O tombola platita a devenit brusc gratuita, ca au fost platite biletele. Cine clipeste, o rateaza:

[Raffle] 2019 Bitcoin DIY Penny Raffle in a Penny [Now Free PAID BY tweetious]
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435596.0;topicseen

Premiul este o moneda Bitcoin Penny.
Transport gratuit doar in State.

Concurs incheiat.

3 - NeuroticFish

Thank you tweetious, thank you DaveF

I guess that best would be to ask the support people about the e-mail.
I have no idea if it's about the source of some coins or fiat, I have no idea if it's about their so-called p2p platform. But maybe, with some luck, the support knows this.

The documentation for the Electrum Server Protocol is the same as for ElectrumX, i.e. this one: https://electrumx-spesmilo.readthedocs.io/en/latest/protocol.html
Electrs most probably also follows that.

It depends a lot whether you want to receive at the end of the day bitcoin or fiat. Then it depends a lot whether you want it implemented locally by some IT technician or you want to just use pretty much out-of-the-box.

The cleanest solution is BTCPay. But for that you'll receive bitcoin and that needs installed/configured. However, this is what most will recommend (including myself).

If you want to receive fiat, or you want to not need skilled specialist and local hardware/hosting for it, then the option is the commercial solutions.
The problem is that they come with fees and KYC, hence not really "loved". Even more, the most known commercial solution, BitPay, has a history of supporting more an altcoin (BCH, which they even advertise as "the real bitcoin"), sometimes even imposing even higher fees for Bitcoin (but I have old information on this and I don't know whether it's outdated or not).
Afaik other big players like Coinbase or Binance may have similar solutions (but I don't know for sure).

I expect KYC and maybe some extra fees too are not a big issue for your buyers, still, you'll have to find out which service has the required reputation (this is against not a problem if you go for BTCPay).

Hmm, interesting. Thank you.
I've never needed to remove my own topics, but I've always seen the Delete button on my posts, even if they were topic starters, hence my conclusion...

There are also already IanColeman's clones which sole reason to exist is to steal users' keys.
And while IanColeman's original is supposed to be safe, it's much better to trust nobody and make sure you handle it with the correct security precautions. Better safe than sorry.

I'd assume that you didn't get any PM about the removed posts. And if it's so, then it means the topic was completely removed, for whatever reasons, and it's not uncommon to see newbies removing their topics after getting their answers (I failed to understand why they do that, but I've noticed that too at some point); possibly also banned/nuked users' topics can have the same fate.
However, does it matter that much?! Since it's not exactly your post that's removed, then you didn't do anything wrong.

There may be laws, or maybe even the Constitution forbidding them do that.
In short, I think that access to money is warranted for everybody, without the necessity of hardware, internet, smartphones and so on.
And this means that even if, by some miracle, they'd be all on the same page, they still may be unable to do so.

Blockstream Green wallet is another wallet on Android that works with hardware wallets (or at least with Ledger and Trezor), may worth adding that to the list too, especially since it's supposed to be open source.

I didn't manage to verify the signature with Electrum, still, the message is important and should not be ignored.

While your intentions seem to be good, your logic has a flaw, hence people will pick on you (or it).
If we all perceive bitcoin as much more expensive than it is, then nobody will send coins (because we may consider the tx fees to big) and nobody will sell bitcoins (not even the miners, hence they will at some point become unable to pay for their electricity).

No. Bitcoin doesn't have to be perceived as more expensive. Bitcoin has to be perceived as it is. Not more, not less. And this being said, all the safety measures will differ from person to person. One has to be very careful, according to how much he affords to lose because of mistakes or hacks. One can get hacked and buy back next day all the loses. Others.... don't...

Indeed the private keys start with 5.. however, if one wants cheap fees he will use pure SegWit in 2023, isn't it? 
And for SegWit addresses I just use my hardware wallet, trading the lack of nice addresses for my funds' safety.

In 2023 there aren't many valid reasons for using legacy addresses, still, some do want them/insist for them. I am curious about OP's and also about what he actually wants to achieve, that's also why I've asked for details.

Îți ratasem eseul original pe această temă, din secțiunea internațională. Așadar acesta, tradus, e o surpriză plăcută. Bravo!

Este clar, banii digitali emiși de stat sunt doar o altă față a fiat, a banilor de zi cu zi, cu inflație, cu valoare decisă de stat șamd. Chiar mai mult, sunt o față care poate fi mult mai nasoală, în funcție de modul de implementare (care, clar, nu va fi public).

Cu banii digitali statul câștigă pe multe fronturi:
* nu mai are de plătit sume importante pentru re-tipărirea unor cantități mari de bani de hârtie din timp în timp
* pot (în funcție de implementare) să urmărească tot ce faci cu banii (da, pot face asta și când folosești cardul, dar trebuie să convingă banca, plus că poate că tu de fapt folosești bani de hârtie...)
* pot (în funcție de implementare) să îți blocheze fondurile sau chiar să ți le retragă (inclusiv "preventiv", fără ordin judecătoresc trimis băncii!)

Comercianții vor fi co-interesați fiindcă vor putea să scape de mare parte din comisioanele pe care le plătesc VISA/Mastercard sau/și băncilor.
Noi, oamenii de rând... noi se pare ca doar pierdem din afacerea asta...

Voi veni totuși și cu niște mici note:


Eu nu sunt la fel de vehement. Cred că scopul criptomonedelor este să ofere o alternativă și atât. Pentru ca oamenii să se elibereze este nevoie de mult mai mult, începând cu a folosi criptomonedele la mai mult decât o sursă în plus de venit, continuând prin a ne opune tuturor tâmpeniilor pe care le fac guvernele (și lumea face asta la scară foarte mică) și mai departe ajungând a face noi parte din guverne, și, ca un punct nou, ar trebui ca noi să le corupem, nu să devenim parte din sistem. Momentan suntem doar niște neînțeleși din mediul online. Eliberarea necesită inclusiv ieșirea din confortul de acasă...

Plus, o să vezi cum vor fi împachetate aceste monede guvernamentale... Mă aștept să vină (nu la noi, noi suntem cu 100 de ani în urmă) cu modalități deștepte de interconectare, poate cu facilități la comercianți șamd. Oprimarea nu va fi vizibilă (cum nu este nici acum), iar în țări cât de cât democratice aproape insesizabilă.

Pentru noi, care știm care-i treaba, această împachetare ar trebui să fie un semnal de alarmă, dar pentru alții nu va fi, ci dimpotrivă...


Discutabil, o foarte mică inflație poate fi bună și la criptomonede, în ideea că pe termen nelimitat, pierderile pot deveni semnificative comparativ cu ce rămâne în circulație. Clar, pentru noi și încă o generație-două nu ar trebui să fie o problemă nici numărul fix. Plus, noi de fapt avem acum un fel de inflație (oarecum falsă) la Bitcoin, întrucât fiecare bloc nou aduce monezi noi. Oamenii nu conștientizează și nu lucrează pe baza viitoarei limitări la 21 milioane de unități, ci cu ce se "aruncă" pe piață, în principal de mineri.


Lumea nu înțelege nici valoarea stabilită de stat, nici inflația, din păcate. Ei se bucură când crește pensia și nu corelează cu faptul că prețurile au crescut și mai mult, iar banii puși deoparte valorează din ce în ce mai puțin. Uită că inclusiv leul a "pierdut" 4 zerouri din pix, doar ca să nu arătăm chiar ca un stat "bananier". Uită că asta se mai poate întâmpla, și nu e greu să ajungem iar acolo...
Lumea pune botul la ce se zice la teveu, și la noi, și la alții ("Wag the dog" nu e chiar așa departe de adevăr..), deci criptomonedele sunt ponegrite fiindcă așa zic niște politicieni (adică mincinoși de profesie). Iar faptul că prețul variază între niște limite extreme face treaba asta cu atât mai grea și de neînțeles pentru omul de rând...


Repet, nu sunt convins că scopul criptomonedelor este eliminarea fiat, cel puțin nu în primă fază.
Pe de altă parte banii digitali ai statului sunt meniți să înlocuiască, cel puțin în mare parte, banii de hârtie, adică cei care nu puteau fi urmăriți. Nici asta nu vor putea, întrucât (din câte știu), legal și constituțional, statul trebuie să ofere acces la bani oricui, fără telefon, internet sau bancomat. Așadar banii de hârtie nu mor, vor fi aici pentru cel puțin încă o generație...
Dacă politicienii ar înțelege asta, poate că nu s-ar agăța atât de tare de acești bani digitali ai băncilor centrale.

O sa vad in zilele urmatoare, inca nu sunt convins daca sa ma bag.
Dupa cum zisesem, nu am o saptamana stralucita...


Ba da, dar nu ma grabesc, mai ales ca HDD meu extern a incasat un soc, ceva, si mi s-au corupt niste date, inclusiv copia de blockchain.
Deci probabil ca ma inscriu dupa ce termin re-sincronizarea 

I have a very (!) old version of a vanity generator. It's since before the scammy ones also came onto the market.
So for the rare cases I use 1* addresses, I can also make them look nice if I want to.

Since many other cases were already covered, I've added this only to show that the possibilities are many.
It's all up to you (and your skills), to the wallet you want to use, to the amount you want to use this address/these addresses for (the bigger the amounts, the more important also the safety measures).
Maybe you consider giving more info so you can get more relevant answers.

I'm glad it got handled/fixed.

I recommend you change the initial post's title into
[fixed] DuckDice.io - Pending Withdrawal - Requesting KYC

This would be more fair by avoiding some people (who won't read the details) get the wrong impression.
....Just my satoshi.

If there are significant funds in discussion, the seed phrase should not touch even the computer or smartphone that will ever be connected to the internet. This supersedes the use of password managers, e-mail, cloud or whatever.
I don't understand, people no longer have paper and a ball pen in their homes?! Is it so difficult to actually write down (a couple of times) 12 or 24 English words? They have to put everything onto the internet? WTF?!

So you are already considering us pretty much idiots, but you still expect us to read your mind and see what you see.
Let me tell you: if you expect us to read at least 15 pages of stuff in order to get what you mean, you give yourself far too much importance.

PS. Lutpin already has negative tag for shady things done in signature campaigns. Whether that's correct or not, I don't know. But the forum is more that one person.

OP, did you, by chance, got (or made) this list from one or more old posts about bitcoin?
While you do have a point and in some cases publishing only one address does make sense and has its uses - actually even bitcoin.org has one donation address, hence they're reusing it, the point related to the number of keys, as already said, it's outdated. Now people use HD wallets and only handle one seed; the history has shown that having wallets with a lot of unrelated keys is a recipe for disaster.


By using correctly multiple addresses, different parties will not know how many bitcoins one has. This is important, there was already at least one case with user complaining here on bitcointalk (some years ago) that somebody know all his bitcoins and now it's threatening him. So it's not something to be as easily dismissed as you do.

I will add that moving to new addresses at least now and then is beneficial also for security, at least in theory. If an address was used in the past with a wallet with bugs and - in a way or another some information was slipped online - using new addresses at least when going to new wallets can easily help one avoid bad surprises.