I find it inappropriate to offer a betting option on the winner of a war; it's just edited, and the screenshot isn't even clear. Regarding other betting options, such as elections, Oscar winners, or music event winners, I don't see anything wrong with that, as people enjoy betting on various events.

What I believe is that a regulated casino won't joke around on serious matters, especially those that involve the lives of many.

Using gambling as a way to make money is a mistake because one should think that it will never be effective, even though there may be people who can actually make money from gambling. But the difference is so great that many people who try will not be able to make money from gambling. They will only experience worse problems if they continue to gamble in order to make money from gambling, and they could even have the possibility of becoming addicted to gambling. This is what people should worry about, so they should look for other ways to make money where they can have more opportunities. Playing gambling requires self-control, while if someone has often experienced loss, his self-control can start to disappear until, finally, he will lose self-control just because he wants to get a steady income from gambling.

Fret not, pero sa tingin ko sa laki ng Binance ay hindi naman ata nila babalewalain ang mga Philippine users which in fact isa sa mga nangungunang crypto hub dito sa Asia. Gumagamit parin ako kay Binance at yung settlement para sa akin isang hakbang natin yun para maging agresibo na sila lalo na sa mga licences na yan.

That's the typical mindset ng karamihan sa mga pinoy. Alam natin sa sarili natin na too good to be true ang inooffer, pero iisipin na maganda pasukan. Palaging umaasa sa chance na magkaroon ng profit kahit alam ang risk na haharapin. Ang malaking katanungan natin kasi dito ay paano mo masasabi kung kelan sila magiging scam at paano mo ggawing maging maingat ang sarili mo kung hindi mo hawak ang funds mo. Walang maingat sa pagpasok sa obvious scam, walang way para maiwasan kung ikaw mismo ang lalapit dito. Mas mabuting wag pasukin ang ganitong klaseng scheme para walang pagsisihan sa huli. Laging tandaan na huwag magpapasilaw sa malaking pera o sa interest na pinapakita nila dahil imbis na kumita ka, mawawalan ka lang.

Never ko narinig yan at masyadong too good to be true nga. Kapag mga ganyang offer ay parang mas maganda na iignore mo nalang. Kung effective kasi yan, mas maganda na gawin niya nalang sa sarili niya kung gumagana naman talaga at siya nalang mismo makinabang muna. Sa dami ng mga scam ngayon, ingat tayo sa mga inooffer sa atin. Pero kung nag iinsist ka naman at gusto mo itry, pera mo naman isasalang mo diyan at kung afford mong mawala yun. Mas ok talaga sa mga ganitong scheme na iwasan nalang at iwarn mo nalang ibang tao sa grupo na yan kung may kakilala ka.

If you want to understand the world better and write a better "analysis" than this, you have to expand your view a lot more than this. Right now you are too focused on a very tiny portion of what is actually happening in the world which makes your view very limited.

The East vs. West is far more complicated than just Russia and US and only oil/gas. And even though there are only 4-5 actual geopolitical players, this affects the entire world and the rest are picking sides making a big bloc versus bloc.

If you want to be rich sell to rich kids.

you’re saying that we should sell drugs and liquor to rich kids who are now poor because of drug addiction and alcohol abuse?

the example you used are kids partying and spending money like it’s nothing it’s true that you could have them as your target market and gain profit but this will weigh in on too much on my conscience i also don’t think we should sacrifice our own safety just to get rich

instead you’d want to sell to middle-class people sell them items that are luxury looking but are cheap i’m not saying to scam them but a lot of middle-class people buy fake goods because they want to seem rich for some reasons they’re the most expressive about their purchases

There are so many solutions to the issue of food shortages that the world may be experiencing. Some of these solutions have a pragmatic approach, and some do not. Food shortages can be addressed indirectly through cryptocurrency. How so?
Cryptocurrencies can help with the provision of farm credit to poor farmers and those located in hard-to-reach areas where financial services may be nonexistent. Doing so will give them the morale to get back to the field to cultivate their crops or rear their animals.

Binance usually keeps delisting those coins and pair which don't meet certain criteria, I have seen Binance delisting coins when they are heavily manipulated like it did with a coin named Nebilo where the price of coin were heavily manipulated as Binance cannot afford to lose out on its reputation by having projects listed in it's exchange which are very volatile and it's prices being controlled hence they removed Nebilo and I guess same logic applies to some of these coins .

If op could endure to hold bitcoin from 25k till date what then stops him from not holding till bullrun, what difference does it make selling now?
Well I can't detects for op even to tell him hold on but as a bitcoiner someone who so much believe and trust bitcoin should be able to know that bitcoin is a speculative assets and for that we have just few months/days to halving and this could really fetched him something very amazing if op can just hold till the main bullrun.

You still have to survive to be able to benefit from such a thing, and there could be a lot of battles along the way, including some people getting caught into situations in which they get their coins taken from them (or they lose them through their own inadvertences). Another thing, if you have an income that is between $800 and $2,000 per month, but your expenses are $1k per month, then surely you have to figure out how aggressive that you can be in terms of how much bitcoin you buy every month. and surely you can be more aggressive in your BTC accumulation if you have other things in place, such as enough for expenses for 6 months or longer (which would be $6k) and some emergency funds, and so many of us have to figure out ways to make sure that we can stay in the game, including being careful regarding how much BTC we store with 3rd parties (maybe not allowing any more than 20% of all your stash to be with them at any given time), but even when we engage in our own private key management, we can make mistakes by being too simple or not researching sufficiently secure systems, or we could even overly complicate matters and lose our coins that way... also how much do you talk about bitcoin with people who might end up leaking your bitcoin amounts and/or security practices..... so I am not wanting to get off of topic regarding many things that could happen along the way, and we likely want to be as aggressive as we are able to be in terms of our own BTC accumulation, but at the same time, not so aggressive that we end up losing our coins or putting ourselves in to a position in which we have4 to sell some or all of our coins at a time that is not completely of our own choosing.. and my own proposal is that no one should ever be selling all of their coins, so whatever coins they do sell would likely not be a very large percentage of their overall stash.. and of course, people differ in their opinions on the topic of BTC stash management... and/or when/if/how to cash out.

Avoid more worries by increasing your optimism about the potential for good bitcoin prices ahead of the halving. I have removed $20k from my list of risks to consider since bitcoin broke $38k, but of course I can still consider some corrections that make many traders panic like a drop below $35k or $32k.

Anyone considering to buy bitcoin based on possible upside scenarios should attempt to be somewhat realistic in terms of timeline and probabilities, and surely these are quite speculative type plays.

Without getting into dollar debasement so much, yet I would think that the best of scenarios would take 50 years for $1 to equal 1 sat (that means more or less in today's dollar value), but the more likely timelines would be 100 years or more, and so there could be a variety of lesser scenarios that would have to play out before getting to those higher numbers, and I would think that even the lesser scenarios justify getting some kind of a position in bitcoin, whether you are on the whimpy side, such as 1% of your investment portfolio in bitcoin or if you are on the more aggressive side and put 25% of your investment portfolio into bitcoin.