Put in 8.8.8.8 for your DNS, then power cycle the unit.
You will also need to disable DHCP
Why would DHCP need to be disabled, for some users, they might like their routers etc. to auto assign IP's to which could then be dedicated via router settings. DHCP does not work in the current software, has to be disabled to get the unit hashing. Well, here's hoping that softwares easily updated if and when a patch is found. Even though all my stuff will be hosted, when it does come home to me I would prefer DHCP.
|
|
|
Put in 8.8.8.8 for your DNS, then power cycle the unit.
You will also need to disable DHCP
Why would DHCP need to be disabled, for some users, they might like their routers etc. to auto assign IP's to which could then be dedicated via router settings.
|
|
|
Havent tried but even if it does work, it would be pointless as I cannot leave it off all the time. Does it keep doing it even if you disable and then use the program? I wish I had an answer for you. I know that for some reason many of the mining software packs cause the anti virus programs to lock them. Currently running a scan so I can't do anything to try and exclude it until it's done but MBAM jus logged the exe file from the 3.5.10 (Latest Stable) as Trojan.BitcoinMiner
Edit: Scans been done but keeps getting quarantined by MBAM ;-(
I like the inherent minimal OC out of the box and want to give BFG a shot for a while, currently using CGM and the two requests I made asking for help on how to OC have gone unanswered.
Anyone ? Doesn't do it to CGM but this is kind of sucking for me.
|
|
|
I wish I had an answer for you. I know that for some reason many of the mining software packs cause the anti virus programs to lock them. Currently running a scan so I can't do anything to try and exclude it until it's done but MBAM jus logged the exe file from the 3.5.10 (Latest Stable) as Trojan.BitcoinMiner
Edit: Scans been done but keeps getting quarantined by MBAM ;-(
I like the inherent minimal OC out of the box and want to give BFG a shot for a while, currently using CGM and the two requests I made asking for help on how to OC have gone unanswered.
Anyone ? Doesn't do it to CGM but this is kind of sucking for me.
|
|
|
Currently running a scan so I can't do anything to try and exclude it until it's done but MBAM jus logged the exe file from the 3.5.10 (Latest Stable) as Trojan.BitcoinMiner
Edit: Scans been done but keeps getting quarantined by MBAM ;-(
I like the inherent minimal OC out of the box and want to give BFG a shot for a while, currently using CGM and the two requests I made asking for help on how to OC have gone unanswered.
Anyone ?
|
|
|
Currently running a scan so I can't do anything to try and exclude it until it's done but MBAM jus logged the exe file from the 3.5.10 (Latest Stable) as Trojan.BitcoinMiner
Edit: Scans been done but keeps getting quarantined by MBAM ;-(
I like the inherent minimal OC out of the box and want to give BFG a shot for a while, currently using CGM and the two requests I made asking for help on how to OC have gone unanswered.
|
|
|
Still down here too. It's 6:30 AM in Germany. I know what I'd be doing at that time of the day. Blunt n coffee lol ?
|
|
|
All right, WHO ATE ALL the Lucky Charms and put the empty box back in the pantry! The Lucky Charms box is never empty...it just doesn't have any marshmallows left. Oh the memories of being like 10 and doing that lol
|
|
|
it is time for Golden Grahams!!!
Funny thing is I got a full box downstairs lol
|
|
|
All right, WHO ATE ALL the Lucky Charms and put the empty box back in the pantry! *Runs like hell...*
|
|
|
Thanks! I'm sure many more stupid questions will follow, but so far I'm having a blast. What is this Bitminter thing ? Sorry, couldn't resist lol
|
|
|
If Eligius is withholding payment to this user (and rightfully so), will he redistribute those 200 BTC to the other members?
And what about here on BTC Guild?
I noticed luck has gone back up. So was it really bad luck before, or was it an attack?
Wizkid stated in the Eligius thread that he plans on paying the "shelved" shares from the time period of the withholding attack with the 225 BTC that was held from being distributed. But how will be be determined who gets what ? I've been mining BTCGuild for some time now and was quite active during the "attack".
|
|
|
So what you mean is you want to solo mine, but do it through a pool? Why not solo mine yourself? I'm sure you could get someone to set it up for you. Better still, why not p2pool? Your variance will be much less than that of solomining.
I could be wrong but I think phillips idea is to force people in to a solo mine situation when said person tries to connect with unfaithful gear which is putting it nicely. Not that he wants to solo mine which would just be nuts. If you know they're a bad actor, why not just block them? Again I could be wrong as I'm just assuming here, but it could be more of a long game. Sure it would mess with current people and ya, why not just block them. But again, if I am right it would also serve to protect the future so you wouldnt have to hunt, find and block each and every person that tries to be naughty. Sorry, that's beyond me. I'd just block 'em. Anyway, what's to stop them changing accounts and IP addresses? What's the detection heuristic? Phillip would better to answer this as well as whether my assumptions are close to anything since I was just guessing at everything.
|
|
|
So what you mean is you want to solo mine, but do it through a pool? Why not solo mine yourself? I'm sure you could get someone to set it up for you. Better still, why not p2pool? Your variance will be much less than that of solomining.
I could be wrong but I think phillips idea is to force people in to a solo mine situation when said person tries to connect with unfaithful gear which is putting it nicely. Not that he wants to solo mine which would just be nuts. If you know they're a bad actor, why not just block them? Again I could be wrong as I'm just assuming here, but it could be more of a long game. Sure it would mess with current people and ya, why not just block them. But again, if I am right it would also serve to protect the future so you wouldnt have to hunt, find and block each and every person that tries to be naughty.
|
|
|
So what you mean is you want to solo mine, but do it through a pool? Why not solo mine yourself? I'm sure you could get someone to set it up for you. Better still, why not p2pool? Your variance will be much less than that of solomining.
I could be wrong but I think phillips idea is to force people in to a solo mine situation when said person tries to connect with unfaithful gear which is putting it nicely. Not that he wants to solo mine which would just be nuts.
|
|
|
Tehnically he's not a pool / pool operator but he does seem to be trying to keep everyone happy with his "service".
Technically, I run pools for 37 different cryptocurrencies and 4 profit-switching ports. I see your ass cheeks moving but only smoke is coming out. I think he just meant that btc multipool is a proxy rather than a block solving pool. Pretty much so the way he replied was uncalled for when I haven't said anything about him until now.
|
|
|
Tehnically he's not a pool / pool operator but he does seem to be trying to keep everyone happy with his "service". Adam, you run a good pool at Multipool. I've used it to mine various coins. Keep up the good work. Wasn't sure at first if you were the official Multipool when I saw you show up at Bitminter. The concern that everyone has is with that much hash, you should be solving a block every couple of days. Is this just a run of bad luck or some other problem? Were your blocks solved at Ghash on par with what the average of your hash rate should be solving?
|
|
|
I can't speak anything to compensation obviously but what can he really do to recover ? I mean, lets say I steal money from a bank. I hide it really well, sure I go to jail buy unless some dumb ass stumbles upon my stash which doesn't apply to this situation, the money will always remain un-recovered. Point being there's nothing he can really do to reover anything. This isn't meant to be a negative but people don't generally invest more time or money in to something that what they feel isn't required until something like everyone leaving happens which in this case never will because some people just accept stuff for what it is when it isn't which with shit like luck is easily argued away with luck being what it is by nature.
Stupid ass analogy but...
Here's a paper bag for your groceries, we could have opted for plastic which is generally stronger but we wanted to save the store som money. Just be careful with the paper and it shouldn't rip thus dropping your groceries all over the ground.
This situation is more like the grocery store pouring the milk you purchased into a paper bag and then getting indignant when you ask where the all the milk you paid for went. Eluethria admits that this one group was stripping around 20% of earnings from every participant in the pool for over a month but he hasn't done anything to recover funds and compensate those that were cheated.
|
|
|
This isn't meant to be a negative but people don't generally invest more time or money in to something that what they feel isn't required until something like everyone leaving happens which in this case never will because some people just accept stuff for what it is when it isn't which with shit like luck is easily argued away with luck being what it is by nature.
Stupid ass analogy but...
Here's a paper bag for your groceries, we could have opted for plastic which is generally stronger but we wanted to save the store som money. Just be careful with the paper and it shouldn't rip thus dropping your groceries all over the ground.
|
|
|
Well, maybe when Michael gets on he'll chime in but I agree that a lot of the smaller miners would stay as well as the larger ones. That aside though, it would make life easier for users like me and you who just stick it out and ride the waves. I agree. It would definitely help so much. Many smaller miners would more apt to stay mining as well if that was implemented. He sort of states he fixed the issue but it seems we are having that terrible variance we had last time he was at BTCG.
and I come back to this... no rush on an answer from Michael but I do feel as I suspect others feel as well that this should try and be addressed a bit more, the issue that is. Seeing as how if it is possible, would nip the problem in the ass. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49417.msg7314921#msg7314921
|
|
|
|