the moment - and there are plenty of media and political leaders taking his lead, pushing the "Democrats want to destroy our Country, we must unite to defeat this evil". All this is doing is getting everyone on both sides even more fired up, the right think that there's an Antifa Army on their way to steal their country, while the left is being taunted by the POTUS - it's like we're going through the 5 minutes before kickoff at a football game where they hype up the crowd and Trump is the guy saying "LETS MAKE SOME NOISE ARE YOU READYYYY"
A few examples:
“Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities, They think the American people are weak and soft and submissive. Make no mistake, this left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American revolution.”
“Make no mistake: This is being done deliberately to discredit America’s founding principles by discrediting the individuals who formed them,”
"We will not be terrorized, we will not be demeaned, and we will not be intimidated by bad, evil people, It will not happen.”
“They think the American people are weak and soft and submissive, but no, the American people are strong and proud, and they will not allow our country and all of its values, history and culture to be taken from them.”
...
When the Democratic mayors condone the violence, and force the police to stand down, then the media focus on nothing else, isn't his attitude justified? Sure, the Democratic Party has been hijacked. I've been saying that for years. But don't criticize Trump about it. |
|
|
|
No, I'd like a vote on REMOVING THE ONE THAT'S THERE NOW.
Except there isn't. So you'd have to put the statue up first, then you can vote to remove it. That'll show them libtards. No need to do that. Because the libtards thought they'd be clever and put one up that was slightly different. But we saw through it. Located in Central Park, “El Che” is a sculpture by artist Christian Jankowski. Apparently, it’s not supposed to depict Che himself, but rather a Che impersonator who idolized the actual guy (what?). We’re dealing with people who defaced an Abraham Lincoln statue when going after confederates, so one would think a statue of a person who looks exactly like Che Guevara that says “Viva La Re-Evolucion,” might be a target of people who actually cared about injustice. https://www.redstate.com/ameliahamilton/2017/08/28/if-you-must-destroy-statues-consider-these-four/So what do you say? You have a problem with this Che statue in NY coming down? I hope not. But it'd be kind of fun to listen to the libtards whine, bitch and moan about how they'd like to keep their statutes of their heroes. |
|
|
|
Let's start with the Che statue in NY Central Park. How about that, Twitch?
No violence, no mobs, a simple vote in the House and the Senate.
You wanna build a statue for Che Guevara in Central Park? No, I'd like a vote on REMOVING THE ONE THAT'S THERE NOW. After all, we're talking about the thug that said this. "If the missiles had remained (in Cuba),We would have used them against the very heart of the U.S., including New York City. The victory of Socialism is well worth millions of atomic victims." - Ernesto 'Che" Guevara, November 1962. And by the way, let's leave all the Confederate statues up. The Left got it's share of statues down, and they did it their way. They don't get more. Now it's time for Lenin, Stalin, Che, and many others. To go down. |
|
|
|
I don't think anyone should be tearing them down and destroying them, and I'm sure the majority of BLM protesters and democrats would agree with me on that. ..... But we know why this is becoming a partisan issue and it's because Trump chose to give a stance on it therefore people feel the need to do a 180 on his position to spite him.
.....
.... Let's start with the Che statue in NY Central Park. How about that, Twitch? No violence, no mobs, a simple vote in the House and the Senate. |
|
|
|
I'm fine with a national vote, because these characters wanted to take down our NATION, as they did others. They were not a part of the building of this country. But it'd be entertaining to hear the debates.
If Tammy Duckworth gets Biden's VP pick, you'll hear Mike Pence grill her over her stance on statues in a VP debate. Pence is a fantastic debater and won't let her absurd stance on statues slide. "The Left" will view Pences anti-lgbtq stances as equally absurd as "The Right" views removing statues. Shouldn't the idea of removing statues and setting them on fire in angry mob fashion not be a partisan issue though? Very odd that you'd even have to ask such a thing. |
|
|
|
....
As for the vagueness, what exactly is vague about it. Run two guys that work as a partnership that would theoretically govern more from the center and that aren't beholden to the political parties.
EVERYTHING is vague about it, no doubt on purpose. However I'll give you a sort-of analogy that's been tried and tested. The City Manager, runs the city and keeps it out of the hands of the elected and partisan Mayor. |
|
|
|
At this point, Bien could say that he did everything people suspect he did and still walk free and even get elected, because orange man bad!
This appears to be the world they seek, where a certain group of criminal, but powerful interests can do anything, and everyone else kowtows in front of them. |
|
|
|
.....
If you stand by taking down statues, let alone one of Washington, it's a disqualifier. I don't get why politicians are dying on this hill to please the far left. No one cares about statues.
But while we're on the subject, how about a national vote on statues? In the USA, there are several of Lenin, and at least one of Stalin. They need to go. Let's get some voting on the matter, and watch those Democrats squirm as they try to lecture us dull deplorables why statues of complete Marxist assholes should not be taken down. Che needs to go, too. https://www.newsmax.com/MichaelDorstewitz/lenin-che-guevara-statues-robert-e-lee/2017/08/21/id/808898/The argument that people make against removing statues is that they represent the concrete history that can't be changed, but also represent how far we've come. I don't necessarily disagree with the logic, but it falls apart when you talk about erecting a statue of Hitler. Lenin and Stalin fall in that category so yeah I think it's a good idea to allow people to vote on it and democratically have statues removed, not mobbing George Washington and setting it ablaze. Wouldn't make them national votes though. Specific statues in a jurisdiction are a local matter so hold local votes. I'm fine with a national vote, because these characters wanted to take down our NATION, as they did others. They were not a part of the building of this country. But it'd be entertaining to hear the debates. |
|
|
|
.....
If you stand by taking down statues, let alone one of Washington, it's a disqualifier. I don't get why politicians are dying on this hill to please the far left. No one cares about statues.
But while we're on the subject, how about a national vote on statues? In the USA, there are several of Lenin, and at least one of Stalin. They need to go. Let's get some voting on the matter, and watch those Democrats squirm as they try to lecture us dull deplorables why statues of complete Marxist assholes should not be taken down. Che needs to go, too. https://www.newsmax.com/MichaelDorstewitz/lenin-che-guevara-statues-robert-e-lee/2017/08/21/id/808898/They enslaved more people than American old time slaveowners ever dreamed of. |
|
|
|
US media and state organizations give Putin too much credit....
Only those factions that thought Putin'd make a handy scapegoat. |
|
|
|
....
Ultimately, it doesn't matter what I think about it. But if the CEO of Reddit isn't worried about it, then I'm not worried about it either.
Got it. Reddit will stand up in righteousness for it's ability play partisan politics during the countdown to the election, and you're with them. Bad choice, methinks. But as I started out and said, the ability to prosecute Antifa members was also ridiculed, and we're at what now, 200+ arrests? Regardless, let's revisit this topic in, say 90 days. |
|
|
|
For me the problem is that democrats tried too much to discredit Trump and it backfired a lot of time.
It backfires because election propagandas doesn't work in America any longer, it's easy for citizens of the US to know what's true and what's not, except prolly those on the side of the democrats. The democrats should try to think less of debasing Donald Trump's government and draft out better plans to take back power in the November polls. Good point. When they were normal acting for the four years of a POTUS term and then right at the verge of the election introduced their lying lies, they'd catch everyone by surprise and put the opponet on the defensive. But here and now, it's been four years of lying lies and nonstop BS, and people are really sick and tired of it. |
|
|
|
The political system needs to undergo some fundamental changes for this to work. First of all, political donations should be limited to $1000 per physical person of voting age. No corporate/business donations should be allowed. A federal registration to keep track of political candidates and their donations is required. Lobbying should be banned and criminalized. Any candidate who takes donations outside of what is allowed should be automatically disqualified for life. All candidates should be selected based on merit. A 'Political Olympiad' exam winners would be my choice. All government employees should be hired based on merit in their corresponding fields. This will eliminate lawyers and lobbyists running departments they have no expertise in, HHS comes to mind. Like it or not, you've just described a sort of Utopian ideals, and those always, like perpetual motion fantasies or Maxist theology, fail to work in actual practice. Not that I don't agree with your proposed reforms, but breaking apart a power system in one place causes another to arise elsewhere, which is oftentimes worse. |
|
|
|
The comment thread looks and feels fake.
What is it about it that looks "fake"? When he first "announced" this idea on Joe Rogan, he through out Yang and another guy as potential candidates. A lot of the "Yang Gang" is apparently on board with the idea and have been promoting it from what I've seen. I don't know a lot about Yang other than the UBI thing and I don't know who the other guy is that he brought up for the "right" other than apparently he was/is military or something. Wait, so I can't opinionate? Sure I can elaborate. The extent of vagueness in the "proposal" is matched only by the extent of positive comments. For WHAT, EXACTLY? But without thinking or critical examination, Orange Man = Bad, right? Here's another comment for you. Fuck that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
