Get a hardware wallet and write your backups onto paper with your own hand.

I didn't use Coinbase, but based on how centralized exchanges work, some things that come into my mind are:

* afaik Coinbase asks for KYC, make sure you pass that and don't get surprises when you want to withdraw
    (as alternative you can look for non-KYC exchanges, usually decentralized ones, but those need a different learning curve)

* depending on the amount you'll be buying the withdrawal fee from Coinbase to your own wallet may or may not hurt (it's a fixed fee and on small amounts to withdraw it can be seen as significant fee)
    (again, there's the already mentioned decentralized exchanges, but also the OTC exchanges which have worse exchange rates, but together with the withdrawal fees it may get less expensive for small amounts)


Sorry if I'm confusing you more than I help you. If you want to keep it simple: pass KYC first, don't withdraw very small amounts, instead withdraw after more smaller buys if it's the case.

I think that even for PC there could be a need for a special column (because of the NFC wallets, for example).
But overall, yes, after gathering all the info I am sure that OP can make a better looking table that can be read easier by all who are interested.

It is. But the manufacturers pretty much try to sell them like art (imho). There are unloaded and DYI ones which imho they make much more sense, but the loaded ones bear much higher premium, plus the owner will think twice before redeeming the "paper wallet" because it decreases its value more than just with those bitcoins it was holding.

But yes, at the end of the day, they're just nicer paper wallets made by somebody else.
Even more, while 95% of the cases the manufacturers can be trusted (at least until now), the more hands the collectible pass on, the bigger the chance somebody has found a way to unseal it and copy the private key for "future use".

As minerjones said it very good:

I agree with @pooya87 on this.
I see no good reason to send 4 BTC to Satoshi and some 100$ to a change address. I think that whoever did that wanted to send the 100$ to Satoshi and 4 BTC to self.

Of course, making a donation to everybody is another not-too-bad scenario, i.e. somebody with lots of money wanted to make every bitcoiner a bit richer with this, or at least Satoshi if he ever comes back.
Still, the scenario with the error makes more sense to me...

Daaaa  , il mai auzisem, demult, dar tot am ras din nou la el. Super fain si de actualitate!


Multumesc!
Din pacate nu ma lasa sistemul sa iti mai dau merite pentru o vreme, am fost prea darnic in ultima luna

Just read again, what I was asking for was new charts and predictions, not old proofs. 
I am aware that this kind of predictions, no matter how good are they documented, may or may not come true, don't worry.

@ImThour, I've admitted that my crystal globe is broken, but it looks like yours is no better...
It's not only that the 9th of January doomsday was avoided, but the crypto winter seems to be ending too; or am I rushed with my conclusions?

So let's move on and bring us another chart, what you think? Any new prediction?

Nu ai cum! Ia uita-te pe ce a postat peste tot: chestii "cu talc" si fara sens.
E doar inca un bounty spammer si nimic mai mult. Nu-ti bate capul. Nu m-ar mira sa fi si tradus cu cine stie ce, deci si daca ar fi avut sens in limba originala, nu mai are.

Traiasca si infloreasca ChatGPT bounty hunters!

Maybe this is what you're looking for? https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/transaction-data
That website is afaik one of the best sources for learning.

With the proper cable or an adapter into the original cable Ledger Nano S (and S Plus) can also easily get connected to smartphone. Tested/used by me with Android phones.
I've even posted sometime in the past the adapter I'm using (for microUSB, but there also exist such adapted for USB-C too)

And before Tibu sees you   you can also add SatoChip since it's NFC, but I don't really know more details on that one. For PC they sell a reader too.

Go to https://mempool.space/tx/c073634c862353b7a90303d52806defba55cac63a86762213fcb949b74a5573b
Press show all 86
All the red ones are gone  

Another rather popular random seed is system uptime (as opposed to current date/time).

If you insist, I guess that you can even try to start up the mic, record some noise and add that too to the randomness. Just of course, the recording level has to be big enough to catch anything and there's a chance the OS may tell the user what you're doing.

The easiest way to get rich is to make money out of thin air. Whether Elon will try to make only some "game coins" inside Twitter or something else, we'll see. Depending on the path he's taking he may have to pass various licensing steps or not. After Facebook experiment I'm sure the politicians will keep a close eye on it.
If he will make a new coin, then the success of that may happen only together with Twitter's.

Doar ca din pacate, cum ai vazut in sectiunea internationala, lumea poate (chiar foarte usor) sa "iti sara la gat" pentru unele inexactitati mai degraba nesemnificative si sa piarda esenta...


Nu stiu cati ar avea o vedere de ansamblu suficient de buna pentru o analiza mai corecta decat a mea (ca a mea, desi o doresc corecta, este doar cum simt eu ca stau lucrurile), dar las la latitudinea ta daca merita sau nu incercat.
Mi-e ca prea multi o sa se cramponeze in componenta speculativa si de teapa a monedelor alternative, de exemplu...


Multumesc
Mai am si eu uneori momente de inspiratie  

I am actually surprised that people still need this kind of news to understand all these (bad) relationships.
Of course, people will prefer some rich exchange owners' posts on Twitter than the plain and simple "not your keys, not your coins".


Welcome to the world of altcoins  
..And yeah, if this is true then there are reasonable chances that WazirX could fall before Binance does.

With the risk of stating the obvious... you know that quite a number of members of the forum already use the existing notification bots.
So in many cases posting an invitation (of course, unless it's meant to be very private) directly in a post can already do the job with much less risks.
.. just my 2 sats...

Even more, one can easily ignore the Archival board and he will not see those posts in his history.
I've done that and not only for Archival; I've also ignored most local boards, for example...

@Coin_trader, wouldn't this be a reasonable solution for you?
see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=807453;sa=ignoreBoards

Este foarte frumos ce ai scris aici. Sunt cateva mici amanunte pe care nu le consider corecte, dar, cum deja am zis de cel putin una pe partea internationala, o sa fiu mai ingaduitor aici si o sa le trec la capitolul "licenta poetica" 

Bitcoin are (inca) doua avantaje pe care fie nu le-ai expus, fie mi-au scapat:

1. Are radacini in lumea IT + internet. Asta este o lume pe care politicienii nu o inteleg si de cele mai multe ori fie o urasc, fie le este frica de ea. De aceea majoritatea politicienilor (si a dinozaurilor din bancile centrale si nu numai) au incercat sa minimizeze, ridiculizeze sau sa ignore aceasta miscare, in speranta ca "va trece".

2. Monedele alternative. Da, cele mai multe sunt gunoi pur, dar nu asta e ideea. Este un semn de dezvoltare exploziva a curentului "valoare pe blockchain". Si se dezvolta ca un virus. Nu un virus care ataca oamenii sau sistemele IT, ci unul care intra in tot ce inseamna bani, intrand pana in esenta sistemului bancar si destabilizandu-l. Nu stiu daca Bitcoin singur putea face asta atat de repede si atat de puternic.

Este Bitcoin varful de lance a unei revolutii? Clar.
Revolutia s-a incheiat? Nici pe departe.
Vom prinde sfarsitul acestei revolutii? Greu de spus! Dar ma bucur ca traiesc in acesta perioada.

That's something not many can answer. Maybe only PP...
It may be you've done (willingly or not, in that nefarious business or not, I can't tell) something that either offended him badly, either spoiled some business for him or somebody he knows.
Or it may be just a bad impression he got on you, which got worse with that mistake from last year and then also because of his "initial" view on you and the fact you didn't stop engaging into businesses involving money. Plus, if we're brutally honest, your next business idea had its own communication and misinterpretation related issues, which, because of misunderstanding the reasons, was for him another proof he is doing the right thing (I don't think I could've done it much different or better, don't take me wrong, I'm just stating the perceived result).
Then, the fact so many people still consider you trustworthy may be angering him even more. ...Or not; he may be even doing it for some odd sense of fun (who knows?).

However, these are wild guesses. I can't tell what's going on PP mind, only he can. Human mind is... complicated...


As said, grow a thicker skin, you have no other choice for it. From what I know aggressiveness and (cyber) bullying are not against the rules.

---

This is unfortunate and can get him easily from distrust to negative tag.
Just you have to properly and publicly prove / document this, else it's just your word against his and that pretty much means nothing for a more or less impartial viewer.

---

That's correct. But since Royse777 has paid some consistent amounts of money from his pocket to handle the mishap from last year, I expect he wants to recover that by working for it. And PP negativity has the potential to harm. If it would not be that, Royse777 could just go on, but as it is ... it can be a problem. And most probably PP knows this and may be also doing it on purpose.