If you want to understand the world better and write a better "analysis" than this, you have to expand your view a lot more than this. Right now you are too focused on a very tiny portion of what is actually happening in the world which makes your view very limited.

The East vs. West is far more complicated than just Russia and US and only oil/gas. And even though there are only 4-5 actual geopolitical players, this affects the entire world and the rest are picking sides making a big bloc versus bloc.

If you want to be rich sell to rich kids.

you’re saying that we should sell drugs and liquor to rich kids who are now poor because of drug addiction and alcohol abuse?

the example you used are kids partying and spending money like it’s nothing it’s true that you could have them as your target market and gain profit but this will weigh in on too much on my conscience i also don’t think we should sacrifice our own safety just to get rich

instead you’d want to sell to middle-class people sell them items that are luxury looking but are cheap i’m not saying to scam them but a lot of middle-class people buy fake goods because they want to seem rich for some reasons they’re the most expressive about their purchases

There are so many solutions to the issue of food shortages that the world may be experiencing. Some of these solutions have a pragmatic approach, and some do not. Food shortages can be addressed indirectly through cryptocurrency. How so?
Cryptocurrencies can help with the provision of farm credit to poor farmers and those located in hard-to-reach areas where financial services may be nonexistent. Doing so will give them the morale to get back to the field to cultivate their crops or rear their animals.

Binance usually keeps delisting those coins and pair which don't meet certain criteria, I have seen Binance delisting coins when they are heavily manipulated like it did with a coin named Nebilo where the price of coin were heavily manipulated as Binance cannot afford to lose out on its reputation by having projects listed in it's exchange which are very volatile and it's prices being controlled hence they removed Nebilo and I guess same logic applies to some of these coins .

If op could endure to hold bitcoin from 25k till date what then stops him from not holding till bullrun, what difference does it make selling now?
Well I can't detects for op even to tell him hold on but as a bitcoiner someone who so much believe and trust bitcoin should be able to know that bitcoin is a speculative assets and for that we have just few months/days to halving and this could really fetched him something very amazing if op can just hold till the main bullrun.

You still have to survive to be able to benefit from such a thing, and there could be a lot of battles along the way, including some people getting caught into situations in which they get their coins taken from them (or they lose them through their own inadvertences). Another thing, if you have an income that is between $800 and $2,000 per month, but your expenses are $1k per month, then surely you have to figure out how aggressive that you can be in terms of how much bitcoin you buy every month. and surely you can be more aggressive in your BTC accumulation if you have other things in place, such as enough for expenses for 6 months or longer (which would be $6k) and some emergency funds, and so many of us have to figure out ways to make sure that we can stay in the game, including being careful regarding how much BTC we store with 3rd parties (maybe not allowing any more than 20% of all your stash to be with them at any given time), but even when we engage in our own private key management, we can make mistakes by being too simple or not researching sufficiently secure systems, or we could even overly complicate matters and lose our coins that way... also how much do you talk about bitcoin with people who might end up leaking your bitcoin amounts and/or security practices..... so I am not wanting to get off of topic regarding many things that could happen along the way, and we likely want to be as aggressive as we are able to be in terms of our own BTC accumulation, but at the same time, not so aggressive that we end up losing our coins or putting ourselves in to a position in which we have4 to sell some or all of our coins at a time that is not completely of our own choosing.. and my own proposal is that no one should ever be selling all of their coins, so whatever coins they do sell would likely not be a very large percentage of their overall stash.. and of course, people differ in their opinions on the topic of BTC stash management... and/or when/if/how to cash out.

Avoid more worries by increasing your optimism about the potential for good bitcoin prices ahead of the halving. I have removed $20k from my list of risks to consider since bitcoin broke $38k, but of course I can still consider some corrections that make many traders panic like a drop below $35k or $32k.

Anyone considering to buy bitcoin based on possible upside scenarios should attempt to be somewhat realistic in terms of timeline and probabilities, and surely these are quite speculative type plays.

Without getting into dollar debasement so much, yet I would think that the best of scenarios would take 50 years for $1 to equal 1 sat (that means more or less in today's dollar value), but the more likely timelines would be 100 years or more, and so there could be a variety of lesser scenarios that would have to play out before getting to those higher numbers, and I would think that even the lesser scenarios justify getting some kind of a position in bitcoin, whether you are on the whimpy side, such as 1% of your investment portfolio in bitcoin or if you are on the more aggressive side and put 25% of your investment portfolio into bitcoin.

But at least an employee knows that he is working in the office and he should not gamble in the office because he gets a salary from his office. That is an employee's ethics towards the office that wants to choose and accept him to work in the office. He should be able to respect this by not gambling in his office because it could interfere with work. It's different if he gambles when he's on a break from work because it won't affect his work. However, an employee should not do other things that are not related to office work because he is in the office and can adapt himself to the circumstances in which he is. But each person has his or her opinion about gambling while he or she is at work.

Unfortunately, this success is difficult or even seems impossible to achieve because the opportunity for gambler to win consistently and turn himself into successful gambler is very small or almost non-existent, unless the gambler really has luck which makes him have a more guaranteed win.
Success in changing your life or becoming rich from gambling is the desire of many gamblers but they do not realize that gambling is not suitable place to achieve this goal and I am sure that 99% of gamblers are more likely to lose lot of wealth than increase their income from gambling.
The definition of gambling is actually place and activity to have fun and get entertainment not to make money, plus we come to risk money with opportunities that are uncertain so that expecting profits from gambling will only give a feeling of disappointment.

Gone are the days when African Americans and Hispanics would vote en bloc for the Democrat party. Many of them are now well settled in the United States and the welfare politics of Democrats no longer appeal to them. Large populations have moved to the wealthy suburbs and many are now bothered about high taxes and growing crime rate. Also, I have a feeling that Democrats are taking these two sections for granted. They are failing to realize that they can no longer get blind support from them, by putting up the scare stories about evil Republican white politician trying to segregate the other races. GOP has been made more inclusive, while Democrat Party has remained where they were in the 1980s.

I think people are getting it easier nowadays when it comes to consequences so they do stupid stuff like this one and then try to make it everyone's problem when it's clearly their fault. If I ever come across that kind of person, I would probably laugh on their faces because they've made an avoidable mistake, why let me in on your problem? I don't even know you.

"would you keep buying an alcoholic more booze" Is what I read and understand from this question.

Definitely not. It's like I'm being an accessory to their addiction. If I myself can't fund my own gambling activities that much, why would I fund and support someone who's been proven to be irresponsible and cannot control themselves? I can support them in some way but certainly not financially. If the person will not hold the funds directly and will only get what they need in order to recover from their addiction, perhaps I can help with that. Otherwise, I won't extend any financial help at all.