|
Over $90k "market cap" at the moment... Ain't that nice?
|
|
|
|
LOL. Who's the liar now? And using numerals at that? I don't believe it! Anyays let me try to spruce this up for you. Deserving's got everything to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? To think otherwise would just be funny... Oh and please let me remind everyone of the "great things" you have "done for this coin", ok? Like the price of the coin being below 5 SATs before you did any of those "great things". (proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6887339#msg6887339 that Barrabas is a liar.) Because you know that the "great things" and the "hard you've worked" is completely material as it produces amazing results, don't you agree? I have this figure in my mind, < 5 SATs when you showed up, I have to be right, don't I? Unless you consider the 50+ SAT above that a bid "deserving" improvement, of course... We have here a big misunderstanding. Huge one. I am counting since the big change in objectives took place. That was a mere few months ago, when the NEW set of developers came out? Up until them I was endorsing PINK all the way, without reserves. You were in PINK before that? So sorry, I never noticed you. And PINK was just another fork coin with no extra features nor need for them and doing, up to that point, quite well. AFTER that point, you became noticeable (to me). As did the others (except Cayce that I had known to be the main dev from the revamping). So, to me, the "great things" that you and the others have "done for this coin" are just features that are not needed nor desirable in any way and that, as the price clearly reflects, bring nothing to the value of the coin. You know, the anon, the poker, the lottery... all that crap that you and the others brought and that are "great things" only FOR YOU and that you hope to sell using the window of the PINK platform which you have converted into a joke in crypto, from the serious, respected, clean project that it was. So, if in fact you were along since the very beginning of the revamp, you don't deserve ANY credit because, technically, nothing had been done before the others arrived. And, AFTER the others arrive, the scenario is a total change in direction that has brought NOTHING but shame to the coin -or the coin's value-, and perhaps a few (different) coins to you and the other on the side. I believe that more clearly reflect the developments here? LOL. Dude. Go back to the beginning. The anon is the feature that brought Pinkcoin from 10-15 SATs you can go back to the first 10 pages of this thread and find all the info and proof you need for that. In fact, let me provide you with a link to the original Pinkcoin thread before the revamp to show you that the lottery was also already in discussion. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6808177#msg6808177The coin was relaunched by Sumgye. The thread and designs were done Sony, and the rest was Tranz and I. Cayce, is the marketing/face of Pinkcoin and not the main dev, never has been for that fact. WE HAVE ALL BEEN A TEAM SINCE BEFORE THE REVAMP. I can feel your whole universe coming crushing down on you right now. Except that you are li... that your memory doesn't serve you well. As I have proven that long before the anon or any of that the price -at which you yourself bought, was quite above the 6 SAT you li--- failed in memory before and li--- fail in memory now. You yourself bought -and was very grateful to the ones that sold to you- much higher than you pretend it was. Sorry but it is from the horse's (your) mouth. You cannot change that... Edit to add: The "main dev" is generally a term to define the "face" of any coin in crypto, when not a community manager. Cayce was by far the "active dev" of pink in twitter and here, holder of 10% of all the coins and, since the coin did not have ANY features then (not anon, no poker, no nothing, just a copyu/paste job), there was no other development needed than the wallet and the marketing/promotion. It you and Tranzium (who I know was making his living elsewhere in crypto, or trying to), were part of the team, you were grossly forgotten by the "face" of the revamped coin in his acknowledgements. Quite an oversight, I'd say... Proven, by picking and choosing which links you share? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6754615#msg6754615 This was my first purchase, which was around 6 SATs, you can see in a later post, that I was upset that one of my orders at 3 SATs did not get hit. So all you have proven to me, is that you use relevant information to back your beliefs, and ignore the truth. We were not forgotten, in fact, at that point, we were part of the team. But why would we get, or expect credit for a wallet that Sumgye made, and designs that Sony made. Our developments were in discussion and progress, not yet complete. So when you and Tranzium brought SOMETHING to PINK, it's price was already much, much, MUCH higher (like 10 times higher?) that the 6 SAT the you originally li-- er failed in memory, is that the right description of facts? Because I can prove it... And wait. did you just take us to a DIFFERENT pink coin thread with your link? Not THE REVAMPED pinkcoin thread? You cannot be serious!!!!Oh, you are... Let me put it to you in plain words that you can understand: You have not done anything for PINK, Pink has done for you, providing you with a window to sell software, a window the community has been not aware of until recently when Boxxa exposed it publicly. Since you and Tranzium's features, whatever you want to call them, were brought online, the price of the coin, as of today, is BELOW what it was then. So your HOBBY has, in fact, cost pINK, not brought anything to PINK. Clear now? And that's not to make any mention that all those "features" have re-direct PINK away from it original pathway, as the FRIST CHARITY COIN and the CLEAN COIN, the GOOD BOYS coin. THOSE are your contributions. Still think the "deserving" applies? |
|
|
|
LOL. Who's the liar now? And using numerals at that? I don't believe it! Anyays let me try to spruce this up for you. Deserving's got everything to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? To think otherwise would just be funny... Oh and please let me remind everyone of the "great things" you have "done for this coin", ok? Like the price of the coin being below 5 SATs before you did any of those "great things". (proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6887339#msg6887339 that Barrabas is a liar.) Because you know that the "great things" and the "hard you've worked" is completely material as it produces amazing results, don't you agree? I have this figure in my mind, < 5 SATs when you showed up, I have to be right, don't I? Unless you consider the 50+ SAT above that a bid "deserving" improvement, of course... We have here a big misunderstanding. Huge one. I am counting since the big change in objectives took place. That was a mere few months ago, when the NEW set of developers came out? Up until them I was endorsing PINK all the way, without reserves. You were in PINK before that? So sorry, I never noticed you. And PINK was just another fork coin with no extra features nor need for them and doing, up to that point, quite well. AFTER that point, you became noticeable (to me). As did the others (except Cayce that I had known to be the main dev from the revamping). So, to me, the "great things" that you and the others have "done for this coin" are just features that are not needed nor desirable in any way and that, as the price clearly reflects, bring nothing to the value of the coin. You know, the anon, the poker, the lottery... all that crap that you and the others brought and that are "great things" only FOR YOU and that you hope to sell using the window of the PINK platform which you have converted into a joke in crypto, from the serious, respected, clean project that it was. So, if in fact you were along since the very beginning of the revamp, you don't deserve ANY credit because, technically, nothing had been done before the others arrived. And, AFTER the others arrive, the scenario is a total change in direction that has brought NOTHING but shame to the coin -or the coin's value-, and perhaps a few (different) coins to you and the other on the side. I believe that more clearly reflect the developments here? LOL. Dude. Go back to the beginning. The anon is the feature that brought Pinkcoin from 10-15 SATs you can go back to the first 10 pages of this thread and find all the info and proof you need for that. In fact, let me provide you with a link to the original Pinkcoin thread before the revamp to show you that the lottery was also already in discussion. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6808177#msg6808177The coin was relaunched by Sumgye. The thread and designs were done Sony, and the rest was Tranz and I. Cayce, is the marketing/face of Pinkcoin and not the main dev, never has been for that fact. WE HAVE ALL BEEN A TEAM SINCE BEFORE THE REVAMP. I can feel your whole universe coming crushing down on you right now. Except that you are li... that your memory doesn't serve you well. As I have proven that long before the anon or any of that the price -at which you yourself bought, was quite above the 6 SAT you li--- failed in memory before and li--- fail in memory now. You yourself bought -and was very grateful to the ones that sold to you- much higher than you pretend it was. Sorry but it is from the horse's (your) mouth. You cannot change that... Edit to add: The "main dev" is generally a term to define the "face" of any coin in crypto, when not a community manager. Cayce was by far the "active dev" of pink in twitter and here, holder of 10% of all the coins and, since the coin did not have ANY features then (not anon, no poker, no nothing, just a copyu/paste job), there was no other development needed than the wallet and the marketing/promotion. It you and Tranzium (who I know was making his living elsewhere in crypto, or trying to), were part of the team, you were grossly forgotten by the "face" of the revamped coin in his acknowledgements. Quite an oversight, I'd say... |
|
|
|
Hummmm. perhaps this ports of May 25th will show who the liar here is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624017.msg6923491#msg6923491By the way, Cayce's post -just two spots behind the one linked in the below paragraph-, of that same date did not make any mention of any contribution from you, either previous or in project, in spite of the fact that.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624017.msg6922971#msg6922971 ... ... you were requesting donations for your lottery bot. Although you credited yourself (rightfully, I assume) with having created "the Twitter account" and "the website", no one acknowledged you for any of that I imagine voluntary work to maximize your investment in PINK. At no point, there or later on, you stated that you wanted to use PINK to promote software with the purpose to sell it. Here's YOU giving credit to yourself: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624017.msg6921577#msg6921577.. What is clear though is that on May 25th the price of the coin, at which you bought, was significantly above the 6 SAT -up to 5 times above- and that you were not acknowledge as having had any participation in the revamping of PINK. Even more clear, I repeat, that your contributions were both voluntary and with the purpose of benefiting your investment through price increase, NOT to use the name and platform to sell software or otherwise obtain an income from Pink Coin. Enough said. |
|
|
|
"Wonderful" idea... almost as wonderful as sponsor, support, promote and escrow thw SEED debacle. Now our devs are requesting funds to create basically a buy bwall... something that has been done already -to terrible results, by the way- by almost any established coin from BC to Naut and a bunch of others in between. The coin that was supposed to be CLEAN, not only has become the gambling coin, the window to sell software, an escrow-promotional service but now it will try to manipulate the markets facilitating, in fact, a wall into which the dumpers can dump. The Black Hand at BC invented this and used to great benefit... of The Black Hand, or course. Naut has is, to no effect whatsoever. And here we go, sex months behind but never too late to create a escapa way in case things turn really sour... as it would seem they are turning of late.
I'm sure the "pink soldiers" or whatever will respond quite favorably... all seven of them.
Please do us and yourself a favour, just leave us alone if you don't mind, since you really are a big pain in the ass for the team and its community members you should just leave this floor! I have been reading your posts since the first day, you had some points in the beginning when you posted in this thread, but now you are just so damn ridiculous and don't even bring anything than pointless replies this thread. So please, leave us ALONE and go somewhere else! regards Anoxy We appreciate this Anoxy, but it will do nothing except get our now negative thread another bump. Maybe we can start rewording each of his posts in a positive manner. That'd be both a serious task, and fun  To the annoying one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? I for one would appreciate it. To the lying one: Positive... for you? Or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you even pretending to make it a personal source of income, hard as you have tried. No chance. No merits for it either. Sorry. To the friendly one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? Many people benefit from it. To the honest one: Positive... for you? or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you have done great things with this coin and deserve a personal source of income, as hard as you've worked. Good chance, great merits for it too. You're welcome. Deserving's got nothing to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? Now that's just funny... Oh and please go ahead and remind us all what "great things" you have "done for this coin", ok? Like what was the price of the coin before you did any of those "great things". Because you know that the "great thinks" and the "hard you've worked" is completely immaterial if neither produces results, don't you? I have this figure stuck in my mind, 59 sat before you showed up, but I have to be wrong, don't I? Unless you consider the current 1 sat above that a big "deserving" improvement, of course... LOL. Who's the liar now? And using numerals at that? I don't believe it! Anyays let me try to spruce this up for you. Deserving's got everything to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? To think otherwise would just be funny... Oh and please let me remind everyone of the "great things" you have "done for this coin", ok? Like the price of the coin being below 5 SATs before you did any of those "great things". (proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591666.msg6887339#msg6887339 that Barrabas is a liar.) Because you know that the "great things" and the "hard you've worked" is completely material as it produces amazing results, don't you agree? I have this figure in my mind, < 5 SATs when you showed up, I have to be right, don't I? Unless you consider the 50+ SAT above that a bid "deserving" improvement, of course... We have here a big misunderstanding. Huge one. I am counting since the big change in objectives took place. That was a mere few months ago, when the NEW set of developers came out? Up until them I was endorsing PINK all the way, without reserves. You were in PINK before that? So sorry, I never noticed you. And PINK was just another fork coin with no extra features nor need for them and doing, up to that point, quite well. AFTER that point, you became noticeable (to me). As did the others (except Cayce that I had known to be the main dev from the revamping). So, to me, the "great things" that you and the others have "done for this coin" are just features that are not needed nor desirable in any way and that, as the price clearly reflects, bring nothing to the value of the coin. You know, the anon, the poker, the lottery... all that crap that you and the others brought and that are "great things" only FOR YOU and that you hope to sell using the window of the PINK platform which you have converted into a joke in crypto, from the serious, respected, clean project that it was. So, if in fact you were along since the very beginning of the revamp, you don't deserve ANY credit because, technically, nothing had been done before the others arrived. And, AFTER the others arrive, the scenario is a total change in direction that has brought NOTHING but shame to the coin -or the coin's value-, and perhaps a few (different) coins to you and the other on the side. I believe that more clearly reflect the developments here? |
|
|
|
-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.
more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive. I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue: Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE. there is no 67% coins - more like 11% where do you think some of the 2.5 million is going? the humans in the company are breakoutcoin stakeholders to. also the bergstake, gives incentive to keep prices stable. its doesn't work like that, even if you can sell it down.. there wont be enough liquidity to buy it back at lower prices. Whale action 101? has this ever been verified? does this even work? they have looking into silver prices forever, and its still inconclusive, its not such a simple strategy. I won't argue the % because it is irrelevant to the subject of price manipulation. It works like this: You get inflows of fiat, BTC and BRO constantly, right? You need a supply, on a given period, of let's say 100,000 BRO. You accumulate (through those inflows, plus your "11%"), 20 times as much. So the price, while you have been only buying (with the BTC and Fiat incoming), has been rising, lets say to 1000 sat. You start dumping. And continue dumping. And continue dumping, as the price dives. You dump until it goes to 500, not just because you dump but because people panic sell. At 500, you start buying. And price goes back up. Rinse and repeat. Because you have unlimited reserves, you can do this at whatever scale the markets support. If Breakout gaming is successful, the level can be very, very high. And the frequency. The obvious purpose is to dump at a median price of 7 and buy back the same amount at the median price of 6. Thousands of times. Millions to be had. Whale 101. |
|
|
|
"Wonderful" idea... almost as wonderful as sponsor, support, promote and escrow thw SEED debacle. Now our devs are requesting funds to create basically a buy bwall... something that has been done already -to terrible results, by the way- by almost any established coin from BC to Naut and a bunch of others in between. The coin that was supposed to be CLEAN, not only has become the gambling coin, the window to sell software, an escrow-promotional service but now it will try to manipulate the markets facilitating, in fact, a wall into which the dumpers can dump. The Black Hand at BC invented this and used to great benefit... of The Black Hand, or course. Naut has is, to no effect whatsoever. And here we go, sex months behind but never too late to create a escapa way in case things turn really sour... as it would seem they are turning of late.
I'm sure the "pink soldiers" or whatever will respond quite favorably... all seven of them.
Please do us and yourself a favour, just leave us alone if you don't mind, since you really are a big pain in the ass for the team and its community members you should just leave this floor! I have been reading your posts since the first day, you had some points in the beginning when you posted in this thread, but now you are just so damn ridiculous and don't even bring anything than pointless replies this thread. So please, leave us ALONE and go somewhere else! regards Anoxy We appreciate this Anoxy, but it will do nothing except get our now negative thread another bump. Maybe we can start rewording each of his posts in a positive manner. That'd be both a serious task, and fun To the annoying one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? I for one would appreciate it. To the lying one: Positive... for you? Or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you even pretending to make it a personal source of income, hard as you have tried. No chance. No merits for it either. Sorry. To the friendly one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? Many people benefit from it. To the honest one: Positive... for you? or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you have done great things with this coin and deserve a personal source of income, as hard as you've worked. Good chance, great merits for it too. You're welcome. Deserving's got nothing to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? Now that's just funny... Oh and please go ahead and remind us all what "great things" you have "done for this coin", ok? Like what was the price of the coin before you did any of those "great things". Because you know that the "great thinks" and the "hard you've worked" is completely immaterial if neither produces results, don't you? I have this figure stuck in my mind, 59 sat before you showed up, but I have to be wrong, don't I? Unless you consider the current 1 sat above that a big "deserving" improvement, of course... |
|
|
|
-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.
more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive. I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue: Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE. |
|
|
|
"Wonderful" idea... almost as wonderful as sponsor, support, promote and escrow thw SEED debacle. Now our devs are requesting funds to create basically a buy bwall... something that has been done already -to terrible results, by the way- by almost any established coin from BC to Naut and a bunch of others in between. The coin that was supposed to be CLEAN, not only has become the gambling coin, the window to sell software, an escrow-promotional service but now it will try to manipulate the markets facilitating, in fact, a wall into which the dumpers can dump. The Black Hand at BC invented this and used to great benefit... of The Black Hand, or course. Naut has is, to no effect whatsoever. And here we go, sex months behind but never too late to create a escapa way in case things turn really sour... as it would seem they are turning of late.
I'm sure the "pink soldiers" or whatever will respond quite favorably... all seven of them.
Please do us and yourself a favour, just leave us alone if you don't mind, since you really are a big pain in the ass for the team and its community members you should just leave this floor! I have been reading your posts since the first day, you had some points in the beginning when you posted in this thread, but now you are just so damn ridiculous and don't even bring anything than pointless replies this thread. So please, leave us ALONE and go somewhere else! regards Anoxy We appreciate this Anoxy, but it will do nothing except get our now negative thread another bump. Maybe we can start rewording each of his posts in a positive manner. That'd be both a serious task, and fun To the annoying one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? I for one would appreciate it. To the lying one: Positive... for you? Or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you even pretending to make it a personal source of income, hard as you have tried. No chance. No merits for it either. Sorry. To the friendly one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? Many people benefit from it. To the honest one: Positive... for you? or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you have done great things with this coin and deserve a personal source of income, as hard as you've worked. Good chance, great merits for it too. You're welcome. Deserving's got nothing to do with it ... fortunately for you. Honest one you? Now that's just funny... |
|
|
|
The "Bill Gates" argument is an exercise in absurdity for anyone intent of "scooping up" most of the coins could do it just the same during the ICO period. The same way that they could if the price is capped, so it is immaterial either way.
Now the 30 days ICO period is good and is bad. Some will not be interested in having the coins locked for that period. On the other hand,, many will be adjusting their investment along the 320 days depending on many factors, including availability of funds.
The only things I would implement if I were you is VIP coins, with privileges, which I have already pointed out before. Otherwise, this is going to be extremely successful and only limited by the limited availability of BTC in the crypto world that, at the moment, is quite stretched.
Anyone with a minimum investment acumen will see that this is by far the best long term investment ever to appear in crypto... regardless what the final price will be.
Nice to hear from you Barabbas. You are one of the most critical knowledgeable informed investors on these forums and you've given our project an unequivocal endorsement. Nice to hear. Thank you Thank you Randy for the nice words. I'll have to add though that my "endorsement" is not without some important caveats: -- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming. -- I have only seen a few snapshots of the actual platform. If the experience is not easy and rewarding, from the entertainment side of things, the potential success will be clearly diminished. Not having a working test one available is, in my opinion, a severe mistake that may reasonably hold out some big investors. -- Bergstake and its liquidity remain a big not fully explained enigma. Additionally, the 7 million BRO that is going to be given away should not include Bergstake and those Bergstake should be destroyed to increase the value of the ones mined or obtained through the ICO. Other than that, yes, this is a very interesting project that will make crypto history, I believe. |
|
|
|
"Wonderful" idea... almost as wonderful as sponsor, support, promote and escrow thw SEED debacle. Now our devs are requesting funds to create basically a buy bwall... something that has been done already -to terrible results, by the way- by almost any established coin from BC to Naut and a bunch of others in between. The coin that was supposed to be CLEAN, not only has become the gambling coin, the window to sell software, an escrow-promotional service but now it will try to manipulate the markets facilitating, in fact, a wall into which the dumpers can dump. The Black Hand at BC invented this and used to great benefit... of The Black Hand, or course. Naut has is, to no effect whatsoever. And here we go, sex months behind but never too late to create a escapa way in case things turn really sour... as it would seem they are turning of late.
I'm sure the "pink soldiers" or whatever will respond quite favorably... all seven of them.
Please do us and yourself a favour, just leave us alone if you don't mind, since you really are a big pain in the ass for the team and its community members you should just leave this floor! I have been reading your posts since the first day, you had some points in the beginning when you posted in this thread, but now you are just so damn ridiculous and don't even bring anything than pointless replies this thread. So please, leave us ALONE and go somewhere else! regards Anoxy We appreciate this Anoxy, but it will do nothing except get our now negative thread another bump. Maybe we can start rewording each of his posts in a positive manner. That'd be both a serious task, and fun To the annoying one: May I remind you of the ever useful "ignore" feature? I for one would appreciate it. To the lying one: Positive... for you? Or for anyone else? This is way too small; for you even pretending to make it a personal source of income, hard as you have tried. No chance. No merits for it either. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Who would have ever known a PINK coin dev would stoop to such levels...
When you live in the gutters, sooner rather than later it shows though. Wow.
Managed to get off your knees long enough in the PINK thread to type that? My the tables turned your opinion huh? Whatever you are trying to say you should rephrase because it just did not come through at all. When your command of English is so poor you should forget the rhetoric ... or try Google translate... So now you are also a grammar Nazi to boot, keep going you just get better with age, so much time on your hands, do you live in some bailed out EU shit hole where people sleep half the day and expect the world for free? Nope. I live in a country were parasites like you had it very difficult to make a buck, legally. But don't worry, they still have no rules against assholes. Extortionists though, sooner rather than later usually, end up behind bars... N Nancy, that is your name, isn't it? I seem to recall reading it somewhere here in these forums... |
|
|
|
Is outright lying a new thing or just newly on the open?
Shaneful...
It was a question... Your "remembrance" wasnt a question, just an outright lie. It seems to be right in line with the new type of behavior by the most outspoken devs here... and everywhere. I don't know, I may not have the best memory, but I am pretty sure I saw you post about your "modest" investment not too long ago. If I'm wrong, than I guess it was just wishful thinking. You also were pretty sure SEED was a great opportunity... But if you are pretty sure of something, why do you have to convert it in an outright lie by adding numerals? I guess it's just an inevitable natural inclination... |
|
|
|
Who would have ever known a PINK coin dev would stoop to such levels...
When you live in the gutters, sooner rather than later it shows though. Wow.
Managed to get off your knees long enough in the PINK thread to type that? My the tables turned your opinion huh? Whatever you are trying to say you should rephrase because it just did not come through at all. When your command of English is so poor you should forget the rhetoric ... or try Google translate... |
|
|
|
the scum from pakistan...
hey how much you think the coin will worth after the growth ? Probably not much but I see a short term opportunity if you can buy it when the market cap is below $10k. |
|
|
|
|
It sounds so legit too...
|
|
|
|
Is outright lying a new thing or just newly on the open?
Shaneful...
It was a question... Your "remembrance" wasnt a question, just an outright lie. It seems to be right in line with the new type of behavior by the most outspoken devs here... and everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Is outright lying a new thing or just newly on the open?
Shaneful...
|
|
|
|
|
"Wonderful" idea... almost as wonderful as sponsor, support, promote and escrow thw SEED debacle. Now our devs are requesting funds to create basically a buy bwall... something that has been done already -to terrible results, by the way- by almost any established coin from BC to Naut and a bunch of others in between. The coin that was supposed to be CLEAN, not only has become the gambling coin, the window to sell software, an escrow-promotional service but now it will try to manipulate the markets facilitating, in fact, a wall into which the dumpers can dump. The Black Hand at BC invented this and used to great benefit... of The Black Hand, or course. Naut has is, to no effect whatsoever. And here we go, sex months behind but never too late to create a escapa way in case things turn really sour... as it would seem they are turning of late.
I'm sure the "pink soldiers" or whatever will respond quite favorably... all seven of them.
|
|
|
|
|
the scum from pakistan...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
